aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2025-06-01[gdb/tdep] Fix gdb.ada/finish-var-size.exp on ppc64le-linuxTom de Vries1-1/+7
On openSUSE Tumbleweed ppc64le-linux using gcc 14.3.0, with a gdb 16.3 based package and test-case gdb.ada/finish-var-size.exp, I run into: ... (gdb) finish^M Run till exit from #0 pck.get (value=true) at pck.adb:19^M 0x0000000100004a20 in p () at finish-var-size/p.adb:18^M 18 V : Result_T := Get (True);^M Value returned is $1 = <error reading variable: \ Cannot access memory at address 0x0>^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/finish-var-size.exp: finish ... Function pck.get returns type Result_T: ... type Array_Type is array (1 .. 64) of Integer; type Maybe_Array (Defined : Boolean := False) is record Arr : Array_Type; Arr2 : Array_Type; end record; type Result_T (Defined : Boolean := False) is record case Defined is when False => Arr : Maybe_Array; when True => Payload : Boolean; end case; end record; ... and uses r3 as address of the return value, which means RETURN_VALUE_STRUCT_CONVENTION, but while executing finish_command we do: ... return_value = gdbarch_return_value_as_value (gdbarch, read_var_value (sm->function, nullptr, callee_frame), val_type, nullptr, nullptr, nullptr); ... and get: ... (gdb) p return_value $1 = RETURN_VALUE_REGISTER_CONVENTION ... This is caused by this check in ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value: ... /* In the ELFv2 ABI, aggregate types of up to 16 bytes are returned in registers r3:r4. */ if (tdep->elf_abi == POWERPC_ELF_V2 && valtype->length () <= 16 ... which succeeds because valtype->length () == 0. Fix this by also checking for !TYPE_HAS_DYNAMIC_LENGTH (valtype). [ I also tested a version of this patch using "!is_dynamic_type (valtype)" instead, but ran into a regression in test-case gdb.ada/variant-record.exp, because type T: ... Length : constant Positive := 8; subtype Name_T is String (1 .. Length); type A_Record_T is record X1 : Natural; X2 : Natural; end record; type Yes_No_T is (Yes, No); type T (Well : Yes_No_T := Yes) is record case Well is when Yes => Name : Name_T; when No => Unique_Name : A_Record_T; end case; end record; ... while being dynamic, also has a non-zero size, and is small enough to be returned in registers r3:r4. ] Fixing this causes the test-case to fail with the familiar: ... warning: Cannot determine the function return value. Try compiling with -fvar-tracking. ... and indeed using -fvar-tracking makes the test-case pass. Tested on ppc64le-linux. PR tdep/33000 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33000
2025-05-29Fix build when RUSAGE_THREAD is not available & add warningPedro Alves1-0/+34
Building current GDB on Cygwin, fails like so: /home/pedro/gdb/src/gdbsupport/run-time-clock.cc: In function ‘void get_run_time(user_cpu_time_clock::time_point&, system_cpu_time_clock::time_point&, run_time_scope ’: /home/pedro/gdb/src/gdbsupport/run-time-clock.cc:52:13: error: ‘RUSAGE_THREAD’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘SIGEV_THREAD’? 52 | who = RUSAGE_THREAD; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ | SIGEV_THREAD Cygwin does not implement RUSAGE_THREAD. Googling around, I see Cygwin is not alone, other platforms don't support it either. For example, here is someone suggesting an alternative for darwin/macos: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5652463/equivalent-to-rusage-thread-darwin Fix this by falling back to process scope if thread scope can't be supported. I chose this instead of returning zero usage or some other constant, because if gdb is built without threading support, then process-scope run time usage is the right info to return. But instead of falling back silently, print a warning (just once), like so: (gdb) maint set per-command time on ⚠️ warning: per-thread run time information not available on this platform ... so that developers on other platforms at least have a hint upfront. This new warning also shows on platforms that don't have getrusage in the first place, but does not show if the build doesn't support threading at all. New tests are added to gdb.base/maint.exp, to expect the warning, and also to ensure other "mt per-command" sub commands don't trigger the new warning. Change-Id: Ie01b916b62f87006f855e31594a5ac7cf09e4c02 Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-26gdb/testsuite: Clarify -lbl option in gdb_test_multipleThiago Jung Bauermann1-1/+4
I was a bit confused about the -lbl option in gdb_test_multiple, and needed to read its implementation to determine that it would be useful for my needs. Explicitly mention what the option does and why it's useful to hopefully help other developers. Reviewed-By: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2025-05-26gdb/testsuite: Fix flakiness in gdb.base/default.expThiago Jung Bauermann1-60/+147
The Linaro CI runs the GDB testsuite using the read1 tool, which significantly increases the time it takes DejaGNU to read inferior output. On top of that sometimes the test machine has higher than normal load, which causes tests to run even slower. Because gdb.base/default.exp tests some verbose commands such as "info set", it sometimes times out while waiting for the complete command output when running in the Linaro CI environment. Fix this problem by consuming each line of output from the most verbose commands with gdb_test_multiple's -lbl (line-by-line) option — which causes DejaGNU to reset the timeout after each match — and also by breaking up regular expressions that try to match more than 2000 characters (the default Expect buffer size) in one go into multiple matches. Some tests use the same regular expression, so I created a procedure for them. This is the case for "i" / "info", "info set" / "show", and "set print" tests. The tests for "show print" don't actually test their output, so this patch improves them by checking some lines of the output. Reviewed-By: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2025-05-23[gdb/testsuite] Add gdb.dwarf2/fission-dw-form-strx.expTom de Vries3-8/+117
Add a dwarf assembly test-case using a DW_FORM_strx in a .dwo file. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2025-05-20[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/dw-form-strx-out-of-bounds.exp with ↵Tom de Vries3-1/+13
make-check-all.sh I forgot to run test-case gdb.dwarf2/dw-form-strx-out-of-bounds.exp with make-check-all.sh, and consequently failed to notice that it fails with for instance target board fission-dwp. The test-case does: ... source $srcdir/$subdir/dw-form-strx.exp.tcl ... and in that tcl file, prepare_for_testing fails, so a -1 is returned, but that is ignored by the source command. Fix this by using require, but rather that testing the result of the source command, communicate success by setting a global variable prepare_for_testing_done. Likewise in gdb.dwarf2/dw-form-strx.exp. Also, the test-case gdb.dwarf2/dw-form-strx-out-of-bounds.exp fails for target board readnow, because the DWARF error occurs during a different command than expected. Fix this by just skipping the test-case in that case. Tested on x86_64-linux. Reported-by: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-20[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.debuginfod codespell-cleanTom de Vries3-4/+4
