aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-10-02gdb/testsuite: extend styling test for libopcodes stylingAndrew Burgess1-30/+65
This commit extends the gdb.base/style.exp test to cover disassembler styling using libopcodes (where available). The test will try to enable libopcode based styling, if this works (because such styling is available) then some tests are run to check that the output is styled, and that the styling can be disabled using 'set style disassembler enabled off'. If libopcodes styling is not available on the current architecture then these new tests will be skipped. I've moved the Python Pygments module check inside the test_disable_disassembler_styling function now, so that the test will be run even when Python Pygments is not available, this allows the new tests discussed above. If the Pygments module is not available then the Pygments based tests will be skipped just as they were before.
2022-10-02gdb/testsuite: rewrite capture_command_output procAndrew Burgess1-3/+32
I noticed a test failure in gdb.base/completion.exp for RISC-V on a native Linux target. Upon investigation I discovered a couple of reasons for the failure, this commit addresses one of them. A later commit will address the other issue. The completion.exp test makes use of the capture_command_output proc to collect the output of the 'maint print registers' command. For RISC-V this command produces a lot of output. Currently the capture_command_output proc tries to collect the complete command output in a single expect buffer, and what I see is an error caused by the expect buffer becoming full. This commit rewrites capture_command_output to make use of gdb_test_multiple to collect the command output line at a time, in this way we avoid overflowing the expect buffer. The capture_command_output proc has some logic for skipping a prefix pattern, which is passed in to the proc as an argument. In order to handle this correctly (only matching the prefix at the start of the command output), I use two gdb_test_multiple calls, the first spots and discards the echoed command and the (optional) prefix pattern, the second gdb_test_multiple call then collects the rest of the command output line at a time until a prompt is seen. There is one slight oddity with the current implementation, which I have changed in my rewrite, this does, slightly, change the behaviour of the proc. The current implementation uses this pattern: -re "[string_to_regexp ${command}]\[\r\n\]+${prefix}(.*)\[\r\n\]+$gdb_prompt $" Now a typical command output will look like this: output here\r\n (gdb) As the TCL regexp matching is greedy, TCL will try to match as much as possible in one part of the pattern before moving on to the next. Thus, when this matches against (.*)[\r\n]+, the (.*) will end up matching against 'output here\r' and the [\r\n]+ will match '\n' only. In short the previous implementation would leave the '\r' on the end of the returned text, but not the final trailing '\n'. Now clearly I could make a new version of capture_command_output that maintained this behaviour, but I couldn't see any reason to do this. So, my new implementation drops the final '\r\n' completely, in our example above we now return 'output here' with no '\r'. This change doesn't seem to affect any of the existing tests, but I thought it was worth mentioning.
2022-10-02gdb/mi: new options for -data-disassemble commandAndrew Burgess1-21/+45
Now that the disassembler has two different strategies for laying out the opcode bytes of an instruction (see /r vs /b for the disassemble command), I wanted to add support for this to the MI disassemble command. Currently the -data-disassemble command takes a single 'mode' value, which currently has 6 different values (0 -> 5), 3 of these modes relate to opcode display. So, clearly I should just add an additional 3 modes to handle the new opcode format, right? No, I didn't think that was a great idea either. So, I wonder, could I adjust the -data-disassemble command in a backward compatible way, that would allow GDB to move away from using the mode value altogether? I think we can. In this commit, I propose adding two new options to -data-disassemble, these are: --opcodes none|bytes|display --source Additionally, I will make the mode optional, and default to mode 0 if no mode value is given. Mode 0 is the simplest, no source code, no opcodes disassembly mode. The two new options are only valid for mode 0, if they are used with any other mode then an error is thrown. The --opcodes option can add opcodes to the result, with 'bytes' being equivalent to 'disassemble /b' and 'display' being 'disassemble /r'. The --source option will enable the /s style source code display, this is equivalent to modes 4 and 5. There is no way, using the new command options to get the now deprecated /m style source code display, that is mode 1 and 3. My hope is that new users of the MI will not use the mode at all, and instead will just use the new options to achieve the output they need. Existing MI users can continue to use the mode, and will not need to be updated to use the new options.
2022-10-02gdb: disassembler opcode display formattingAndrew Burgess1-3/+3
This commit changes the format of 'disassemble /r' to match GNU objdump. Specifically, GDB will now display the instruction bytes in as 'objdump --wide --disassemble' does. Here is an example for RISC-V before this patch: (gdb) disassemble /r 0x0001018e,0x0001019e Dump of assembler code from 0x1018e to 0x1019e: 0x0001018e <call_me+66>: 03 26 84 fe lw a2,-24(s0) 0x00010192 <call_me+70>: 83 25 c4 fe lw a1,-20(s0) 0x00010196 <call_me+74>: 61 65 lui a0,0x18 0x00010198 <call_me+76>: 13 05 85 6a addi a0,a0,1704 0x0001019c <call_me+80>: f1 22 jal 0x10368 <printf> End of assembler dump. And here's an example after this patch: (gdb) disassemble /r 0x0001018e,0x0001019e Dump of assembler code from 0x1018e to 0x1019e: 0x0001018e <call_me+66>: fe842603 lw a2,-24(s0) 0x00010192 <call_me+70>: fec42583 lw a1,-20(s0) 0x00010196 <call_me+74>: 6561 lui a0,0x18 0x00010198 <call_me+76>: 6a850513 addi a0,a0,1704 0x0001019c <call_me+80>: 22f1 jal 0x10368 <printf> End of assembler dump. There are two differences here. First, the instruction bytes after the patch are grouped based on the size of the instruction, and are byte-swapped to little-endian order. Second, after the patch, GDB now uses the bytes-per-line hint from libopcodes to add whitespace padding after the opcode bytes, this means that in most cases the instructions are nicely aligned. It is still possible for a very long instruction to intrude into the disassembled text space. The next example is x86-64, before the patch: (gdb) disassemble /r main Dump of assembler code for function main: 0x0000000000401106 <+0>: 55 push %rbp 0x0000000000401107 <+1>: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 0x000000000040110a <+4>: c7 87 d8 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 movl $0x1,0xd8(%rdi) 0x0000000000401114 <+14>: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax 0x0000000000401119 <+19>: 5d pop %rbp 0x000000000040111a <+20>: c3 ret End of assembler dump. And after the patch: (gdb) disassemble /r main Dump of assembler code for function main: 0x0000000000401106 <+0>: 55 push %rbp 0x0000000000401107 <+1>: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 0x000000000040110a <+4>: c7 87 d8 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 movl $0x1,0xd8(%rdi) 0x0000000000401114 <+14>: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax 0x0000000000401119 <+19>: 5d pop %rbp 0x000000000040111a <+20>: c3 ret End of assembler dump. Most instructions are aligned, except for the very long instruction. Notice too that for x86-64 libopcodes doesn't request that GDB group the instruction bytes. This matches the behaviour of objdump. In case the user really wants the old behaviour, I have added a new modifier 'disassemble /b', this displays the instruction byte at a time. For x86-64, which never groups instruction bytes, /b and /r are equivalent, but for RISC-V, using /b gets the old layout back (except that the whitespace for alignment is still present). Consider our original RISC-V example, this time using /b: (gdb) disassemble /b 0x0001018e,0x0001019e Dump of assembler code from 0x1018e to 0x1019e: 0x0001018e <call_me+66>: 03 26 84 fe lw a2,-24(s0) 0x00010192 <call_me+70>: 83 25 c4 fe lw a1,-20(s0) 0x00010196 <call_me+74>: 61 65 lui a0,0x18 0x00010198 <call_me+76>: 13 05 85 6a addi a0,a0,1704 0x0001019c <call_me+80>: f1 22 jal 0x10368 <printf> End of assembler dump. Obviously, this patch is a potentially significant change to the behaviour or /r. I could have added /b with the new behaviour and left /r alone. However, personally, I feel the new behaviour is significantly better than the old, hence, I made /r be what I consider the "better" behaviour. The reason I prefer the new behaviour is that, when I use /r, I almost always want to manually decode the instruction for some reason, and having the bytes displayed in "instruction order" rather than memory order, just makes this easier. The 'record instruction-history' command also takes a /r modifier, and has been modified in the same way as disassemble; /r gets the new behaviour, and /b has been added to retain the old behaviour. Finally, the MI command -data-disassemble, is unchanged in behaviour, this command now requests the raw bytes of the instruction, which is equivalent to the /b modifier. This means that the MI output will remain backward compatible.
