aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-11-29[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/vla-optimized-out.exp for ppc64leTom de Vries1-6/+17
On powerpc64le-linux, I run into: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/vla-optimized-out.exp: o1: printed optimized out vla p sizeof (a)^M $2 = <optimized out>^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/vla-optimized-out.exp: o1: \ printed size of optimized out vla ... The problem happens as follows. In order to find the size of the optimized out vla, gdb needs to evaluate: ... <155> DW_AT_upper_bound : 13 byte block: f3 1 53 23 1 8 20 24 8 20 26 31 1c \ (DW_OP_GNU_entry_value: (DW_OP_reg3 (r3)); DW_OP_plus_uconst: 1; DW_OP_const1u: 32; DW_OP_shl; DW_OP_const1u: 32; DW_OP_shra; DW_OP_lit1; DW_OP_minus) ... When trying to evaluate DW_OP_GNU_entry_value, it looks for a call site matching the pc, but doesn't find it: ... $ gdb -q -batch outputs/gdb.base/vla-optimized-out/vla-optimized-out-o1 \ -ex "break f1" -ex run -ex "set debug entry-values 1" -ex "print sizeof (a)" Breakpoint 1 at 0x1000067c: file vla-optimized-out.c, line 34. Breakpoint 1, f1 (i=5) at vla-optimized-out.c:34 34 } DW_OP_entry_value resolving cannot find DW_TAG_call_site 0x100006b0 in main $1 = <optimized out> .... The call site lookup fails because the call site label .LVL4: ... bl f1 # 11 *call_value_nonlocal_aixdi [length = 8] nop .LVL4: ... is not placed directly after the bl insn. This is gcc PR target/107909. However, after manually fixing the .s file we have instead: ... Cannot find matching parameter at DW_TAG_call_site 0x10000690 at main $1 = <optimized out> ... due to the fact that the call site has no call site parameters. The call site does have a reference to the corresponding function f1, with parameter i, for which we find location list entries: ... 0037 1000067c 10000680 (DW_OP_reg3 (r3)) 004a 10000680 10000690 (DW_OP_GNU_entry_value: (DW_OP_reg3 (r3)); DW_OP_stack_value) ... and we could use the fact that the current pc is in the 1000067c-10000680 range, and that that the range starts at the start of the function, to deduce that DW_OP_GNU_entry_value: (DW_OP_reg3 (r3)) == DW_OP_reg3 (r3). But that's a non-trivial enhancement, filed as enhancement PR symtab/29836. Fix this by allowing <optimized out> for target powerpc and the gcc compiler. Reviewed-By: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com> Tested-By: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com> PR testsuite/29813 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29813
2022-11-29gdb/testsuite: make gdb_unload use gdb_test_multipleSimon Marchi4-32/+24
In the failure seen by Philippe here: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20221120173024.3647464-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be/ gdb_unload crashed GDB, leaving no trace in the test results. Change it to use gdb_test_multiple, so that it leaves an UNRESOLVED result. I think it is good practice anyway. Make it return the result of gdb_test_multiple directly, change gdb.python/py-objfile.exp accordingly. Change gdb.base/endian.exp as well to avoid duplicate test names. Change gdb.base/gnu-debugdata.exp to avoid recording a test result, since gdb_unload does it already now. Change-Id: I59a1e4947691330797e6ce23277942547c437a48 Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
2022-11-29gdb/testsuite: make gdb_test_multiple return immediately if send_gdb failsSimon Marchi1-2/+6
In the failure seen by Philippe here: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20221120173024.3647464-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be/ ... the testsuite only outputs PASSes, and an ERROR, resulting from an uncaught exception. This is a bit sneaky, because ERRORs are not reported in the test summary. In certain circumstances, it can be easy to miss. Normally, gdb_test_multiple outputs an UNRESOLVED when GDB crashes. But this is only if it manages to send the command, and it's that command that crashes GDB. Here, the ERROR is due to the fact that GDB had already crashed by the time we entered gdb_test_multiple and tried to send a command. GDB was crashed by the previous "file" command, sent by gdb_unload. Because gdb_unload uses bare expect, it didn't record a test failure when crashing GDB (this will be addressed separately). In this patch, I propose to make gdb_test_multiple call unresolved directly and return -1 send_gdb fails. This way, if GDB is already crashed by the time we enter gdb_test_multiple, it will leave a trace in the test results in the form of an UNRESOLVED. It will also spare us the not-so-useful-in-my-opinion TCL backtrace. Before, it looks like: ERROR: Couldn't send python print(objfile.filename) to GDB. ERROR: : spawn id exp9 not open while executing "expect { -i exp9 -timeout 10 -re ".*A problem internal to GDB has been detected" { fail "$message (GDB internal error)" gdb_internal_error..." ("uplevel" body line 1) invoked from within "uplevel $body" NONE : spawn id exp9 not open And after: Couldn't send python print(objfile.filename) to GDB. UNRESOLVED: gdb.python/py-objfile.exp: objfile.filename after objfile is unloaded Change-Id: I72af8dc0d687826fc3f76911c27a9e5f91b677ba Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from library filesAndrew Burgess11-109/+109
