aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdbsupport
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-01-01Automatic Copyright Year update after running gdb/copyright.pyJoel Brobecker138-138/+138
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure. For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were performed by the script.
2021-12-15New --enable-threading configure option to control use of threads in ↵Luis Machado2-4/+42
GDB/GDBserver Add the --enable-threading configure option so multithreading can be disabled at configure time. This is useful for statically-linked builds of GDB/GDBserver, since the thread library doesn't play well with that setup. If you try to run a statically-linked GDB built with threading, it will crash when setting up the number of worker threads. This new option is also convenient when debugging GDB in a system with lots of threads, where the thread discovery code in GDB will emit too many messages, like so: [New Thread 0xfffff74d3a50 (LWP 2625599)] If you have X threads, that message will be repeated X times. The default for --enable-threading is "yes".
2021-12-09Revert "gdbsupport: remove unnecessary `#ifndef IN_PROCESS_AGENT`"Simon Marchi1-0/+2
This reverts commit fe72c32765e1190c8a17d309fc3a7e1882d6a430. It turns out it was wrong, libinproctrace.so does build its own gdbsupport/tdesc.cc. This broke the build: make[1]: Entering directory '/home/simark/build/binutils-gdb-one-target/gdbserver' CXXLD libinproctrace.so /usr/bin/ld: gdbsupport/tdesc-ipa.o: in function `print_xml_feature::visit_pre(target_desc const*)': /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdbsupport/tdesc.cc:407: undefined reference to `tdesc_architecture_name(target_desc const*)' /usr/bin/ld: /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdbsupport/tdesc.cc:408: undefined reference to `tdesc_architecture_name(target_desc const*)' /usr/bin/ld: /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdbsupport/tdesc.cc:411: undefined reference to `tdesc_osabi_name(target_desc const*)' /usr/bin/ld: /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdbsupport/tdesc.cc:416: undefined reference to `tdesc_compatible_info_list(target_desc const*)' /usr/bin/ld: /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdbsupport/tdesc.cc:418: undefined reference to `tdesc_compatible_info_arch_name(std::unique_ptr<tdesc_compatible_info, std::default_delete<tdesc_compatible_info> > const&)'
2021-12-09gdbsupport: remove unnecessary `#ifndef IN_PROCESS_AGENT`Simon Marchi1-2/+0
I suppose this code was copied from GDBserver and this ifndef was left there. As far as I know, IN_PROCESS_AGENT will never be defined when building this file, so we can remove this. Change-Id: I84fc408e330b3a29106df830a09342861cadbaf6
2021-12-04gdbsupport: fix memory leak in create_file_handler when re-using file handlerSimon Marchi1-7/+6
ASan made me notice a memory leak, where the memory tied to the file handle name string wasn't freed. When register a file handler with an fd that is already registered, we re-use the file_handler object, so we ended up creating a new std::string object and overwriting the file_handler::name pointer, without free-ing the old std::string. Fix this by allocating file_handler with new, deleting it with delete, and making file_handler::name not a pointer. Change-Id: Ie304cc78ab5ae5dfad9a1366e9890c09de651f43
2021-12-03gdbsupport: add array_view copy functionSimon Marchi1-0/+15
An assertion was recently added to array_view::operator[] to ensure we don't do out of bounds accesses. However, when the array_view is copied to or from using memcpy, it bypasses that safety. To address this, add a `copy` free function that copies data from an array view to another, ensuring that the destination and source array views have the same size. When copying to or from parts of an array_view, we are expected to use gdb::array_view::slice, which does its own bounds check. With all that, any copy operation that goes out of bounds should be caught by an assertion at runtime. copy is implemented using std::copy and std::copy_backward, which, at least on libstdc++, appears to pick memmove when copying trivial data. So in the end there shouldn't be much difference vs using a bare memcpy, as we do right now. When copying non-trivial data, std::copy and std::copy_backward assigns each element in a loop. To properly support overlapping ranges, we must use std::copy or std::copy_backward, depending on whether the destination is before the source or vice-versa. std::copy and std::copy_backward don't support copying exactly overlapping ranges (where the source range is equal to the destination range). But in this case, no copy is needed anyway, so we do nothing. The order of parameters of the new copy function is based on std::copy and std::copy_backward, where the source comes before the destination. Change a few randomly selected spots to use the new function, to show how it can be used. Add a test for the new function, testing both with arrays of a trivial type (int) and of a non-trivial type (foo). Test non-overlapping ranges as well as three kinds of overlapping ranges: source before dest, dest before source, and dest == source. Change-Id: Ibeaca04e0028410fd44ce82f72e60058d6230a03
2021-11-22gdb: introduce target_waitkind_str, use it in target_waitstatus::to_stringSimon Marchi2-4/+8
I would like to print target_waitkind values in debug messages, so I think that a target_waitkind-to-string function would be useful. While at it, use it in target_waitstatus::to_string. This changes the output of target_waitstatus::to_string a bit, but I think it is for the better. The debug messages will show a string matching exactly the target_waitkind enumerator (minus the TARGET_WAITKIND prefix). As a convenience, make string_appendf return the same reference to string it got as a parameter. This allows doing this: return string_appendf (str, "foo"); ... keeping the code concise. Change-Id: I383dffc9c78614e7d0668b1516073905e798eef7
2021-11-20gdbsupport: fix array-view compilation with c++11 && _GLIBCXX_DEBUGSimon Marchi1-3/+3
When building with -std=c++11 and -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG=1, we get some errors like: CXX unittests/array-view-selftests.o In file included from /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/utils.h:25, from /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/defs.h:630, from /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/array-view-selftests.c:20: /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/array-view.h: In instantiation of constexpr gdb::array_view<T> gdb::array_view<T>::slice(gdb::array_view<T>::size_type, gdb::array_view<T>::size_type) const [with T = unsigned char; gdb::array_view<T>::size_type = long unsigned int: /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/array-view-selftests.c:532:29: required from here /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/array-view.h:192:3: error: body of constexpr function constexpr gdb::array_view<T> gdb::array_view<T>::slice(gdb::array_view<T>::size_type, gdb::array_view<T>::size_type) const [with T = unsigned char; gdb::array_view<T>::size_type = long unsigned int not a return-statement 192 | } | ^ This is because constexpr functions in c++11 can only consist of a single return statement, so we can't have the gdb_assert in there. Make the gdb_assert presence conditional to the __cplusplus version, to enable it only for c++14 and later. Change-Id: I2ac33f7b4bd1765ddc3ac8d07445b16ac1f340f0