2022-10-02gdb/testsuite: new test for -data-disassemble opcodes formatAndrew Burgess2-0/+110
Add another test for the output of MI command -data-disassemble. The new check validates the format of the 'opcodes' field, specifically, this test checks that the field contains a series of bytes, separated by a single space. We also check that the bytes are in the correct order, that is, the first byte is from the lowest address, and subsequent bytes are from increasing addresses. The motivation for this test (besides more tests being generally good) is that I plan to make changes to how opcode bytes are displayed in the disassembler output, and I want to ensure that I don't break any existing MI behaviour. There should be no user visible changes to GDB after this commit.
2022-09-30[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.mi/mi-sym-info.exp on openSUSE TumbleweedTom de Vries1-1/+2
On openSUSE Tumbleweed, I run into: ... FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-sym-info.exp: List all functions from debug information only ... The problem is in matching this string: ... {name="_start",type="void (void)",description="void _start(void);"} ... using regexp fun_re, which requires a line field: ... set fun_re \ "\{line=\"$decimal\",name=${qstr},type=${qstr},description=${qstr}\}" ... Fix this by making the line field optional in fun_re. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-09-30[gdb/testsuite] Add aranges to gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.expTom de Vries2-2/+29
Since commit 52b920c5d20 ("[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.exp for ppc64le"), the test-case fails with target board cc-with-debug-names, due to missing .debug_aranges info. Add the missing .debug_aranges info. Also add a file_id option to Dwarf::assemble, to make it possible to contribute to an already open file. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-09-30[gdb/c++] Print destructor the same for gcc and clangTom de Vries4-3/+79
Consider the test-case contained in this patch. With g++ (7.5.0) we have for "ptype A": ... type = class A { public: int a; A(void); ~A(); } ... and with clang++ (13.0.1): ... type = class A { public: int a; A(void); ~A(void); } ... and we observe that the destructor is printed differently. There's a difference in debug info between the two cases: in the clang case, there's one artificial parameter, but in the g++ case, there are two, and these similar cases are handled differently in cp_type_print_method_args. This is due to this slightly convoluted bit of code: ... i = staticp ? 0 : 1; if (nargs > i) { while (i < nargs) ... } else if (varargs) gdb_printf (stream, "..."); else if (language == language_cplus) gdb_printf (stream, "void"); ... The purpose of "i = staticp ? 0 : 1" is to skip the printing of the implicit this parameter. In commit 5f4d1085085 ("c++/8218: Destructors w/arguments"), skipping of other artificial parameters was added, but using a different method: rather than adjusting the potential loop start, it skips the parameter in the loop. The observed difference in printing is explained by whether we enter the loop: - in the clang case, the loop is not entered and we print "void". - in the gcc case, the loop is entered, and nothing is printed. Fix this by rewriting the code to: - always enter the loop - handle whether arguments need printing in the loop - keep track of how many arguments are printed, and use that after the loop to print void etc. such that we have the same for both gcc and clang: ... A(void); ~A(void); ... Note that I consider the discussion of whether we want to print: - A(void) / ~A(void), or - A() / ~A() out-of-scope for this patch. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-09-28Treat Character as a discrete type in AdaTom Tromey2-0/+65
A user noticed that gdb would assert when printing a certain array with array-indexes enabled. This turned out to be caused by the array having an index type of Character, which is completely valid in Ada. This patch changes the Ada support to recognize Character as a discrete type, and adds some tests. Because this is Ada-specific and was also reviewed internally, I am checking it in.
2022-09-26gdb/testsuite: use gdb_test in gdb.gdb/python-helper.expSimon Marchi2-75/+21
If some command in there gives the wrong answer, we currently have to wait for a timeout for the test to continue. For instance, I currently see: print *val->type $1 = Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'>: Cannot take address of method length. (outer-gdb) FAIL: gdb.gdb/python-helper.exp: pretty print type (timeout) We can avoid this and modernize the test at the same time by using the -prompt option of gdb_test. gdb_test_no_output currently accepts a -prompt_re option (the variable name passed to parse_args defines the option name), but I think it's a typo. It's supposed to be -prompt, like gdb_test. I can't find anything using -prompt_re using grep. Change it to just "prompt". Change-Id: Icc0a9a0ef482e62460c708bccdd544c11d711eca
2022-09-26gdb/testsuite: bump duration for the whole test in do_self_testsSimon Marchi1-28/+8
When running gdb.gdb/python-helper.exp, I get some timeouts: continue Continuing. print 1 FAIL: gdb.gdb/python-helper.exp: hit breakpoint in outer gdb (timeout) At this time, GDB is actually processing the stop and reading in some CUs. selftest_setup does bump the timeout, but it's not for the whole test. Since debugging GDB with GDB is (unfortunately) a bit slow, bump the timeout for the whole duration of the setup and body. On my optimized build, the command takes just a bit more than the current timeout of 10 seconds. But it's much slower if running the test on an unoptimized build, so I think it's necessary to bump the timeout for that in any case. Change-Id: I4d38285870e76c94f9d0bfdb60648a2e7f2cfa5d
2022-09-26[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/dw2-unspecified-type-foo.c with -m32Tom de Vries1-0/+1
When running test-case gdb.dwarf2/dw2-unspecified-type-foo.c with target board unix/-m32, I run into: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-unspecified-type.exp: ptype foo p ((int (*) ()) foo) ()^M $1 = -135698472^M ... Add the missing "return 0" in foo, which fixes this. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-09-23gdb/testsuite/tui: start GDB with "set filename-display basename"Simon Marchi1-1/+7
The test gdb.tui/tui-missing-src.exp fails on my CI machine, and I concluded that it is caused by the long source directory name: /home/jenkins/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_linuxbuild/platform/jammy-amd64/target_board/unix/src/binutils-gdb The long name causes some particular redrawing that doesn't happen for shorter directories, and causes a Term::command call to return too early. This can be reproduced by cloning the binutils-gdb repo in a directory with a name similar to the one shown above. $ pwd /home/simark/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_linuxbuild/platform/jammy-amd64/target_board/unix/src/binutils-gdb/build/gdb $ make check-read1 TESTS="gdb.tui/tui-missing-src.exp" FAIL: gdb.tui/tui-missing-src.exp: checking if inside f2 () FAIL: gdb.tui/tui-missing-src.exp: f2.c must be displayed in source window FAIL: gdb.tui/tui-missing-src.exp: check source box is empty after return FAIL: gdb.tui/tui-missing-src.exp: Back in main Note that using "make check" instead of "make check-read1" only shows the last 2 failures for me. When running gdb.tui/tui-missing-src.exp in a directory with a shorter name, the terminal looks like this by the time the "checking if inside f2" test runs: Screen Dump (size 80 columns x 24 rows, cursor at column 6, row 23): 0 +-...ld/binutils-gdb-noasan/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.tui/tui-missing-src/f2.c-+ 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 int | 3 | 3 f2 (int x) | 4 | 4 { | 5 | > 5 x <<= 1; | 6 | 6 return x+5; | 7 | 7 } | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 14 +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ 15 multi-thre