aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-05-23Implement gdb.execute_miTom Tromey2-0/+59
This adds a new Python function, gdb.execute_mi, that can be used to invoke an MI command but get the output as a Python object, rather than a string. This is done by implementing a new ui_out subclass that builds a Python object. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11688 Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2023-05-23gdb/testsuite: change hardcoded assembly in gdb.arch/disp-step-insn-reloc.expBruno Larsen1-4/+2
When testing gdb.arch/disp-step-insn-reloc.exp with clang in an x86_64 machine, the compiled test case would segfault when returning from the function can_relocate_call, with a suggestion of a broken stack. The example assembly in the commment was the following: f: MOV $1, %[ok] JMP end set_point0: CALL f ; tracepoint here. end: And the segmentation fault happening at the final "ret" instruction of can_relocate_call. Looking at the disassembled version of the later half of the important function, we see: Clang version (f starting at 11a4): 00000000000011ae <set_point0>: 11ae: e8 f1 ff ff ff callq 11a4 <can_relocate_call+0x14> 11b3: 89 45 fc mov %eax,-0x4(%rbp) 11b6: 83 7d fc 01 cmpl $0x1,-0x4(%rbp) 11ba: 0f 85 0a 00 00 00 jne 11ca <set_point0+0x1c> 11c0: e8 5b 00 00 00 callq 1220 <pass> 11c5: e9 05 00 00 00 jmpq 11cf <set_point0+0x21> 11ca: e8 61 00 00 00 callq 1230 <fail> 11cf: 48 83 c4 10 add $0x10,%rsp 11d3: 5d pop %rbp 11d4: c3 retq 11d5: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 data16 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1) 11dc: 00 00 00 00 gcc version (f starting at 401125): 000000000040112c <set_point0>: 40112c: e8 f4 ff ff ff callq 401125 <can_relocate_call+0x11> 401131: 89 45 fc mov %eax,-0x4(%rbp) 401134: 83 7d fc 01 cmpl $0x1,-0x4(%rbp) 401138: 75 07 jne 401141 <set_point0+0x15> 40113a: e8 c7 ff ff ff callq 401106 <pass> 40113f: eb 05 jmp 401146 <set_point0+0x1a> 401141: e8 c7 ff ff ff callq 40110d <fail> 401146: 90 nop 401147: c9 leaveq 401148: c3 retq The epilogue of set_point0 (11cf for clang, 401146 for gcc) is the main difference: GCC's version uses the leaveq instruction, which resets rsp based on rbp, while clang adds the same constant to rsp that it subtracted in the prologue. Clang fails because the return address that is added by the "call f" instruction isn't accounted for. This commit fixes that by adding a return instruction to f, which leaves the rsp as the compilers would expect. Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2023-05-22[gdb/testsuite] Add Term::get_line_with_attrsTom de Vries2-7/+59
Add a new proc Term::get_line_with_attrs, similar to Term::get_line, that annotates a tuiterm line with the active attributes. For instance, the line representing the TUI status window with attribute mode standout looks like this with Term::get_line: ... exec No process In: ... L?? PC: ?? ... but like this with Term::get_line_with_attrs: ... <reverse:1>exec No process In: ... L?? PC: ?? <reverse:0> ... Also add Term::dump_screen_with_attrs, a Term::dump_screen variant that uses Term::get_line_with_attrs instead of Term::get_line. Tested by re-running the TUI test-cases (gdb.tui/*.exp and gdb.python/tui*.exp) on x86_64-linux.
2023-05-22[gdb/testsuite] Factor out Term::_reset_attrsTom de Vries1-12/+14
Factor out new proc Term::_reset_attrs. Tested by re-running the TUI test-cases (gdb.tui/*.exp and gdb.python/tui*.exp) on x86_64-linux.
2023-05-19gdb: Remove redundant frame switchingRichard Bunt1-0/+12
547ce8f00b fixed an issue where dynamic types were not being resolved correctly prior to printing a value. The same issue was discovered when printing the value using mi-mode, which was not covered by the fix. Porting the fix to the mi-mode code path resolved the issue. However, it was discovered that a later patch series, ending 2fc3b8a4cb8, independently fixed the issue in both the cli- and mi-mode code paths, making the original fix unneeded. This commit removes this extra frame switch and adds test coverage for the mi-mode scenario to protect against any future divergence in this area. GDB built with GCC 11. No test suite regressions detected. Compilers: GCC 12.1.0, ACfL 22.1, Intel 22.1; Platforms: x86_64, aarch64. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-05-19gdb/testsuite: test for a function with no line tableAndrew Burgess2-0/+154
This commit adds a test for the following commit: commit e86e87f77fd5d8afb3e714f1d9e09e0ff5b4e6ff Date: Tue Nov 28 16:23:32 2006 +0000 * symtab.c (find_pc_sect_line): Do not return a line before the start of a symtab. We have been carrying a test for that commit in the Fedora GDB tree since that commit was added to GDB. I don't know why the test wasn't added along with the original commit, but as was written, the test is pretty gross, it uses objcopy to pull the .text section from an object file, which was then injected into another source file within a .asm statement... ... these days we can just make use of the DWARF assembler to achieve the same results, so I've rewritten the test and think it is worth adding this to upstream GDB. The original patch was about about how we find the best symtab and line table entry, and what to do when GDB can't find a good match. The new test creates a CU with two functions, only one of which is covered by the line table. With the above patch reverted GDB returns an invalid address. With the above patch reverted I did run the testsuite to see what other tests might already be exercising this functionality, and I found two tests: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-step-out-of-function-no-stmt.exp gdb.dwarf2/dw2-vendor-extended-opcode.exp These are pretty similar, they either create minimal, or no line table for one of the functions in the source file, and as a consequence GDB returns an unexpected address at some point during the test. However, both of those tests are really focused on other issues, so I think this new test does add some value. Plus the new test is not large, so it's not a huge cost to also run this new test. Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-05-19gdb/breakpoint: use warning function instead of gdb_printfAndrew Burgess2-3/+3
Noticed that in breakpoint.c, in one place, we do this: gdb_printf (_("warning: Error removing " "breakpoint %d\n"), old_loc->owner->number); Instead of using the `warning` function. There are a number of differences between using gdb_printf like this and calling `warning`, the main one is probably that real warnings are sent to gdb_stderr, while the above gdb_printf call will go to gdb_stdout. In this commit I: 1. Change to call `warning`, we can drop the "warning: " prefix from the string in breakpoint.c, 2. Update the warning text, I now start with a lower case 'e', which I believe is the GDB style for warnings, 3. And I have included the address of the bp_location in the warning messsage, 4. Finally, I update all the tests (2) that include this error message. Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-05-19gdb/testsuite: handle older Python versions in gdb.python/py-disasm.expAndrew Burgess1-5/+15
It was pointed out on the mailing list that the new tests added in this commit: commit 4de4e48514fc47aeb4ca95cd4091e2a333fbe9e1 Date: Tue Jan 24 15:35:45 2023 +0000 gdb/python: extend the Python Disassembler API to allow for styling will fail when GDB is built with Python 3.6 or earlier. This is because the error that is emitted when a function argument is missing changed in Python 3.7, instead of an error like this: Python Exception <class 'TypeError'>: function missing required argument 'style' (pos 1) earlier versions of Python emit: Python Exception <class 'TypeError'>: Required argument 'style' (pos 1) not found and the new tests didn't allow for this. This commit fixes this by allowing either pattern. I've tested this building GDB against Python 3.7.9 and 3.6.15, with this commit all tests in gdb.python/py-disasm.exp now pass.
