aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
10 hoursAutomatic date update in version.ingdb-17-branchGDB Administrator1-1/+1
20 hoursHave gdb.ThreadExitedEvent inherit from gdb.ThreadEventTom Tromey2-1/+3
The documentation says that ThreadExitedEvent is derived from ThreadEvent, but the code does not actually implement this. This patch fixes the problem. I propose applying this to gdb 17 as well. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33444 Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> (cherry picked from commit 3a9f5df6ea8adcae7769f271cccbc2da8553c08d)
34 hoursAutomatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
38 hoursGDB: aarch64: Use GCS features to calculate hash of struct aarch64_featuresThiago Jung Bauermann1-0/+4
Luis noticed that when adding the gcs and gcs_linux members to struct aarch64_features in my Guarded Control Stack patch series, I neglected to modify struct hash<aarch64_features>::operator() to take them into account when computing its hash. This can cause GDB to use the wrong aarch64_features object during a debugging session. Regression tested on aarch64-linux-gnu. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33440 Suggested-by: Luis Machado <luis.machado.foss@gmail.com> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado.foss@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 86e6907244c89bde0d1584dbcbd617b53319d0f9)
2 daysAutomatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
3 daysAutomatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
4 daysAutomatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
5 daysAutomatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
6 daysAutomatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
7 daysAutomatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
8 daysAutomatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
9 daysAutomatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
10 daysFix gdb.Value.dynamic_type attributeHannes Domani3-0/+6
gdb currently crashes if you try to get the dynamic_type from a gdb.Value of a POD struct: (gdb) py print(gdb.parse_and_eval('pod').dynamic_type) Fatal signal: Segmentation fault It happens because value_rtti_type() returns NULL for them, and this is not handled correctly. Fixed by using val->type() as a fallback in this case. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
10 daysgdb: Add i386-gnu-tdep to the list of objects for x86_64-*-gnu*Sergio Durigan Junior1-1/+1
When starting GDB on Hurd amd64, one will currently see the following warning: # gdb -q gdb: warning: A handler for the OS ABI "GNU/Hurd" is not built into this configuration of GDB. Attempting to continue with the default i386 settings. (gdb) This happens because, in gdb/configure.tgt, the "x86_64-*-gnu*" target is not pulling in the i386-gnu-tdep.o object, which means that only 64-bit debugging is currently supported. The fix here is to add i386-gnu-tdep.o to the gdb_target_obs for Hurd amd64. Signed-off-by: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> Suggested-by: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> Reported-by: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33377 Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 3d22a6cee4b27866c544d67a82e2272ae4201f9e)
10 daysAutomatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
11 daysgdb: Add svr4-tls-tdep.o to list of objects of i*86 targetsSergio Durigan Junior1-1/+1
GDB currently fails to build from source on i386 if compiled with --enable-64-bit-bfd. This is happening because svr4-tls-tdep.o is missing from the gdb_target_obs variable, while amd64-linux-tdep.o is obviously there. Fix the problem by adding svr4-tls-tdep.o to the object list, but only when --enable-64-bit-bfd is provided. Signed-off-by: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33399 (cherry picked from commit b318480f27322c15c6b10c1bab4418e81d44b77e)
11 daysgdb/testsuite: small fix for amd64-extended-prologue-analysis.expAndrew Burgess1-2/+6
I noticed I was sometimes getting this failure: FAIL: gdb.arch/amd64-extended-prologue-analysis.exp: offset \ initialization: ASM source: gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint \ at *0x0000000000401151 The problem was introduced in commit: commit f9aa48dc545ef511e19f4dfab88a196b820fd2da Date: Thu Aug 28 11:50:13 2025 +0000 gdb, amd64: extend the amd64 prologue analyzer to skip register pushes A gdb_test_multiple exits early when processing the results of a 'disassemble' command, without waiting for the prompt to be seen. This can leave unhandled output in expect's input buffer, which will then throw off the next test. Update the gdb_test_multiple to wait for the prompt before declaring the test passed. After this I'm no longer seeing the above failure. There should be no change in what is tested after this commit.
11 daysAutomatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
12 daysAutomatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
12 daysBump GDB's version number to 17.0.90.DATE-git.Joel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit changes gdb/version.in to 17.0.90.DATE-git.
12 daysSet GDB version number to 17.0.90.Joel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit changes gdb/version.in to 17.0.90.
12 daysgdb/NEWS: Change "since GDB 16" into "in GDB 17"Joel Brobecker1-1/+1
Now that the major release version number is confirmed, we can adjust the title of the corresponding section in the gdb/NEWS file.