Thread 0x7ffff7cc07 In: f2 L5 PC: 0x555555555143 16 at /home/simark/build/binutils-gdb-noasan/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.tui/tui- 17 missing-src/main.c:6 18 (gdb) next 19 (gdb) step 20 f2 (x=4) 21 at /home/simark/build/binutils-gdb-noasan/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.tui/tui- 22 missing-src/f2.c:5 23 (gdb) PASS: gdb.tui/tui-missing-src.exp: checking if inside f2 () When running the `Term::command "step"` just before, GDB writes the "step", which makes the `wait_for` proc go in the "looking for the prompt" mode, to know when the command's execution is complete. As some new output appears, lines that must disappear are deleted using the "Delete Line" operation [1] and some new ones are drawn. The source window gets redrawn with the contents of the f2.c file. Then, GDB writes the prompt (at line 23 above), which satisfies `wait_for`, which then returns. The state of the terminal is therefore correct for the "check if inside f2" and "f2.c must be displayed in the source window" tests. In the non-working case, the terminal looks like this by the time the "check if inside f2" test runs: Screen Dump (size 80 columns x 24 rows, cursor at column 6, row 17): 0 +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ 1 | | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | | 5 | | 6 | | 7 | [ No Source Available ] | 8 | | 9 | | 10 | | 11 | | 12 | | 13 | | 14 +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ 15 multi-thre Thread 0x7ffff7cc1b In: main L7 PC: 0x555555555128 16 sing-src/main.c:6 17 (gdb) ary breakpoint 1, main () 18 at /home/simark/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_linuxbuild/platform/jammy-amd6 19 4/target_board/unix/src/binutils-gdb/build/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.tui/tui-mis 20 sing-src/main.c:6 21 (gdb) next 22 (gdb) step 23 FAIL: gdb.tui/tui-missing-src.exp: checking if inside f2 () What happened is: GDB wrote the "step" command, which make the `wait_for` proc go in its "looking for the prompt" mode. However, curses decided to redraw whatever scrolled up to line 17 using some standard character insertion operations: +++ Cursor Down (1), cursor: (16, 0) -> (17, 0) +++ Inserting string '(' +++ Inserted char '(', cursor: (17, 0) -> (17, 1) +++ Inserted string '(', cursor: (17, 0) -> (17, 1) +++ Inserting string 'g' +++ Inserted char 'g', cursor: (17, 1) -> (17, 2) +++ Inserted string 'g', cursor: (17, 1) -> (17, 2) +++ Inserting string 'd' +++ Inserted char 'd', cursor: (17, 2) -> (17, 3) +++ Inserted string 'd', cursor: (17, 2) -> (17, 3) +++ Inserting string 'b' +++ Inserted char 'b', cursor: (17, 3) -> (17, 4) +++ Inserted string 'b', cursor: (17, 3) -> (17, 4) +++ Inserting string ')' +++ Inserted char ')', cursor: (17, 4) -> (17, 5) +++ Inserted string ')', cursor: (17, 4) -> (17, 5) +++ Inserting string ' ' +++ Inserted char ' ', cursor: (17, 5) -> (17, 6) +++ Inserted string ' ', cursor: (17, 5) -> (17, 6) And that causes `wait_for` to think the "step" command is complete. This is wrong, as the prompt at line 17 isn't the prompt drawn after the completion of the "step" command. The subsequent tests now run with a partially updated screen (what is shown above) and obviously fail. The ideal way to fix this would be for `wait_for` to be smarter, to avoid it confusing the different prompts drawn. However, I would also like to reduce the variations in TUI test results due to the directories (source and build) in which tests are ran. TUI tests are more prone to differences in test results due to variations in directory names than other tests, as it makes curses take different redrawing decisions. So in this patch, I propose to make TUI tests use "set filename-display basename", which makes GDB omit directory names when it prints file names. This way, regardless of where you run the tests, you should get the same results (all other things being equal). Doing this happens to fix my failures and makes my CI happy (which in turns makes me happy). To be clear, I understand that this does not fix the root issue of `proc wait_for` being confused. However, it makes TUI test runs be more similar for everyone, such that there's less chance of TUI tests randomly failing for somebody. If some other change triggers the `wait_for` problem again in the future, hopefully everybody will see the problem and we can work on getting it fixed more easily than if just one unlucky person sees the problem. Note that there are other reasons why TUI tests could vary, like different curses library versions taking different re-drawing decisions. However, I think my change is a good step towards more stable test results. [1] https://vt100.net/docs/vt510-rm/DL.html Change-Id: Ib18da83317e7b78a46f77892af0d2e39bd261bf5
2022-09-22gdb/testsuite/lib/future.exp: follow dejagnu default_target_compileLancelot SIX1-1/+5
GDB's testsuite can override dejagnu's default_target_compile if the system provided dejagnu installation does not provide support to compile languages GDB needs. Recent version of dejagnu (1.6.3, installed on RHEL-9) includes ba60272 "Establish a default C compiler by evaluating [find_gcc] if no other compiler is given."[1]. This commit removed calls such as `set_board_info compiler "[find_gcc]"` from the various baseboards and has default_target_compile call `find_gcc` itself to find a compiler if none was specified by the board description. On systems with dejagnu-1.6.3, if GDB's overrides is needed to support languages still unknown to dejagnu, we end up in the following situation: - The system board files do not set the C compiler anymore, - GDB's replacement for default_target_compile assumes that the compiler should have been set up by the board file. In this situation, no one sets the C compiler for the board and as a result many test are not compiled and not executed: [...] Running .../gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bt-on-error-and-warning.exp ... gdb compile failed, default_target_compile: No compiler to compile with Running .../gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf-non-stop.exp ... gdb compile failed, default_target_compile: No compiler to compile with Running .../gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs3.exp ... gdb compile failed, default_target_compile: No compiler to compile with [...] We are observing this error with ROCgdb[2], a downstream port of GDB supporting AMD GPUs. This port needs to use GDB's override of default_target_compile to compile HIP programs since dejagnu does not provide support for this language yet. This patch changes gdb_default_target_compile_1 in a similar way default_target_compile has been updated so both implementations remain compatible. Even if this is not strictly required by GDB just yet, I believe keeping both implementations in sync desirable. Using board files provided with dejagnu <=1.6.2 is still supported: if the compiler is set by the board file, gdb_default_target_compile_1 uses it and does not need `find_gcc`. Patch tested on x86_64 RHEL-9 and ubuntu-20.04 on top of GDB and ROCgdb. [1] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=dejagnu.git;a=commit;h=ba60272a5ac6f6a7012acca03f596a6ed003f044 [2] https://github.com/ROCm-Developer-Tools/ROCgdb Change-Id: Ibff52684d9cab8243a7c6748ecbd29f50c37e669
2022-09-22gdb/python: restrict the names accepted by gdb.register_window_typeAndrew Burgess1-0/+84