2023-05-18gdb.fortran/lbound-ubound.exp: read expected lbound and ubound from function ↵Simon Marchi2-68/+18
parameters (PR 30414) gdb.fortran/lbound-ubound.exp reads the expected lbound and ubound values by reading some output from the inferior. This is racy when running on boards where the inferior I/O is on a separate TTY than GDB's, such as native-gdbserver. I sometimes see this behavior: (gdb) continue Continuing. Breakpoint 2, do_test (lb=..., ub=...) at /home/jenkins/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_linuxbuild/platform/jammy-amd64/target_board/nati ve-gdbserver/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/lbound-ubound.F90:45 45 print *, "" ! Test Breakpoint (gdb) Remote debugging from host ::1, port 37496 Expected GDB Output: LBOUND = (-8, -10) UBOUND = (-1, -2) APB: Run a test here APB: Expected lbound '(-8, -10)' APB: Expected ubound '' What happened is that expect read the output from GDB before the output from the inferior, triggering this gdb_test_multiple clause: -re "$gdb_prompt $" { set found_prompt true if {$found_dealloc_breakpoint || ($expected_lbound != "" && $expected_ubound != "")} { # We're done. } else { exp_continue } } So it set found_prompt, but the gdb_test_multiple kept going because found_dealloc_breakpoint is false (this is the flag indicating that the test is finished) and we still don't have expected_lbound and expected_ubound. Then, expect reads in the inferior I/O, triggering this clause: -re ".*LBOUND = (\[^\r\n\]+)\r\n" { set expected_lbound $expect_out(1,string) if {!$found_prompt} { exp_continue } } This sets expected_lbound, but since found_prompt is true, we don't do exp_continue, and exit the gdb_test_multiple, without having an expected_ubound. Change the test to read the values from the lb and ub function parameters instead. As far as I understand, this still exercises what we want to test. These variables contain the return values of the lbound and ubound functions as computed by the program. We'll use them to check the return values of the lbound and ubound functions as computed by GDB. Change-Id: I3c4d3d17d9291870a758a42301d15a007821ebb5 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30414
2023-05-18[gdb/testsuite] Fix whitespace and indentation in lib/tuiterm.expTom de Vries1-48/+48
I noticed a trailing whitespace and some indentation errors in lib/tuiterm.exp. Fix these. Tested by re-running the TUI test-cases (gdb.tui/*.exp and gdb.python/tui*.exp) on x86_64-linux.
2023-05-17Special case "&str" in Rust parserTom Tromey1-0/+3
"&str" is an important type in Rust -- it's the type of string literals. However, the compiler puts it in the DWARF in a funny way. The slice itself is present and named "&str". However, the Rust parser doesn't look for types with names like this, but instead tries to construct them from components. In this case it tries to make a pointer-to-"str" -- but "str" isn't always available, and in any case that wouldn't yield the best result. This patch adds a special case for &str. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22251 Reviewed-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2023-05-16[gdb/tui] Don't show line number for lines not in source fileTom de Vries2-16/+20
Currently, for a source file containing only 5 lines, we also show line numbers 6 and 7 if they're in scope of the source window: ... 0 +-compact-source.c----------------+ 1 |___3_{ | 2 |___4_ return 0; | 3 |___5_} | 4 |___6_ | 5 |___7_ | 6 +---------------------------------+ ... Fix this by not showing line numbers not in a source file, such that we have instead: ... 0 +-compact-source.c----------------+ 1 |___3_{ | 2 |___4_ return 0; | 3 |___5_} | 4 | | 5 | | 6 +---------------------------------+ ... Tested on x86_64-linux. Suggested-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-05-16Update comments for the gdb/24331 fix.Paul Pluzhnikov2-3/+4
Approved-by: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2023-05-16gdb/testsuite: fix formatting of gdb.python/py-disasm.pyAndrew Burgess1-3/+3
Run black on gdb.python/py-disasm.py file and commit the changes.
2023-05-16gdb/testsuite: make gdb_supported_languages a caching procAndrew Burgess1-5/+23
Rewrite gdb_supported_languages as a caching proc that actually queries GDB for the list of supported languages, rather than just containing a hard-coded list of languages. There's only one test that uses this proc right now, gdb.python/py-function.exp, and that still passes after this change, with no changes in the test names.