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the testsuite library files (in boards/, config/, and lib/). Previous commits have removed all uses of the 'then' keyword from the test script files, this commit just cleans up the library files. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.*/*.exp scriptsAndrew Burgess29-44/+44
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the remaining gdb.*/*.exp scripts. Previous commits have done the bulk of this removal, this commit just handles the remaining directories that each contain a low number of instances. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.multi/*.expAndrew Burgess9-18/+18
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the gdb.multi/ test script directory. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.fortran/*.expAndrew Burgess23-23/+23
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the gdb.fortran/ test script directory. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.disasm/*.expAndrew Burgess13-26/+26
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the gdb.disasm/ test script directory. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.reverse/*.expAndrew Burgess15-31/+31
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the gdb.reverse/ test script directory. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.trace/*.expAndrew Burgess22-38/+38
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the gdb.trace/ test script directory. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.threads/*.expAndrew Burgess38-60/+60
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the gdb.threads/ test script directory. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.python/*.expAndrew Burgess38-66/+66
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the gdb.python/ test script directory. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.cp/*.expAndrew Burgess66-79/+79
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the gdb.cp/ test script directory. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.arch/*.expAndrew Burgess94-142/+142
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the gdb.arch/ test script directory. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.base/*.expAndrew Burgess216-435/+435
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the gdb.base/ test script directory. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.ada/*.expAndrew Burgess51-55/+55
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the gdb.ada/ test script directory. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove DOS line endings from a test scriptAndrew Burgess1-92/+92
The gdb.fortran/nested-funcs.exp test script has DOS line endings. I can see no reason why this script needs DOS line endings. Convert to UNIX line endings. There should be no change in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28[gdb/testsuite] Require hw watchpoint in gdb.ada/task_watch.expTom de Vries1-0/+2
On powerpc64le-linux I run into: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/task_watch.exp: info tasks before inserting breakpoint watch -location value task 3^M Watchpoint 2: -location value^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/task_watch.exp: watch -location value task 3 continue^M Continuing.^M [Thread 0x7ffff7ccf170 (LWP 65550) exited]^M [Thread 0x7ffff7abf170 (LWP 65551) exited]^M FAIL: gdb.ada/task_watch.exp: continue to watchpoint (timeout) ... On x86_64-linux (where the test-case passes), a hardware watchpoint is used: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/task_watch.exp: info tasks before inserting breakpoint watch -location value task 3^M Hardware watchpoint 2: -location value^M ... and after forcing "set can-use-hw-watchpoints 0" we can intermittently reproduce the same failure. In the gdb documentation related to watchpoints in multi-threaded programs, we read: ... Warning: In multi-threaded programs, software watchpoints have only limited usefulness. If GDB creates a software watchpoint, it can only watch the value of an expression in a single thread. If you are confident that the expression can only change due to the current thread’s activity (and if you are also confident that no other thread can become current), then you can use software watchpoints as usual. However, GDB may not notice when a non-current thread’s activity changes the expression. (Hardware watchpoints, in contrast, watch an expression in all threads.) ... Since the ada task construct is mapped onto threads, it seems that the same limitation holds for tasks. Fix this by using skip_hw_watchpoint_tests. Tested on powerpc64-linux. Tested-By: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>
