| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do
not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come
from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in
to CFG namespace.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
The current name is inconsistent with SPL which uses CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE
and this makes it imposible to use CONFIG_VAL().
Rename it to resolve this problem.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
These particular values are not configurable and today we always set
CONFIG_SECURE_BL1_ONLY. Move these to where they're used in the code,
and drop from the CONFIG namespace.
Cc: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
|
|
On ARM, the gd pointer is stored in registers r9 / x18. For this the
-ffixed-r9 / -ffixed-x18 flag is used when compiling, but using global
register variables causes errors when building with LTO, and these
errors are very difficult to overcome.
Richard Biener says [1]:
Note that global register vars shouldn't be used with LTO and if they
are restricted to just a few compilation units the recommended fix is
to build those CUs without -flto.
We cannot do this for U-Boot since all CUs use -ffixed-reg flag.
It seems that with LTO we could in fact store the gd pointer differently
and gain performance or size benefit by allowing the compiler to use
r9 / x18. But this would need more work.
So for now, when building with LTO, go the clang way, and instead of
declaring gd a global register variable, we make it a function call via
macro.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68384
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Move this header out of the common header.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Move this uncommon header out of the common header.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Move this header out of the common header. Network support is used in
quite a few places but it still does not warrant blanket inclusion.
Note that this net.h header itself has quite a lot in it. It could be
split into the driver-mode support, functions, structures, checksumming,
etc.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Replace CONFIG_ENV_SPI_BASE by the better CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE
(it is not the location for environment but the location for U-Boot)
and, as it is the only platform with use this define, remove
it from whitelist.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Correct spelling of "U-Boot" shall be used in all written text
(documentation, comments in source files etc.).
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
|
|
Move arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/* to arch/arm/mach-exynos/* to allow
reuse of existing code for ARMv8 based Exynos platforms.
Cc: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Tested-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
|