2023-05-16gdb/testsuite: fix regressions in break-main-file-remove-fail.expAndrew Burgess1-1/+16
After this commit: commit a68f7e9844208ad8cd498f89b5100084ece7d0f6 Date: Tue May 9 10:28:42 2023 +0100 gdb/testsuite: extend special '^' handling to gdb_test_multiple buildbot notified me of a regression on s390 in the test: gdb.base/break-main-file-remove-fail.exp the failure looks like this: print /d ((int (*) (void *, size_t)) munmap) (16781312, 4096) warning: Error removing breakpoint 0 $2 = 0 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/break-main-file-remove-fail.exp: cmdline: get integer valueof "((int (*) (void *, size_t)) munmap) (16781312, 4096)" On the mailing list it has been reported that this failure also impacts arm, aarch64, and possibly ppc/ppc64 too. The above commit changed get_integer_valueof so that no output is expected between the command and the '$2 = 0' line. In this case the 'warning: Error removing breakpoint 0' output is causing the get_integer_valueof call to fail. The reason for this warning is that this test deliberately calls munmap on a page of the inferior's code. The test is checking that GDB can handle the situation where a s/w breakpoint can't be removed (due to the page no longer being readable/writable). The test that is supposed to trigger the warning is later in the test script when we delete a breakpoint. So why do some targets trigger the warning earlier during the inferior call? The impacted targets use AT_ENTRY_POINT as their strategy for handling inferior calls, that is, the trampoline that calls the inferior function is placed at the program's entry point, e.g. often the _start label. If this location happens to be on the same page as the page that the test script unmaps then, when the inferior function call returns, GDB will not be able to remove the temporary breakpoint that is inserted to catch the inferior function call returning! As a result we end up seeing the warning earlier than expected. I did wonder if this means I should relax the pattern in get_integer_valueof - just accept that there might be additional output from GDB which we should ignore. However, I don't think this the right way to go. With the change in a68f7e984420 we are now stricter for GDB emitting additional, unexpected, output, and I think that is a good thing. So, I think, in this case, in order to handle the possible extra output, we should implement something like get_integer_valueof directly in the gdb.base/break-main-file-remove-fail.exp test script. This local version will handle the possible warning output. After this the test should pass again on the impacted targets.
2023-05-16gdb/python: extend the Python Disassembler API to allow for stylingAndrew Burgess2-38/+220
This commit extends the Python Disassembler API to allow for styling of the instructions. Before this commit the Python Disassembler API allowed the user to do two things: - They could intercept instruction disassembly requests and return a string of their choosing, this string then became the disassembled instruction, or - They could call builtin_disassemble, which would call back into libopcode to perform the disassembly. As libopcode printed the instruction GDB would collect these print requests and build a string. This string was then returned from the builtin_disassemble call, and the user could modify or extend this string as needed. Neither of these approaches allowed for, or preserved, disassembler styling, which is now available within libopcodes for many of the more popular architectures GDB supports. This commit aims to fill this gap. After this commit a user will be able to do the following things: - Implement a custom instruction disassembler entirely in Python without calling back into libopcodes, the custom disassembler will be able to return styling information such that GDB will display the instruction fully styled. All of GDB's existing style settings will affect how instructions coming from the Python disassembler are displayed in the expected manner. - Call builtin_disassemble and receive a result that represents how libopcode would like the instruction styled. The user can then adjust or extend the disassembled instruction before returning the result to GDB. Again, the instruction will be styled as expected. To achieve this I will add two new classes to GDB, DisassemblerTextPart and DisassemblerAddressPart. Within builtin_disassemble, instead of capturing the print calls from libopcodes and building a single string, we will now create either a text part or address part and store these parts in a vector. The DisassemblerTextPart will capture a small piece of text along with the associated style that should be used to display the text. This corresponds to the disassembler calling disassemble_info::fprintf_styled_func, or for disassemblers that don't support styling disassemble_info::fprintf_func. The DisassemblerAddressPart is used when libopcodes requests that an address be printed, and takes care of printing the address and associated symbol, this corresponds to the disassembler calling disassemble_info::print_address_func. These parts are then placed within the DisassemblerResult when builtin_disassemble returns. Alternatively, the user can directly create parts by calling two new methods on the DisassembleInfo class: DisassembleInfo.text_part and DisassembleInfo.address_part. Having created these parts the user can then pass these parts when initializing a new DisassemblerResult object. Finally, when we return from Python to gdbpy_print_insn, one way or another, the result being returned will have a list of parts. Back in GDB's C++ code we walk the list of parts and call back into GDB's core to display the disassembled instruction with the correct styling. The new API lives in parallel with the old API. Any existing code that creates a DisassemblerResult using a single string immediately creates a single DisassemblerTextPart containing the entire instruction and gives this part the default text style. This is also what happens if the user calls builtin_disassemble for an architecture that doesn't (yet) support libopcode styling. This matches up with what happens when the Python API is not involved, an architecture without disassembler styling support uses the old libopcodes printing API (the API that doesn't pass style info), and GDB just prints everything using the default text style. The reason that parts are created by calling methods on DisassembleInfo, rather than calling the class constructor directly, is DisassemblerAddressPart. Ideally this part would only hold the address which the part represents, but in order to support backwards compatibility we need to be able to convert the DisassemblerAddressPart into a string. To do that we need to call GDB's internal print_address function, and to do that we need an gdbarch. What this means is that the DisassemblerAddressPart needs to take a gdb.Architecture object at creation time. The only valid place a user can pull this from is from the DisassembleInfo object, so having the DisassembleInfo act as a factory ensures that the correct gdbarch is passed over each time. I implemented both solutions (the one presented here, and an alternative where parts could be constructed directly), and this felt like the cleanest solution. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-05-16gdb/python: rework how the disassembler API reads the result objectAndrew Burgess2-40/+12