2022-11-28[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.ada/out_of_line_in_inlined.exp for ppc64leTom de Vries1-1/+1
On powerpc64le-linux, with test-case gdb.ada/out_of_line_in_inlined.exp I run into: ... (gdb) run ^M Starting program: foo_o224_021-all ^M ^M Breakpoint 1, 0x0000000010002f48 in foo_o224_021.child1.child2 (s=...) at \ foo_o224_021.adb:24^M 24 function Child2 (S : String) return Boolean is -- STOP^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/out_of_line_in_inlined.exp: scenario=all: \ run to foo_o224_021.child1.child2 ... The breakpoint is correctly set at the local entry point, and given that the local entry point doesn't correspond to a line number entry, the instruction address of the breakpoint is shown. The problem is that test-case doesn't expect the breakpoint address. Fix this by allowing the breakpoint address to occur. Tested on powerpc64le-linux.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: fail if gdb_start_cmd failsSimon Marchi10-42/+43
I broke gdb.ada/start.exp, and did not notice it, because it outputs an UNTESTED if gdb_start_cmd fails. I don't really see when start would fail and it's not a problem that should be looked at. Change all spots that call untested after a gdb_start_cmd failure, use fail instead. Doing so caused some failures with the native-gdbserver board. Some tests that use "start" were relying on the fact that start would fail with that board to just return with "untested". Change them to add an early return if use_gdb_stub returns true. Some gdb.pascal tests also failed with native-gdbserver, because they did use gdb_start_cmd to start the inferior, for no good reason. Convert them to use runto_main instead, which does the right thing if the target is a stub. A further refactoring could be to make gdb_start_cmd match the expected breakpoint hit and the prompt, which it doesn't do currently (it leaves that to the callers, but not all of them do). Change-Id: I097370851213e798ff29fb6cf8ba25ef7d2be007 Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2022-11-28Fix range type signed-ness heuristicTom Tromey2-0/+60
The code to create a range type has a heuristic to decide whether the range is unsigned. However, this heuristic can fail if the upper bound of the range has its high bit set, because the test is done using LONGEST. With this patch, if the underlying type of a range is unsigned, then the range will always be unsigned. A new test is included. Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 34. We've also been using this internally at AdaCore for a while.
2022-11-28gdb: disable commit resumed in target_killSimon Marchi2-0/+151
New in this version: - Better comment in target_kill - Uncomment line in test to avoid hanging when exiting, when testing on native-extended-gdbserver PR 28275 shows that doing a sequence of: - Run inferior in background (run &) - kill that inferior - Run again We get into this assertion: /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:2590: internal-error: target_wait: Assertion `!proc_target->commit_resumed_state' failed. #0 internal_error_loc (file=0x5606b344e740 "/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c", line=2590, fmt=0x5606b344d6a0 "%s: Assertion `%s' failed.") at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/errors.cc:54 #1 0x00005606b6296475 in target_wait (ptid=..., status=0x7fffb9390630, options=...) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:2590 #2 0x00005606b5767a98 in startup_inferior (proc_target=0x5606bfccb2a0 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>, pid=3884857, ntraps=1, last_waitstatus=0x0, last_ptid=0x0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/nat/fork-inferior.c:482 #3 0x00005606b4e6c9c5 in gdb_startup_inferior (pid=3884857, num_traps=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/fork-child.c:132 #4 0x00005606b50f14a5 in inf_ptrace_target::create_inferior (this=0x5606bfccb2a0 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>, exec_file=0x604000039f50 "/home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/test", allargs="", env=0x61500000a580, from_tty=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/inf-ptrace.c:105 #5 0x00005606b53b6d23 in linux_nat_target::create_inferior (this=0x5606bfccb2a0 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>, exec_file=0x604000039f50 "/home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/test", allargs="", env=0x61500000a580, from_tty=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/linux-nat.c:978 #6 0x00005606b512b79b in run_command_1 (args=0x0, from_tty=1, run_how=RUN_NORMAL) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/infcmd.c:468 #7 0x00005606b512c236 in run_command (args=0x0, from_tty=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/infcmd.c:526 When running the kill command, commit_resumed_state