I noticed that, from Python, I could register a new TUI window that had whitespace in its name, like this: gdb.register_window_type('my window', MyWindowType) however, it is not possible to then use this window in a new TUI layout, e.g.: (gdb) tui new-layout foo my window 1 cmd 1 Unknown window "my" (gdb) tui new-layout foo "my window" 1 cmd 1 Unknown window ""my" (gdb) tui new-layout foo my\ window 1 cmd 1 Unknown window "my\" GDB clearly uses the whitespace to split the incoming command line. I could fix this by trying to add a mechanism by which we can use whitespace within a window name, but it seems like an easier solution if we just forbid whitespace within a window name. Not only is this easier, but I think this is probably the better solution, identifier names with spaces in would mean we'd need to audit all the places a window name could be printed and ensure that the use of a space didn't make the output ambiguous. So, having decided to disallow whitespace, I then thought about other special characters. We currently accept anything as a window name, and I wondered if this was a good idea. My concerns were about how special characters used in a window name might cause confusion, for example, we allow '$' in window names, which is maybe fine now, but what if one day we wanted to allow variable expansion when creating new layouts? Or what about starting a window name with '-'? We already support a '-horizontal' option, what if we want to add more in the future? Or use of the special character '{' which has special meaning within a new layout? In the end I figured it might make sense to place some restrictive rules in place, and then relax the rules later if/when users complain, we can consider each relaxation as its requested. So, I propose that window names should match this regular expression: [a-zA-Z][-_.a-zA-Z0-9]* There is a chance that there is user code in the wild which will break with the addition of this change, but hopefully adapting to the new restrictions shouldn't be too difficult.
2022-09-22gdb/testsuite: Add test to step through function epilogueBruno Larsen2-0/+136
The testsuite implicitly tests GDB's ability to step through epilogues in multiple tests, without doing it explicitly anywhere. This is unfortunate, as clang does not emit epilogue information, so using clang on our testsuite makes many tests fail. This patch adds a central, explicit test for walking through the epilogue so we can safely remove this from other tests and have them working with clang. The test created attempts to step through a simple epilogue, an epilogue that ends on another epilogue, and epilogues leading to other function calls.
2022-09-22gdb.base/skip.exp: Use finish to exit functionsBruno Larsen1-17/+17
gdb.base/skip.exp was making use of a fixed number of step commands to exit some functions. This caused some problems when using clang to test GDB, as GDB would need fewer steps to reach the desired spots. For instance, when testing in the section "step after disabling 3", the log looks like this: Breakpoint 4, main () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip.c:32 32 x = baz ((bar (), foo ())); (gdb) step bar () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip1.c:21 21 return 1; (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/skip.exp: step after disabling 3: step 1 step foo () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip.c:42 42 return 0; (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/skip.exp: step after disabling 3: step 2 step main () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip.c:34 34 test_skip_file_and_function (); (gdb) step test_skip_file_and_function () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip.c:59 59 test_skip (); (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/skip.exp: step after disabling 3: step 3 step test_skip () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip.c:48 48 } (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/skip.exp: step after disabling 3: step 4 step test_skip_file_and_function () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip.c:60 60 skip1_test_skip_file_and_function (); (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/skip.exp: step after disabling 3: step 5 This shows that the feature is working but because the inferior lands in a different location, it registers as a failure. Seeing as along with this difference, there are also some differences that depend on gcc versions (where gdb might stop back at line 32 before entering foo), it would not be easy to test for this behavior using steps and analzing where the inferior stops at each point. On the other hand, using gdb_step_until is not feasible because we'd possibly gloss over stepping into baz and rendering the whole test useless. Instead, skip.exp now uses finish to leave functions, synchronizing through compilers and compiler versions. Some test names were also changed to be a bit more descriptive. The new log looks like this, independently of compiler used: Breakpoint 4, main () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip.c:32 32 x = baz ((bar (), foo ())); (gdb) step bar () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip1.c:21 21 return 1; (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/skip.exp: step after disabling 3: step into bar finish Run till exit from #0 bar () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip1.c:21 main () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip.c:32 32 x = baz ((bar (), foo ())); Value returned is $2 = 1 (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/skip.exp: step after disabling 3: return from bar step foo () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip.c:42 42 return 0; (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/skip.exp: step after disabling 3: step into foo finish Run till exit from #0 foo () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip.c:42 main () at binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip.c:32 32 x = baz ((bar (), foo ())); Value returned is $3 = 0 (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/skip.exp: step after disabling 3: Return from foo step 34 test_skip_file_and_function (); (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/skip.exp: step after disabling 3: step and skip baz
2022-09-22fix gdb.base/jit-elf.exp when testing with clangBruno Larsen1-1/+1
When using clang as the compiler for the target, gdb.base/jit-elf.exp was failing because the filename displayed when GDB attached to the inferior was only showing up as with a relative path, like so: (gdb) attach 3674146 Attaching to program: /home/blarsen/Documents/gdb-build/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/jit-elf/jit-elf-main, process 3674146 Reading symbols from /lib64/libm.so.6... Reading symbols from .gnu_debugdata for /lib64/libm.so.6... (No debugging symbols found in .gnu_debugdata for /lib64/libm.so.6) Reading symbols from /lib64/libc.so.6... (No debugging symbols found in /lib64/libc.so.6) Reading symbols from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2... [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". 0x00000000004013ff in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffd820) at ../../../common/git-repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/jit-elf-main.c:118 118| WAIT_FOR_GDB; i = 0; /* gdb break here 1 */ (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/jit-elf.exp: attach: one_jit_test-2: break here 1: attach While gcc's output is as follows: (gdb) attach 3592961 Attaching to program: /home/blarsen/Documents/gdb-build/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/jit-elf/jit-elf-main, process 3592961 Reading symbols from /lib64/libm.so.6... Reading symbols from .gnu_debugdata for /lib64/libm.so.6... (No debugging symbols found in .gnu_debugdata for /lib64/libm.so.6) Reading symbols from /lib64/libc.so.6... (No debugging symbols found in /lib64/libc.so.6) Reading symbols from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2... [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffd860) at /home/blarsen/Documents/gdb-build/gdb/testsuite/../../../common/git-repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/jit-elf-main.c:118 118| WAIT_FOR_GDB; i = 0; /* gdb break here 1 */ (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/jit-elf.exp: attach: one_jit_test-2: break here 1: attach This difference only happens when GDB's configure is ran using a relative path, but seeing as testing the full path is not important for this specific test, it feels worth fixing anyway. To fix the false positive, the regexp for checking where gdb has stopped was relaxed a little to allow the relative path.