12 daysSet development mode to "off" by default.Joel Brobecker1-1/+1
This is done by setting the "development" variable to "false" in bfd/development.sh.
12 daysBump version to 17.0.90.DATE-git.Joel Brobecker1-1/+1
Now that the GDB 17 branch has been created, this commit bumps the version number in gdb/version.in to 17.0.90.DATE-git For the record, the GDB 17 branch was created from commit 46ada32fc979550ad4f46792b74c182bb7232aeb.
13 daysUpdate x86: Add GLIBC_ABI_GNU2_TLS version dependencygdb-17-branchpointH.J. Lu1-1/+1
commit 0d1e88f8bfb0e62f37bf8a89172cd91373ace5e6 Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> Date: Fri Jul 4 08:39:03 2025 +0800 x86: Add GLIBC_ABI_GNU2_TLS version dependency added solaris2-x86-64.em to accommodate moving x86-64 specific extra emulation bits to elf-x86-64.em. Update emulparams/elf_x86_64_sol2.sh to use it. * emulparams/elf_x86_64_sol2.sh (EXTRA_EM_FILE): Set to "solaris2-x86-64". Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
13 daysRe: tekhex test for commit bf0f85df1254Alan Modra1-1/+1
* testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp (objcopy_tek2bin): Correct isremote to is_remote.
13 daysAutomatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
14 daysbfd: configure.ac: Fix mention of flag to enable 64-bit BFD in commentThiago Jung Bauermann2-2/+2
It was changed back in 1994. Fixing because it misled me into using the wrong flag in a build.
14 daysAllow conversion of 128-bit integers to PythonTom Tromey2-6/+58
Currently, trying to convert a 128-bit integer from a gdb.Value to a Python integer will fail. This is surprising because Python uses bigints internally. The bug here is that valpy_long uses value_as_long, which fails for anything wider than LONGEST. This patch fixes the problem by using the recommended Python API. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33366 Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
14 days[gdb/testsuite] Fix clean_restart <absolute filename> in gdb.base, part 3Tom de Vries6-9/+16
Fix fallout in gdb.base from erroring out on clean_restart <absolute filename>. Tested on x86_64-linux.
14 days[gdb/testsuite] Fix clean_restart <absolute filename> in gdb.base, part 2Tom de Vries31-42/+69
Manually fix the test-cases found by: ... $ find gdb/testsuite/gdb.base -name *.exp* \ | xargs grep -l 'clean_restart[^;]*binfile' $ find gdb/testsuite/gdb.base -name *.exp* \ | xargs grep -l 'prepare_for_testing.*bin' ... except for gdb.base/foll-vfork.exp and gdb.base/solib-overlap.exp. Tested on x86_64-linux.
14 days[gdb/testsuite] Fix clean_restart <absolute filename> in gdb.base, part 1Tom de Vries192-250/+500
Run: ... $ find gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/ -name *.exp* \ | xargs sed -i 's/^\([ \t]*\)clean_restart $binfile$/\1clean_restart\n\1gdb_load $binfile/' $ find gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/ -name *.exp* \ | xargs sed -i 's/^\([ \t]*\)clean_restart ${binfile}$/\1clean_restart\n\1gdb_load $binfile/' $ find gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/ -name *.exp* \ | xargs sed -i 's/^\([ \t]*\)clean_restart $::binfile$/\1clean_restart\n\1gdb_load $::binfile/' $ find gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/ -name *.exp* \ | xargs sed -i 's/^\([ \t]*\)clean_restart ${::binfile}$/\1clean_restart\n\1gdb_load $::binfile/' ... Revert the change in test-case gdb.base/foll-vfork.exp, which does 'set binfile $testfile'. Tested on x86_64-linux. The only modified test-case I was not able to test is gdb.base/dtrace-probe.exp (filed PR testsuite/33379 about this). The change in the test-case is trivial though.
