diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/eval.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | gdb/eval.c | 78 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 39 deletions
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ binop_promote (const struct language_defn *language, struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int unsigned_operation; /* Determine type length and signedness after promotion for - both operands. */ + both operands. */ if (promoted_len1 < TYPE_LENGTH (builtin->builtin_int)) { is_unsigned1 = 0; @@ -1354,11 +1354,11 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type, if (regno == -1) error (_("Register $%s not available."), name); - /* In EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS mode, we only need to return - a value with the appropriate register type. Unfortunately, - we don't have easy access to the type of user registers. - So for these registers, we fetch the register value regardless - of the evaluation mode. */ + /* In EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS mode, we only need to return + a value with the appropriate register type. Unfortunately, + we don't have easy access to the type of user registers. + So for these registers, we fetch the register value regardless + of the evaluation mode. */ if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS && regno < gdbarch_num_cooked_regs (exp->gdbarch)) val = value_zero (register_type (exp->gdbarch, regno), not_lval); @@ -1487,8 +1487,8 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type, range_low = range_high = value_as_long (elem_val); /* Check types of elements to avoid mixture of elements from - different types. Also check if type of element is "compatible" - with element type of powerset. */ + different types. Also check if type of element is "compatible" + with element type of powerset. */ if (range_low_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_RANGE) range_low_type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (range_low_type); if (range_high_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_RANGE) @@ -1740,7 +1740,7 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type, } /* If we found a method with symbol information, check to see - if it returns a struct. Otherwise assume it doesn't. */ + if it returns a struct. Otherwise assume it doesn't. */ if (method) { @@ -1873,7 +1873,7 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type, case OP_COMPLEX: /* We have a complex number, There should be 2 floating - point numbers that compose it. */ + point numbers that compose it. */ (*pos) += 2; arg1 = evaluate_subexp (nullptr, exp, pos, noside); arg2 = evaluate_subexp (nullptr, exp, pos, noside); @@ -1900,7 +1900,7 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type, return eval_skip_value (exp); /* Check to see if operator '->' has been overloaded. If so replace - arg1 with the value returned by evaluating operator->(). */ + arg1 with the value returned by evaluating operator->(). */ while (unop_user_defined_p (op, arg1)) { struct value *value = NULL; @@ -1924,21 +1924,21 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type, with rtti type in order to continue on with successful lookup of member / method only available in the rtti type. */ { - struct type *arg_type = value_type (arg1); - struct type *real_type; - int full, using_enc; - LONGEST top; + struct type *arg_type = value_type (arg1); + struct type *real_type; + int full, using_enc; + LONGEST top; struct value_print_options opts; get_user_print_options (&opts); - if (opts.objectprint && TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (arg_type) - && (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (arg_type)->code () == TYPE_CODE_STRUCT)) - { - real_type = value_rtti_indirect_type (arg1, &full, &top, + if (opts.objectprint && TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (arg_type) + && (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (arg_type)->code () == TYPE_CODE_STRUCT)) + { + real_type = value_rtti_indirect_type (arg1, &full, &top, &using_enc); - if (real_type) - arg1 = value_cast (real_type, arg1); - } + if (real_type) + arg1 = value_cast (real_type, arg1); + } } arg3 = value_struct_elt (&arg1, NULL, &exp->elts[pc + 2].string, @@ -2208,8 +2208,8 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type, if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS) { /* If the user attempts to subscript something that has no target - type (like a plain int variable for example), then report this - as an error. */ + type (like a plain int variable for example), then report this + as an error. */ type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (check_typedef (value_type (arg1))); if (type != NULL) @@ -2416,7 +2416,7 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type, return eval_skip_value (exp); type = check_typedef (value_type (arg2)); if (type->code () != TYPE_CODE_INT - && type->code () != TYPE_CODE_ENUM) + && type->code () != TYPE_CODE_ENUM) error (_("Non-integral right operand for \"@\" operator.")); if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS) { @@ -2712,14 +2712,14 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type, case OP_TYPE: /* The value is not supposed to be used. This is here to make it - easier to accommodate expressions that contain types. */ + easier to accommodate expressions that contain types. */ (*pos) += 2; if (noside == EVAL_SKIP) return eval_skip_value (exp); else if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS) return allocate_value (exp->elts[pc + 1].type); else - error (_("Attempt to use a type name as an expression")); + error (_("Attempt to use a type name as an expression")); case OP_TYPEOF: case OP_DECLTYPE: @@ -2757,7 +2757,7 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type, return result; } else - error (_("Attempt to use a type as an expression")); + error (_("Attempt to use a type as an expression")); case OP_TYPEID: { @@ -2777,13 +2777,13 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type, default: /* Removing this case and compiling with gcc -Wall reveals that - a lot of cases are hitting this case. Some of these should - probably be removed from expression.h; others are legitimate - expressions which are (apparently) not fully implemented. + a lot of cases are hitting this case. Some of these should + probably be removed from expression.h; others are legitimate + expressions which are (apparently) not fully implemented. - If there are any cases landing here which mean a user error, - then they should be separate cases, with more descriptive - error messages. */ + If there are any cases landing here which mean a user error, + then they should be separate cases, with more descriptive + error messages. */ error (_("GDB does not (yet) know how to " "evaluate that kind of expression")); @@ -2985,9 +2985,9 @@ evaluate_subexp_for_sizeof (struct expression *exp, int *pos, switch (op) { /* This case is handled specially - so that we avoid creating a value for the result type. - If the result type is very big, it's desirable not to - create a value unnecessarily. */ + so that we avoid creating a value for the result type. + If the result type is very big, it's desirable not to + create a value unnecessarily. */ case UNOP_IND: (*pos)++; val = evaluate_subexp (nullptr, exp, pos, EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS); @@ -3019,8 +3019,8 @@ evaluate_subexp_for_sizeof (struct expression *exp, int *pos, val = evaluate_subexp (nullptr, exp, pos, EVAL_NORMAL); type = value_type (val); if (type->code () == TYPE_CODE_ARRAY - && is_dynamic_type (type->index_type ()) - && type->bounds ()->high.kind () == PROP_UNDEFINED) + && is_dynamic_type (type->index_type ()) + && type->bounds ()->high.kind () == PROP_UNDEFINED) return allocate_optimized_out_value (size_type); } else |