2022-09-22gdb/testsuite: fix gdb.base/msym-bp-shl when running with ClangBruno Larsen1-1/+1
When trying to test gdb.base/msym-bp-shl.exp using clang, it would have many failures because one of the version of the foo function was being optimized away. Adding __attribute__ ((used)) to it fixed this.
2022-09-22gdb/testsuite: fix testing gdb.base/skip-inline.exp with clangBruno Larsen1-45/+62
When testing gdb.base/skip-inline.exp using clang, we get failures when trying to step out of functions, since clang requires one fewer step when compared to gcc. The inferior gets increasingly out of sync as the test continues because of this difference, which generates those failures. This commit fixes this by switching those hardcoded steps to gdb_step_until, to guarantee that the inferior is always synced to what the test expects. This approach does not work for the parts that use step 2 or step 3, so when we identify that clang is being used, those tests are skipped.
2022-09-22Change gdb.base/skip-solib.exp deal with lack of epilogue informationBruno Larsen2-2/+4
When running gdb.base/skip-solib.exp, the backtrace tests could fail with compilers that associated epilogue instructions with the last statement line of the function, instead of associating it with the closing brace, despite the feature being fully functional. As an example, when testing skipping the function square, the testsuite would show Breakpoint 1, main () at (...)/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip-solib-main.c:5 5 return square(0); (gdb) step 0x00007ffff7cef560 in __libc_start_call_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6 (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/skip-solib.exp: ignoring solib file: step bt #0 0x00007ffff7cef560 in __libc_start_call_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffff7cef60c in __libc_start_main_impl () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x0000000000401065 in _start () (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/skip-solib.exp: ignoring solib file: bt Which means that the feature is working, the testsuite is just mis-identifying it. To avoid this problem, the skipped function calls have been sent to a line before `return`, so epilogues won't factor in.
2022-09-22gdb/testsuite: Add a proc to test where compiler links the epilogueBruno Larsen1-0/+32
Different compilers link the epilogue of functions to different lines. As an example, gcc links it to the closing brace of the function, whereas clang links it to the last statement of the function. This difference is important for the testsuite, since the where GDB will land after a step can be wildly different. Where possible, this dependency should be side-stepped in the testsuite, but it isn't always possible, so this commit adds a gdb_caching_proc that is able to detect where the epilogue is linked, so tests can react accordingly.
2022-09-20gdb/testsuite: add a debuginfod-support.exp helper libraryAndrew Burgess2-111/+243
We currently have a single test for GDB's debuginfod support, this is gdb.debuginfod/fetch_src_and_symbols.exp, this script does all the setup, starts debuginfod, and then does the testing. This commit tries to split the existing script in two, there is a new library lib/debuginfod-support.exp, which contains a helper functions related to running debuginfod tests. All the code in the new library is basically copied from the existing test case (which is why I retained the copyright date range on the new library), with some minor adjustments to try and make the code a little more generic. One change I made, for example, is the library offers functions to shut down debuginfod, previously we just relied on expect shutting down debuginfod when dejagnu completed. The existing test script is updated to make use of the new library code, and this test is still passing for me. The only change in the test results is a single test where I changed the name to remove the port number from the test name - the port number can change from run to run, so could make it hard to compare test results. I have also done a little light house keeping on the original test script, updating and adding new comments, and making use of proc_with_prefix in a couple of places.
2022-09-17[gdb/symtab] Fix "file index out of range" complaintTom de Vries2-0/+49
With the test-case included in this commit, we run into this FAIL: ... (gdb) p var^M During symbol reading: file index out of range^M $1 = 0^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-no-code-cu.exp: p var with no complaints ... This is a regression since commit 6d263fe46e0 ("Avoid bad breakpoints with --gc-sections"), which contains this change in read_file_scope: ... - handle_DW_AT_stmt_list (die, cu, fnd, lowpc); + if (lowpc != highpc) + handle_DW_AT_stmt_list (die, cu, fnd, lowpc); ... The change intends to avoid a problem with a check in lnp_state_machine::check_line_address, but also prevents the file and dir tables from being read, which causes the complaint. Fix the FAIL by reducing the scope of the "lowpc != highpc" condition to the call to dwarf_decode_lines in handle_DW_AT_stmt_list. Tested on x86_64-linux. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29561
2022-09-16BFD error message suppression test caseKevin Buettner2-0/+229
This commit adds a GDB test case which tests GDB's BFD error handler hook for suppressing output of all but the first identical messages. See the comment at the beginning of bfd-errors.exp for details about this new test. I've tested this test for both 32- and 64-bit ELF files and also on both little endian and big endian machines. It also works for both native and remote targets. The only major restriction is that it only works for ELF targets.
