From 6424fba1bc4e80c43eb5eb69b9e66c0d89d1b1cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bin Meng Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 20:36:06 +0800 Subject: bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng Reviewed-by: Simon Glass --- cmd/bdinfo.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'cmd') diff --git a/cmd/bdinfo.c b/cmd/bdinfo.c index 996546f..dfd50ae 100644 --- a/cmd/bdinfo.c +++ b/cmd/bdinfo.c @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static void print_bi_dram(const struct bd_info *bd) for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS; ++i) { if (bd->bi_dram[i].size) { bdinfo_print_num_l("DRAM bank", i); - bdinfo_print_num_l("-> start", bd->bi_dram[i].start); - bdinfo_print_num_l("-> size", bd->bi_dram[i].size); + bdinfo_print_num_ll("-> start", bd->bi_dram[i].start); + bdinfo_print_num_ll("-> size", bd->bi_dram[i].size); } } } -- cgit v1.1