for the process_stratum_target (linux-nat, here) is true. After the kill, when there are no more threads, commit_resumed_state is still true, as nothing touches this flag during the kill operation. During the subsequent run command, run_command_1 does: scoped_disable_commit_resumed disable_commit_resumed ("running"); We would think that this would clear the commit_resumed_state flag of our native target, but that's not the case, because scoped_disable_commit_resumed iterates on non-exited inferiors in order to find active process targets. And after the kill, the inferior is exited, and the native target was unpushed from it anyway. So scoped_disable_commit_resumed doesn't touch the commit_resumed_state flag of the native target, it stays true. When reaching target_wait, in startup_inferior (to consume the initial expect stop events while the inferior is starting up and working its way through the shell), commit_resumed_state is true, breaking the contract saying that commit_resumed_state is always false when calling the targets' wait method. (note: to be correct, I think that startup_inferior should toggle commit_resumed between the target_wait and target_resume calls, but I'll ignore that for now) I can see multiple ways to fix this. In the end, we need commit_resumed_state to be cleared by the time we get to that target_wait. It could be done at the end of the kill command, or at the beginning of the run command. To keep things in a coherent state, I'd like to make it so that after the kill command, when the target is left with no threads, its commit_resumed_state flag is left to false. This way, we can keep working with the assumption that a target with no threads (and therefore no running threads) has commit_resumed_state == false. Do this by adding a scoped_disable_commit_resumed in target_kill. It clears the target's commit_resumed_state on entry, and leaves it false if the target does not have any resumed thread on exit. That means, even if the target has another inferior with stopped threads, commit_resumed_state will be left to false, which makes sense. Add a test that tries to cover various combinations of actions done while an inferior is running (and therefore while commit_resumed_state is true on the process target). Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28275 Change-Id: I8e6fe6dc1f475055921520e58cab68024039a1e9 Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2022-11-28gdbserver: switch to right process in find_one_threadSimon Marchi2-0/+95
New in this version: add a dedicated test. When I do this: $ ./gdb -nx --data-directory=data-directory -q \ /bin/sleep \ -ex "maint set target-non-stop on" \ -ex "tar ext :1234" \ -ex "set remote exec-file /bin/sleep" \ -ex "run 1231 &" \ -ex add-inferior \ -ex "inferior 2" Reading symbols from /bin/sleep... (No debugging symbols found in /bin/sleep) Remote debugging using :1234 Starting program: /bin/sleep 1231 Reading /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from remote target... warning: File transfers from remote targets can be slow. Use "set sysroot" to access files locally instead. Reading /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from remote target... Reading /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/a6/7a1408f18db3576757eea210d07ba3fc560dff.debug from remote target... [New inferior 2] Added inferior 2 on connection 1 (extended-remote :1234) [Switching to inferior 2 [<null>] (<noexec>)] (gdb) Reading /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 from remote target... attach 3659848 Attaching to process 3659848 /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/thread.c:85: internal-error: inferior_thread: Assertion `current_thread_ != nullptr' failed. Note the "attach" command just above. When doing it on the command-line with a -ex switch, the bug doesn't trigger. The internal error of GDB is actually caused by GDBserver crashing, and the error recovery of GDB is not on point. This patch aims to fix just the GDBserver crash, not the GDB problem. GDBserver crashes with a segfault here: (gdb) bt #0 0x00005555557fb3f4 in find_one_thread (ptid=...) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.cc:177 #1 0x00005555557fd5cf in thread_db_thread_handle (ptid=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffa0>, handle=0x7fffffffc400, handle_len=0x7fffffffc3f0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.cc:461 #2 0x000055555578a0b6 in linux_process_target::thread_handle (this=0x5555558a64c0 <the_x86_target>, ptid=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffa0>, handle=0x7fffffffc400, handle_len=0x7fffffffc3f0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:6905 #3 0x00005555556dfcc6 in handle_qxfer_threads_worker (thread=0x60b000000510, buffer=0x7fffffffc8a0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1645 #4 0x00005555556e00e6 in operator() (__closure=0x7fffffffc5e0, thread=0x60b000000510) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1696 #5 0x00005555556f54be in for_each_thread<handle_qxfer_threads_proper(buffer*)::<lambda(thread_info*)> >(struct {...