aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/python
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-09-26Introduce gdb.ValuePrinterTom Tromey3-28/+94
There was an earlier thread about adding new methods to pretty-printers: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-June/200503.html We've known about the need for printer extensibility for a while, but have been hampered by backward-compatibilty concerns: gdb never documented that printers might acquire new methods, and so existing printers may have attribute name clashes. To solve this problem, this patch adds a new pretty-printer tag class that signals to gdb that the printer follows new extensibility rules. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30816 Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2023-09-26[gdb/dap] Fix dap for python < 3.8Tom de Vries1-1/+5
With any gdb.dap test and python 3.6 I run into: ... Error occurred in Python: 'code' object has no attribute 'co_posonlyargcount' ERROR: eof reading json header ... The attribute is not supported before python 3.8, which introduced the "Positional−only Parameters" concept. Fix this by using try/except AttributeError. Tested on x86_64-linux: - openSUSE Leap 15.4 with python 3.6, and - openSUSE Tumbleweed with python 3.11.5. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-09-20Remove stray trailing "," from DAP breakpoint.pyTom Tromey1-1/+1
The buildbot pointed out that the last DAP series I checked in had an issue. Looking into it, it seems there is a stray trailing "," in breakpoint.py. This patch removes it. This seems to point out a test suite deficiency. I will look into fixing that.
2023-09-20Remove explanatory comments from includesTom Tromey4-4/+4
I noticed a comment by an include and remembered that I think these don't really provide much value -- sometimes they are just editorial, and sometimes they are obsolete. I think it's better to just remove them. Tested by rebuilding. Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2023-09-20gdb/dap: only include sourceReference if file path does not existGregory Anders1-5/+11
According to the DAP specification if the "sourceReference" field is included in a Source object, then the DAP client _must_ make a "source" request to the debugger to retrieve file contents, even if the Source object also includes path information. If the Source's path field is a valid path that the DAP client is able to read from the filesystem, having to make another request to the debugger to get the file contents is wasteful and leads to incorrect results (DAP clients will try to get the contents from the server and display those contents as a file with the name in "source.path", but this will conflict with the _acutal_ existing file at "source.path"). Instead, only set "sourceReference" if the source file path does not exist. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-09-20gdb/dap: use breakpoint fullname to resolve sourceGregory Anders1-3/+3
If the breakpoint has a fullname, use that as the source path when resolving the breakpoint source information. This is consistent with other callers of make_source which also use "fullname" if it exists (see e.g. DAPFrameDecorator which returns the symtab's fullname). Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-09-20gdb/dap: ignore unused keyword args in step_outGregory Anders2-1/+8
Some DAP clients may send additional parameters in the stepOut command (e.g. "granularity") which are not used by GDB, but should nonetheless be accepted without error. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-09-20gdb/dap: check for breakpoint source before unpackingGregory Anders1-8/+12
Not all breakpoints have a source location. For example, a breakpoint set on a raw address will have only the "address" field populated, but "source" will be None, which leads to a RuntimeError when attempting to unpack the filename and line number. Before attempting to unpack the filename and line number from the breakpoint, ensure that the source information is not None. Also populate the source and line information separately from the "instructionReference" field, so that breakpoints that include only an address are still included. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-09-20Run 'black' on printing.pyTom Tromey1-1/+5
The buildbot pointed out that I neglected to re-run 'black' after making some changes. This patch fixes the oversight.
2023-09-19Handle pointers and references correctly in DAPTom Tromey1-0/+16
A user pointed out that the current DAP variable code does not let the client deference a pointer. Oops! Fixing this oversight is simple enough -- adding a new no-op pretty-printer for pointers and references is quite simple. However, doing this naive caused a regession in scopes.exp, which expected there to be no children of a 'const char *' variable. This problem was fixed by the preceding patches in the series, which ensure that a C type of this kind is recognized as a string. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30821
2023-09-19Give a language to a typeTom Tromey1-9/+4
This changes main_type to hold a language, and updates the debug readers to set this field. This is done by adding the language to the type-allocator object. Note that the non-DWARF readers are changed on a "best effort" basis. This patch also reimplements type::is_array_like to use the type's language, and it adds a new type::is_string_like as well. This in turn lets us change the Python implementation of these methods to simply defer to the type.
