diff options
author | Par Olsson <par.olsson@windriver.com> | 2016-04-28 12:54:07 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com> | 2016-04-28 12:56:05 -0400 |
commit | 35fd2deb6916e972248d52b1bc1d584fa9059f8f (patch) | |
tree | 30a626e989c31b451a639d012a795a9f68f42b1c /gdb/python | |
parent | 952ebca5831911a8ef2a79f6e1e7a2c24f71a388 (diff) | |
download | binutils-35fd2deb6916e972248d52b1bc1d584fa9059f8f.zip binutils-35fd2deb6916e972248d52b1bc1d584fa9059f8f.tar.gz binutils-35fd2deb6916e972248d52b1bc1d584fa9059f8f.tar.bz2 |
Fix write endianness/size problem for fast tracepoint enabled flag
I am sending this fix on behalf of Par Olsson, as a follow-up of this
one:
https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-10/msg00196.html
This problem is exposed when enabling/disabling fast tracepoints on big
endian machines. The flag is defined as an int8_t, but is written from
gdbserver as an integer (usually 32 bits). When the agent code reads it
as an int8_t, it only considers the most significant byte, which is
always 0.
Also, we were writing 32 bits in an 8 bits field, so the write would
overflow, but since the following bytes are padding (the next field is
an uint64_t), it luckily didn't cause any issue on little endian
systems.
The fix was originally tested on ARM big endian systems, but I don't
have access to such a system. However, thanks to Marcin's PowerPC fast
tracepoint patches and gcc110 (big endian Power7) on the gcc compile
farm, I was able to reproduce the problem, test the fix and write a
test (the following patch).
gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
YYYY-MM-DD Par Olsson <par.olsson@windriver.com>
* tracepoint.c (write_inferior_int8): New function.
(cmd_qtenable_disable): Write enable flag using
write_inferior_int8.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/python')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions