| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This commit is the result of the following actions:
- Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to
include 2024,
- Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to
update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the
file,
- Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright
date,
- Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If
these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've
updated them this year to 2024.
I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as
you spot them.
|
|
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
|
|
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
|
|
This commits the result of running gdb/copyright.py as per our Start
of New Year procedure...
gdb/ChangeLog
Update copyright year range in copyright header of all GDB files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
This commit applies all changes made after running the gdb/copyright.py
script.
Note that one file was flagged by the script, due to an invalid
copyright header
(gdb/unittests/basic_string_view/element_access/char/empty.cc).
As the file was copied from GCC's libstdc++-v3 testsuite, this commit
leaves this file untouched for the time being; a patch to fix the header
was sent to gcc-patches first.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
Invoking -var-info-path-expression on a dynamic varobj lead either in wrong
(nonsense) result or to a segmentation fault in cplus_describe_child().
This was caused by the fact that varobj_get_path_expr() called
cplus_path_expr_of_child() ignoring the fact the parent of the variable
is dynamic. Then, cplus_describe_child() accessed the underlaying C type
members by index, causing (i) either wrong (nonsense) expression being
returned (since dynamic child may be completely arbibtrary value)
or (ii) segmentation fault (in case the index higher than number of
underlaying C type members.
This fixes the problem by checking whether a varobj is a child of a dynamic
varobj and, if so, reporting an error as described in documentation.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* varobj.c (varobj_get_path_expr_parent): Report an error if
parent is a dynamic varobj.
gdb/testsuite/Changelog:
* gdb.python/py-mi-var-info-path-expression.c: New file.
* gdb.python/py-mi-var-info-path-expression.py: New file.
* gdb.python/py-mi-var-info-path-expression.exp: New file.
|