2022-09-16[gdb/symtab] Handle named DW_TAG_unspecified_type DIETom de Vries2-0/+68
With the test-case included in the patch, we run into: ... (gdb) info types -q std::nullptr_t^M During symbol reading: unsupported tag: 'DW_TAG_unspecified_type'^M ^M File /usr/include/c++/7/x86_64-suse-linux/bits/c++config.h:^M 2198: typedef decltype(nullptr) std::nullptr_t;^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/nullptr_t.exp: info types -q std::nullptr_t \ without complaint ... Fix the complaint by handling DW_TAG_unspecified_type in new_symbol, and verify in the test-case using "maint print symbols" that the symbol exists. Tested on x86_64-linux, with gcc 7.5.0 and clang 13.0. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17271
2022-09-16[gdb/tdep] Fix PowerPC IEEE 128-bit format arg passingTom de Vries2-0/+30
On a powerpc system with gcc 12 built to default to 128-bit IEEE long double, I run into: ... (gdb) print find_max_long_double_real(4, ldc1, ldc2, ldc3, ldc4)^M $8 = 0 + 0i^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/varargs.exp: print \ find_max_long_double_real(4, ldc1, ldc2, ldc3, ldc4) ... This is due to incorrect handling of the argument in ppc64_sysv_abi_push_param. Fix this and similar cases, and expand the test-case to test handling of homogeneous aggregates. Tested on ppc64le-linux, power 10. Co-Authored-By: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> Tested-by: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29543
2022-09-16[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.exp for aarch64Tom de Vries1-5/+12
[ Another attempt at fixing the problem described in commit cd919f5533c ("[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.exp"). ] When running the test-case gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.exp with aarch64-linux, we run into: ... (gdb) continue^M Continuing.^M ^M Breakpoint 2, compdir_missing__ldir_missing__file_basename () at \ tmp-dw2-dir-file-name.c:999^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.exp: \ compdir_missing__ldir_missing__file_basename: continue to breakpoint: \ compdir_missing__ldir_missing__file_basename ... The breakpoint set at compdir_missing__ldir_missing__file_basename_label, address 0x400608 starts at a line entry: ... CU: tmp-dw2-dir-file-name.c: File name Line number Starting address View Stmt tmp-dw2-dir-file-name.c 999 0x400608 x tmp-dw2-dir-file-name.c 1000 0x40062c x tmp-dw2-dir-file-name.c - 0x40062c ... and therefore the breakpoint is printed without instruction address. In contrast, for x86_64-linux, we have the breakpoint printed with instruction address: ... (gdb) continue^M Continuing.^M ^M Breakpoint 2, 0x004004c1 in compdir_missing__ldir_missing__file_basename () \ at tmp-dw2-dir-file-name.c:999^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.exp: \ compdir_missing__ldir_missing__file_basename: continue to breakpoint: \ compdir_missing__ldir_missing__file_basename ... The breakpoint set at compdir_missing__ldir_missing__file_basename_label, address 0x004004c1 doesn't start at a line entry: ... CU: tmp-dw2-dir-file-name.c: File name Line number Starting address View Stmt tmp-dw2-dir-file-name.c 999 0x4004bd x tmp-dw2-dir-file-name.c 1000 0x4004d3 x tmp-dw2-dir-file-name.c - 0x4004d3 ... Fix this by: - unifying behaviour between the archs by adding an explicit line number entry for the address compdir_missing__ldir_missing__file_basename_label, making the FAIL reproducible on x86_64-linux. - expecting the breakpoint to be printed without instruction address. Tested on x86_64-linux and aarch64-linux.
2022-09-13gdb/testsuite: Update gdb.base/so-impl-ld.expBruno Larsen2-13/+5
gdb.base/so-impl-ld.exp was setup assuming that the compiler would add epilogue information and that GDB would stop in the } line. This would make clang tests fail like so: step^M solib_main (arg=10000) at ../../../common/git-repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib1.c:7^M 7|__ return arg*arg;|__|___/* HERE */^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/so-impl-ld.exp: step into solib call next^M main () at ../../../common/git-repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/so-impl-ld.c:22^M 22|_ return 0;^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/so-impl-ld.exp: step in solib call next^M 0x00007ffff7cef560 in __libc_start_call_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/so-impl-ld.exp: step out of solib call This patch changes it so solib_main has 2 lines where GDB can stop regardless of compiler choices, and updates the exp file to generically deal with unknown number of steps until leaving that function.
2022-09-13gdb/testsuite: introduce gdb_step_untilBruno Larsen1-0/+30
Currently, GDB's testsuite uses a set amount of step commands to exit functions. This is a problem if a compiler emits different epilogue information from gcc, or emits no epilogue information at all. It was most noticeable if Clang was used to test GDB. To fix this unreliability, this commit introduces a new proc that will step the inferior until it is stopped at a line that matches the given regexp, or until it steps too many times - defined as an optional argument. If the line is found, it shows up as a single PASS in the test, and if the line is not found, a single FAIL is emitted. This patch only introduces this proc, but does not add it to any existing tests, these will be introduced in the following commit.
2022-09-13explicitly test for stderr in gdb.base/dprintf.expBruno Larsen1-0/+10
Not all compilers add stderr debug information when compiling a program. Clang, for instance, prefers to add nothing from standard libraries and let an external debug package have this information. Because of this, gdb.base/dprintf.exp was failing when GDB attempted to use dprintf as a call to fprintf(stderrr, ...), like this: (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: call: fprintf: set dprintf style to call continue Continuing. kickoff 1234 also to stderr 1234 'stderr' has unknown type; cast it to its declared type (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: call: fprintf: 1st dprintf (timeout) To avoid this false positive, we explicitly test to see if the compiler has added information about stderr at all, and abort testing dprintf as an fprintf call if it is unavailable.
2022-09-12add xfails to gdb.base/complex-parts.exp when testing with clangBruno Larsen1-0/+5
clang doesn't add encoding to the name of complex variables, only says that the type name is complex, making the relevant tests fail. This patch adds the xfails to the tests that expect the variable name to include it.
2022-09-12Fix gdb.base/call-ar-st to work with ClangBruno Larsen1-1/+12
When running gdb.base/call-ar-st.exp against Clang, we see one FAIL, like so: print_all_arrays (array_i=<main.integer_array>, array_c=<main.char_array> "ZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZa ZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZa", array_f=<main.float_array>, array_d=<main.double_array>) at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/call-ar-st.c:274 274 print_int_array(array_i); /* -step1- */ (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/call-ar-st.exp: step inside print_all_arrays With GCC we instead see: print_all_arrays (array_i=<integer_array>, array_c=<char_array> "ZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZaZa", array_f=<float_array>, array_d=<double_array>) at /home/pedro/gdb/build/gdb/testsuite/../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/call-ar-st.c:274 274 print_int_array(array_i); /* -step1- */ (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/call-ar-st.exp: step inside print_all_arrays The difference is that with Clang we get: array_i=<main.integer_array>, ... instead of array_i = <integer_array>, ... These symbols are local static variables, and "main" is the name of the function they are defined in. GCC instead appends a sequence number to the linkage name: $ nm -A call-ar-st.gcc | grep integer_ call-ar-st/call-ar-st:00000000000061a0 b integer_array.3968 $ nm -A call-ar-st.clang | grep integer_ call-ar-st:00000000004061a0 b main.integer_array This commit changes the testcase to accept both outputs, as they are functionally identical. Co-Authored-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> Change-Id: Iaf2ccdb9d5996e0268ed12f595a6e04b368bfcb4
2022-09-12fix gdb.base/access-mem-running.exp for clang testingBruno Larsen1-1/+1
Clang was optimizing global_var away because it was not being used anywhere. this commit fixes that by adding the attribute used it.
2022-09-12update gdb.base/info-program.exp to not fail with clangBruno Larsen1-3/+3
The test specifically mentions that it doesn't care where the program stops, however it was still testing for a specific location. The clang compiler emits different line information for epilogue, so GDB reports a different stopping location, depending on the used compiler. With this patch the test works even with clang.
