| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Since the last change to address_from_register, it no longer supports
targets that require a special conversion (gdbarch_convert_register_p)
for plain pointer type; I had assumed no target does so.
This turned out to be incorrect: MIPS64 n32 big-endian needs such a
conversion in order to properly sign-extend pointer values.
This patch fixes this regression by handling targets that need a
special conversion in address_from_register as well.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* findvar.c (address_from_register): Handle targets requiring
a special conversion routine even for plain pointer types
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
* version.in: Set GDB version number to 7.8.2.DATE-cvs.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
GDB 7.8.2 released.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
* version.in: Set GDB version number to 7.8.2.
|
|
Executing a gdb script that runs the inferior (from the command line
with -x), and has it hit breakpoints with breakpoint commands that
themselves run the target, is currently broken on async targets
(Linux, remote).
While we're executing a command list or a script, we force the
interpreter to be sync, which results in some functions nesting an
event loop and waiting for the target to stop, instead of returning
immediately and having the top level event loop handle the stop.
The issue with this bug is simply that bpstat_do_actions misses
checking whether the interpreter is sync. When we get here, in the
case of executing a script (or, when the interpreter is sync), the
program has already advanced to the next breakpoint, through
maybe_wait_sync_command_done. We need to process its breakpoints
immediately, just like with a sync target.
Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20.
gdb/
2015-01-14 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR gdb/17525
* breakpoint.c: Include "interps.h".
(bpstat_do_actions_1): Also check whether the interpreter is
async.
gdb/testsuite/
2015-01-14 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
PR gdb/17525
* gdb.base/bp-cmds-execution-x-script.c: New file.
* gdb.base/bp-cmds-execution-x-script.exp: New file.
* gdb.base/bp-cmds-execution-x-script.gdb: New file.
|
|
Commit d3d4baed (PR python/17372 - Python hangs when displaying
help()) had the side effect of causing 'gdb -batch' to leave the
terminal in the wrong state if the program was run. E.g,.
$ echo 'main(){*(int*)0=0;}' | gcc -x c -; ./gdb/gdb -batch -ex r ./a.out
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000000004004ff in main ()
$
If you start typing the next command, seemingly nothing happens - GDB
left the terminal with echo disabled.
The issue is that that "r" ends up in fetch_inferior_event, which
calls reinstall_readline_callback_handler_cleanup, which causes
readline to prep the terminal (raw, echo disabled). But "-batch"
causes GDB to exit before the top level event loop is first started,
and then nothing de-preps the terminal.
The reinstall_readline_callback_handler_cleanup function's intro
comment mentions:
"Need to do this as we go back to the event loop, ready to process
further input."
but the implementation forgets the case of when the interpreter is
sync, which indicates we won't return to the event loop yet, or as in
the case of -batch, we have not started it yet.
The fix is to not install the readline callback in that case.
For the test, in this case, checking that command echo still works is
sufficient. Comparing stty output before/after running GDB is even
better. Because stty may not be available, the test tries both ways.
In any case, since expect's spawn (what we use to start gdb) creates a
new pseudo tty, another expect spawn or tcl exec after GDB exits would
not see the wrong terminal settings. So instead, the test spawns a
shell and runs stty and GDB in it.
Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20.
gdb/
2015-01-14 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR cli/17828
* infrun.c (reinstall_readline_callback_handler_cleanup): Don't
reinstall if the interpreter is sync.
gdb/testsuite/
2015-01-14 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR cli/17828
* gdb.base/batch-preserve-term-settings.c: New file.
* gdb.base/batch-preserve-term-settings.exp: New file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDB is currently broken on all SPARC targets when using GCC 4.9.
When trying to print any local variable:
(gdb) p x
can't compute CFA for this frame
This is related to the fact that the compiler now generates DWARF 4
debugging info by default, and in particular that it now emits
DW_OP_call_frame_cfa, which triggers a limitation in dwarf2_frame_cfa:
/* This restriction could be lifted if other unwinders are known to
compute the frame base in a way compatible with the DWARF
unwinder. */
if (!frame_unwinder_is (this_frame, &dwarf2_frame_unwind)
&& !frame_unwinder_is (this_frame, &dwarf2_tailcall_frame_unwind))
error (_("can't compute CFA for this frame"));
We couldn't append the dwarf2 unwinder to all SPARC targets because
it does not work properly with StackGhost:
https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-07/msg00012.html
We also later discovered that using the DWARF2 unwinder means
using it for computing the function's return address, which
is buggy when it comes to functions returning a struct (where
the return address is saved-pc+12 instead of saved-pc+8).