This commit is a refactor ahead of the next change which will make disassembler styling available through the Python API. Unfortunately, in order to make the styling support available, I think the easiest solution is to make a very small change to the existing API. The current API relies on returning a DisassemblerResult object to represent each disassembled instruction. Currently GDB allows the DisassemblerResult class to be sub-classed, which could mean that a user tries to override the various attributes that exist on the DisassemblerResult object. This commit removes this ability, effectively making the DisassemblerResult class final. Though this is a change to the existing API, I'm hoping this isn't going to cause too many issues: - The Python disassembler API was only added in the previous release of GDB, so I don't expect it to be widely used yet, and - It's not clear to me why a user would need to sub-class the DisassemblerResult type, I allowed it in the original patch because at the time I couldn't see any reason to NOT allow it. Having prevented sub-classing I can now rework the tail end of the gdbpy_print_insn function; instead of pulling the results out of the DisassemblerResult object by calling back into Python, I now cast the Python object back to its C++ type (disasm_result_object), and access the fields directly from there. In later commits I will be reworking the disasm_result_object type in order to hold information about the styled disassembler output. The tests that dealt with sub-classing DisassemblerResult have been removed, and a new test that confirms that DisassemblerResult can't be sub-classed has been added. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-05-15Correctly handle forward DIE references in scannerTom Tromey1-0/+102
The cooked index scanner has special code to handle forward DIE references. However, a bug report lead to the discovery that this code does not work -- the "deferred_entry::spec_offset" field is written to but never used, i.e., the lookup is done using the wrong key. This patch fixes the bug and adds a regression test. The test in the bug itself used a thread_local variable, which provoked a failure at runtime. This test instead uses "maint print objfiles" and then inspects to ensure that the entry in question has a parent. This lets us avoid a clang dependency in the test. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30271
2023-05-13Fix bad interaction between element limit and repeated values (BZ#24331).Paul Pluzhnikov2-1/+16
Currently print -elements=3 -- "AAAAAA" prints complete string, which is not what the user asked for. Fix two buggy tests exposed by the fix, and add a new test. Reviewed-by: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
2023-05-12Fix regression due to Pragma Import seriesTom Tromey3-0/+14
A co-worker here at AdaCore discovered that the Pragma Import series caused a rgression. When debugging gnat1, gdb started asking for overload resolution like: (gdb) call pp(n) Multiple matches for pp [0] cancel [1] pp (types.union_id) at ../../gcc/gcc/ada/treepr.adb:511 [2] treepr.pp (types.union_id) at ../../gcc/gcc/ada/treepr.adb:511 This worked before the series, and is strange anyway, because the matches refer to the same function. This patch adds a test case for this situation and fixes the bug by pruning identical functions in remove_extra_symbols.
2023-05-12Handle Ada Pragma Import and Pragma ExportTom Tromey8-4/+189
Ada can import C APIs and also export Ada constructs to C via Pragma Import and Pragma Export. This patch adds support for these to gdb, by arranging to either defer some aspects of a symbol to the underlying C symbol (for Import) or by introducing a second symbol (for Export). A somewhat tricky approach is needed, both because gdb doesn't generally handle symbol aliasing, and because Ada treats symbol names in an unusual way (as compared to the rest of gdb).
2023-05-12Implement DAP register scopeTom Tromey1-2/+16
I noticed that gdb's DAP code did not provide a way to see register values. DAP defines a "register" scope, which this patch implements. This patch also adds the missing (and optional) "presentationHint" to scopes.
2023-05-12Fix calling debuginfo-less functions in AdaTom Tromey5-1/+112
A co-worker at AdaCore noticed that calling a function without debuginfo yields: (gdb) print plus_one(23) 'pck.plus_one' has unknown return type; cast the call to its declared return type However, this also happens if you follow the directions and add the cast. This patch fixes the problem and adds a regression test.
2023-05-12gdb/python: implement DisassemblerResult.__str__ methodAndrew Burgess2-0/+13
Add the DisassemblerResult.__str__ method. This gives the same result as the DisassemblerResult.string attribute, but can be useful sometimes depending on how the user is trying to print the object. There's a test for the new functionality.
2023-05-12gdb/python: implement __repr__ methods for py-disasm.c typesAndrew Burgess2-0/+52
Add a __repr__ method for the DisassembleInfo and DisassemblerResult types, and add some tests for these new methods.
2023-05-12gdb/testsuite: extend special '^' handling to gdb_test_multipleAndrew Burgess7-28/+39
The commit: commit 08ec06d6440745ef9204d39197aa1e732df41056 Date: Wed Mar 29 10:41:07 2023 +0100 gdb/testsuite: special case '^' in gdb_test pattern Added some special handling of '^' to gdb_test -- a leading '^' will cause the command regexp to automatically be included in the expected output pattern. It was pointed out that the '-wrap' flag of gdb_test_multiple is supposed to work in the same way as gdb_test, and that the recent changes for '^' had not been replicated for gdb_test_multiple. This patch addresses this issue. So, after this commit, the following two constructs should have the same meaning: gdb_test "command" "^output" "test name" gdb_test_multiple "command" "test name" { -re -wrap "^output" { pass $gdb_test_name } } In both cases the '^' will case gdb.exp to inject a regexp that matches 'command' after the '^' and before the 'output', this is in addition to adding the $gdb_prompt pattern after 'output' in the normal way. The special '^' handling is only applied when '-wrap' is used, as this is the only mode that aims to mimic gdb_test. While working on this patch I realised that I could actually improve the logic for the special '^' handling in the case where the expected output pattern is empty. I replicated these updates for both gdb_test and gdb_test_multiple in order to keep these two paths in sync. There were a small number of tests that needed adjustment after this change, mostly just removing command regexps that are now added automatically, but the gdb.base/settings.exp case was a little weird as it turns out trying to match a single blank line is probably harder now than it used to be -- still, I suspect this is a pretty rare case, so I think the benefits (improved anchoring) outweigh this small downside (IMHO).