2021-11-18gdbsupport: make gdb_assert_not_reached accept a format stringSimon Marchi2-5/+6
Change gdb_assert_not_reached to accept a format string plus corresponding arguments. This allows giving more precise messages. Because the format string passed by the caller is prepended with a "%s:" to add the function name, the callers can no longer pass a translated string (`_(...)`). Make the gdb_assert_not_reached include the _(), just like the gdb_assert_fail macro just above. Change-Id: Id0cfda5a57979df6cdaacaba0d55dd91ae9efee7
2021-11-16gdbsupport: remove FUNCTION_NAMESimon Marchi2-33/+2
__func__ is standard C++11: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/function Also, in C++11, __func__ expands to the demangled function name, so the mention in the comment above FUNCTION_NAME doesn't apply anymore. Finally, in places where FUNCTION_NAME is used, I think it's enough to print the function name, no need to print the whole signature. Therefore, I propose to just remove FUNCTION_NAME and update users to use the standard __func__. Change-Id: I778f28155422b044402442dc18d42d0cded1017d
2021-11-16gdb/gdbsupport: make xstrprintf and xstrvprintf return a unique_ptrAndrew Burgess2-7/+8
The motivation is to reduce the number of places where unmanaged pointers are returned from allocation type routines. All of the callers are updated. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-11-16gdbsupport: move xfree into its own fileAndrew Burgess4-16/+43
In the next commit I'd like to reference gdb_unique_ptr within the common-utils.h file. However, this requires that I include gdb_unique_ptr.h, which requires that xfree be defined. Interestingly, gdb_unique_ptr.h doesn't actually include anything that defines xfree, but I was finding that when I added a gdb_unique_ptr.h include to common-utils.h I was getting a dependency cycle; before my change xfree was defined when gdb_unique_ptr.h was processed, while after my change it was not, and this made g++ unhappy. To break this cycle, I propose to move xfree into its own header file, gdb-xfree.h, which I'll then include into gdb_unique_ptr.h and common-utils.cc.
2021-11-11[gdb/build] Fix Wimplicit-exception-spec-mismatch in clang buildTom de Vries1-2/+2
When building with clang 13 (and -std=gnu++17 to work around an issue in string_view-selftests.c), we run into a few Wimplicit-exception-spec-mismatch warnings: ... src/gdbsupport/new-op.cc:102:1: error: function previously declared with an \ explicit exception specification redeclared with an implicit exception \ specification [-Werror,-Wimplicit-exception-spec-mismatch] operator delete (void *p) ^ /usr/include/c++/11/new:130:6: note: previous declaration is here void operator delete(void*) _GLIBCXX_USE_NOEXCEPT ^ ... These are due to recent commit 5fff6115fea "Fix LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libasan.so.6 gdb". Fix this by adding the missing noexcept. Build on x86_64-linux, using gcc 7.5.0 and clang 13.0.0.
2021-11-11[gdb/build] Fix build with -std=c++11Tom de Vries1-0/+5
When building with -std=c++11, we run into two Werror=missing-declarations: ... new-op.cc: In function 'void operator delete(void*, std::size_t)': new-op.cc:114:1: error: no previous declaration for \ 'void operator delete(void*, std::size_t)' [-Werror=missing-declarations] operator delete (void *p, std::size_t) noexcept ^~~~~~~~ new-op.cc: In function 'void operator delete [](void*, std::size_t)': new-op.cc:132:1: error: no previous declaration for \ 'void operator delete [](void*, std::size_t)' [-Werror=missing-declarations] operator delete[] (void *p, std::size_t) noexcept ^~~~~~~~ ... These are due to recent commit 5fff6115fea "Fix LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libasan.so.6 gdb". The declarations are provided by <new> (which is included) for c++14 onwards, but they are missing for c++11. Fix this by adding the missing declarations. Tested on x86_64-linux, with gcc 7.5.0, both without (implying -std=gnu++14) and with -std=c++11.
2021-11-09Fix build on rhES5Tom Tromey3-0/+25
The rhES5 build failed due to an upstream import a while back. The bug here is that, while the 'personality' function exists, ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE is only defined in <linux/personality.h>, not <sys/personality.h>. However, <linux/personality.h> does not declare the 'personality' function, and <sys/personality.h> and <linux/personality.h> cannot both be included. This patch restores one of the removed configure checks and updates the code to check it. We had this as a local patch at AdaCore, because it seemed like there was no interest upstream. However, now it turns out that this fixes PR build/28555, so I'm sending it now.
2021-11-08Improve gdb::array_view ctor from contiguous containersLancelot SIX1-3/+4
While reading the interface of gdb::array_view, I realized that the constructor that builds an array_view on top of a contiguous container (such as std::vector, std::array or even gdb::array_view) can be missused. Lets consider the following code sample: struct Parent { Parent (int a): a { a } {} int a; }; std::ostream &operator<< (std::ostream& os, const Parent & p) { os << "Parent {a=" << p.a << "}"; return os; } struct Child : public Parent { Child (int a, int b): Parent { a }, b { b } {} int b; }; std::ostream &operator<< (std::ostream& os, const Child & p) { os << "Child {a=" << p.a << ", b=" << p.b << "}"; return os; } template <typename T> void print (const gdb::array_view<const T> &p) { std::for_each (p.begin (), p.end (), [](const T &p) { std::cout << p << '\n'; }); } Then with the current interface nothinng prevents this usage of array_view to be done: const std::array<Child, 3> elts = { Child {1, 2}, Child {3, 4}, Child {5, 6} }; print_all<Parent> (elts); This compiles fine and produces the following output: Parent {a=1} Parent {a=2} Parent {a=3} which is obviously wrong. There is nowhere in memory a Parent-like object for which the A member is 2 and this call to print_all<Parent> shold not compile at all (calling print_all<Child> is however fine). This comes down to the fact that a Child* is convertible into a Parent*, and that an array view is constructed to a pointer to the first element and a size. The valid type pointed to that can be used with this constructor are restricted using SFINAE, which requires that a pointer to a member into the underlying container can be converted into a pointer the array_view's data type. This patch proposes to change the constraints on the gdb::array_view ctor which accepts a container now requires that the (decayed) type of the elements in the container match the (decayed) type of the array_view being constructed. Applying this change required minimum adjustment in GDB codebase, which are also included in this patch. Tested by rebuilding.
