| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do
not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come
from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in
to CFG namespace.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
- Merge the patch to take <asm/global_data.h> out of <common.h>
|
|
At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers.
We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be
64-bit on a 32-bit platform.
Rename these 2 functions to be clearer:
bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l()
print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll()
While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can
be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
|
Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Factor out m68k-specific bdinfo setup to arch_setup_bdinfo in
arch/m68k/lib/bdinfo.c. Also, use if(IS_ENABLED()) instead of #ifdef where
possible.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
|
|
bi_sramstart and bi_sramsize are generic members of the bd_info structure,
so move the m68k/powerpc-specific prints to generic code. Also, print them
only if SRAM support is enabled via CONFIG_SYS_HAS_SRAM.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
|
|
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
We don't have an easy way to share these three lines of code with two
architectures. We also want to make it clear that this code is actually
arch-specific.
So just duplicate it in each arch-specific file.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
|
|
We don't really want to have m68k-specific code in a generic file. Create
a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that.
Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@timesys.com>
Tested-by: Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@timesys.com>
|