}) (func=...) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/gdbthread.h:159 #6 0x00005555556e0242 in handle_qxfer_threads_proper (buffer=0x7fffffffc8a0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1694 #7 0x00005555556e04ba in handle_qxfer_threads (annex=0x629000000213 "", readbuf=0x621000019100 '\276' <repeats 200 times>..., writebuf=0x0, offset=0, len=4097) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1732 #8 0x00005555556e1989 in handle_qxfer (own_buf=0x629000000200 "qXfer:threads", packet_len=26, new_packet_len_p=0x7fffffffd630) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:2045 #9 0x00005555556e720a in handle_query (own_buf=0x629000000200 "qXfer:threads", packet_len=26, new_packet_len_p=0x7fffffffd630) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:2685 #10 0x00005555556f1a01 in process_serial_event () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4176 #11 0x00005555556f4457 in handle_serial_event (err=0, client_data=0x0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4514 #12 0x0000555555820f56 in handle_file_event (file_ptr=0x607000000250, ready_mask=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:573 #13 0x0000555555821895 in gdb_wait_for_event (block=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:694 #14 0x000055555581f533 in gdb_do_one_event (mstimeout=-1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:264 #15 0x00005555556ec9fb in start_event_loop () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3512 #16 0x00005555556f0769 in captured_main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe0d8) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3992 #17 0x00005555556f0e3f in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe0d8) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4078 The reason is a wrong current process when find_one_thread is called. The current process is the 2nd one, which was just attached. It does not yet have thread_db data (proc->priv->thread_db is nullptr). As we iterate on all threads of all process to fulfull the qxfer:threads:read request, we get to a thread of process 1 for which we haven't read thread_db information yet (lwp_info::thread_known is false), so we get into find_one_thread. find_one_thread uses `current_process ()->priv->thread_db`, assuming the current process matches the ptid passed as a parameter, which is wrong. A segfault happens when trying to dereference that thread_db pointer. Fix this by making find_one_thread not assume what the current process / current thread is. If it needs to call into libthread_db, which we know will try to read memory from the current process, then temporarily set the current process. In the case where the thread is already know and we return early, we don't need to switch process. Add a test to reproduce this specific situation. Change-Id: I09b00883e8b73b7e5f89d0f47cb4e9c0f3d6caaa Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2022-11-28Fix crash in "document" commandTom Tromey1-0/+4
PR cli/29800 points out that "document" will now crash when the argument is an undefined command. This is a regression due to the "document user-defined aliases" patch. Approved-By: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> Reviewed-By: Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29800
2022-11-28[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.opt/solib-intra-step.exp for powerpc64leTom de Vries1-0/+19
On powerpc64le-linux, I run into: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.opt/solib-intra-step.exp: first-hit step^M 28 { /* first-retry */^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.opt/solib-intra-step.exp: second-hit ... It's a bit easier to understand what happens if we do a full stepping session: ... Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at solib-intra-step-main.c:23 23 shlib_first (); (gdb) step shlib_first () at solib-intra-step-lib.c:29 29 shlib_second (0); /* first-hit */ (gdb) step 28 { /* first-retry */ (gdb) step 29 shlib_second (0); /* first-hit */ (gdb) step shlib_second (dummy=0) at solib-intra-step-lib.c:23 23 abort (); /* second-hit */ ... and compare that to the line info: ... CU: solib-intra-step-lib.c: File name Line number Starting address View Stmt solib-intra-step-lib.c 22 0x710 x solib-intra-step-lib.c 23 0x724 x solib-intra-step-lib.c 28 0x740 x solib-intra-step-lib.c 29 0x74c x solib-intra-step-lib.c 28 0x750 x solib-intra-step-lib.c 29 0x758 x solib-intra-step-lib.c 30 0x760 x solib-intra-step-lib.c - 0x77c ... So we step from line 29 to line 28, and back to line 29, which is behaviour that matches the line table. The peculiar order is due to using optimization. The problem is that the test-case doesn't expect this order. Fix this by allowing this order in the test-case. Tested on powerpc64le-linux. PR testsuite/29792 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29792
