| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Using pointer arithmetic to generate a pointer outside a known object is,
technically, undefined behaviour in C. Unfortunately, we were using that
in fdt_offset_ptr() to detect overflows.
To fix this we need to do our bounds / overflow checking on the offsets
before constructing pointers from them.
Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
A number of style fixes across the files in this directory, including:
* Correct invalid kernel-doc content.
* Tidy up massive comment in fdt_region.c.
* Use correct spelling of "U-Boot".
* Replace tests of "! <var>" with "!<var>".
* Replace "libfdt_env.h" with <libfdt_env.h>.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Roger Meier <roger@bufferoverflow.ch>
Acked-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
|
|
Iterating through subnodes with libfdt is a little painful to write as we
need something like this:
for (depth = 0, count = 0,
offset = fdt_next_node(fdt, parent_offset, &depth);
(offset >= 0) && (depth > 0);
offset = fdt_next_node(fdt, offset, &depth)) {
if (depth == 1) {
/* code body */
}
}
Using fdt_next_subnode() we can instead write this, which is shorter and
easier to get right:
for (offset = fdt_first_subnode(fdt, parent_offset);
offset >= 0;
offset = fdt_next_subnode(fdt, offset)) {
/* code body */
}
Also, it doesn't require two levels of indentation for the loop body.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
(Cherry-picked from dtc commit 4e76ec79)
Acked-by: Gerald Van Baren <vanbaren@cideas.com>
|
|
commit 142419e "dtc/libfdt: sparse fixes", for u-boot's libfdt copy.
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Cc: Jerry Van Baren <gvb.uboot@gmail.com>
|
|
For ages, we've been talking about adding functions to libfdt to allow
iteration through properties. So, finally, here are some.
I got bogged down on this for a long time because I didn't want to
expose offsets directly to properties to the callers. But without
that, attempting to make reasonable iteration functions just became
horrible. So eventually, I settled on an interface which does now
expose property offsets. fdt_first_property_offset() and
fdt_next_property_offset() are used to step through the offsets of the
properties starting from a particularly node offset. The details of
the property at each offset can then be retrieved with either
fdt_get_property_by_offset() or fdt_getprop_by_offset() which have
interfaces similar to fdt_get_property() and fdt_getprop()
respectively.
No explicit testcases are included, but we do use the new functions to
reimplement the existing fdt_get_property() function.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This was extracted from the DTC commit:
73dca9ae0b9abe6924ba640164ecce9f8df69c5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Signed-off-by: Gerald Van Baren <vanbaren@cideas.com>
|
|
Move the libfdt directory into the common lib/ directory to clean up the
top-level directory.
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
|