2022-09-12gdb/testsuite: change gdb.base/nodebug.exp to not fail with clangBruno Larsen1-2/+10
Clang organizes the variables differently to gcc in the original version of this code, leading to the following differences when testing p (int*) &dataglobal + 1 gcc: $16 = (int *) 0x404034 <datalocal> clang: $16 = (int *) 0x404034 <dataglobal8> However, since the important part of this test doesn't seem to be which symbol is linked, but rather if GDB is correctly increasing the address. This test was changed to actually measure address changes, instead of assuming the ordering and naming of symbols. Co-Authored-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2022-09-12[gdb/symtab] Support .gdb_index section with TUs in .debug_infoTom de Vries2-0/+70
The .gdb_index variant of commit d878bb39e41 ("[gdb/symtab] Support .debug_names section with TUs in .debug_info"). Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-09-12[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.exp for ppc64leTom de Vries2-10/+5
In commit cd919f5533c ("[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.exp"), I made gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.exp independent of prologue analyzers, using this change: ... - gdb_breakpoint $func + gdb_breakpoint *$func ... That however caused a regression on ppc64le. For PowerPC, as described in the ELFv2 ABI, a function can have a global and local entry point. Setting a breakpoint on *$func effectively creates a breakpoint for the global entry point, so if the function is entered through the local entry point, the breakpoint doesn't trigger. Fix this by reverting commit cd919f5533c, and setting the breakpoint on ${func}_label instead. Tested on x86_64-linux and ppc64le-linux.
2022-09-12[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.exp with clangTom de Vries2-23/+62
When running test-case gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.exp with clang, we run into: ... (gdb) break *compdir_missing__ldir_missing__file_basename^M Breakpoint 2 at 0x400580^M (gdb) continue^M Continuing.^M ^M Breakpoint 2, 0x0000000000400580 in \ compdir_missing.ldir_missing.file_basename ()^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.exp: \ compdir_missing__ldir_missing__file_basename: continue to breakpoint: \ compdir_missing__ldir_missing__file_basename ... The problem is that the test-case uses labels outside functions, which is know to cause problem with clang, as documented in the comment for proc function_range. Fix this by using get_func_info instead. Tested on x86_64-linux, with both gcc 7.5.0 and clang 13.0.0.
2022-09-11[gdb/symtab] Fix handling of DW_TAG_unspecified_typeTom de Vries3-0/+119
Currently, the test-case contained in this patch fails: ... (gdb) p (int) foo ()^M Invalid cast.^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-unspecified-type.exp: p (int) foo () ... because DW_TAG_unspecified_type is translated as void. There's some code in read_unspecified_type that marks the type as stub, but that's only active for ada: ... if (cu->lang () == language_ada) type->set_is_stub (true); ... Fix this by: - marking the type as a stub for all languages, and - handling the stub return type case in call_function_by_hand_dummy. Tested on x86_64-linux. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29558
2022-09-08Fix hardware watchpoint check in test gdb.base/watchpoint-reuse-slot.expCarl Love1-1/+11
This test generates 48 failures on Power 9 when testing with HW watchpoints enabled. Note HW watchpoint support is disabled on Power 9 due to a HW bug. The skip_hw_watchpoint_tests proc must be used to correctly determine if the processor supports HW watchpoints. This patch replaces the [target_info exists gdb,no_hardware_watchpoints] with the skip_hw_watchpoint_tests check. This patch was tested on Power 9, Power 10 and X86-64 with no regressions.
2022-09-07[gdb/testsuite] xfail gdb.ada/O2_float_param.exp for aarch64 and gcc 7.5.0Tom de Vries1-1/+23
On aarch64-linux, with gcc 7.5.0, we run into: ... (gdb) frame^M #0 callee.increment (val=99.0, val@entry=9.18340949e-41, msg=...) at \ callee.adb:21^M 21 if Val > 200.0 then^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/O2_float_param.exp: scenario=all: frame ... The problem is a GCC bug, filed as "PR98148 - [AArch64] Wrong location expression for function entry values" ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98148 ). Xfail the test for aarch64 and gcc 7. Tested on x86_64-linux and aarch64-linux. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29418
2022-09-07[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.ada/access_tagged_param.exp for aarch64Tom de Vries3-3/+3
On aarch64-linux, I run into: ... Breakpoint 2, pck.inspect (obj=0x430eb0 \ <system.pool_global.global_pool_object>, <objL>=0) at pck.adb:17^M 17 procedure Inspect (Obj: access Top_T'Class) is^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/access_tagged_param.exp: continue ... while on x86_64-linux, I see: ... Breakpoint 2, pck.inspect (obj=0x62b2a0, <objL>=2) at pck.adb:19^M 19 null;^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/access_tagged_param.exp: continue ... Note the different line numbers, 17 vs 19. The difference comes from the gdbarch_skip_prologue implementation. The amd64_skip_prologue implementation doesn't use gcc line numbers, and falls back to the architecture-specific prologue analyzer, which correctly skips past the prologue, to address 0x4022f7: ... 00000000004022ec <pck__inspect>: 4022ec: 55 push %rbp 4022ed: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 4022f0: 48 89 7d f8 mov %rdi,-0x8(%rbp) 4022f4: 89 75 f4 mov %esi,-0xc(%rbp) 4022f7: 90 nop 4022f8: 90 nop 4022f9: 5d pop %rbp 4022fa: c3 ret ... The aarch64_skip_prologue implementation does use gcc line numbers, which are: ... File name Line number Starting address View Stmt pck.adb 17 0x402580 x pck.adb 17 0x402580 1 x pck.adb 19 0x40258c x pck.adb 20 0x402590 x ... and which are represented like this internally in gdb: ... INDEX LINE ADDRESS IS-STMT PROLOGUE-END 0 17 0x0000000000402580 Y 1 17 0x0000000000402580 Y 2 19 0x000000000040258c Y 3 20 0x0000000000402590 Y 4 END 0x00000000004025a0 Y ... The second entry is interpreted as end-of-prologue, so 0x402580 is used, while the actual end of the prologue is at 0x40258c: ... 0000000000402580 <pck__inspect>: 402580: d10043ff sub sp, sp, #0x10 402584: f90007e0 str x0, [sp, #8] 402588: b90007e1 str w1, [sp, #4] 40258c: d503201f nop 402590: d503201f nop 402594: 910043ff add sp, sp, #0x10 402598: d65f03c0 ret 40259c: d503201f nop ... Note that the architecture-specific prologue analyzer would have gotten this right: ... (gdb) p /x aarch64_analyze_prologue (gdbarch, pc, pc + 128, 0) $2 = 0x40258c ... Fix the FAIL by making the test-case more robust against problems in prologue skipping, by setting the breakpoint on line 19 instead. Likewise in a few similar test-cases. Tested on x86_64-linux and aarch64-linux.