2023-09-19Use gdb::checked_static_cast for watchpointsTom Tromey1-2/+1
This replaces some casts to 'watchpoint *' with checked_static_cast. In one spot, an unnecessary block is also removed. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-09-12Avoid spurious breakpoint-setting failure in DAPTom Tromey1-1/+7
A user pointed out that if a DAP setBreakpoints request has a 'source' field in a SourceBreakpoint object, then the gdb DAP implementation will throw an exception. While SourceBreakpoint does not allow 'source' in the spec, it seems better to me to accept it. I don't think we should fully go down the "Postel's Law" path -- after all, we have the type-checker -- but at the same time, if we do send errors, they should be intentional and not artifacts of the implementation. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30820
2023-09-06[gdb/symtab] Fix too many symbols in gdbpy_lookup_static_symbolsTom de Vries1-2/+5
When running test-case gdb.python/py-symbol.exp with target board cc-with-dwz-m, we run into: ... (gdb) python print (len (gdb.lookup_static_symbols ('rr')))^M 4^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.python/py-symbol.exp: \ print (len (gdb.lookup_static_symbols ('rr'))) ... while with target board unix we have instead: ... (gdb) python print (len (gdb.lookup_static_symbols ('rr')))^M 2^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.python/py-symbol.exp: \ print (len (gdb.lookup_static_symbols ('rr'))) ... The problem is that the loop in gdbpy_lookup_static_symbols loops over compunits representing both CUs and PUs: ... for (compunit_symtab *cust : objfile->compunits ()) ... When doing a lookup on a PU, the user link is followed until we end up at a CU, and the lookup is done in that CU. In other words, when doing a lookup in the loop for a PU we duplicate the lookup for a CU that is already handled by the loop. Fix this by skipping PUs in the loop in gdb.lookup_static_symbols. Tested on x86_64-linux. PR symtab/25261 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25261
2023-09-05Handle array- and string-like values in no-op pretty printersTom Tromey1-3/+23
This changes the no-op pretty printers -- used by DAP -- to handle array- and string-like objects known by the gdb core. Two new tests are added, one for Ada and one for Rust.
2023-09-05Add new Python APIs to support DAP value displayTom Tromey2-0/+94
gdb's language code may know how to display values specially. For example, the Rust code understands that &str is a string-like type, or Ada knows how to handle unconstrained arrays. This knowledge is exposed via val-print, and via varobj -- but currently not via DAP. This patch adds some support code to let DAP also handle these cases, though in a somewhat more generic way. Type.is_array_like and Value.to_array are added to make Python aware of the cases where gdb knows that a structure type is really "array-like". Type.is_string_like is added to make Python aware of cases where gdb's language code knows that a type is string-like. Unlike Value.string, these cases are handled by the type's language, rather than the current language. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2023-09-05Select frame when fetching a frame variable in DAPTom Tromey2-3/+12
Right now, if a program uses multiple languages, DAP value formatting will always use the language of the innermost frame. However, it is better to use the variable's defining frame instead. This patch does this by selecting the frame first. This also fixes a possibly latent bug in the "stepOut" command -- "finish" is sensitive to the selected frame, but the DAP code may already select other frames when convenient. The DAP stepOut request only works on the newest frame, so be sure to select it before invoking "finish".
2023-09-05Use ada_value_subscript in valpy_getitemTom Tromey1-0/+3
Ada has a few complexities when it comes to array handling. Currently these are all handled in Ada-specific code -- but unfortunately that means they aren't really accessible to Python. This patch changes the Python code to defer to Ada when given an Ada array. In order to make this work, one spot in ada-lang.c had to be updated to set the "GNAT-specific" flag on an array type. The test case for this will come in a later patch.