Make gdb.debuginfod codespell-clean and add the dir to the pre-commit configuration. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-20[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.guile codespell-cleanTom de Vries1-1/+1
Make gdb.guile codespell-clean and add the dir to the pre-commit configuration. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-20[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.mi codespell-cleanTom de Vries4-5/+5
Make gdb.mi codespell-clean and add the dir to the pre-commit configuration. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-20[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.opt codespell-cleanTom de Vries1-1/+1
Make gdb.opt codespell-clean and add the dir to the pre-commit configuration. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-20[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.pascal codespell-cleanTom de Vries1-1/+1
Make gdb.pascal codespell-clean and add the dir to the pre-commit configuration. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-20[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.reverse codespell-cleanTom de Vries3-3/+3
Make gdb.reverse codespell-clean and add the dir to the pre-commit configuration. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-20[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.rocm codespell-cleanTom de Vries1-1/+1
Make gdb.rocm codespell-clean and add the dir to the pre-commit configuration. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-20[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.stabs codespell-cleanTom de Vries1-1/+1
Make gdb.stabs codespell-clean and add the dir to the pre-commit configuration. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-20[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.xml codespell-cleanTom de Vries2-2/+2
Make gdb.xml codespell-clean and add the dir to the pre-commit configuration. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-20[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.tui codespell-cleanTom de Vries2-3/+3
Make gdb.tui codespell-clean and add the dir to the pre-commit configuration. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-20[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdbsever typoTom de Vries2-2/+2
I noticed a typo in the testsuite, twice: gdbsever. Fix these. Codespell doesn't detect it, so add a new file gdb/contrib/codespell-dictionary.txt that contains a gdbsever->gdbserver entry, and update gdb/contrib/setup.cfg to use it. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-15Fix regression with dynamic array boundsTom Tromey2-0/+118
Kévin discovered that commit ba005d32b0f ("Handle dynamic field properties") regressed a test in the internal AdaCore test suite. The problem here is that, when writing that patch, I did not consider the case where an array type's bounds might come from a member of a structure -- but where the array is not defined in the structure's scope. In this scenario the field-resolution logic would trip this condition: /* Defensive programming in case we see unusual DWARF. */ if (fi == nullptr) return nullptr; This patch reworks this area, partly backing out that commit, and fixes the problem. In the new code, I chose to simply duplicate the field's location information. This isn't totally ideal, in that it might result in multiple copies of a baton. However, this seemed nicer than tracking the DIE/field correspondence for every field in every CU -- my thinking here is that this particular dynamic scenario is relatively rare overall. Also, if the baton cost does prove onerous, we could intern the batons somewhere. Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 41. I also tested this using the AdaCore internal test suite. Tested-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2025-05-14testsuite: fix gdb_exit for MinGW targetRohr, Stephan1-1/+2
GDB is not properly exited via 'remote_close host' when running the testsuite in a MinGW environment. Use the 'quit' command to properly exit the GDB debugging session. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-14testsuite: get windows PID on MinGW targetRohr, Stephan1-1/+1
Also translate the MinGW PID to the Windows PID when running on a MinGW target. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-13gdb/python: new gdb.ParameterPrefix classAndrew Burgess1-0/+285
This commit adds a new gdb.ParameterPrefix class to GDB's Python API. When creating multiple gdb.Parameters, it is often desirable to group these together under a sub-command, for example, 'set print' has lots of parameters nested under it, like 'set print address', and 'set print symbol'. In the Python API the 'print' part of these commands are called prefix commands, and are created using gdb.Command objects. However, as parameters are set via the 'set ....' command list, and shown through the 'show ....' command list, creating a prefix for a parameter usually requires two prefix commands to be created, one for the 'set' command, and one for the 'show' command. This often leads to some duplication, or at the very least, each user will end up creating their own helper class to simplify creation of the two prefix commands. This commit adds a new gdb.ParameterPrefix class. Creating a single instance of this class will create both the 'set' and 'show' prefix commands, which can then be used while creating the gdb.Parameter. Here is an example of it in use: gdb.ParameterPrefix('my-prefix', gdb.COMMAND_NONE) This adds 'set my-prefix' and 'show my-prefix', both of which are prefix commands. The user can then add gdb.Parameter objects under these prefixes. The gdb.ParameterPrefix initialise method also supports documentation strings, so we can write: gdb.ParameterPrefix('my-prefix', gdb.COMMAND_NONE, "Configuration setting relating to my special extension.") which will set the documentation string for the prefix command. Also, it is possible to support prefix commands that use the `invoke` functionality to handle unknown sub-commands. This is done by sub-classing gdb.ParameterPrefix and overriding either 'invoke_set' or 'invoke_show' to handle the 'set' or 'show' prefix command respectively. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2025-05-13gdb/guile: generate general description string for parametersAndrew Burgess1-10/+45
This commit builds on the previous one, and auto-generates a general description string for parameters defined via the Guile API. This brings the Guile API closer inline with the Python API. It is worth reading the previous commit to see some motivating examples. This commit updates get_doc_string in guile/scm-param.c to allow for the generation of a general description string. Then in gdbscm_make_parameter, if '#:doc' was not given, get_doc_string is used to generate a suitable default. This does invalidate (and so the commit removes) this comment that was in gdbscm_make_parameter: /* If doc is NULL, leave it NULL. See add_setshow_cmd_full. */ First, Python already does exactly what I'm proposing here, and has done for a while, with no issues reported. And second, I've gone and read add_setshow_cmd_full, and some of the functions it calls, and can see no reasoning behind this comment... ... well, there is one reason that I can think of, but I'll discuss that more below. With this commit, if I define a parameter like this: (use-modules (gdb)) (register-parameter! (make-parameter "print test" #:command-class COMMAND_NONE #:parameter-type PARAM_BOOLEAN)) Then, in GDB, I now see this behaviour: (gdb) help show print test Show the current value of 'print test'. This command is not documented. (gdb) help set print test Set the current value of 'print test'. This command is not documented. (gdb) The two 'This command is not documented.' lines are new. This output is what we get from a similarly defined parameter using the Python API (see the previous commit for an example). I mentioned above that I can think of one reason for the (now deleted) comment in gdbscm_make_parameter about leaving the doc field as NULL, and that is this: consider the following GDB behaviour: (gdb) help show style filename foreground Show the foreground color for this property. (gdb) Notice there is only a single line of output. If I want to get the same behaviour from a parameter defined in Guile, I might try skipping the #:doc argument, but (after this commit), if I do that, GDB will auto-generate some text for me, giving two lines of output (see above). So, next, maybe I try setting #:doc to the empty string, but if I do that, then I get this: (use-modules (gdb)) (register-parameter! (make-parameter "print test" #:doc "" #:command-class COMMAND_NONE #:parameter-type PARAM_BOOLEAN)) (gdb) help show print test Show the current value of 'print test'. (gdb) Notice the blank line, that's not what I wanted. In fact, the only way to get rid of the second line is to leave the 'doc' variable as NULL in gdbscm_make_parameter, which, due to the new auto-generation, is no longer possible. This issue also existed in the Python API, and was addressed in commit: commit 4b68d4ac98aec7cb73a4b276ac7dd38d112786b4 Date: Fri Apr 11 23:45:51 2025 +0100 gdb/python: allow empty gdb.Parameter.__doc__ string After this commit, an empty __doc__ string for a gdb.Parameter is translated into a NULL pointer passed to the add_setshow_* command, which means the second line of output is completely skipped. And this commit includes the same solution for the Guile API. Now, with this commit, and the Guile parameter using an empty '#:doc' string, GDB has the following behaviour: (gdb) help show print test Show the current value of 'print test'. (gdb) This matches the output for a similarly defined parameter in Python.
2025-05-13gdb/guile: improve auto-generated strings for parametersAndrew Burgess1-8/+18
Consider this user defined parameter created in Python: class test_param(gdb.Parameter): def __init__(self, name): super ().__init__(name, gdb.COMMAND_NONE, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN) self.value = True test_param('print test') If this is loaded into GDB, then we observe the following behaviour: (gdb) show print test The current value of 'print test' is "on". (gdb) help show print test Show the current value of 'print test'. This command is not documented. (gdb) help set print test Set the current value of 'print test'. This command is not documented. (gdb) If we now define the same parameter using Guile: (use-modules (gdb)) (register-parameter! (make-parameter "print test" #:command-class COMMAND_NONE #:parameter-type PARAM_BOOLEAN)) And load this into a fresh GDB session, we see the following: (gdb) show print test Command is not documented is off. (gdb) help show print test This command is not documented. (gdb) help set print test This command is not documented. (gdb) The output of 'show print test' doesn't make much sense, and is certainly worse than the Python equivalent. For both the 'help' commands it appears as if the first line is missing, but what is actually happening is that the first line has become 'This command is not documented.', and the second line is then missing. The problems can all be traced back to 'get_doc_string' in guile/scm-param.c. This is the guile version of this function. There is a similar function in python/py-param.c, however, the Python version returns one of three different strings depending on the use case. In contrast, the Guile version just returns 'This command is not documented.' in all cases. The three cases that the Python code handles are, the 'set' string, the 'show' string, and the general 'description' string. Right now the Guile get_doc_string only returns the general 'description' string, which is funny, because, in gdbscm_make_parameter, where get_doc_string is used, the one case that we currently don't need is the general 'description' string. Instead, right now, the general 'description' string is used for both the 'set' and 'show' cases. In this commit I plan to bring the Guile API a little more inline with the Python API. I will update get_doc_string (in scm-param.c) to return either a 'set' or 'show' string, and gdbscm_make_parameter will make use of these strings. The changes to the Guile get_doc_string are modelled on the Python version of this function. It is also worth checking out the next commit, which is related, and helps motivate how the changes have been implemented in this commit. After this commit, the same Guile parameter description shown above, now gives this behaviour: (gdb) show print test The current value of 'print test' is off. (gdb) help show print test Show the current value of 'print test'. (gdb) help set print test Set the current value of 'print test'. (gdb) The 'show print test' output now matches the Python behaviour, and is much more descriptive. The set and show 'help' output are now missing the second line when compared to the Python output, but the first line is now correct, and I think this is better than the previous Guile output. In the next commit I'll address the problem of the missing second line. Existing tests have been updated to expect the new output.