2021-11-05Introduce make_unique_xstrndupTom Tromey1-0/+9
This adds a new make_unique_xstrndup function, which is the "n" analogue of make_unique_xstrdup. It also updates a couple existing places to use this function.
2021-11-03Fix LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libasan.so.6 gdbJan Kratochvil1-0/+42
Currently for a binary compiled normally (without -fsanitize=address) but with LD_PRELOAD of ASAN one gets: $ ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0:alloc_dealloc_mismatch=1:abort_on_error=1:fast_unwind_on_malloc=0 LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libasan.so.6 gdb ================================================================= ==1909567==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete []) on 0x602000001570 #0 0x7f1c98e5efa7 in operator delete[](void*) (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.6+0xb0fa7) ... 0x602000001570 is located 0 bytes inside of 2-byte region [0x602000001570,0x602000001572) allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x7f1c98e5cd1f in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.6+0xaed1f) #1 0x557ee4a42e81 in operator new(unsigned long) (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x74ce81) SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.6+0xb0fa7) in operator delete[](void*) ==1909567==HINT: if you don't care about these errors you may set ASAN_OPTIONS=alloc_dealloc_mismatch=0 ==1909567==ABORTING Despite the code called properly operator new[] and operator delete[]. But GDB's new-op.cc provides its own operator new[] which gets translated into malloc() (which gets recogized as operatore new(size_t)) but as it does not translate also operators delete[] Address Sanitizer gets confused. The question is how many variants of the delete operator need to be provided. There could be 14 operators new but there are only 4, GDB uses 3 of them. There could be 16 operators delete but there are only 6, GDB uses 2 of them. It depends on libraries and compiler which of the operators will get used. Currently being used: U operator new[](unsigned long) U operator new(unsigned long) U operator new(unsigned long, std::nothrow_t const&) U operator delete[](void*) U operator delete(void*, unsigned long) Tested on x86_64-linux.
2021-10-28gdb: add selftest name completionSimon Marchi1-1/+3
After the previous commit, it is easy to add completion for selftest names. Again, this is not particularly high value, but I rarely touched completion, so it served as a simple example to get some practice. Change the for_each_selftest_ftype parameter to gdb::function_view, so that we can pass a lambda that captures things. Change-Id: I87cac299ddca9ca7eb0ffab78342e850a98d954c
2021-10-25gdbsupport: add assertions in array_viewSimon Marchi1-4/+24
Add assertions to ensure we don't access an array_view out of bounds. Enable these assertions only when _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is set, as we did for gdb::optional. Change-Id: Iffaee38252405073735ed123c8e57fde6b2c6be3
2021-10-19Fix format_pieces selftest on WindowsTom Tromey3-0/+70
The format_pieces selftest currently fails on Windows hosts. The selftest doesn't handle the "%ll" -> "%I64" rewrite that the formatter may perform, but also gdbsupport was missing a configure check for PRINTF_HAS_LONG_LONG. This patch fixes both issues.
2021-10-19Always use std::function for self-testsTom Tromey2-45/+6
Now that there is a register_test variant that accepts std::function, it seems to me that the 'selftest' struct and accompanying code is obsolete -- simply always using std::function is simpler. This patch implements this idea.
2021-10-04[gdb/build] Add CXX_DIALECT to CXXTom de Vries1-0/+8
Say we use a gcc version that (while supporting c++11) does not support c++11 by default, and needs an -std setting to enable it. If gdb would use the default AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX from autoconf-archive, then we'd have: ... CXX="g++ -std=gnu++11" ... That mechanism however has the following problem (quoting from commit 0bcda685399): ... the top level Makefile passes CXX down to subdirs, and that overrides whatever gdb/Makefile may set CXX to. The result would be that a make invocation from the build/gdb/ directory would use "g++ -std=gnu++11" as expected, while a make invocation at the top level would not. ... Commit 0bcda685399 fixes this by using a custom AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX which does: ... CXX=g++ CXX_DIALECT=-std=gnu++11 ... The problem reported in PR28318 is that using the custom instead of the default AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX makes the configure test for std::thread support fail. We could simply add $CXX_DIALECT to the test for std::thread support, but that would have to be repeated for each added c++ support test. Instead, fix this by doing: ... CXX="g++ -std=gnu++11" CXX_DIALECT=-std=gnu++11 ... This is somewhat awkward, since it results in -std=gnu++11 occuring twice in some situations: ... $ touch src/gdb/dwarf2/read.c $ ( cd build/gdb; make V=1 dwarf2/read.o ) g++-4.8 -std=gnu++11 -x c++ -std=gnu++11 ... ... However, both settings are needed: - the switch in CXX for the std::thread tests (and other tests) - the switch in CXX_DIALECT so it can be appended in Makefiles, to counteract the fact that the top-level Makefile overrides CXX The code added in gdb/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.m4 is copied from the default AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX from autoconf-archive. Tested on x86_64-linux. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28318
2021-10-04gdbsupport: remove attempt to define TARGET_WORD_SIZEAndrew Burgess3-14/+0
In the gdbsupport configure.ac file, there is an attempt to define TARGET_WORD_SIZE. This is done by running grep on the file ../bfd/bfd-in3.h. The problem with this is, the file bfd-in3.h is generated into the bfd build directory when bfd is configured, and there is no dependency between the gdbsupport module and the bfd module, so, for example, if I do: $ ../src/configure $ make all-gdbsupport Then bfd will neither be configured, or built. In this case TARGET_WORD_SIZE ends up being defined, but with no value because the grep on bfd-in3.h fails. However, it turns out that this doesn't matter; we don't actually use TARGET_WORD_SIZE anywhere. My proposal in this commit is to just remove the definition of TARGET_WORD_SIZE, the alternative would be to add a dependency between configure-gdbsupport and configure-bfd into Makefile.def, but adding a dependency for something we don't need seems pretty pointless.