2023-08-31gdb: remove TYPE_FIELD_BITSIZESimon Marchi1-1/+1
Replace with type::field + field::bitsize. Change-Id: I2a24755a33683e4a2775a6d2a7b7a9ae7362e43a Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-08-31gdb: remove TYPE_FIELD_ARTIFICIALSimon Marchi1-1/+1
Replace with type::field + field::is_artificial. Change-Id: Ie3bacae49d9bd02e83e504c1ce01470aba56a081 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-08-24[gdb/build] Return gdb::array_view in thread_info_to_thread_handleTom de Vries1-2/+2
In remote_target::thread_info_to_thread_handle we return a copy: ... gdb::byte_vector remote_target::thread_info_to_thread_handle (struct thread_info *tp) { remote_thread_info *priv = get_remote_thread_info (tp); return priv->thread_handle; } ... Fix this by returning a gdb::array_view instead: ... gdb::array_view<const gdb_byte> remote_target::thread_info_to_thread_handle (struct thread_info *tp) ... Tested on x86_64-linux. This fixes the build when building with -std=c++20. Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
2023-08-23gdb: centralize "[Thread ...exited]" notificationsPedro Alves1-1/+3
Currently, each target backend is responsible for printing "[Thread ...exited]" before deleting a thread. This leads to unnecessary differences between targets, like e.g. with the remote target, we never print such messages, even though we do print "[New Thread ...]". E.g., debugging the gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp with gdbserver, letting it run for a bit, and then pressing Ctrl-C, we currently see: (gdb) c Continuing. ^C[New Thread 3850398.3887449] [New Thread 3850398.3887500] [New Thread 3850398.3887551] [New Thread 3850398.3887602] [New Thread 3850398.3887653] ... Thread 1 "attach-many-sho" received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. 0x00007ffff7e6a23f in __GI___clock_nanosleep (clock_id=clock_id@entry=0, flags=flags@entry=0, req=req@entry=0x7fffffffda80, rem=rem@entry=0x7fffffffda80) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_nanosleep.c:78 78 in ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_nanosleep.c (gdb) Above, we only see "New Thread" notifications, even though threads were deleted. After this patch, we'll see: (gdb) c Continuing. ^C[Thread 3558643.3577053 exited] [Thread 3558643.3577104 exited] [Thread 3558643.3577155 exited] [Thread 3558643.3579603 exited] ... [New Thread 3558643.3597415] [New Thread 3558643.3600015] [New Thread 3558643.3599965] ... Thread 1 "attach-many-sho" received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. 0x00007ffff7e6a23f in __GI___clock_nanosleep (clock_id=clock_id@entry=0, flags=flags@entry=0, req=req@entry=0x7fffffffda80, rem=rem@entry=0x7fffffffda80) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_nanosleep.c:78 78 in ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_nanosleep.c (gdb) q This commit fixes this by moving the thread exit printing to common code instead, triggered from within delete_thread (or rather, set_thread_exited). There's one wrinkle, though. While most targest want to print: [Thread ... exited] the Windows target wants to print: [Thread ... exited with code <exit_code>] ... and sometimes wants to suppress the notification for the main thread. To address that, this commits adds a delete_thread_with_code function, only used by that target (so far). This fix was originally posted as part of a larger series: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20221212203101.1034916-1-pedro@palves.net/ But didn't really need to be part of that series. In order to get this fix merged sooner, I (Andrew Burgess) have rebased this commit outside of the original series. Any bugs introduced while splitting this patch out and rebasing, are entirely my own. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30129 Co-Authored-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2023-08-23gdb: remove mi_parse::make functionsAndrew Burgess1-2/+2
Remove the static mi_parse::make functions, and instead use the mi_parse constructor. This is a partial revert of the commit: commit fde3f93adb50c9937cd2e1c93561aea2fd167156 Date: Mon Mar 20 10:56:55 2023 -0600 Introduce "static constructor" for mi_parse which introduced the mi_parse::make functions, though after discussion on the list the reasons for seem to have been lost[1]. Given there are no test regressions when moving back to using the constructors, I propose we should do that for now. There should be no user visible changes after this commit. [1] https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20230404-dap-loaded-sources-v2-5-93f229095e03@adacore.com/ Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-08-23gdb: add gdb::make_unique functionAndrew Burgess1-3/+1
While GDB is still C++11, lets add a gdb::make_unique template function that can be used to create std::unique_ptr objects, just like the C++14 std::make_unique. If GDB is being compiled with a C++14 compiler then the new gdb::make_unique function will delegate to the std::make_unique. I checked with gcc, and at -O1 and above gdb::make_unique will be optimised away completely in this case. If C++14 (or later) becomes our minimum, then it will be easy enough to go through the code and replace gdb::make_unique with std::make_unique later on. I've make use of this function in all the places I think this can easily be used, though I'm sure I've probably missed some. Should be no user visible changes after this commit. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-08-22Remove value::copy call from gdbpy_get_varobj_pretty_printerTom Tromey1-9/+0
I noticed a call to value::copy in gdbpy_get_varobj_pretty_printer, and I couldn't figure out why it was there. I think maybe it came from the time when value_to_value_object would release values from the value chain -- but that was removed in commit f3d3bbbc. This patch removes this call. Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 36.