2023-05-12gdb: fix error message for $_gdb_maint_settingAndrew Burgess1-0/+15
I spotted this behaviour: (gdb) p $_gdb_maint_setting("xxx") First argument of $_gdb_maint_setting must be a valid setting of the 'show' command. Notice that GDB claims I need to use a setting from the 'show' command, which isn't correct for $_gdb_maint_setting, in this case I need to use a setting from 'maintenance show'. This same issue is present for $_gdb_maint_setting_str. This commit fixes this minor issue. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-05-12[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/opt-out-not-implptr.exp for -m32Tom de Vries1-7/+45
When running test-case gdb.dwarf2/opt-out-not-implptr.exp with target board unix/-m32 we have: ... (gdb) print noptr^M $1 = {0, <optimized out>, <optimized out>, <optimized out>}^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/opt-out-not-implptr.exp: print noptr ... The problem happens when evaluating this dwarf expression: ... <45> DW_AT_location : 13 byte block: 10 86 ea d7 d0 96 8e cf 92 5c 9f 93 8 \ (DW_OP_constu: 6639779683436459270; DW_OP_stack_value; DW_OP_piece: 8) ... The DW_OP_constu pushes a value with "generic type" on to the DWARF stack, and the "generic type" has the size of an address on the target machine, which for target board unix/-m32 is 4 bytes. Consequently, the constant is abbreviated. Next, the DW_OP_piece declares that the resulting 4-byte value is 8 bytes large, and we hit this clause in rw_pieced_value: ... /* Use zeroes if piece reaches beyond stack value. */ if (p->offset + p->size > stack_value_size_bits) break; ... and consequently get a zero. We could just add require is_target_64 to the test-case, but instead, add a 32-bit case and require is_target_64 just for the 64-bit case. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-05-12[gdb/testsuite] Make is_64_target more robustTom de Vries1-1/+8
I ran test-case gdb.dwarf2/opt-out-not-implptr.exp with make-check-all.sh, and with target board dwarf64 ran into: ... FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/opt-out-not-implptr.exp: print noptr ... due to is_target_64 failing because of: ... builtin_spawn -ignore SIGHUP gcc -fno-stack-protector \ -fdiagnostics-color=never -w -c -gdwarf64 -g -o is_64_target.o \ is_64_target.c^M gcc: error: '-gdwarf64' is ambiguous; use '-gdwarf-64' for DWARF version or \ '-gdwarf -g64' for debug level^M compiler exited with status 1 ... The FAIL is the same FAIL I run into with target board unix/-m32: is_target_64 fails for both cases. The reason that is_target_64 is failing for target board dwarf64, is because of using system compiler 7.5.0 which doesn't support -gdwarf64. Fix this by making is_target_64 use nodebug instead of debug for compilation. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-05-12[gdb/cli] Fix wrapping for TERM=ansiTom de Vries2-12/+0
I. Auto-detected width (xterm vs. ansi) Say we have a terminal with a width of 40 chars: ... $ echo $COLUMNS 40 ... With TERM=xterm, we report a width of 40 chars: ... $ TERM=xterm gdb (gdb) show width Number of characters gdb thinks are in a line is 40. ... And with TERM=ansi, a width of 39 chars: ... $ TERM=ansi gdb (gdb) show width Number of characters gdb thinks are in a line is 39. ... Gdb uses readline to auto-detect screen size, and readline decides in the TERM=ansi case that the terminal does not have reliable auto-wrap, and consequently decides to hide the last terminal column from the readline user (in other words GDB), hence we get 39 instead of 40. II. Types of wrapping Looking a bit more in detail inside gdb, it seems there are two types of wrapping: - readline wrapping (in other words, prompt edit wrapping), and - gdb output wrapping (can be observed by issuing "info sources"). This type of wrapping attempts to wrap some of the gdb output earlier than the indicated width, to not break lines in inconvenient places. III. Readline wrapping, auto-detected screen size Let's investigate readline wrapping with the auto-detected screen widths. First, let's try with xterm: ... $ TERM=xterm gdb (gdb) 7890123456789012345678901234567890 123 ... That looks as expected, wrapping occurs after 40 chars. Now, let's try with ansi: ... $ TERM=ansi gdb (gdb) 78901234567890123456789012345678 90123 ... It looks like wrapping occurred after 38, while readline should be capable of wrapping after 39 chars. This is caused by readline hiding the last column, twice. In more detail: - readline detects the screen width: 40, - readline hides the last column, setting the readline screen width to 39, - readline reports 39 to gdb as screen width, - gdb sets its width setting to 39, - gdb sets readline screen width to 39, - readline hides the last column, again, setting the readline screen width to 38. This is reported as PR cli/30346. IV. gdb output wrapping, auto-detected screen size Say we set the terminal width to 56. With TERM=xterm, we have: ... /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.31/csu/elf-init.c, /data/vries/hello.c, ... but with TERM=ansi: ... /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.31/csu/elf-init.c, / data/vries/hello.c, ... So what happened here? With TERM=ansi, the width setting is auto-detected to 55, and gdb assumes the terminal inserts a line break there, which it doesn't because the terminal width is 56. This is reported as PR cli/30411. V. Fix PRs Fix both mentioned PRs by taking into account the hidden column when readline reports the screen width in init_page_info, and updating chars_per_line accordingly. Note that now we report the same width for both TERM=xterm and TERM=ansi, which is much clearer. The point where readline respectively expects or ensures wrapping is still indicated by "maint info screen", for xterm: ... Number of characters readline reports are in a line is 40. ... and ansi: ... Number of characters readline reports are in a line is 39. ... VI. Testing PR cli/30346 is covered by existing regression tests gdb.base/wrap-line.exp and gdb.tui/wrap-line.exp, so remove the KFAILs there. I didn't manage to come up with a regression test for PR cli/30411. Perhaps that would be easier if we had a maintenance command that echoes its arguments while applying gdb output wrapping. Tested on x86_64-linux. PR cli/30346 PR cli/30411 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30346 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30411
2023-05-11Do not print <synthetic pointer> when piece is optimized outTom Tromey2-2/+78
A user reported a bug where printing a certain array of integer types would result in the nonsensical: (gdb) p l_126 $1 = {6639779683436459270, <synthetic pointer>, <synthetic pointer>, <synthetic pointer>} I tracked this down to some issues in the DWARF expression code. First, check_pieced_synthetic_pointer did not account for the situation where a location expression does not describe all the bits of a value -- in this case it returned true, meaning there is a synthetic pointer, but in fact these bits are optimized out. (It turns out this incorrect output had already been erroneously tested for as well.) Next, rw_pieced_value did not mark these bits as optimized-out, either. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30296
2023-05-11gdb/testsuite: Match file size in gdb.debuginfod/crc_mismatch.expAaron Merey1-1/+1
gdb's debuginfod progress messages include the size of the file being downloaded if the size information is available at the time the message is printed. For example: Downloading 10 MB separate debug info for /lib64/libxyz.so This size information is omitted if it's not available at the time of printing: Downloading separate debug info for /lib64/libxyz.so A pattern in crc_mismatch.exp fails to be matched if a progress message includes a file size. Add a wildcard to the pattern so that it matches the progress message whether or not it includes the file size.