2025-05-13gdb/python: allow empty gdb.Parameter.__doc__ stringAndrew Burgess1-0/+87
I was recently attempting to create some parameters via the Python API. I wanted these parameters to appear similar to how GDB handles the existing 'style' parameters. Specifically, I was interested in this behaviour: (gdb) help show style filename foreground Show the foreground color for this property. (gdb) help set style filename foreground Set the foreground color for this property. (gdb) Notice how each 'help' command only gets a single line of output. I tried to reproduce this behaviour via the Python API and was unable. The problem is that, in order to get just a single line of output like this, the style parameters are registered with a call to add_setshow_color_cmd with the 'help_doc' being passed as nullptr. On the Python side, when parameters are created, the 'help_doc' is obtained with a call to get_doc_string (python/py-param.c). This function either returns the __doc__ string, or a default string: "This command is not documented.". To avoid returning the default we could try setting __doc__ to an empty string, but setting this field to any string means that GDB prints a line for that string, like this: class test_param(gdb.Parameter): __doc__ = "" def __init__(self, name): super ().__init__(name, gdb.COMMAND_NONE, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN) self.value = True test_param('print test') Then in GDB: (gdb) help set print test Set the current value of 'print test'. (gdb) The blank line is the problem I'd like to solve. This commit makes a couple of changes to how parameter doc strings are handled. If the doc string is set to an empty string, then GDB now converts this to nullptr, which removes the blank line problem, the new behaviour in GDB (for the above `test_param`) is: (gdb) help set print test Set the current value of 'print test'. (gdb) Next, I noticed that if the set/show docs are set to empty strings, then the results are less than ideal: class test_param(gdb.Parameter): set_doc = "" def __init__(self, name): super ().__init__(name, gdb.COMMAND_NONE, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN) self.value = True test_param('print test') And in GDB: (gdb) help set print test This command is not documented. (gdb) So, if the set/show docs are the empty string, GDB now forces these to be the default string instead, the new behaviour in GDB is: (gdb) help set print test Set the current value of 'print test'. This command is not documented. (gdb) I've added some additional asserts; the set/show docs should always be non-empty strings, which I believe is the case after this commit. And the 'doc' string returned from get_doc_string should never nullptr, but could be empty. There are new tests to cover all these changes.
2025-05-13gdb/python/guile: check for invalid prefixes in Command/Parameter creationAndrew Burgess4-0/+169
The manual for gdb.Parameter says: If NAME consists of multiple words, and no prefix parameter group can be found, an exception is raised. This makes sense; we cannot create a parameter within a prefix group, if the prefix doesn't exist. And this almost works, so: (gdb) python gdb.Parameter("xxx foo", gdb.COMMAND_NONE, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN) Python Exception <class 'RuntimeError'>: Could not find command prefix xxx. Error occurred in Python: Could not find command prefix xxx. The prefix 'xxx' doesn't exist, and we get an error. But, if we try multiple levels of prefix: (gdb) python gdb.Parameter("print xxx foo", gdb.COMMAND_NONE, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN) This completes without error, however, we didn't get what we were maybe expecting: (gdb) show print xxx foo Undefined show print command: "xxx foo". Try "help show print". But we did get: (gdb) show print foo The current value of 'print foo' is "off". GDB stopped scanning the prefix string at the unknown 'xxx', and just created the parameter there. I don't think this makes sense, nor is it inline with the manual. An identical problem exists with gdb.Command creation; GDB stops parsing the prefix at the first unknown prefix, and just creates the command there. The manual for gdb.Command says: NAME is the name of the command. If NAME consists of multiple words, then the initial words are looked for as prefix commands. In this case, if one of the prefix commands does not exist, an exception is raised. So again, the correct action is, I believe, to raise an exception. The problem is in gdbpy_parse_command_name (python/py-cmd.c), GDB calls lookup_cmd_1 to look through the prefix string and return the last prefix group. If the very first prefix word is invalid then lookup_cmd_1 returns NULL, and this case is handled. However, if there is a valid prefix, followed by an invalid prefix, then lookup_cmd_1 will return a pointer to the last valid prefix list, and will update the input argument to point to the start of the invalid prefix word. This final case, where the input is left pointing to an unknown prefix, was previously not handled. I've fixed gdbpy_parse_command_name, and added tests for command and parameter creation to cover this case. The exact same error is present in the guile API too. The guile documentation for make-parameter and make-command says the same things about unknown prefixes resulting in an exception, but the same error is present in gdbscm_parse_command_name (guile/scm-cmd.c), so I've fixed that too, and added some tests.