2023-08-17gdb: add inferior-specific breakpointsAndrew Burgess2-2/+96
This commit extends the breakpoint mechanism to allow for inferior specific breakpoints (but not watchpoints in this commit). As GDB gains better support for multiple connections, and so for running multiple (possibly unrelated) inferiors, then it is not hard to imagine that a user might wish to create breakpoints that apply to any thread in a single inferior. To achieve this currently, the user would need to create a condition possibly making use of the $_inferior convenience variable, which, though functional, isn't the most user friendly. This commit adds a new 'inferior' keyword that allows for the creation of inferior specific breakpoints. Inferior specific breakpoints are automatically deleted when the associated inferior is removed from GDB, this is similar to how thread-specific breakpoints are deleted when the associated thread is deleted. Watchpoints are already per-program-space, which in most cases mean watchpoints are already inferior specific. There is a small window where inferior-specific watchpoints might make sense, which is after a vfork, when two processes are sharing the same address space. However, I'm leaving that as an exercise for another day. For now, attempting to use the inferior keyword with a watchpoint will give an error, like this: (gdb) watch a8 inferior 1 Cannot use 'inferior' keyword with watchpoints A final note on the implementation: currently, inferior specific breakpoints, like thread-specific breakpoints, are inserted into every inferior, GDB then checks once the inferior stops if we are in the correct thread or inferior, and resumes automatically if we stopped in the wrong thread/inferior. An obvious optimisation here is to only insert breakpoint locations into the specific program space (which mostly means inferior) that contains either the inferior or thread we are interested in. This would reduce the number times GDB has to stop and then resume again in a multi-inferior setup. I have a series on the mailing list[1] that implements this optimisation for thread-specific breakpoints. Once this series has landed I'll update that series to also handle inferior specific breakpoints in the same way. For now, inferior specific breakpoints are just slightly less optimal, but this is no different to thread-specific breakpoints in a multi-inferior debug session, so I don't see this as a huge problem. [1] https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/cover.1685479504.git.aburgess@redhat.com/
2023-08-16Implement DAP module-removed eventTom Tromey1-0/+13
DAP specifies an event that should be sent when a module is removed. This patch implements this. Tested-By: Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova <ahajkova@redhat.com>
2023-08-14[gdb/build] Fix enum param_types odr violationTom de Vries1-1/+1
When building gdb with -O2 -flto, I run into: ... gdb/guile/scm-param.c:121:6: warning: type 'param_types' violates the C++ \ One Definition Rule [-Wodr] enum param_types ^ gdb/python/py-param.c:33:6: note: an enum with different value name is \ defined in another translation unit enum param_types ^ ... Fix this by renaming to enum scm_param_types and py_param_types. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR build/22395 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22395
2023-08-14[gdb/build] Remove superfluous variable param_types in gdb/python/py-param.cTom de Vries1-2/+1
In gdb/python/py-param.c we have: ... enum param_types { ... } param_types; ... which declares both an enum param_types, and an unused variable param_types. Fix this by removing the variable. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-08-03Remove f-string from DAPTom Tromey1-1/+1
One more f-string snuck into the DAP code, in breakpoint.py. Most of them were removed here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-June/200023.html but I think this one landed after that patch. While DAP only supports Python 3.5 and later, f-strings were added in 3.6, so remove this. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30708
2023-08-03Use frame.name() in FrameDecoratorTom Tromey1-11/+4
A co-worker pointed out that gdb's DAP implementation might return an integer for the name of a stack frame, like: {"id": 1, "name": 93824992310799, ...} This can be seen currently in the logs of the bt-nodebug.exp test case. What is happening is that FrameDecorator falls back on returning the PC when the frame's function symbol cannot be found, relying on the gdb core to look up the minsym and print its name. This can actually yield the wrong answer sometimes, because it falls into the get_frame_pc / get_frame_address_in_block problem -- if the frame is at a call to a noreturn function, the PC in this case might appear to be in the next function in memory. For more on this, see: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8416 and related bugs. However, there's a different approach we can take: the code here can simply use Frame.name. This handles the PC problem correctly, and gets us the information we need.