2023-05-11Disable out-of-scope watchpointsJohnson Sun3-0/+102
Currently, when a local software watchpoint goes out of scope, GDB sets the watchpoint's disposition to `delete at next stop' and then normal stops (i.e., stop and wait for the next GDB command). When GDB normal stops, it automatically deletes the breakpoints with their disposition set to `delete at next stop'. Suppose a Python script decides not to normal stop when a local software watchpoint goes out of scope, the watchpoint will not be automatically deleted even when its disposition is set to `delete at next stop'. Since GDB single-steps the program and tests the watched expression after each instruction, not deleting the watchpoint causes the watchpoint to be hit many more times than it should, as reported in PR python/29603. This was happening because the watchpoint is not deleted or disabled when going out of scope. This commit fixes this issue by disabling the watchpoint when going out of scope. It also adds a test to ensure this feature isn't regressed in the future. Calling `breakpoint_auto_delete' on all kinds of stops (in `fetch_inferior_event') seem to solve this issue, but is in fact inappropriate, since `breakpoint_auto_delete' goes over all breakpoints instead of just going through the bpstat chain (which only contains the breakpoints that were hit right now). Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29603 Change-Id: Ia85e670b2bcba2799219abe4b6be3b582387e383
2023-05-10[gdb/tui] Fix tui compact-source a bit moreTom de Vries1-15/+28
Andrew pointed out that the behaviour as tested in gdb.tui/compact-source.exp is incorrect: ... 0 +-compact-source.c--------------------------------------------------------+ 1 |___3_{ | 2 |___4_ return 0; | 3 |___5_} | 4 |___6_ | 5 |___7_ | 6 |___8_ | 7 |___9_ | 8 +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ... The last line number in the source file is 5, and there are 7 lines to display source lines, so if we'd scroll all the way down, the first line number in the source window would be 5, and the last one would be 11. To represent 11 we'd need 2 digits, so we expect to see ___04_ here instead of ___4_, even though all line numbers currently in the src window (3-9) can be represented with only 1 digit. Fix this in tui_source_window::set_contents, by updating the computation of max_line_nr: ... - int max_line_nr = std::max (lines_in_file, last_line_nr_in_window); + int max_line_nr = lines_in_file + nlines - 1; ... Tested on x86_64-linux. Co-Authored-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-05-10gdb/rust: fix crash for expression debug with stringsAndrew Burgess1-0/+21
While working on another patch I did this: (gdb) set debug expression 1 (gdb) set language rust (gdb) p "foo" Operation: OP_AGGREGATE Type: &str Fatal signal: Segmentation fault ... etc ... The problem is that the second field of the rust_aggregate_operation is created as a nullptr, this can be seen in rust-parse.c. in the function rust_parser::parse_string(). However, in expop.h, in the function dump_for_expression, we make the assumption that the expressions will never be nullptr. I did consider moving the nullptr handling into a new function rust_aggregate_operation::dump, however, as the expression debug dumping code is not exercised as much as it might be, I would rather that this code be hardened and able to handle a nullptr without crashing, so I propose that we add nullptr handling into the general dump_for_expression function. The behaviour is now: (gdb) set debug expression 1 (gdb) set language rust (gdb) p "foo" Operation: OP_AGGREGATE Type: &str nullptr Vector: String: data_ptr Operation: UNOP_ADDR Operation: OP_STRING String: foo String: length Operation: OP_LONG Type: usize Constant: 3 evaluation of this expression requires the target program to be active (gdb) There's a new test to check for this case. Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-05-10[gdb/tui] Fix tui compact-sourceTom de Vries1-0/+61
Consider a hello.c, with less than 10 lines: ... $ wc -l hello.c 8 hello.c ... and compiled with -g into an a.out. With compact-source off: ... $ gdb -q a.out \ -ex "set tui border-kind ascii" \ -ex "maint set tui-left-margin-verbose on" \ -ex "set tui compact-source off" \ -ex "tui enable" ... we get: ... +-./data/hello.c-----------------------+ |___000005_{ | |___000006_ printf ("hello\n"); | |___000007_ return 0; | |___000008_} | |___000009_ | |___000010_ | |___000011_ | ... but with compact-source on: ... +-./data/hello.c-----------------------+ |___5{ | |___6 printf ("hello\n"); | |___7 return 0; | |___8} | |___9 | |___1 | |___1 | ... There are a couple of problems with compact-source. First of all the documentation mentions: ... The default display uses more space for line numbers and starts the source text at the next tab stop; the compact display uses only as much space as is needed for the line numbers in the current file, and only a single space to separate the line numbers from the source. ... The bit about the default display and the next tab stop looks incorrect. The source doesn't start at a tab stop, instead it uses a single space to separate the line numbers from the source. Then the documentation mentions that there's single space in the compact display, but evidently that's missing. Then there's the fact that the line numbers "10" and "11" are both abbreviated to "1" in the compact case. The abbreviation is due to allocating space for <lines in source>, which is 8 for this example, and takes a single digit. The line numbers though continue past the end of the file, so fix this by allocating space for max (<lines in source>, <last line in window>), which in this example takes 2 digits. The missing space is due to some confusion about what the "1" here in tui_source_window::set_contents represent: ... double l = log10 ((double) offsets->size ()); m_digits = 1 + (int) l; ... It could be the trailing space