2025-05-12[PATCH] Add syscall tests when following/detaching from forkKeith Seitz2-0/+177
breakpoints/13457 discusses issues with syscall catchpoints when following forks, lamenting that there is no coverage for the various permutations of `follow-fork-mode' and `detach-on-fork'. This is an attempt to try and cover some of this ground. Unfortunately the state of syscall support when detaching after the fork is very, very inconsistent across various architectures. [I've tested extensively Fedora/RHEL platforms.] Right now, the only reliable platform to run tests on is x86_64/i?86 for the specific case where we do not detach from the fork. Consequently, this patch limits testing to those architectures. I have updated breakpoints/13457 with my findings on failures with the detaching case. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13457 Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2025-05-12gdb: add '-stopped' and '-running' options to "info threads"Tankut Baris Aktemur3-1/+223
Add two options to "info threads": `-stopped` and `-running`. The purpose of these options is to filter the output of the command. The `-stopped` option means "print stopped threads only" and, similarly, `-running` means "print the running threads only". When both options are provided by the user, the indication is that the user wants the union. That is, the output contains both stopped and running threads. Suppose we have an application with 5 threads, 2 of which have hit a breakpoint. The "info threads" command in the non-stop mode gives: (gdb) info threads Id Target Id Frame * 1 Thread 0x7ffff7d99740 (running) 2 Thread 0x7ffff7d98700 something () at file.c:30 3 Thread 0x7ffff7597700 (running) 4 Thread 0x7ffff6d96700 something () at file.c:30 5 Thread 0x7ffff6595700 (running) (gdb) Using the "-stopped" flag, we get (gdb) info threads -stopped Id Target Id Frame 2 Thread 0x7ffff7d98700 something () at file.c:30 4 Thread 0x7ffff6d96700 something () at file.c:30 (gdb) Using the "-running" flag, we get (gdb) info threads -running Id Target Id Frame * 1 Thread 0x7ffff7d99740 (running) 3 Thread 0x7ffff7597700 (running) 5 Thread 0x7ffff6595700 (running) (gdb) Using both flags prints all: (gdb) info threads -stopped -running Id Target Id Frame * 1 Thread 0x7ffff7d99740 (running) 2 Thread 0x7ffff7d98700 something () at file.c:30 3 Thread 0x7ffff7597700 (running) 4 Thread 0x7ffff6d96700 something () at file.c:30 5 Thread 0x7ffff6595700 (running) (gdb) When combined with a thread ID, filtering applies to those threads that are matched by the ID. (gdb) info threads 3 Id Target Id Frame 3 Thread 0x7ffff7597700 (running) (gdb) info threads -stopped 3 No threads matched. (gdb) Regression-tested on X86_64 Linux. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Reviewed-By: Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com> Approved-by: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net
2025-05-12gdb: update "info threads" output when no threads match the argumentsTankut Baris Aktemur3-4/+4
If "info threads" is provided with the thread ID argument but no such threads matching the thread ID(s) are found, GDB prints No threads match '<ID...>'. Update this output to the more generalized No threads matched. The intention is that the next patch, and potentially future ones, will extend the command with more filter/match arguments. We cannot customize the output to each such argument. Hence, be more generic. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Approved-by: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net
2025-05-06Remove kfail from templates.expTom Tromey1-4/+1
templates.exp has one remaining kfail. However, the output in question has been stabilized ever since the cp-name-parser.y work -- the test just wasn't updated. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8617 Reviewed-By: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
2025-05-06Rewrite bug references in templates.expTom Tromey1-22/+22
templates.exp has many kfails that refer to old GNATS bug numbers. This patch updates them to refer to Bugzilla instead. Reviewed-By: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
2025-05-06Handle field with dynamic bit offsetTom Tromey2-0/+91
I discovered that GCC emitted incorrect DWARF for the test case included in this patch. Eric wrote a fix for GCC, but then he found that gdb crashed on the resulting file. This test has a field that is at a non-constant bit offset from the start of the type. DWARF 5 does not allow for this situation (I've sent a report to the DWARF list), but DWARF 3 did allow for this via a combination of an expression for the byte offset and then the use of DW_AT_bit_offset. This looks like: <5><117a>: Abbrev Number: 17 (DW_TAG_member) <117b> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x1959): another_field ... <1188> DW_AT_bit_offset : 6 <1189> DW_AT_data_member_location: 6 byte block: 99 3d 1 0 0 22 (DW_OP_call4: <0x1193>; DW_OP_plus) ... <3><1193>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_dwarf_procedure) <1194> DW_AT_location : 15 byte block: 97 94 1 37 1a 32 1e 23 7 38 1b 31 1c 23 3 (DW_OP_push_object_address; DW_OP_deref_size: 1; DW_OP_lit7; DW_OP_and; DW_OP_lit2; DW_OP_mul; DW_OP_plus_uconst: 7; DW_OP_lit8; DW_OP_div; DW_OP_lit1; DW_OP_minus; DW_OP_plus_uconst: 3) Now, that combination is not fully general, in that the bit offset must be a constant -- only the byte offset may really vary. However, I couldn't come up with a situation where full generality is needed, mainly because GNAT won't seem to pack fields into the padding of a variable-length array. Meanwhile, the reason for the gdb crash is that the code handling DW_AT_bit_offset assumes that the byte offset is a constant. This causes an assertion failure. This patch arranges for DW_AT_bit_offset to be applied during field resolution, when needed.