2021-09-30gdbsupport: make gdb_mkostemp_cloexec return a scoped_fdSimon Marchi1-2/+2
This encourages the callers to use automatic file descriptor management. Change-Id: I137a81df6f3607b457e28c35aafde8ed6f3a3344
2021-09-30gdbsupport: make gdb_open_cloexec return scoped_fdSimon Marchi3-8/+9
Make gdb_open_cloexec return a scoped_fd, to encourage using automatic management of the file descriptor closing. Except in the most trivial cases, I changed the callers to just release the fd, which retains their existing behavior. That will allow the transition to using scoped_fd more to go gradually, one caller at a time. Change-Id: Ife022b403f96e71d5ebb4f1056ef6251b30fe554
2021-09-30gdbsupport: move gdb_file_up to its own fileSimon Marchi3-13/+39
The following patches wants to change gdb_fopen_cloexec and gdb_mkostemp_cloexec to return a scoped_fd. Doing this causes a cyclic include between scoped_fd.h and filestuff.h, that both want to include each other. scoped_fd.h includes filestuff.h because of the scoped_fd::to_file method's return value. filestuff.h would then include scoped_fd.h for gdb_fopen_cloexec's and gdb_mkostemp_cloexec's return values. To fix that, move gdb_file_up to its own file, gdb_file.h. Change-Id: Ic82a48914b2aacee8f14af535b7469245f88b93d
2021-09-23Change ptid_t::tid to ULONGESTTom Tromey2-4/+6
The ptid_t 'tid' member is normally used as an address in gdb -- both bsd-uthread and ravenscar-thread use it this way. However, because the type is 'long', this can cause problems with sign extension. This patch changes the type to ULONGEST to ensure that sign extension does not occur.
2021-09-23Remove defaulted 'tid' parameter to ptid_t constructorTom Tromey1-1/+1
I wanted to find, and potentially modify, all the spots where the 'tid' parameter to the ptid_t constructor was used. So, I temporarily removed this parameter and then rebuilt. In order to make it simpler to search through the "real" (nonzero) uses of this parameter, something I knew I'd have to do multiple times, I removed any ", 0" from constructor calls. Co-Authored-By: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
2021-09-22[gdb] Add maint selftest -verbose optionTom de Vries2-2/+20
The print_one_insn selftest in gdb/disasm-selftests.c contains: ... /* If you want to see the disassembled instruction printed to gdb_stdout, set verbose to true. */ static const bool verbose = false; ... Make this parameter available in the maint selftest command using a new option -verbose, such that we can do: ... (gdb) maint selftest -verbose print_one_insn ... Tested on x86_64-linux.
2021-09-21[gdb] Change register_test to use std::function argTom de Vries2-19/+22
Change register_test to use std::function arg, such that we can do: ... register_test (test_name, [=] () { SELF_CHECK (...); }); ... Tested on x86_64-linux.
2021-09-20gdbsupport/gdb_proc_service.h: use decltype instead of typeofSimon Marchi1-1/+1
Bug 28341 shows that GDB fails to compile when built with -std=c++11. I don't know much about the use case, but according to the author of the bug: I encountered the scenario where CXX is set to "g++ -std=c++11" when I try to compile binutils under GCC as part of the GCC 3-stage compilation, which is common for building a cross-compiler. The author of the bug suggests using __typeof__ instead of typeof. But since we're using C++, we might as well use decltype, which is standard. This is what this patch does. The failure (and fix) can be observed by configuring GDB with CXX="g++ -std=c++11": CXX linux-low.o In file included from /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/gdb_proc_service.h:22, from /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.h:27, from /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:20: /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdbsupport/gdb_proc_service.h:177:50: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before (token 177 | __attribute__((visibility ("default"))) typeof (SYM) SYM | ^ /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdbsupport/gdb_proc_service.h:179:1: note: in expansion of macro PS_EXPORT 179 | PS_EXPORT (ps_get_thread_area); | ^~~~~~~~~ Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28341 Change-Id: I84fbaae938209d8d935ca08dec9b7e6a0dd1bda0
2021-08-03gdbsupport: add debug assertions in gdb::optional::getSimon Marchi1-2/+14
The libstdc++ version of optional contains some runtime checks enabled when _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is defined. I think it would be useful if our version contained similar checks. Add checks in the two `get` methods, also conditional on _GLIBCXX_DEBUG. I think it's simpler to use that macro rather than introducing a new GDB-specific one, as I think that if somebody is interested in enabling these runtime checks, they'll also be interested in enabling the libstdc++ runtime checks (and vice-versa). I implemented these checks using gdb_assert. Note that gdb_assert throws (after querying the user), and we are in noexcept methods. That means that std::terminate / abort will immediately be called. I think this is ok, since if those were "real" _GLIBCXX_DEBUG checks, abort would be called straight away. If I add a dummy failure, it looks like so: $ ./gdb -q -nx --data-directory=data-directory /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/gdb_optional.h:206: internal-error: T& gdb::optional<T>::get() [with T = int]: Assertion `this->has_value ()' failed. A problem internal to GDB has been detected, further debugging may prove unreliable. Quit this debugging session? (y or n) n [1] 658767 abort (core dumped) ./gdb -q -nx --data-directory=data-directory Change-Id: Iadfdcd131425bd2ca6a2de30d7b22e9b3cc67793
2021-07-30Replace exception_print_same with operator!=Tom Tromey1-0/+17
I noticed that exception_print_same is only used in a single spot, and it seemed to be better as an operator!= method attached to gdb_exception. Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 34.