that's mentioned in tui-source.h: ... /* How many digits to use when formatting the line number. This includes the trailing space. */ int m_digits; ... Then again, it could be part of the calculation for the number of digits needed for printing. With this minimal example: ... int main () { for (int i = 8; i <= 11; ++i) { double l = log10 ((double) i); printf ("%d %d\n", i, (int)l); } return 0; } ... we get: ... $ ./a.out 8 0 9 0 10 1 11 1 ... which shows that the number of digits needed for printing i is "1 + (int)log10 ((double) i)". Fix this by introducing named variables needed_digits and trailing_space, each adding 1. With the fixes, we get for compact-source on: ... +-./data/hello.c-----------------------+ |___05_{ | |___06_ printf ("hello\n"); | |___07_ return 0; | |___08_} | |___09_ | |___10_ | |___11_ | |... Also fix the documentation and help text to actually match effect of compact-source. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-05-08gdb: Avoid warning for the jump command inside an inline function.Felix Willgerodt2-0/+74
When stopped inside an inline function, trying to jump to a different line of the same function currently results in a warning about jumping to another function. Fix this by taking inline functions into account. Before: Breakpoint 1, function_inline (x=510) at jump-inline.cpp:22 22 a = a + x; /* inline-funct */ (gdb) j 21 Line 21 is not in `function_inline(int)'. Jump anyway? (y or n) After: Breakpoint 2, function_inline (x=510) at jump-inline.cpp:22 22 a = a + x; /* inline-funct */ (gdb) j 21 Continuing at 0x400679. Breakpoint 1, function_inline (x=510) at jump-inline.cpp:21 21 a += 1020 + a; /* increment-funct */ This was regression-tested on X86-64 Linux. Co-Authored-by: Cristian Sandu <cristian.sandu@intel.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2023-05-06Allow pretty-print of static membersTom Tromey2-0/+16
Python pretty-printers haven't applied to static members for quite some time. I tracked this down to the call to cp_print_value_fields in cp_print_static_field -- it doesn't let pretty-printers have a chance to print the value. This patch fixes the problem. The way that static members are handled is very weird to me. I tend to think this should be done more globally, like in value_print. However, I haven't made any big change. Reviewed-by: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> Tested-by: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30057
2023-05-05Filter out types from DAP scopes requestTom Tromey1-6/+6
The DAP scopes request examines the symbols in a block tree, but neglects to omit types. This patch fixes the problem.
2023-05-05gdb/testsuite: more newline pattern cleanupAndrew Burgess5-9/+9
After this commit: commit e2f620135d92f7cd670af4e524fffec7ac307666 Date: Thu Mar 30 13:26:25 2023 +0100 gdb/testsuite: change newline patterns used in gdb_test It was pointed out in PR gdb/30403 that the same patterns can be found in other lib/gdb.exp procs and that it would probably be a good idea if these procs remained in sync with gdb_test. Actually, the bug specifically calls out gdb_test_multiple when using with '-wrap', but I found a couple of other locations in gdb_continue_to_breakpoint, gdb_test_multiline, get_valueof, and get_local_valueof. In all these locations one or both of the following issues are addressed: 1. A leading pattern of '[\r\n]*' is pointless. If there is a newline it will be matched, but if there is not then the testsuite doesn't care. Also, as expect is happy to skip non-matched output at the start of a pattern, if there is a newline expect is happy to skip over it before matching the rest. As such, this leading pattern is removed. 2. Using '\[\r\n\]*$gdb_prompt' means that we will swallow unexpected blank lines at the end of a command's output, but also, if the pattern from the test script ends with a '\r', '\n', or '.' then these will partially match the trailing newline, with the remainder of the newline matched by the pattern from gdb.exp. This split matching doesn't add any value, it's just something that has appeared as a consequence of how gdb.exp was originally written. In this case the '\[\r\n\]*' is replaced with '\r\n'. I've rerun the testsuite and fixed the regressions that I saw, these were places where GDB emits a blank line at the end of the command output, which we now need to explicitly match in the test script, this was for: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-out-of-range-end-of-seq.exp gdb.guile/guile.exp gdb.python/python.exp Or a location where the test script was matching part of the newline sequence, while gdb.exp was previously matching the remainder of the newline sequence. Now we rely on gdb.exp to match the complete newline sequence, this was for: gdb.base/commands.exp Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30403
2023-05-05[gdb/testsuite] Generate long string in gdb.base/page.expTom de Vries1-1/+1
I noticed in gdb.base/page.exp: ... set fours [string repeat 4 40] ... but then shortly afterwards: ... [list 1\r\n 2\r\n 3\r\n 444444444444444444444444444444] ... Summarize the long string in the same way using string repeat: ... [list 1\r\n 2\r\n 3\r\n [string repeat 4 30]] ... Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-05-05gdb/testsuite: tighten patterns in build-id-no-debug-warning.expAndrew Burgess1-2/+4
Tighten the expected output pattern in the test script: gdb.debuginfod/build-id-no-debug-warning.exp While working on some other patch I broke GDB such that this warning: warning: "FILENAME": separate debug info file has no debug info (which is generated in build-id.c) didn't actually include the FILENAME any more -- yet this test script continued to pass. It turns out that this script doesn't actually check for FILENAME. This commit extends the test pattern to check for the full warning string, including FILENAME, and also removes some uses of '.*' to make the test stricter.