2023-08-02[gdb/dap] Disable DAP for python <= 3.5Tom de Vries1-0/+3
DAP requires python module typing, which is supported starting python 3.5. Make this formal by: - disabling the dap interpreter for python version < 3.5 - returning 0 in allow_dap_tests for python version < 3.5 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR dap/30708 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30708
2023-08-01Implement DAP "source" requestTom Tromey1-1/+23
This implements the DAP "source" request. I renamed the "loadedSources" function from "sources" to "loaded_sources" to avoid any confusion. I also moved the loadedSources test to the new sources.exp. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30691
2023-08-01Handle Source in DAP breakpointLocationsTom Tromey2-8/+20
This changes the DAP breakpointLocations request to accept a Source and to decode it properly.
2023-08-01Introduce sourceReference handling in DAPTom Tromey3-20/+41
This changes the gdb DAP implementation to emit a real sourceReference, rather than emitting 0. Sources are tracked in some maps in sources.py, and a new helper function is introduced to compute the "Source" object that can be sent to the client.
2023-08-01Don't supply DAP 'path' for non-file shared librariesTom Tromey1-2/+4
The DAP 'module' event may include a 'path' component. I noticed that this is supplied even when the module in question does not come from a file. This patch only emits this field when the objfile corresponds to a real file. No test case, because I wasn't sure how to write a portable one. However, it's clear from gdb.log on Linux: {"type": "event", "event": "module", "body": {"reason": "new", "module": {"id": "system-supplied DSO at 0x7ffff7fc4000", "name": "system-supplied DSO at 0x7ffff7fc4000"}}, "seq": 21} Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30676
2023-08-01Implement ValueFormat for DAPTom Tromey3-78/+114
This patch implements ValueFormat for DAP. Currently this only means supporting "hex". Note that StackFrameFormat is defined to have many more options, but none are currently recognized. It isn't entirely clear how these should be handled. I'll file a new gdb bug for this, and perhaps an upstream DAP bug as well. New in v2: - I realized that the "hover" context was broken, and furthermore that we only had tests for "hover" failing, not for it succeeding. This version fixes the oversight and adds a test. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30469
2023-08-01Respect supportsMemoryReferences in DAPTom Tromey2-11/+7
I noticed that the support for memoryReference in the "variables" output is gated on the client "supportsMemoryReferences" capability. This patch implements this and makes some other changes to the DAP memory reference code: * Remove the memoryReference special case from _SetResult. Upstream DAP fixed this oversight in response to https://github.com/microsoft/debug-adapter-protocol/issues/414 * Don't use the address of a variable as its memoryReference -- only emit this for pointer types. There's no spec support for the previous approach. * Use strip_typedefs to handle typedefs of pointers.
2023-08-01Add DAP support for C++ exceptionsTom Tromey1-4/+17
This adds DAP support for the various C++ exception-catching operations. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30682
2023-08-01Implement DAP 'terminated' eventTom Tromey2-1/+2
This implements the DAP 'terminated' event. Vladimir Makaev noticed that VSCode will not report the debug session as over unless this is sent. It's not completely clear when exactly this event ought to be sent. Here I've done it when the inferior exits. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30681
2023-08-01Do not send "new breakpoint" event when breakpoint is setTom Tromey1-8/+28
When the DAP client sets a breakpoint, gdb currently sends a "new breakpoint" event. However, Vladimir Makaev discovered that this causes VSCode to think there are two breakpoints. This patch changes gdb to suppress the event in this case. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30678
2023-08-01Move DAP breakpoint event code to breakpoint.pyTom Tromey2-39/+40
A subsequent patch will add the ability to suppress breakpoint events to DAP. My first attempt at this ended up with recurse imports, causing Python failures. So, this patch moves all the DAP breakpoint event code to breakpoint.py in preparation for the change. I've renamed breakpoint_descriptor here as well, because it can now be private to breakpoint.py.