2021-07-30[gdb/build] Disable attribute nonnullTom de Vries1-0/+75
With trunk gcc (12.0) we're running into a -Werror=nonnull-compare build breaker in gdb, which caused a broader review of the usage of the nonnull attribute. The current conclusion is that it's best to disable this. This is explained at length in the gdbsupport/common-defs.h comment. Tested by building with trunk gcc. gdb/ChangeLog: 2021-07-29 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdbsupport/common-defs.h (ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL): Disable.
2021-07-26gdb: move remaining ChangeLogs to legacy filesAndrew Burgess1-0/+0
In commit: commit f069ea46a03ae868581d1c852da28e979ea1245a Date: Sat Jul 3 16:29:08 2021 -0700 Rename gdb/ChangeLog to gdb/ChangeLog-2021 The gdb/ChangeLog file was renamed, but all of the other ChangeLog files relating to gdb were left in place. As I understand things, the no ChangeLogs policy applies to all the GDB related directories, so this commit renames all of the remaining GDB related ChangeLog files. As with the original commit, the intention behind this commit is to hopefully stop people merging ChangeLog entries by mistake. The renames carried out in this commit are: gdb/doc/ChangeLog -> gdb/doc/ChangeLog-1991-2021 gdb/stubs/ChangeLog -> gdb/stubs/ChangeLog-2012-2020 gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog -> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog-2014-2021 gdbserver/ChangeLog -> gdbserver/ChangeLog-2002-2021 gdbsupport/ChangeLog -> gdbsupport/ChangeLog-2020-2021
2021-07-23gdb: make inferior::m_cwd an std::stringSimon Marchi1-3/+4
Same idea as the previous patch, but for m_cwd. To keep things consistent across the board, change get_inferior_cwd as well, which is shared with GDBserver. So update the related GDBserver code too. Change-Id: Ia2c047fda738d45f3d18bc999eb67ceb8400ce4e
2021-07-23gdb: un-share set_inferior_cwd declarationSimon Marchi1-4/+0
The declaration of set_inferior_cwd is currently shared between gdb and gdbserver, in gdbsupport/common-inferior.h. It doesn't need to be, as set_inferior_cwd is not called from common code. Only get_inferior_cwd needs to. The motivation for this is that a future patch will change the prototype of set_inferior_cwd in gdb, and I don't want to change it for gdbserver unnecessarily. I see this as a good cleanup in any case, to reduce to just the essential what is shared between GDB and GDBserver. Change-Id: I3127d27d078f0503ebf5ccc6fddf14f212426a73
2021-07-17gdb: make all_inferiors_safe actually workSimon Marchi1-5/+5
The test gdb.threads/fork-plus-threads.exp fails since 08bdefb58b78 ("gdb: make inferior_list use intrusive_list"): FAIL: gdb.threads/fork-plus-threads.exp: detach-on-fork=off: only inferior 1 left Looking at the log, we see that we are left with a bunch of inferiors in the detach-on-fork=off case: info inferiors^M Num Description Connection Executable ^M * 1 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M 2 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M 3 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M 4 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M 5 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M 6 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M 7 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M 8 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M 9 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M 10 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M 11 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/fork-plus-threads.exp: detach-on-fork=off: only inferior 1 left when we expect to have just one. The problem is prune_inferiors not pruning inferiors. And this is caused by all_inferiors_safe not actually iterating on inferiors. The current implementation: inline all_inferiors_safe_range all_inferiors_safe () { return {}; } default-constructs an all_inferiors_safe_range, which default-constructs an all_inferiors_safe_iterator as its m_begin field, which default-constructs a all_inferiors_iterator. A default-constructed all_inferiors_iterator is an end iterator, which means we have constructed an (end,end) all_inferiors_safe_range. We actually need to pass down the list on which we want to iterator (that is the inferior_list global), so that all_inferiors_iterator's first constructor is chosen. We also pass nullptr as the proc_target filter. In this case, we don't do any filtering, but if in the future all_inferiors_safe needed to allow filtering on process target (like all_inferiors does), we could pass down a process target pointer. basic_safe_iterator's constructor needs to be changed to allow constructing the wrapped iterator with multiple arguments, not just one. With this, gdb.threads/fork-plus-threads.exp is passing once again for me. Change-Id: I650552ede596e3590c4b7606ce403690a0278a01
2021-07-12gdb: maintain per-process-target list of resumed threads with pending wait ↵Simon Marchi2-0/+15
status Looking up threads that are both resumed and have a pending wait status to report is something that we do quite often in the fast path and is expensive if there are many threads, since it currently requires walking whole thread lists. The first instance is in maybe_set_commit_resumed_all_targets. This is called after handling each event in fetch_inferior_event, to see if we should ask targets to commit their resumed threads or not. If at least one thread is resumed but has a pending wait status, we don't ask the targets to commit their resumed threads, because we want to consume and handle the pending wait status first. The second instance is in random_pending_event_thread, where we want to select a random thread among all those that are resumed and have a pending wait status. This is called every time we try to consume events, to see if there are any pending events that we we want to consume, before asking the targets for more events. To allow optimizing these cases, maintain a per-process-target list of threads that are resumed and have a pending wait status. In maybe_set_commit_resumed_all_targets, we'll be able to check in O(1) if there are any such threads simply by checking whether the list is empty. In random_pending_event_thread, we'll be able to use that list, which will be quicker than iterating the list of threads, especially when there are no resumed with pending wait status threads. About implementation details: using the new setters on class thread_info, it's relatively easy to maintain that list. Any time the "resumed" or "pending wait status" property is changed, we check whether that should cause the