From 970d9b3e2edc656ef8e9a68b6d83cdb891c58455 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Levon <john.levon@nutanix.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:49:44 +0100
Subject: test_device_set_irqs: fix bool test (#561)

We were accidentally hitting the wrong error condition for one of these tests,
and hence not properly covering the intended failure path.

Signed-off-by: John Levon <john.levon@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Thanos Makatos <thanos.makatos@nutanix.com>
---
 test/py/test_device_set_irqs.py | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

(limited to 'test')

diff --git a/test/py/test_device_set_irqs.py b/test/py/test_device_set_irqs.py
index 9e54381..ebc3768 100644
--- a/test/py/test_device_set_irqs.py
+++ b/test/py/test_device_set_irqs.py
@@ -188,6 +188,8 @@ def test_device_set_irqs_bad_fds_for_DATA_BOOL():
                            VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_BOOL, index=VFU_DEV_MSIX_IRQ,
                            start=0, count=1)
 
+    payload = bytes(payload) + struct.pack("?", False)
+
     fd = eventfd()
 
     hdr = vfio_user_header(VFIO_USER_DEVICE_SET_IRQS, size=len(payload))
-- 
cgit v1.1