2025-05-06Handle dynamic field propertiesTom Tromey2-0/+112
I found a situation where gdb could not properly decode an Ada type. In this first scenario, the discriminant of a type is a bit-field. PROP_ADDR_OFFSET does not handle this situation, because it only allows an offset -- not a bit-size. My original approach to this just added a bit size as well, but after some discussion with Eric Botcazou, we found another failing case: a tagged type can have a second discriminant that appears at a variable offset. So, this patch changes this code to accept a general 'struct field' instead of trying to replicate the field-finding machinery by itself. This is handled at property-evaluation time by simply using a 'field' and resolving its dynamic properties. Then the usual field-extraction function is called to get the value. Because the baton now just holds a field, I renamed PROP_ADDR_OFFSET to PROP_FIELD. The DWARF reader now defers filling in the property baton until the fields have been attached to the type. Finally, I noticed that if the discriminant field has a biased representation, then unpack_field_as_long would not handle this either. This bug is also fixed here, and the test case checks this. Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 41.
2025-05-06gdb/testsuite: Add require allow_hipcc_tests in gdb.rocm/mi-attach.expLancelot SIX1-1/+2
The gdb.rocm/mi-attach.exp test is missing a proper `require` check to ensure that the current configuration can run ROCm tests. This issue has been reported by Baris. This patch adds the missing `allow_hipcc_tests` requirement, and also adds `load_lib rocm.exp` to enable this test. Change-Id: Ie136adfc2d0854268b92af5c4df2dd0334dce259 Reviewed-By: Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-06gdb/testsuite: add gcore_cmd_available predicate procAndrew Burgess7-4/+25
Add a new gcore_cmd_available predicate proc that can be used in a 'requires' line, and make use of it in a few tests. All of the tests I have modified call gdb_gcore_cmd as one of their first actions and exit if the gcore command is not available, so it makes sense (I think) to move the gcore command check into a requires call. There should be no change in what is actually run after this commit.
2025-05-06gdb/python/guile: check if styling is disabled in Color.escape_sequenceAndrew Burgess2-3/+19
I noticed that the gdb.Color.escape_sequence() method would produce an escape sequence even when styling is disabled. I think this is the wrong choice. Ideally, when styling is disabled (e.g. with 'set style enabled off'), GDB should not be producing styled output. If a GDB extension is using gdb.Color to apply styling to the output, then currently, the extension should be checking 'show style enabled' any time Color.escape_sequence() is used. This means lots of code duplication, and the possibility that some locations will be missed, which means disabling styling no longer does what it says. I propose that Color.escape_sequence() should return the empty string if styling is disabled. A Python extension can then do: python c_none = gdb.Color('none') c_red = gdb.Color('red') print(c_red.escape_sequence(True) + "Text in red." + c_none.escape_sequence(True)) end If styling is enable this will print some red text. And if styling is disabled, then it will print text in the terminal's default color. I have applied the same fix to the guile API. I have extended the tests to cover this case. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-05Fix sign of Ada rational constantsTom Tromey2-0/+11
My earlier patch commit 0c03db90 ("Use correct sign in get_mpz") was (very) incorrect. It changed get_mpz to check for a strict sign when examining part of an Ada rational constant. However, in Ada the "delta" for a fixed-point type must be positive, and so the components of the rational representation will be positive. This patch corrects the error. It also renames the get_mpz function, in case anyone is tempted to reuse this code for another purpose. Finally, this pulls over the test from the internal AdaCore test suite that found this issue.