thread to be added or removed from the list. In set_thread_exited, we try to remove the thread from the list, because keeping an exited thread in that list would make no sense (especially if the thread is freed). My first implementation assumed that a process stratum target was always present when set_thread_exited is called. That's however, not the case: in some cases, targets unpush themselves from an inferior and then call "exit_inferior", which exits all the threads. If the target is unpushed before set_thread_exited is called on the threads, it means we could mistakenly leave some threads in the list. I tried to see how hard it would be to make it such that targets have to exit all threads before unpushing themselves from the inferior (that would seem logical to me, we don't want threads belonging to an inferior that has no process target). That seemed quite difficult and not worth the time at the moment. Instead, I changed inferior::unpush_target to remove all threads of that inferior from the list. As of this patch, the list is not used, this is done in the subsequent patches. The debug messages in process-stratum-target.c need to print some ptids. However, they can't use target_pid_to_str to print them without introducing a dependency on the current inferior (the current inferior is used to get the current target stack). For debug messages, I find it clearer to print the spelled out ptid anyway (the pid, lwp and tid values). Add a ptid_t::to_string method that returns a string representation of the ptid that is meant for debug messages, a bit like we already have frame_id::to_string. Change-Id: Iad8f93db2d13984dd5aa5867db940ed1169dbb67
2021-07-12gdb: use intrusive list for step-over chainSimon Marchi2-0/+30
The threads that need a step-over are currently linked using an hand-written intrusive doubly-linked list, so that seems a very good candidate for intrusive_list, convert it. For this, we have a use case of appending a list to another one (in start_step_over). Based on the std::list and Boost APIs, add a splice method. However, only support splicing the other list at the end of the `this` list, since that's all we need. Add explicit default assignment operators to reference_to_pointer_iterator, which are otherwise implicitly deleted. This is needed because to define thread_step_over_list_safe_iterator, we wrap reference_to_pointer_iterator inside a basic_safe_iterator, and basic_safe_iterator needs to be able to copy-assign the wrapped iterator. The move-assignment operator is therefore not needed, only the copy-assignment operator is. But for completeness, add both. Change-Id: I31b2ff67c7b78251314646b31887ef1dfebe510c
2021-07-12gdb: introduce intrusive_list, make thread_info use itPedro Alves2-0/+638
GDB currently has several objects that are put in a singly linked list, by having the object's type have a "next" pointer directly. For example, struct thread_info and struct inferior. Because these are simply-linked lists, and we don't keep track of a "tail" pointer, when we want to append a new element on the list, we need to walk the whole list to find the current tail. It would be nice to get rid of that walk. Removing elements from such lists also requires a walk, to find the "previous" position relative to the element being removed. To eliminate the need for that walk, we could make those lists doubly-linked, by adding a "prev" pointer alongside "next". It would be nice to avoid the boilerplate associated with maintaining such a list manually, though. That is what the new intrusive_list type addresses. With an intrusive list, it's also possible to move items out of the list without destroying them, which is interesting in our case for example for threads, when we exit them, but can't destroy them immediately. We currently keep exited threads on the thread list, but we could change that which would simplify some things. Note that with std::list, element removal is O(N). I.e., with std::list, we need to walk the list to find the iterator pointing to the position to remove. However, we could store a list iterator inside the object as soon as we put the object in the list, to address it, because std::list iterators are not invalidated when other elements are added/removed. However, if you need to put the same object in more than one list, then std::list<object> doesn't work. You need to instead use std::list<object *>, which is less efficient for requiring extra memory allocations. For an example of an object in multiple lists, see the step_over_next/step_over_prev fields in thread_info: /* Step-over chain. A thread is in the step-over queue if these are non-NULL. If only a single thread is in the chain, then these fields point to self. */ struct thread_info *step_over_prev = NULL; struct thread_info *step_over_next = NULL; The new intrusive_list type gives us the advantages of an intrusive linked list, while avoiding the boilerplate associated with manually maintaining it. intrusive_list's API follows the standard container interface, and thus std::list's interface. It is based the API of Boost's intrusive list, here: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_73_0/doc/html/boost/intrusive/list.html Our implementation is relatively simple, while Boost's is complicated and intertwined due to a lot of customization options, which our version doesn't have. The easiest way to use an intrusive_list is to make the list's element type inherit from intrusive_node. This adds a prev/next pointers to the element type. However, to support putting the same object in more than one list, intrusive_list supports putting the "node" info as a field member, so you can have more than one such nodes, one per list. As a first guinea pig, this patch makes the per-inferior thread list use intrusive_list using the base class method. Unlike Boost's implementation, ours is not a circular list. An earlier version of the patch was circular: the intrusive_list type included an intrusive_list_node "head". In this design, a node contained pointers to the previous and next nodes, not the previous and next elements. This wasn't great for when debugging GDB with GDB, as it was difficult to get from a pointer to the node to a pointer to the element. With the design proposed in this patch, nodes contain pointers to the previous and next elements, making it easy to traverse the list by hand and inspect each element. The intrusive_list object contains pointers to the first and last elements of the list. They are nullptr if the list is empty. Each element's node contains a pointer to the previous and next elements. The first