14 daysreadelf: Handle 0 sh_entsize of GOT sectionsH.J. Lu1-0/+19
Gold, lld and mold set sh_entsize to 0 on .got and .got.plt sections. If sh_entsize of GOT sections is 0, assume 8 for ELFCLASS64 and 4 for ELFCLASS32, except for x32 which uses 8. PR binutils/33368 * readelf.c (process_got_section_contents): Handle 0 sh_entsize of GOT sections. Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
14 daysRevert "MicroBlaze: Add microblaze_get_next_pcs"Gopi Kumar Bulusu1-93/+0
This reverts commit c6df5d79aac5c4a77c06314fd26c837470360f70. Causes buildbot failure. Bug 33381
2025-09-05gdb: ensure bp_location::section is set correct to avoid an assertAndrew Burgess2-1/+11
While reviewing and testing another patch I set a breakpoint on an gnu ifunc function, then restarted the inferior, and this assert triggered: ../../src/gdb/breakpoint.c:14747: internal-error: breakpoint_free_objfile: Assertion `loc->symtab == nullptr' failed. The backtrace at the time of the assert is: #6 0x00000000005ffee0 in breakpoint_free_objfile (objfile=0x4064b30) at ../../src/gdb/breakpoint.c:14747 #7 0x0000000000c33ff2 in objfile::~objfile (this=0x4064b30, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at ../../src/gdb/objfiles.c:478 #8 0x0000000000c38da6 in std::default_delete<objfile>::operator() (this=0x7ffc1a49d538, __ptr=0x4064b30) at /usr/include/c++/9/bits/unique_ptr.h:81 #9 0x0000000000c3782a in std::unique_ptr<objfile, std::default_delete<objfile> >::~unique_ptr (this=0x7ffc1a49d538, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/9/bits/unique_ptr.h:292 #10 0x0000000000caf1bd in owning_intrusive_list<objfile, intrusive_base_node<objfile> >::erase (this=0x3790d68, i=...) at ../../src/gdb/../gdbsupport/owning_intrusive_list.h:111 #11 0x0000000000cacd0c in program_space::remove_objfile (this=0x3790c80, objfile=0x4064b30) at ../../src/gdb/progspace.c:192 #12 0x0000000000c33e1c in objfile::unlink (this=0x4064b30) at ../../src/gdb/objfiles.c:408 #13 0x0000000000c34fb9 in objfile_purge_solibs (pspace=0x3790c80) at ../../src/gdb/objfiles.c:729 #14 0x0000000000edf6f7 in no_shared_libraries (pspace=0x3790c80) at ../../src/gdb/solib.c:1359 #15 0x0000000000fb3f6c in target_pre_inferior () at ../../src/gdb/target.c:2466 #16 0x0000000000a724d7 in run_command_1 (args=0x0, from_tty=0, run_how=RUN_NORMAL) at ../../src/gdb/infcmd.c:390 #17 0x0000000000a72a97 in run_command (args=0x0, from_tty=0) at ../../src/gdb/infcmd.c:514 #18 0x00000000006bbb3d in do_simple_func (args=0x0, from_tty=0, c=0x39124b0) at ../../src/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c:95 #19 0x00000000006c1021 in cmd_func (cmd=0x39124b0, args=0x0, from_tty=0) at ../../src/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c:2827 The function breakpoint_free_objfile is being called when an objfile representing a shared library is being unloaded ahead of the inferior being restarted, the function is trying to remove references to anything that could itself reference the objfile that is being deleted. The assert is making the claim that, for a bp_location, which has a single address, the objfile of the symtab associated with the location will be the same as the objfile associated with the section of the location. This seems reasonable to me now, as it did when I added the assert in commit: commit 5066f3680667ec0f2d1745847a2372d85973a1e7 Date: Mon Nov 11 21:45:17 2024 +0000 gdb: do better in breakpoint_free_objfile The bp_location::section is maintained, according to the comments in breakpoint.h, to aid overlay debugging (is that even used any more), and looking at the code, this does appear to be the case. The problem in the above case arises when we are dealing with an ifunc function. What happens is that we end up with a section from one objfile, but a symtab from a different objfile. This problem originates from minsym_found (in linespec.c). The user asked for 'break gnu_ifunc' where 'gnu_ifunc' is an ifunc function. What this means is that gnu_ifunc is actually a resolver function that returns the address of the actual function to use. In this particular test case, the resolver function is in a shared library, and the actual function to use is in the main executable. So, when GDB looks for 'gnu_ifunc' is finds the minimal_symbol with that name, and spots that this has type mst_text_gnu_ifunc. GDB then uses this to figure out the actual address of the function that will be run. GDB then creates the symtab_and_line using the _real_ address and the symtab in which that address lies, in our case this will all be related to the main executable objfile. But, finally, in minsym_found, GDB fills in the symtab_and_line's section field, and this is done using the section containing the original minimal_symbol, which is from the shared library objfile. The minimal symbol and section are then use to initialise the bp_location object, and this is how we end up in, what I think, is an unexpected state. So what to do about this? The symtab_and_line::msymbol field is _only_ set within minsym_found, and is then _only_ used to initialise the bp_location::msymbol field. The bp_location::msymbol field is _only_ used in the function set_breakpoint_location_function, and we only really care about the msymbol type, we check to see if it's an ifunc symbol or not. This allows us to set the name of the function correctly. The bp_location::section is used, as far as I can tell, extensively for overlay handling. It would seem to me, that this section should be the section containing the actual breakpoint address. If the question we're asking is, is this breakpoint mapped in or