| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This commit is the result of the following actions:
- Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to
include 2024,
- Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to
update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the
file,
- Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright
date,
- Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If
these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've
updated them this year to 2024.
I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as
you spot them.
|
|
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
|
|
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
|
|
As reported in bug 27757, we get an internal error when doing:
$ cat test.c
struct foo {
int len;
int items[];
};
struct foo *p;
int main() {
return 0;
}
$ gcc test.c -g -O0 -o test
$ ./gdb -q -nx --data-directory=data-directory ./test -ex 'python gdb.parse_and_eval("p").type.target()["items"].type.range()'
Reading symbols from ./test...
/home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/gdbtypes.h:435: internal-error: LONGEST dynamic_prop::const_val() const: Assertion `m_kind == PROP_CONST' failed.
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
further debugging may prove unreliable.
Quit this debugging session? (y or n)
This is because the Python code (typy_range) blindly reads the high
bound of the type of `items` as a constant value. Since it is a
flexible array member, it has no high bound, the property is undefined.
Since commit 8c2e4e0689 ("gdb: add accessors to struct dynamic_prop"),
the getters check that you are not getting a property value of the wrong
kind, so this causes a failed assertion.
Fix it by checking if the property is indeed a constant value before
accessing it as such. Otherwise, use 0. This restores the previous GDB
behavior: because the structure was zero-initialized, this is what was
returned before. But now this behavior is explicit and not accidental.
Add a test, gdb.python/flexible-array-member.exp, that is derived from
gdb.base/flexible-array-member.exp. It tests the same things, but
through the Python API. It also specifically tests getting the range
from the various kinds of flexible array member types (AFAIK it wasn't
possible to do the equivalent through the CLI).
gdb/ChangeLog:
PR gdb/27757
* python/py-type.c (typy_range): Check that bounds are constant
before accessing them as such.
* guile/scm-type.c (gdbscm_type_range): Likewise.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR gdb/27757
* gdb.python/flexible-array-member.c: New test.
* gdb.python/flexible-array-member.exp: New test.
* gdb.guile/scm-type.exp (test_range): Add test for flexible
array member.
* gdb.guile/scm-type.c (struct flex_member): New.
(main): Use it.
Change-Id: Ibef92ee5fd871ecb7c791db2a788f203dff2b841
|