2022-11-28gdb: fix assert when quitting GDB while a thread is steppingAndrew Burgess1-0/+52
This commit addresses one of the issues identified in PR gdb/28275. Bug gdb/28275 identifies a number of situations in which this assert: Assertion `!proc_target->commit_resumed_state' failed. could be triggered. There's actually a number of similar places where this assert is found in GDB, the two of interest in gdb/28275 are in target_wait and target_stop. In one of the comments: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28275#c1 steps to trigger the assertion within target_stop were identified when using a modified version of the gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp test script. In the gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp test, we attach to a multi-threaded inferior, and continue the inferior in asynchronous (background) mode. Each thread is continuously hitting a conditional breakpoint where the condition is always false. While the inferior is running we detach. The goal is that we detach while GDB is performing a step-over for the conditional breakpoint in at least one thread. While detaching, if a step-over is in progress, then GDB has to complete the step over before we can detach. This involves calling target_stop and target_wait (see prepare_for_detach). As far as gdb/28275 is concerned, the interesting part here, is the the process_stratum_target::commit_resumed_state variable must be false when target_stop and target_wait are called. This is currently ensured because, in detach_command (infrun.c), we create an instance of scoped_disable_commit_resumed, this ensures that when target_detach is called, ::commit_resumed_state will be false. The modification to the test that I propose here, and which exposed the bug, is that, instead of using "detach" to detach from the inferior, we instead use "quit". Quitting GDB after attaching to an inferior will cause GDB to first detach, and then exit. When we quit GDB we end up calling target_detach via a different code path, the stack looks like: #0 target_detach #1 kill_or_detach #2 quit_force #3 quit_command Along this path there is no scoped_disable_commit_resumed created. ::commit_resumed_state can be true when we reach prepare_for_detach, which calls target_wait and target_stop, so the assertion will trigger. In this commit, I propose fixing this by adding the creation of a scoped_disable_commit_resumed into target_detach. This will ensure that ::commit_resumed_state is false when calling prepare_for_detach from within target_detach. I did consider placing the scoped_disable_commit_resumed in prepare_for_detach, however, placing it in target_detach ensures that the target's commit_resumed_state flag is left to false if the detached inferior was the last one for that target. It's the same rationale as for patch "gdb: disable commit resumed in target_kill" that comes later in this series, but for detach instead of kill. detach_command still includes a scoped_disable_commit_resumed too, but I think it is still relevant to cover the resumption at the end of the function. Co-Authored-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28275 Change-Id: Ie128f7aba6ef0e018859275eca372e6ea738e96f
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: refactor gdb.threads/detach-step-over.expAndrew Burgess1-100/+138
Factor out some bits of gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp to procs in preparation to adding some new variations of the test. Rename the existing "test" proc and make it use proc_with_prefix. Co-Authored-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Change-Id: Ib4412545c81c8556029e0f7bfa9dd48d7a9f3189
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove global declarations in gdb.threads/detach-step-over.expSimon Marchi1-23/+17
Before doing further changes to this file, change to use the :: notation instead of declaring global variables with the `global` keyword. Change-Id: I72301fd8f4693fea61aac054ba17245a1f4442fb Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2022-11-28[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp with gcc 4.8.5Tom de Vries1-1/+1
On powerpc64le-linux, using gcc 4.8.5, I run into: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp: next (1) next^M 11 c = vec_add (a, b);^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp: next (2) print/x a^M $67 = {0xfefefefe, 0xfefefefe, 0xfefefefe, 0xfefefefe}^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp: print vector parameter a ... Looking at the disassembly and the debug info, it's clear why there's a FAIL. The debug info says that the variable can be found at some stack location, but the instructions don't seem to be writing there. We can work around this by marking variable a volatile. Likewise for b. Note that marking the variables as volatile doesn't change the location information. Tested on power64le-linux.