2023-08-01Full paths in DAP stackTrace responsesTom Tromey2-51/+82
Vladimir Makaev noticed that, in some cases, a DAP stackTrace response would include a relative path name for the "path" component. This patch changes the frame decorator code to add a new DAP-specific decorator, and changes the DAP entry point to frame filters to use it. This decorator prefers the symtab's full name, and does not fall back to the solib's name. I'm not entirely happy with this patch, because if a user frame filter uses FrameDecorator, it may still do the wrong thing. It would be better to have frame filters return symtab-like objects instead, or to have a separate method to return the full path to the source file. I also tend to think that the solib fallback behavior of FrameDecorator is a mistake. If this is ever needed, it seems to me that it should be a separate method. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30665
2023-08-01Add "cwd" parameter to DAP launch requestTom Tromey1-17/+17
This adds the "cwd" parameter to the DAP launch request. This came up here: https://github.com/eclipse-cdt-cloud/cdt-gdb-adapter/issues/90 ... and seemed like a good idea. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2023-08-01Rename private member of FrameDecoratorTom Tromey1-4/+4
In Python, a member name starting with "__" is specially handled to make it "more private" to the class -- it isn't truly private, but it is renamed to make it less likely to be reused by mistake. This patch ensures that this is done for the private method of FrameDecorator.
2023-08-01Add thread exited eventSimon Farre1-7/+18
Reports a thread exit according to the DAP spec: https://microsoft.github.io/debug-adapter-protocol/specification#Events_Thread This patch requires the ThreadExitedEvent to be checked in, in order to work. That patch is found here https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-June/200071.html Formatted correctly using black Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30474 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-07-31Restore previous sigmask in gdb.block_signalsTom Tromey1-2/+2
Tom de Vries found a bug where, sometimes, a SIGCHLD would be delivered to a non-main thread, wreaking havoc. The problem is that gdb.block_signals after first blocking a set of signals, then unblocked the same set rather than restoring the initial situation. This function being called from the DAP thread lead to SIGCHLD being unblocked there. This patch fixes the problem by restoring the previous set of signals instead. Tested-by: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Reviewed-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30680
2023-07-28Re-acquire GIL earlier in gdbpy_parse_and_evalTom Tromey1-2/+10
Tom de Vries filed a bug about an intermittent gdb DAP failure -- and coincidentally, at the same time, Alexandra Hájková sent email about a somewhat similar failure. After looking into this for a while (with no results) using ASan and valgrind, I found that setting PYTHONMALLOC=malloc_debug found the bug instantly. The problem is that gdbpy_parse_and_eval releases the GIL while calling parse_and_eval, but fails to re-acquire it before calling value_to_value_object. This is easily fixed by introducing a new scope. I wonder whether the test suite should unconditionally set PYTHONMALLOC=malloc_debug. Tested-by: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Reviewed-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30686
2023-07-27Report supportsBreakpointLocationsRequestTom Tromey1-1/+9
While looking at the DAP spec, I noticed that the breakpointLocations request is gated behind a capability. This patch changes gdb to report this capability. I've also added a comment to explain the fact that arguments to breakpointLocations are not optional, even though the spec says they are.
2023-07-26[gdb/tui] Fix assert in ~gdbpy_tui_window_makerTom de Vries1-1/+2
In gdb/tui/tui-layout.c, we have: ... static window_types_map known_window_types; ... and in gdb/python/py-tui.c: ... /* A global list of all gdbpy_tui_window_maker objects. */ static intrusive_list<gdbpy_tui_window_maker> m_window_maker_list; }; /* See comment in class declaration above. */ intrusive_list<gdbpy_tui_window_maker> gdbpy_tui_window_maker::m_window_maker_list; ... With a gdb build with -O0 or -O2, the static destructor calling order seems to be: - first gdb/tui/tui-layout.c, - then gdb/python/py-tui.c. So when running test-case gdb.python/tui-window-factory.exp, we see the following order of events: - the destructor for known_window_types is called, which triggers calling the destructor for the only element E of m_window_maker_list. The destructor destroys E, and also removes E from m_window_maker_list, leaving it empty. - the destructor for m_window_maker_list is called. It's empty, so it's a nop. However, when building gdb with -O2 -flto=auto, the static destructor calling order seems to be reversed. Instead, we have these events: - the destructor for m_window_maker_list is called. This doesn't destroy it's only element E, but it does make m_window_maker_list empty. - the destructor for known_window_types is called, which triggers calling the destructor for E. An attempt is done to remove E from m_window_maker_list, but we run into an assertion failure, because the list is empty. Fix this by checking is_linked () before attempting to remove from m_window_maker_list, similar to how things were addressed in commit 995a34b1772 ("Guard against frame.c destructors running before frame-info.c's"). Tested on x86_64-linux. PR tui/30646 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30646