not? Then surely we need to ask about the section holding the breakpoint's address, and not the section holding some other code (e.g. the resolver function). In fact, in a memory constrained environment, you'd expect the resolver functions to get mapped out pretty early on, but while the actual functions might still be mapped in. Finally, symtab_and_line::section. This is mostly set using calls to find_pc_overlay. The minsym_found function is one of the few places where we do things differently. In the places where the section is used, it is (almost?) always used in conjunction with the symtab_and_line::pc to lookup information, e.g. calls to block_for_pc_sect, or find_pc_sect_containing_function. In all these cases, it appears to me that the assumption is that the section will be the section that contains the address. So, where does this leave us? I think what we need to do is update minsym_found to just use find_pc_overlay, which is how the symtab_and_line::section is set in most other cases. What this actually means in practise is that the section field will be set to NULL (see find_pc_overlay in symfile.c). But given that this is how the section is computed in most other cases, I don't see why it should be especially problematic for this case. In reality, I think this just means that the section is calculated via a call to find_pc_section when it's needed, as an example, see lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section (minsyms.c). I do wonder if we should be doing better when creating the symtab_and_line, and insist that the section be calculated correctly at that point, but I really don't want to open that can of worms right now, so I think just changing minsym_found to "do it just like everyone else" should be good enough. I've extended the existing ifunc test to expose this issue, the updated test fails without this patch, and passes with. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2025-09-05gdb: pass core file to gdbarch_core_read_x86_xsave_layoutAndrew Burgess8-16/+18
Continuing the removal of 'current_program_space->core_bfd ()' from GDB, this commit updates the gdbarch method 'gdbarch_core_read_x86_xsave_layout' to take the core file BFD as a reference parameter. For now this just moves the 'current_program_space->core_bfd ()' calls up the program stack into core_target::fetch_x86_xsave_layout. In the future I plan to move the core file BFD object out of the program_space and into the core_target, at which point these new global accesses can also be removed. There should be no user visible changes after this commit. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2025-09-05gdb: pass core file to gdbarch_core_thread_name methodAndrew Burgess5-13/+17
Continuing the removal of 'current_program_space->core_bfd ()' from GDB, this commit updates the gdbarch method 'gdbarch_core_thread_name' to take the core file BFD as a reference parameter. For now this just moves the 'current_program_space->core_bfd ()' calls up the program stack into core_target::thread_name. In the future I plan to move the core file BFD object out of the program_space and into the core_target, at which point these new global accesses can also be removed. There should be no user visible changes after this commit. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2025-09-05gdb: pass core file through gdbarch API when loading shared librariesAndrew Burgess7-24/+32
Continuing the removal of 'current_program_space->core_bfd ()' from GDB, this commit updates two gdbarch methods: gdbarch_core_xfer_shared_libraries gdbarch_core_xfer_shared_libraries_aix to take the core file BFD as a reference parameter. For now this just moves the 'current_program_space->core_bfd ()' calls up the program stack into core_target::xfer_partial. In the future I plan to move the core file BFD object out of the program_space and into the core_target, at which point these new global accesses can also be removed. There should be no user visible changes after this commit. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2025-09-05[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/fileio.exp for local-remote-host-nativeTom de Vries2-1/+5
When running test-case gdb.base/fileio.exp with host/target board local-remote-host-native I run into: ... gdb compile failed, fileio.c: In function 'test_open': <command-line>:0:8: error: expected expression before '.' token fileio.c:89:15: note: in expansion of macro 'OUTDIR' ret = open (OUTDIR FILENAME, O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_RDWR, S_IWUSR | S_IRUSR); ^~~~~~ ... Fix this by using: - quote_for_host to pass -DOUTDIR to the compilation, and - STRINGIFY to stringify OUTDIR in fileio.c. Tested on x86_64-linux, with target board unix and host/target board local-remote-host-native.
2025-09-05MicroBlaze: Add microblaze_get_next_pcsGopi Kumar Bulusu1-0/+93
This patch enables software single stepping for gdbserver target * gdb/microblaze-tdep.c: Add microblaze_get_next_pcs Signed-off-by: David Holsgrove <david.holsgrove@petalogix.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Rossi <nathan.rossi@petalogix.com> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bodapati <mbodapat@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Gopi Kumar Bulusu <gopi@sankhya.com> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2025-09-05[gdb/testsuite] Fix clean_restart <absolute filename> in allow_aarch64_sme_testsTom de Vries1-1/+2
Fix fallout on aarch64-linux with test-case gdb.testsuite/gdb-caching-proc-consistency.exp from erroring out on clean_restart <absolute filename>.