2023-05-05[gdb/testsuite] Add gdb.base/wrap-line.expTom de Vries1-0/+169
Add a test-case that tests prompt edit wrapping in CLI, both for TERM=xterm and TERM=ansi, both with auto-detected and hard-coded width. In the TERM=ansi case with auto-detected width we run into PR cli/30346, so add a KFAIL for that failure mode. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-05-05[gdb/testsuite] Add gdb.tui/wrap-line.expTom de Vries2-14/+188
Add a test-case that tests prompt edit wrapping behaviour in the tuiterm, both for CLI and TUI, both with auto-detected and hard-coded width. In the CLI case with auto-detected width we run into PR cli/30411, so add a KFAIL for that failure mode. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-05-04Revert "gdb/testsuite: add KFAILs to gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp"Bruno Larsen1-15/+0
This reverts commit 476410b3bca1389ee69e9c8fa18aaee16793a56d. One of Simon's recent commits (2a740b3ba4c9f39c86dd75e0914ee00942cab471) changed the way recording a remote target works and fixed the underlying issue of the bug, so the KFails can be removed from the test. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-05-04Don't treat references to compound values as "simple".Gareth Rees3-1/+130
SUMMARY The '--simple-values' argument to '-stack-list-arguments' and similar GDB/MI commands does not take reference types into account, so that references to arbitrarily large structures are considered "simple" and printed. This means that the '--simple-values' argument cannot be used by IDEs when tracing the stack due to the time taken to print large structures passed by reference. DETAILS Various GDB/MI commands ('-stack-list-arguments', '-stack-list-locals', '-stack-list-variables' and so on) take a PRINT-VALUES argument which may be '--no-values' (0), '--all-values' (1) or '--simple-values' (2). In the '--simple-values' case, the command is supposed to print the name, type, and value of variables with simple types, and print only the name and type of variables with compound types. The '--simple-values' argument ought to be suitable for IDEs that need to update their user interface with the program's call stack every time the program stops. However, it does not take C++ reference types into account, and this makes the argument unsuitable for this purpose. For example, consider the following C++ program: struct s { int v[10]; }; int sum(const struct s &s) { int total = 0; for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) total += s.v[i]; return total; } int main(void) { struct s s = { { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 } }; return sum(s); } If we start GDB in MI mode and continue to 'sum', the behaviour of '-stack-list-arguments' is as follows: (gdb) -stack-list-arguments --simple-values ^done,stack-args=[frame={level="0",args=[{name="s",type="const s &",value="@0x7fffffffe310: {v = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}}"}]},frame={level="1",args=[]}] Note that the value of the argument 's' was printed, even though 's' is a reference to a structure, which is not a simple value. See https://github.com/microsoft/MIEngine/pull/673 for a case where this behaviour caused Microsoft to avoid the use of '--simple-values' in their MIEngine debug adapter, because it caused Visual Studio Code to take too long to refresh the call stack in the user interface. SOLUTIONS There are two ways we could fix this problem, depending on whether we consider the current behaviour to be a bug. 1. If the current behaviour is a bug, then we can update the behaviour of '--simple-values' so that it takes reference types into account: that is, a value is simple if it is neither an array, struct, or union, nor a reference to an array, struct or union. In this case we must add a feature to the '-list-features' command so that IDEs can detect that it is safe to use the '--simple-values' argument when refreshing the call stack. 2. If the current behaviour is not a bug, then we can add a new option for the PRINT-VALUES argument, for example, '--scalar-values' (3), that would be suitable for use by IDEs. In this case we must add a feature to the '-list-features' command so that IDEs can detect that the '--scalar-values' argument is available for use when refreshing the call stack. PATCH This patch implements solution (1) as I think the current behaviour of not printing structures, but printing references to structures, is contrary to reasonable expectation. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29554
2023-05-02gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp: Always initialize wpoffset_to_wpnumAlexandra Hájková1-1/+2
Initialize wpoffset_to_wpnumto avoid TCL error which happens in some aarch64 types. ERROR: in testcase /root/build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp ERROR: can't read "wpoffset_to_wpnum(1)": no such element in array ERROR: tcl error code TCL READ VARNAME ERROR: tcl error info: can't read "wpoffset_to_wpnum(1)": no such element in array while executing Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30340 Reviewed-by: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Reviewed-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2023-05-02[gdb/testsuite] Use set in lmap in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-abs-hi-pc.expTom de Vries1-1/+1
In gdb.dwarf2/dw2-abs-hi-pc.exp we do: ... set sources [lmap i $sources { expr { "$srcdir/$subdir/$i" } }] ... The use of expr is not idiomatic. Fix this by using set instead: ... set sources [lmap i $sources { set tmp $srcdir/$subdir/$i }] ... Reported-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Reviewed-By: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
2023-05-02gdb/testsuite: compile gdb.linespec/cp-completion-aliases.exp as C++Andrew Burgess1-1/+1
Noticed in passing that the prepare_for_testing call in gdb.linespec/cp-completion-aliases.exp does not pass the 'c++' flag, despite this being a C++ test. I guess, as the source file has the '.cc' extension, all the compilers are doing the right thing anyway -- the source file uses templates, so is definitely being compiled as C++. I noticed this when I tried to set CXX_FOR_TARGET (but not CC_FOR_TARGET) and spotted that this script was still using the C compiler. Fixed in this commit by adding the 'c++' flag for prepare_for_testing.