2025-05-02[gdb/testsuite] Simplify gdb.tui/tui-layout-asm.expTom de Vries1-37/+69
On x86_64-cygwin, with test-case gdb.tui/tui-layout-asm.exp I run into: ... WARNING: The following failure is probably due to the TUI window width. See the comments in the test script for more details. FAIL: $exp: scroll to end of assembler (scroll failed) ... The problem is as follows. On the TUI screen, we have: 1 | 0x1004010ff <__gdb_set_unbuffered_output+95> nop | 2 | 0x100401100 <__cxa_atexit> jmp *0x6fc2(%rip) # 0x10040 | ... We send the down key, which should have the effect of scrolling up. So, we expect that the second line moves to the first line. That seems to be the case indeed: ... 1 | 0x100401100 <__cxa_atexit> jmp *0x6fc2(%rip) # 0x1004080c8 <__imp___cxa_ | ... but the line has changed somewhat, so the matching fails. We could increase the width of the screen, as suggested in the test-case, but I think that approach is fragile. Instead, fix this by relaxing the matching: just check that the line before scrolling is fully contained in the line after scrolling, or the other way around. Doing so gets us the next failure: ... FAIL: $exp: scroll to end of assembler (too much assembler) ... The test-case states: ... if { $down_count > 250 } { # Maybe we should accept this as a pass in case a target # really does have loads of assembler to scroll through. fail "$testname (too much assembler)" ... and I agree, so fix this by issuing a pass. This results in the test-case taking ~20 seconds, so reduce the maximum number of scrolls from 250 to 25, bringing that down to ~10 seconds. Tested on x86_64-cygwin and x86_64-linux. PR testsuite/32898 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32898
2025-05-02[gdb/symtab] Throw DWARF error on out-of-bounds DW_FORM_strxTom de Vries1-0/+35
With the test-case contained in the patch, and gdb build with -fsanitize=address we get: ... ==23678==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow ...^M READ of size 1 at 0x6020000c30dc thread T3^[[1m^[[0m^M ptype global_var^M #0 0x2c6a40b in bfd_getl32 bfd/libbfd.c:846^M #1 0x168f96c in read_str_index gdb/dwarf2/read.c:15349^M ... The executable contains an out-of-bounds DW_FORM_strx attribute: ... $ readelf -wi $exec <2eb> DW_AT_name :readelf: Warning: string index of 1 converts to \ an offset of 0xc which is too big for section .debug_str (indexed string: 0x1): <string index too big> ... and read_str_index doesn't check for this: ... info_ptr = (str_offsets_section->buffer + str_offsets_base + str_index * offset_size); if (offset_size == 4) str_offset = bfd_get_32 (abfd, info_ptr); ... and consequently reads out-of-bounds. Fix this in read_str_index by checking for the out-of-bounds condition and throwing a DWARF error: ... (gdb) ptype global_var DWARF Error: Offset from DW_FORM_GNU_str_index or DW_FORM_strx pointing \ outside of .debug_str_offsets section in CU at offset 0x2d7 \ [in module dw-form-strx-out-of-bounds] No symbol "global_var" in current context. (gdb) ... Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-02[gdb/testsuite] Add gdb.dwarf2/dw-form-strx.expTom de Vries3-0/+125
Add a test-case using DW_FORM_strx. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-02Use emoji to indicate errors and warningsTom Tromey1-0/+12
This patch adds, at long last, some emoji output to gdb. In particular, warnings are indicated with the U+26A0 (WARNING SIGN), and errors with U+274C (CROSS MARK). There is a new setting to control whether emoji output can be used. It defaults to "auto", which means emoji will be used if the host charset is UTF-8. Note that disabling styling will also disable emoji, handy for traditionalists. I've refactored mingw console output a little, so that emoji will not be printed to the console. Note the previous code here was a bit strange in that it assumed that the first use of gdb_console_fputs would be to stdout. This version lets the user control the prefixes directly, so different emoji can be chosen if desired. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Reviewed-By: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com>
2025-05-02[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.reverse/time-reverse.exp timeoutTom de Vries1-1/+25
After building gdb with "-O0 -g -fsanitize=thread" on aarch64-linux, with test-case gdb.reverse/time-reverse.exp I run into: ... (gdb) continue^M Continuing.^M FAIL: $exp: mode=c: continue to breakpoint: marker2 (timeout) ... The problem is that instruction stepping gets stuck in a loop with this call stack: time -> __GI___clock_gettime -> __kernel_clock_gettime -> __cvdso_clock_gettime. This is not specific to fsanitize=thread, it just makes gdb slow, which makes instruction stepping slow, which results in the application getting stuck. I ran into this as well with a regular gdb build on a 32-bit i686 laptop with 1GB of memory, an inherently slow setup. In that instance, I was able to observe that the loop we're stuck in is the outer loop in do_coarse in linux kernel source lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c. Fix this by setting "record full insn-number-max" to 2000, and handling running into the limit. Initially I tried the approach of using "stepi 2000" instead of continue, but that made the issue more likely to show up (for instance, I observed it after building gdb with -O0 on aarch64-linux). Tested on aarch64-linux. Approved-By: Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com> PR testsuite/32678 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32678
2025-05-02[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.reverse/time-reverse.exp more robustTom de Vries1-8/+11
I noticed that test-case gdb.reverse/time-reverse.exp contains: ... if [supports_process_record] { # Activate process record/replay gdb_test_no_output "record" "turn on process record" ... So I tried out forcing supports_process_record to 0, and got: ... FAIL: gdb.reverse/time-reverse.exp: mode=syscall: info record FAIL: gdb.reverse/time-reverse.exp: mode=syscall: reverse to marker1 FAIL: gdb.reverse/time-reverse.exp: mode=syscall: check time record FAIL: gdb.reverse/time-reverse.exp: mode=c: info record FAIL: gdb.reverse/time-reverse.exp: mode=c: reverse to marker1 FAIL: gdb.reverse/time-reverse.exp: mode=c: check time record ... Fix this by requiring supports_process_record alongside supports_reverse. I also noticed when running make-check-all.sh that there were a lot of failures with target board dwarf5-fission-debug-types. Fix this by not ignoring the result of "runto marker1". Then I noticed that $srcfile is used as a regexp. Fix this by applying string_to_regexp. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com>
2025-05-02Minor changes to Ada tests for gnat-llvmTom Tromey6-4/+56
I found a few more spots where a minor modification to a test lets it pass with gnat-llvm: * For array_subcript_addr, gnat-llvm was not putting the array into memory. Making the array larger works around this. * For bp_inlined_func, it is normal for gnat-llvm to sometimes emit a call to an out-of-line copy of the function, so accept this. * For null_overload and type-tick-size, I've applied the usual fix for keeping an unused local variable alive.