2025-09-05[gdb/testsuite] Fix silent timeout in allow_aarch64_gcs_testsTom de Vries1-0/+3
I noticed on M1 aarch64-linux that test-case gdb.testsuite/gdb-caching-proc-consistency.exp took a long time. I saw lack of progress in gdb.log for proc allow_aarch64_gcs_tests. This gdb_expect only handles the case that gcs support is detected: ... gdb_expect { -re ".*$inferior_exited_re normally.*${gdb_prompt} $" { verbose -log "\n$me: gcs support detected" set allow_gcs_tests 1 } } ... but in my case, I get: ... (gdb) run ^M Starting program: allow_aarch64_gcs_tests.x ^M [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]^M Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".^M [Inferior 1 (process 3336556) exited with code 01]^M (gdb) ... so the gdb_expect times out quietly, taking 10 seconds. In the test-case, it does so 11 times. Fix this by adding a gdb_expect clause handling the "with code 01" case. Tested on aarch64-linux. PR testsuite/33378 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33378
2025-09-05x86: check reloc types for relaxable branchesJan Beulich4-12/+26
Bypassing _reloc() isn't a good idea, as there are various errors checked for there. For example 16-bit JMP or Jcc may not use the @plt form (resulting in a 32-bit relocation to be emitted for a 16-bit field), which so far we only reject for 16-bit CALL. In exchange this allows simplifying the setting up of the "reloc_type" local variable.
2025-09-05x86: make reloc() usable during late phases of assemblyJan Beulich1-16/+33
Introduce a clone with extra parameters, to allow subsequent use from md_estimate_size_before_relax() (or elsewhere, should that turn out necessary). There flag_code cannot be used and location information needs to be provided for diagnostics.
2025-09-04gdb: run black on gdbarch_components.pySimon Marchi1-1/+1
Change-Id: Ifcf80faa240c7c235bfea4ddc79f0d6c39858c5e
2025-09-05Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2025-09-04GDB: aarch64-linux: Define HWCAP_GCS as unsigned long long valueThiago Jung Bauermann6-6/+6
On platforms where long is 32 bits, this change fixes a build failure: /home/linux/arm/gdb/src/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c: In function ‘const target_desc* aarch64_linux_core_read_description(gdbarch*, target_ops*, bfd*)’: /home/linux/arm/gdb/src/gdb/arch/aarch64-gcs-linux.h:27:24: error: left shift count >= width of type [-Werror=shift-count-overflow] 27 | #define HWCAP_GCS (1UL << 32) | ~~~~^~~~~ /home/linux/arm/gdb/src/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c:1714:47: note: in expansion of macro ‘HWCAP_GCS’ 1714 | features.gcs = features.gcs_linux = hwcap & HWCAP_GCS; | ^~~~~~~~~ Suggested-by: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33372
2025-09-04gdb/testsuite: revert recent changes to gdb.dap/scopes.expAndrew Burgess1-143/+132
After the previous commit, the changes to gdb.dap/scopes.exp from the commit: commit 63b862be762e1e6e7ce667c6b4a1a3dd79939bf4 Date: Fri Mar 29 16:38:50 2019 +0100 gdb, gdbserver: Add support of Intel shadow stack pointer register. Are no longer needed, the test will now happily handle the shadow stack pointer being unavailable. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33345 Reviewed-By: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com>
2025-09-04gdb/dap: check values are available before converting to intAndrew Burgess1-1/+5
In VariableReference.to_object, we try to convert a gdb.Value to an int without checking if the value is actually available. This came to light in PR gdb/33345, after the x86 CET shadow stack patches were merged. If the x86 CET shadow stack register is available on the machine, but the shadow stack feature is not enabled at run time, then the register will show as "<unavailable>". As the register is of type 'void *', then in the DAP code we try to add a 'memoryReference' attribute with the value of the register formatted as hex. This will fail if the register is unavailable. To test this change you'll need: (a) a machine which support the shadow stack feature, and (b) to revert the changes from commit 63b862be762e1e6e7 in the file gdb.dap/scopes.exp. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33345 Reviewed-By: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com>
2025-09-04gdb/python: add gdb.Value.is_unavailable attributeAndrew Burgess5-1/+93
Add a new gdb.Value.is_unavailable attribute. This is similar to the existing Value.is_optimized_out attribute, but returns True if any part of the value is <unavailable>. The existing Value.is_optimized_out attribute returns true if any part of the value is optimized out, so I thought that Value.is_unavailable should work the same way. There's also a test. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33345 Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Reviewed-By: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com>