This is because GCC is emitting the info about the return address
as %o7/%i7 instead of the actual return address. For functions
that have debugging info, we compensate by looking at the function's
return type and add the extra +4, but for function without debug
info, we're stuck.
EricB and I twisted the issue in all the directions we could think of,
and unfortunately couldn't find a way to make it work without
introduction one regression or another.
But, stepping back a little, just removing the restriction seems to work
well for us on all both sparc-elf and {sparc,sparc64}-solaris.
After reviewing the previous discussions about this test, I could
not figure out whether some unwinders were already known to have
incompatible CFAs or if the concern was purely theoretical:
https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-06/msg00191.html
https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-07/msg00570.html
https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-09/msg00027.html
At the moment, we took the approach of trying it out, and see what
happens...
gdb/ChangeLog:
PR backtrace/16215:
* dwarf2-frame.c (dwarf2_frame_cfa): Remove the restriction
the frame unwinder must either be the dwarf2_frame_unwind
or the dwarf2_tailcall_frame_unwind. Verify that this_frame's
stack_addr is valid before calling get_frame_base. Throw
an error if not valid.
Tested on sparc-solaris and sparc-elf with AdaCore's testsuite
(the FSF testsuite crashes all of AdaCore's solaris machines).
|
|
|
|
* complete.c (stat_char) [_WIN32]: Don't use 'access' and X_OK on
Windows, they don't work. Instead, look at the file-name
extension to determine whether the file is executable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In i386 and x86-64 binaries with ifunc, relocations against .got.plt
section may not be in the same order as entries in PLT section. This
patch adds _bfd_elf_ifunc_get_synthetic_symtab. It takes a function
pointer which returns an array of PLT entry symbol values. It calls
the function pointer to get the PLT entry symbol value array indexed
by relocation index, instead of calling plt_sym_val on each relocation
index.
PR binutils/17677
* elf-bfd.h (_bfd_elf_ifunc_get_synthetic_symtab): New prototype.
* elf-ifunc.c (_bfd_elf_ifunc_get_synthetic_symtab): New
function.
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_plt_sym_val): Removed.
(elf_backend_plt_sym_val): Likewise.
(elf_i386_get_plt_sym_val): New.
(elf_i386_get_synthetic_symtab): Likewise.
(bfd_elf32_get_synthetic_symtab): Likewise.
* elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_plt_sym_val): Removed.
(elf_x86_64_plt_sym_val_offset_plt_bnd): Likewise.
(elf_backend_plt_sym_val): Likewise.
(elf_x86_64_get_plt_sym_val): New.
(bfd_elf32_get_synthetic_symtab): Likewise.
(elf_x86_64_get_synthetic_symtab): Use
_bfd_elf_ifunc_get_synthetic_symtab.
(bfd_elf64_get_synthetic_symtab): Don't undefine for NaCl.
|
|
0' (PR 17642)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17642
Regression since:
commit 012370f6818657a816df1463ee71ca4e4ee40b33
Author: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Date: Thu May 8 11:26:44 2014 -0600
handle VLA in a struct or union
Bugreport:
Regression with gdb scripts for Linux kernel
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2014-08/msg00127.html
That big change after "else" is just reindentation.
gdb/ChangeLog
2014-12-15 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
PR symtab/17642
* gdbtypes.c (resolve_dynamic_type_internal): Apply check_typedef to
TYPE if not TYPE_CODE_TYPEDEF.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2014-12-15 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
PR symtab/17642
* gdb.base/vla-stub-define.c: New file.
* gdb.base/vla-stub.c: New file.
* gdb.base/vla-stub.exp: New file.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog
2014-12-15 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* gdbtypes.c (resolve_dynamic_type_internal): Reindent the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