2025-05-02[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.threads/inf-thr-count.exp more readableTom de Vries1-21/+34
While investigating a timeout in gdb.threads/inf-thr-count.exp I noticed that it uses quite some escaping, resulting in hard-to-parse regexps like "\\\$$::decimal". Fix this by reducing the escaping using: - quoting strings using {} instead of "", and - string_to_regexp. Also use multi_line to split up long multi-line regexps. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2025-05-02[gdb/testsuite] Fix timeout in gdb.threads/inf-thr-count.expTom de Vries1-1/+1
With test-case gdb.threads/inf-thr-count.exp, check-readmore and READMORE_SLEEP=1000 I run into: ... (gdb) set variable spin = 0^M (gdb) ^M Thread 1 "inf-thr-count" hit Breakpoint 2, breakpt () at /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/inf-thr-count.c:49^M 49 }^M FAIL: gdb.threads/inf-thr-count.exp: set 'spin' flag to allow main thread to exit (timeout) PASS: gdb.threads/inf-thr-count.exp: wait for main thread to stop ... Fix this by using -no-prompt-anchor. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2025-04-30[gdb/testsuite] Don't compile read1.so with -fsanitizeTom de Vries1-2/+3
After building gdb with: ... CFLAGS= -O0 -g -fstack-protector-all -fsanitize=thread -fno-exceptions CXXFLAGS= -O0 -g -fstack-protector-all -fsanitize=thread ... when doing: ... $ cd build/gdb $ make check-read1 RUNTESTFLAGS=gdb.threads/clone-attach-detach.exp ... I run into: ... Running /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/clone-attach-detach.exp ... ThreadSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ==4799==ERROR: ThreadSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000000 \ (pc 0x7f636029a947 bp 0x7f635dfbf090 sp 0x7f635dfbf028 T4824) ==4799==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==4799==Hint: address points to the zero page. ThreadSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ThreadSanitizer: nested bug in the same thread, aborting. ... This doesn't happen when doing the same from build/gdb/testsuite, because CFLAGS doesn't get propagated from build/gdb. I'm not sure what is the root cause here, but when building with -fsanitize, I'm interested in running the sanitizer on gdb, not on testsuite utility libraries that are used with expect. Fix this by skipping -fsanitize when compiling read1.so and readmore.so. Tested on x86_64-linux, by rebuilding read1.so and running the test-case. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-04-30[gdb/testsuite] Handle asm frame in gdb.python/py-missing-objfile.expTom de Vries1-0/+10
On arm-linux, with test-case gdb.python/py-missing-objfile.exp I get: ... (gdb) whatis global_exec_var^M type = volatile exec_type^M (gdb) FAIL: $exp: initial sanity check: whatis global_exec_var ... instead of the expected "type = volatile struct exec_type". The problem is that the current language is ASM instead of C, because the inner frame at the point of the core dump has language ASM: ... #0 __libc_do_syscall () at libc-do-syscall.S:47 #1 0xf7882920 in __pthread_kill_implementation () at pthread_kill.c:43 #2 0xf784df22 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at raise.c:26 #3 0xf783f03e in __GI_abort () at abort.c:73 #4 0x009b0538 in dump_core () at py-missing-objfile.c:34 #5 0x009b0598 in main () at py-missing-objfile.c:46 ... Fix this by manually setting the language to C. Tested on arm-linux and x86_64-linux. PR testsuite/32445 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32445
2025-04-29gdb/dwarf: replace some "compile unit" terminology with "unit"Simon Marchi1-1/+1
In DWARF 5 (and even previous versions, with type units), compile units are just one type of units. In many places, we still use "compile units" when in reality it would be better to talk about "units" (unless we specifically want to talk about compile units). Rename comp-unit-head.{c.h} to unit-head.{c,h}, and do a big pass of renames in it to remove the specific mentions of compile units, where in fact we want to talk about units in general. Change-Id: Ia06c90ccb25756c366f269a12620f2f7c8378adb Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-04-29Handle base type without DW_AT_byte_sizeTom Tromey2-1/+21
DWARF says that a base type can have DW_AT_bit_size, without DW_AT_byte_size. However, gdb does not correctly handle this; in fact, it crashes, as pointed out in this LLVM merge request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137123 This patch reworks the base type size logic a bit to handle this situation. Tested-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2025-04-29[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/ptype.exp with gcc 15Tom de Vries1-4/+4
With test-case gdb.base/ptype.exp and gcc 15 I run into: ... (gdb) ptype old_fptr^M type = double (*)(void)^M (gdb) FAIL: $exp: ptype old_fptr (compiler doesn't emit unprototyped types) ... Since C23, non-prototype function declarations are no longer supported, so "double (*old_fptr) ()" is interpreted as "double (*old_fptr) (void)". We could try to fix this by detecting the language dialect used, and accepting the output in that case, but that feels fragile. We could try to fix this by hard-coding the language dialect, but that doesn't work for all compilers. So instead, we opt for the simplest solution: just accept this output, and produce a pass. Tested on aarch64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR testsuite/32756 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32756