2022-11-26[gdb/testsuite] Don't generate core in gdb.base/bt-on-fatal-signal.expTom de Vries2-1/+15
When running test-case gdb.base/bt-on-fatal-signal.exp on powerpc64le-linux I noticed: ... FAIL: gdb.base/bt-on-fatal-signal.exp: SEGV: scan for backtrace (timeout) ... The timeout is 10 seconds, but generating the core file takes more than a minute, probably due to slow NFS. I managed to reproduce this behaviour independently of gdb, by compiling "int main (void) { __builtin_abort (); }" and running it, which took 1.5 seconds for a core file 50 times smaller than the one for gdb. Fix this by preventing the core file from being generated, using a wrapper around gdb that does "ulimit -c 0". Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-11-26[gdb/symtab] Handle failure to open .gnu_debugaltlink fileTom de Vries1-0/+48
If we instrument cc-with-tweaks.sh to remove the .gnu_debugaltlink file after dwz has created it, with test-case gdb.threads/access-mem-running-thread-exit.exp and target board cc-with-dwz-m we run into: ... (gdb) file access-mem-running-thread-exit^M Reading symbols from access-mem-running-thread-exit...^M could not find '.gnu_debugaltlink' file for access-mem-running-thread-exit^M ... followed a bit later by: ... (gdb) file access-mem-running-thread-exit^M Reading symbols from access-mem-running-thread-exit...^M gdb/dwarf2/read.c:7284: internal-error: create_all_units: \ Assertion `per_objfile->per_bfd->all_units.empty ()' failed.^M ... The problem is that create_units does not catch the error thrown by dwarf2_get_dwz_file. Fix this by catching the error and performing the necessary cleanup, getting the same result for the first and second file command. PR symtab/29805 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29805
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_breakSimon Marchi1-307/+293
Move all the remaining tests to a single test_break proc. It's a bit big, but all of these are kind of tied together. The procs starts by setting breakpoints, checks that we can see them in "info breakpoints", and tries stopping on them. Move all the "set bp_locationX" calls together at the top. Change-Id: Id05f98957e1a3462532d2dbd577cd0a7c7263900 Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_tbreakSimon Marchi1-46/+36
Leave setting bp_location11 in the global scope, so that it's accessible to other procs. Change-Id: I8928f01640d3a1e993649b2168b9eda0724ee1d9 Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_no_break_on_catchpointSimon Marchi1-11/+17
Change-Id: Ifa7070943f1de22c2839fedf5f346d6591bb5a76 Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_nonexistent_lineSimon Marchi1-5/+15
Change-Id: I4390dd5da23bae83ccc513ad0de0169ddff7df12 Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_defaultSimon Marchi1-25/+37
One special thing here is that the part just above this one, that sets catchpoints and verifies they are not hit, requires that we resume execution to verify that the catchpoints are indeed not hit. I guess it was previously achieved by the until command, but it doesn't happen now that the until is moved into test_break_default. Add a gdb_continue_to_end after setting the catchpoints. If any catchpoint were to be hit, it would catch the problem. Change-Id: I5d4b43da91886b1beda9f6e56b05aa04331a9c05 Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_silent_and_moreSimon Marchi1-56/+62
This one is a bit tricky. The clear tests seem to depend on the various breakpoints that have been set before, starting with the "silent" breakpoints. So, move all this in a single chunk, it can always be split later if needed. Change-Id: I7ba61a5b130ade63eda0c4790534840339f8a72f Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_line_convenience_varSimon Marchi1-5/+11
Change-Id: I593002373da971a0a4d6b5355d3fe321873479ab Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_user_callSimon Marchi1-22/+32
Change-Id: I9151ce9db9435722b758f41c6606b461bf15f320 Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_finish_argumentsSimon Marchi1-22/+28
Change-Id: Id84babed1eeb3ce7d14b94ff332795964e8ead51 Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: use proc_with_prefix for ↵Simon Marchi1-1/+1
test_next_with_recursion This one is already in a proc, just make the proc use proc_with_prefix, for consistency. Change-Id: I313ecf5097ff04526c29396529baeba84e37df5a Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_optimized_prologueSimon Marchi1-51/+48
Change-Id: Ibf17033c8ce72aa5cfe1b739be2902e84a5e945d Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_rbreak_shlibSimon Marchi1-18/+18
Change-Id: I130e8914c2713095aab03e84aba1481b4c7af978 Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_file_line_convenience_varSimon Marchi1-6/+8
Change-Id: I0c31b037669b2917e062bf431372fb6531f8f53c Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-24gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_commands_clearSimon Marchi1-8/+16
Change-Id: Ia58f90117d52fc419fc494836d9b4ed5d902fe9b Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2022-11-22gdb/testsuite: remove gcc restriction from gdb.dwarf2/clang-cli-macro.expBruno Larsen1-3/+0
With the recent changes to the dwarf assembler, there is no longer a need to test for gcc in gdb.dwarf2/clang-cli-macro.exp and mark it as untested. This commit removes that logic.
