diff options
| author | Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> | 2020-09-03 11:24:28 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> | 2020-10-27 08:13:32 +0100 |
| commit | caa7fc2c57750f323d53aef38c7ee2e01898c4ba (patch) | |
| tree | 37aa0d0239f56f903b70d89d27925ae3b595c794 /common/fdt_support.c | |
| parent | ea836be1e7b9e5a88637a87cf7219f96761d1b70 (diff) | |
| download | u-boot-caa7fc2c57750f323d53aef38c7ee2e01898c4ba.zip u-boot-caa7fc2c57750f323d53aef38c7ee2e01898c4ba.tar.gz u-boot-caa7fc2c57750f323d53aef38c7ee2e01898c4ba.tar.bz2 | |
spl: Use standard FIT entries
SPL is creating fit-images DT node when loadables are recorded in selected
configuration. Entries which are created are using entry-point and
load-addr property names. But there shouldn't be a need to use non standard
properties because entry/load are standard FIT properties. But using
standard FIT properties enables option to use generic FIT functions to
descrease SPL size. Here is result for ZynqMP virt configuration:
xilinx_zynqmp_virt: spl/u-boot-spl:all -82 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata -22 spl/u-boot-spl:text -60
The patch causes change in run time fit image record.
Before:
fit-images {
uboot {
os = "u-boot";
type = "firmware";
size = <0xfd520>;
entry-point = <0x8000000>;
load-addr = <0x8000000>;
};
};
After:
fit-images {
uboot {
os = "u-boot";
type = "firmware";
size = <0xfd520>;
entry = <0x8000000>;
load = <0x8000000>;
};
};
Replacing calling fdt_getprop_u32() by fit_image_get_entry/load() also
enables support for reading entry/load properties recorded in 64bit format.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'common/fdt_support.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | common/fdt_support.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/common/fdt_support.c b/common/fdt_support.c index a565b47..b8a8768 100644 --- a/common/fdt_support.c +++ b/common/fdt_support.c @@ -616,9 +616,9 @@ int fdt_record_loadable(void *blob, u32 index, const char *name, * However, spl_fit.c is not 64bit safe either: i.e. we should not * have an issue here. */ - fdt_setprop_u32(blob, node, "load-addr", load_addr); + fdt_setprop_u32(blob, node, "load", load_addr); if (entry_point != -1) - fdt_setprop_u32(blob, node, "entry-point", entry_point); + fdt_setprop_u32(blob, node, "entry", entry_point); fdt_setprop_u32(blob, node, "size", size); if (type) fdt_setprop_string(blob, node, "type", type); |