2022-09-07[gdb/testsuite] Use prototype to call libc functionsTom de Vries4-4/+6
On openSUSE Tumbleweed (using glibc 2.36), I run into: ... (gdb) print /d (int) munmap (4198400, 4096)^M Invalid cast.^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/break-main-file-remove-fail.exp: cmdline: \ get integer valueof "(int) munmap (4198400, 4096)" ... The problem is that after starting the executable, the symbol has type "void (*) (void)": ... (gdb) p munmap $1 = {<text variable, no debug info>} 0x401030 <munmap@plt> (gdb) start ... (gdb) p munmap $2 = {void (void)} 0x7ffff7feb9a0 <__GI_munmap> ... which causes the "Invalid cast" error. Looking at the debug info for glibc for symbol __GI_munmap: ... <0><189683>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_compile_unit) <189691> DW_AT_name : ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S <189699> DW_AT_producer : GNU AS 2.39.0 <1><1896ae>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_subprogram) <1896af> DW_AT_name : __GI___munmap <1896b3> DW_AT_external : 1 <1896b4> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x10cad0 <1896bc> DW_AT_high_pc : 37 ... that's probably caused by this bit (or similar bits for other munmap aliases). This is fixed in gas on trunk by commit 5578fbf672e ("GAS: Add a return type tag to DWARF DIEs generated for function symbols"). Work around this (for say gas 2.39) by explicitly specifying the prototype for munmap. Likewise for getpid in a couple of other test-cases. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-09-06[gdb/symtab] Support .debug_names section with TUs in .debug_infoTom de Vries4-81/+131
When running test-case gdb.cp/cpexprs-debug-types.exp on target board cc-with-debug-names/gdb:debug_flags=-gdwarf-5, we get an executable with a .debug_names section, but no .debug_types section. For dwarf-5, the TUs are no longer put in a separate unit, but instead they're put in the .debug_info section. When loading the executable, the .debug_names section is silently ignored because of this check in dwarf2_read_debug_names: ... if (map->tu_count != 0) { /* We can only handle a single .debug_types when we have an index. */ if (per_bfd->types.size () != 1) return false; ... which triggers because per_bfd->types.size () == 0. The intention of the check is to make sure we don't have more that one .debug_types section, as can happen in a object file (see PR12984): ... $ grep "\.debug_types" 11.s .section .debug_types,"G",@progbits,wt.75c042c23a9a07ee,comdat .section .debug_types,"G",@progbits,wt.c59c413bf50a4607,comdat ... Fix this by: - changing the check condition to "per_bfd->types.size () > 1", and - handling per_bfd->types.size () == 0. Tested on x86_64-linux. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29385
2022-09-06[gdb/testsuite] Add gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-bad-cu-index.expTom de Vries2-8/+114
Add test-case gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-bad-cu-index.exp, a regression test for commit 2fe9a3c41fa ("[gdb/symtab] Fix bad compile unit index complaint"). Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-09-06[gdb/testsuite] Add gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-tu.expTom de Vries2-12/+137
Add a test-case gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-tu.exp, that uses the dwarf assembler to specify a .debug_names index with the TU list referring to a TU from the .debug_types section. This is intended to produce something similar to: ... $ gcc -g -fdebug-types-section ~/hello.c -gdwarf-4 $ gdb-add-index -dwarf-5 a.out ... Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-08-31Fix interpreter-exec crashTom Tromey1-0/+11
PR mi/10347 points out that using interpreter-exec inside of a "define" command will crash gdb. The bug here is that gdb_setup_readline doesn't check for the case where instream==nullptr. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10347
2022-08-31Fix "source" with interpreter-execTom Tromey2-0/+26
PR mi/15811 points out that "source"ing a file that uses interpreter-exec will put gdb in a weird state, where the CLI stops working. The bug is that tui_interp::suspend does not unregister the event file descriptor. The test case is from Andrew Burgess. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15811
2022-08-31gdb/riscv: better support for fflags and frm registersAndrew Burgess7-12/+363
First, some background on the RISC-V registers fflags, frm, and fcsr. These three registers all relate to the floating-point status and control mechanism on RISC-V. The fcsr is the floatint-point control status register, and consists of two parts, the flags (bits 0 to 4) and the rounding-mode (bits 5 to 7). The fcsr register is just one of many control/status registers (or CSRs) available on RISC-V. The fflags and frm registers are also CSRs. These CSRs are aliases for the relevant parts of the fcsr register. So fflags is an alias for bits 0 to 4 of fcsr, and frm is an alias for bits 5 to 7 of fcsr. This means that a user can change the floating-point rounding mode either, by writing a complete new value into fcsr, or by writing just the rounding mode into frm. How this impacts on GDB is like this: a target description could, legitimately include all three registers, fcsr, fflags, and frm. The QEMU target currently does this, and this makes sense. The target is emulating the complete system, and has all three CSRs available, so why not tell GDB about this. In contrast, the RISC-V native Linux target only has access to the fcsr. This is because the ptrace data structure that the kernel uses for reading and writing floating point state only contains a copy of the fcsr, after all, this one field really contains both the fflags and frm fields, so why carry around duplicate data. So, we might expect that the target description for the RISC-V native Linux GDB would only contain the fcsr register. Unfortunately, this is not the case. The RISC-V native Linux target uses GDB's builtin target descriptions by calling riscv_lookup_target_description, this will then add an fpu feature from gdb/features/riscv, either 32bit-fpu.xml or 64bit-fpu.xml. The problem, is that these features include an entry for fcsr, fflags, and frm. This means that GDB expects the target to handle reading and writing these registers. And the RISC-V native Linux target currently doesn't. In riscv_linux_nat_target::store_registers and riscv_linux_nat_target::fetch_registers only the fcsr register is handled, this means that, for RISC-V native Linux, the fflags and frm registers always show up as <unavailable> - they are present in the target description, but the target doesn't know how to access the registers. A final complication relating to these floating pointer CSRs is which target description feature the registers appear in. These registers are CSRs, so it would seem sensible that these registers should appear in the CSR target description feature. However, when I first added RISC-V target description support, I was using a RISC-V simulator that didn't support any CSRs other than the floating point related ones. This simulator bundled all the float related CSRs into the fpu target feature. This didn't feel completely unreasonable to me, and so I had GDB check for these registers in either target feature. In this commit I make some changes relating to how GDB handles the three floating point CSR: 1. Remove fflags and frm from 32bit-fpu.xml and 64bit-fpu.xml. This means that the default RISC-V target description (which RISC-V native FreeBSD), and the target descriptions created for RISC-V native Linux, will not include these registers. There's nothing stopping some other target (e.g. QEMU) from continuing to include all three of these CSRs, the code in riscv-tdep.c continues to check for all three of these registers, and will handle them correctly if they are present. 2. If a target supplied fcsr, but does not supply fflags and/or frm, then RISC-V GDB will now create two pseudo registers in order to emulate the two missing CSRs. These new pseudo-registers do the obvious thing of just reading and writing the fcsr register. 3. With the new pseudo-registers we can no longer make use of the GDB register numbers RISCV_CSR_FFLAGS_REGNUM and RISCV_CSR_FRM_REGNUM. These will be the numbers used if the target supplies the registers in its target description, but, if GDB falls back to using pseudo-registers, then new, unique numbers will be used. To handle this I've added riscv_gdbarch_tdep::fflags_regnum and riscv_gdbarch_tdep::frm_regnum, I've then updated the RISC-V code to compare against these fields. When adding the pseudo-register support, it is important that the pseudo-register numbers are calculated after the call to tdesc_use_registers. This is because we don't know the total number of physical registers until after this call, and the psuedo-register numbers must follow on from the real (target supplied) registers. I've updated some tests to include more testing of the fflags and frm registers, as well as adding a new test.