element's previous pointer is nullptr and the last element's next pointer is nullptr. Therefore, if there's a single element in the list, both its previous and next pointers are nullptr. To differentiate such an element from an element that is not linked into a list, the previous and next pointers contain a special value (-1) when the node is not linked. This is necessary to be able to reliably tell if a given node is currently linked or not. A begin() iterator points to the first item in the list. An end() iterator contains nullptr. This makes iteration until end naturally work, as advancing past the last element will make the iterator contain nullptr, making it equal to the end iterator. If the list is empty, a begin() iterator will contain nullptr from the start, and therefore be immediately equal to the end. Iterating on an intrusive_list yields references to objects (e.g. `thread_info&`). The rest of GDB currently expects iterators and ranges to yield pointers (e.g. `thread_info*`). To bridge the gap, add the reference_to_pointer_iterator type. It is used to define inf_threads_iterator. Add a Python pretty-printer, to help inspecting intrusive lists when debugging GDB with GDB. Here's an example of the output: (top-gdb) p current_inferior_.m_obj.thread_list $1 = intrusive list of thread_info = {0x61700002c000, 0x617000069080, 0x617000069400, 0x61700006d680, 0x61700006eb80} It's not possible with current master, but with this patch [1] that I hope will be merged eventually, it's possible to index the list and access the pretty-printed value's children: (top-gdb) p current_inferior_.m_obj.thread_list[1] $2 = (thread_info *) 0x617000069080 (top-gdb) p current_inferior_.m_obj.thread_list[1].ptid $3 = { m_pid = 406499, m_lwp = 406503, m_tid = 0 } Even though iterating the list in C++ yields references, the Python pretty-printer yields pointers. The reason for this is that the output of printing the thread list above would be unreadable, IMO, if each thread_info object was printed in-line, since they contain so much information. I think it's more useful to print pointers, and let the user drill down as needed. [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-April/178050.html Co-Authored-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Change-Id: I3412a14dc77f25876d742dab8f44e0ba7c7586c0
2021-07-06gdb: introduce iterator_range, remove next_adapterSimon Marchi2-27/+65
I was always a bit confused by next_adapter, because it kind of mixes the element type and the iterator type. In reality, it is not much more than a class that wraps two iterators (begin and end). However, it assumes that: - you can construct the begin iterator by passing a pointer to the first element of the iterable - you can default-construct iterator to make the end iterator I think that by generalizing it a little bit, we can re-use it at more places. Rename it to "iterator_range". I think it describes a bit better: it's a range made by wrapping a begin and end iterator. Move it to its own file, since it's not related to next_iterator anymore. iterator_range has two constructors. The variadic one, where arguments are forwarded to construct the underlying begin iterator. The end iterator is constructed through default construction. This is a generalization of what we have today. There is another constructor which receives already constructed begin and end iterators, useful if the end iterator can't be obtained by default-construction. Or, if you wanted to make a range that does not end at the end of the container, you could pass any iterator as the "end". This generalization allows removing some "range" classes, like all_inferiors_range. These classes existed only to pass some arguments when constructing the begin iterator. With iterator_range, those same arguments are passed to the iterator_range constructed and then forwarded to the constructed begin iterator. There is a small functional difference in how iterator_range works compared to next_adapter. next_adapter stored the pointer it received as argument and constructeur an iterator in the `begin` method. iterator_range constructs the begin iterator and stores it as a member. Its `begin` method returns a copy of that iterator. With just iterator_range, uses of next_adapter<foo> would be replaced with: using foo_iterator = next_iterator<foo>; using foo_range = iterator_range<foo_iterator>; However, I added a `next_range` wrapper as a direct replacement for next_adapter<foo>. IMO, next_range is a slightly better name than next_adapter. The rest of the changes are applications of this new class. gdbsupport/ChangeLog: * next-iterator.h (class next_adapter): Remove. * iterator-range.h: New. gdb/ChangeLog: * breakpoint.h (bp_locations_range): Remove. (bp_location_range): New. (struct breakpoint) <locations>: Adjust type. (breakpoint_range): Use iterator_range. (tracepoint_range): Use iterator_range. * breakpoint.c (breakpoint::locations): Adjust return type. * gdb_bfd.h (gdb_bfd_section_range): Use iterator_range. * gdbthread.h (all_threads_safe): Pass argument to all_threads_safe_range. * inferior-iter.h (all_inferiors_range): Use iterator_range. (all_inferiors_safe_range): Use iterator_range. (all_non_exited_inferiors_range): Use iterator_range. * inferior.h (all_inferiors, all_non_exited_inferiors): Pass inferior_list as argument. * objfiles.h (struct objfile) <compunits_range>: Remove. <compunits>: Return compunit_symtab_range. * progspace.h (unwrapping_objfile_iterator) <unwrapping_objfile_iterator>: Take parameter by value. (unwrapping_objfile_range): Use iterator_range. (struct program_space) <objfiles_range>: Define with "using". <objfiles>: Adjust. <objfiles_safe_range>: Define with "using". <objfiles_safe>: Adjust. <solibs>: Return so_list_range, define here. * progspace.c (program_space::solibs): Remove. * psymtab.h (class psymtab_storage) <partial_symtab_iterator>: New. <partial_symtab_range>: Use iterator_range. * solist.h (so_list_range): New. * symtab.h (compunit_symtab_range): New. (symtab_range): New. (compunit_filetabs): Change to a function. * thread-iter.h (inf_threads_range, inf_non_exited_threads_range, safe_inf_threads_range, all_threads_safe_range): Use iterator_range. * top.h (ui_range): New. (all_uis): Use ui_range. Change-Id: Ib7a9d2a3547f45f01aa1c6b24536ba159db9b854
2021-07-05gdb: fall back on sigpending + sigwait if sigtimedwait is not availableSimon Marchi1-2/+13