2022-11-21Fix step-over-syscall.exp matching regexp for $bpnum.$locno matchingPhilippe Waroquiers1-2/+2
step-over-syscall.exp has some specific tests for gdbserver. The regexp matching breakpoint hit must take the added locno into account. Test re-run in 3 modes (normal, native-gdbserver and native-extended-gdbserver).
2022-11-19Add missing gdb_prompt in ctxobj.exp to avoid random failure, fix typo.Philippe Waroquiers2-3/+3
ctxobj.exp fails randomly when computer is loaded. With the addition of $gdb_prompt in the regexp testing for breakpoint hit, I could not make it fail anymore. Also fixed a typo in a comment.
2022-11-19Show locno for 'multi location' breakpoint hit msg+conv var $_hit_bbnum ↵Philippe Waroquiers21-73/+134
$_hit_locno PR breakpoints/12464 This implements the request given in PR breakpoints/12464. Before this patch, when a breakpoint that has multiple locations is reached, GDB printed: Thread 1 "zeoes" hit Breakpoint 1, some_func () at somefunc1.c:5 This patch changes the message so that bkpt_print_id prints the precise encountered breakpoint: Thread 1 "zeoes" hit Breakpoint 1.2, some_func () at somefunc1.c:5 In mi mode, bkpt_print_id also (optionally) prints a new table field "locno": locno is printed when the breakpoint hit has more than one location. Note that according to the GDB user manual node 'GDB/MI Development and Front Ends', it is ok to add new fields without changing the MI version. Also, when a breakpoint is reached, the convenience variables $_hit_bpnum and $_hit_locno are set to the encountered breakpoint number and location number. $_hit_bpnum and $_hit_locno can a.o. be used in the command list of a breakpoint, to disable the specific encountered breakpoint, e.g. disable $_hit_bpnum.$_hit_locno In case the breakpoint has only one location, $_hit_locno is set to the value 1, so as to allow a command such as: disable $_hit_bpnum.$_hit_locno to disable the breakpoint even when the breakpoint has only one location. This also fixes a strange behaviour: when a breakpoint X has only one location, enable|disable X.1 is accepted but transforms the breakpoint in a multiple locations breakpoint having only one location. The changes in RFA v4 handle the comments of Tom Tromey: - Changed convenience var names from $bkptno/$locno to $_hit_bpnum/$_hit_locno. - updated the tests and user manual accordingly. User manual also explictly describes that $_hit_locno is set to 1 for a breakpoint with a single location. - The variable values are now set in bpstat_do_actions_1 so that they are set for silent breakpoints, and when several breakpoints are hit at the same time, that the variables are set to the printed breakpoint. The changes in RFA v3 handle the additional comments of Eli: GDB/NEW: - Use max 80-column - Use 'code location' instead of 'location'. - Fix typo $bkpno - Ensure that disable $bkptno and disable $bkptno.$locno have each their explanation inthe example - Reworded the 'breakpoint-hit' paragraph. gdb.texinfo: - Use 'code location' instead of 'location'. - Add a note to clarify the distinction between $bkptno and $bpnum. - Use @kbd instead of examples with only one command. Compared to RFA v1, the changes in v2 handle the comments given by Keith Seitz and Eli Zaretskii: - Use %s for the result of paddress - Use bkptno_numopt_re instead of 2 different -re cases - use C@t{++} - Add index entries for $bkptno and $locno - Added an example for "locno" in the mi interface - Added examples in the Break command manual.
2022-11-18Fix deletion of FinishBreakpointsJohnson Sun3-0/+104
Currently, FinishBreakpoints are set at the return address of a frame based on the `finish' command, and are meant to be temporary breakpoints. However, they are not being cleaned up after use, as reported in PR python/18655. This was happening because the disposition of the breakpoint was not being set correctly. This commit fixes this issue by correctly setting the disposition in the post-stop hook of the breakpoint. It also adds a test to ensure this feature isn't regressed in the future. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18655