The macOS platform does not provide sigtimedwait, so we get: CXX compile/compile.o In file included from /Users/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/compile/compile.c:46: /Users/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/scoped_ignore_signal.h:69:4: error: use of undeclared identifier 'sigtimedwait' sigtimedwait (&set, nullptr, &zero_timeout); ^ An alternative to sigtimedwait with a timeout of 0 is to use sigpending, to first check which signals are pending, and then sigwait, to consume them. Since that's slightly more expensive (2 syscalls instead of 1), keep using sigtimedwait for the platforms that provide it, and fall back to sigpending + sigwait for the others. gdbsupport/ChangeLog: * scoped_ignore_signal.h (struct scoped_ignore_signal) <~scoped_ignore_signal>: Use sigtimedwait if HAVE_SIGTIMEDWAIT is defined, else use sigpending + sigwait. Change-Id: I2a72798337e81dd1bbd21214736a139dd350af87 Co-Authored-By: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
2021-07-05gdbsupport/common.m4: check for sigtimedwaitSimon Marchi3-2/+5
The next patch will make the use of sigtimedwait conditional to whether the platform provides it. Start by adding a configure check for it. gdbsupport/ChangeLog: * common.m4 (GDB_AC_COMMON): Check for sigtimedwait. * config.in, configure: Re-generate. gdb/ChangeLog: * config.in, configure: Re-generate. gdbserver/ChangeLog: * config.in, configure: Re-generate. Change-Id: Ic7613fe14521b966b4d991bbcd0933ab14629c05
2021-06-17Don't call sigtimedwait for scoped_ignore_sigttouPedro Alves2-6/+14
Because SIGTTOU is sent to the whole process instead of to a specific thread, consuming a pending SIGTTOU in the destructor of scoped_ignore_sigttou could consume a SIGTTOU signal raised due to actions done by some other thread. Simply avoid sigtimedwait in scoped_ignore_sigttou, thus plugging the race. This works because we know that when the thread writes to the terminal and the signal is blocked, the kernel does not raise the signal at all. Tested on GNU/Linux, Solaris 11 and FreeBSD. gdb/ChangeLog: yyyy-mm-dd Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> * scoped_ignore_signal.h (scoped_ignore_signal): Add ConsumePending template parameter. (scoped_ignore_signal::~scoped_ignore_signal): Skip calling sigtimedwait if ConsumePending is false. (scoped_ignore_sigpipe): Initialize with ConsumePending=true. * scoped_ignore_sigttou.h (scoped_ignore_sigttou) <m_ignore_signal>: Initialize with ConsumePending=false. Change-Id: I92f754dbc45c45819dce2ce68b8c067d8d5c61b1
2021-06-17scoped_ignore_signal: Use sigprocmask+sigtimedwait instead of signalPedro Alves2-2/+44
The problem with using signal(...) to temporarily ignore a signal, is that that changes the the signal disposition for the whole process. If multiple threads do it at the same time, you have a race. Fix this by using sigprocmask + sigtimedwait to implement the ignoring instead, if available, which I think probably means everywhere except Windows nowadays. This way, we only change the signal mask for the current thread, so there's no race. Change-Id: Idfe3fb08327ef8cae926f3de9ee81c56a83b1738 gdbsupport/ChangeLog: yyyy-mm-dd Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> * scoped_ignore_signal.h (scoped_ignore_signal::scoped_ignore_signal) [HAVE_SIGPROCMASK]: Use sigprocmask to block the signal instead of changing the signal disposition for the whole process. (scoped_ignore_signal::~scoped_ignore_signal) [HAVE_SIGPROCMASK]: Use sigtimedwait and sigprocmask to flush and unblock the signal.
2021-06-17Introduce scoped_restore_signalPedro Alves2-12/+107
We currently have scoped_restore_sigttou and scoped_restore_sigpipe doing basically the same thing -- temporarily ignoring a specific signal. This patch introduce a scoped_restore_signal type that can be used for both. This will become more important for the next patch which changes how the signal-ignoring is implemented. scoped_restore_sigpipe is a straight alias to scoped_restore_signal<SIGPIPE> on systems that define SIGPIPE, and an alias to scoped_restore_signal_nop (a no-op version of scoped_restore_signal) otherwise. scoped_restore_sigttou is not a straight alias because it wants to check the job_control global. gdb/ChangeLog: yyyy-mm-dd Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> * gdbsupport/scoped_ignore_signal.h: New. * compile/compile.c: Include gdbsupport/scoped_ignore_signal.h instead of <signal.h>. Don't include <unistd.h>. (scoped_ignore_sigpipe): Remove. * gdbsupport/scoped_ignore_sigttou.h: Include gdbsupport/scoped_ignore_signal.h instead of <signal.h>. Don't include <unistd.h>. (lazy_init): New. (scoped_ignore_sigttou): Reimplement using scoped_ignore_signal and lazy_init. Change-Id: Ibb44d0bd705e96df03ef0787c77358a4a7b7086c
2021-06-17Move scoped_ignore_sigttou to gdbsupport/Pedro Alves2-0/+60
A following patch will want to use scoped_ignore_sigttou in code shared between GDB and GDBserver. Move it under gdbsupport/. Note that despite what inflow.h/inflow.c's first line says, inflow.c is no longer about ptrace, it is about terminal management. Some other files were unnecessarily including inflow.h, I guess a leftover from the days when inflow.c really was about ptrace. Those inclusions are simply dropped. gdb/ChangeLog: yyyy-mm-dd Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> * Makefile.in (HFILES_NO_SRCDIR): Remove inflow.h. * inf-ptrace.c, inflow.c, procfs.c: Don't include "inflow.h". * inflow.h: Delete, moved to gdbsupport/ under a different name. * ser-unix.c: Don't include "inflow.h". Include "gdbsupport/scoped_ignore_sigttou.h". gdbsupport/ChangeLog: yyyy-mm-dd Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> * scoped_ignore_sigttou.h: New file, moved from gdb/ and renamed. Change-Id: Ie390abf42c3a78bec6d282ad2a63edd3e623559a
2021-05-17gdb: additional settings for emacs in .dir-locals.elAndrew Burgess2-1/+9
Two additional settings for developers who use emacs: 1. Set brace-list-open to 0 for C and C++ modes, this ensures we format things like: enum blah { .... }; Instead of the default for the emacs GNU style: enum blah { ... }; The former seems to be the GDB style. 2. Set sentence-end-double-space to t. This is actually the default value for this setting, but if anyone has customised this to nil in general, then forcing this back to t for GDB files will give a better behaviour for the paragraph filling. gdb/ChangeLog: * .dir-locals.el: Set sentence-end-double-space for all modes, and set brace-list-open to 0 for C and C++ modes. gdbserver/ChangeLog: * .dir-locals.el: Set sentence-end-double-space for all modes, and set brace-list-open to 0 for C and C++ modes. gdbsupport/ChangeLog: * .dir-locals.el: Set sentence-end-double-space for all modes, and set brace-list-open to 0 for C and C++ modes.