; RUN: opt -passes='function(loop-vectorize,require)' -disable-output -pass-remarks-analysis=loop-vectorize < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s ; RUN: opt < %s -passes='function(require,loop-vectorize)' -o /dev/null -pass-remarks-output=%t.yaml ; RUN: cat %t.yaml | FileCheck -check-prefix=YAML %s target datalayout = "e-m:e-i8:8:32-i16:16:32-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128" ; // Loop has an array element B[i] (%arrayidx in IR) being used as index to ; // another array (A), and since the value of B[i] is unknown, ; // the bound for array A is unknown. ; void test_unknown_bounds(int n, int* A, int* B) { ; for(int i = 0; i < n ; ++i) ; A[i] = A[B[i]] + 1; ; } ; CHECK: remark: source.c:4:16: loop not vectorized: cannot identify array bounds define void @test_unknown_bounds(i64 %n, ptr nocapture %A, ptr nocapture readonly %B) !dbg !13 { entry: %cmp10 = icmp sgt i64 %n, 0 br i1 %cmp10, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %B, i64 %indvars.iv %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 %idxprom1 = sext i32 %0 to i64, !dbg !35 %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %idxprom1, !dbg !35 %1 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4, !dbg !35 %add = add nsw i32 %1, 1 %arrayidx4 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %indvars.iv store i32 %add, ptr %arrayidx4, align 4 %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1 %exitcond.not = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, %n br i1 %exitcond.not, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body, !dbg !28 for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.body, %entry ret void } ; // a) Dependence::NoDep ; // Loop containing only reads (here of the array A) does not hinder vectorization ; void test_nodep(int n, int* A, int* B) { ; for(int i = 1; i < n ; ++i) { ; B[i] = A[i-1] + A[i+2]; ; } ; } ; CHECK-NOT: remark: source.c:{{0-9]+}}:{{[0-9]+}}: define void @test_nodep(i64 %n, ptr nocapture readonly %A, ptr nocapture %B) !dbg !44 { entry: %cmp12 = icmp sgt i64 %n, 1 br i1 %cmp12, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ] %0 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -1 %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %0, !dbg !61 %1 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx, align 4, !dbg !61 %2 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 2 %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %2, !dbg !63 %3 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4, !dbg !63 %add3 = add nsw i32 %3, %1 %arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %B, i64 %indvars.iv store i32 %add3, ptr %arrayidx5, align 4 %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1 %exitcond.not = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, %n br i1 %exitcond.not, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.body, %entry ret void } ; // b) Dependence::Forward ; // Loop gets vectorized since it contains only a forward ; // dependency between A[i-2] and A[i] ; void test_forward(int n, int* A, int* B) { ; for(int i=1; i < n; ++i) { ; A[i] = 10; ; B[i] = A[i-2]; ; } ; } ; CHECK-NOT: remark: source.c:{{0-9]+}}:{{[0-9]+}}: define dso_local void @test_forward(i64 %n, ptr nocapture %A, ptr nocapture %B) !dbg !70 { entry: %cmp11 = icmp sgt i64 %n, 1 br i1 %cmp11, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup, !dbg !81 for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %indvars.iv, !dbg !83 store i32 10, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 %0 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -2 %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %0, !dbg !87 %1 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4, !dbg !87 %arrayidx4 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %B, i64 %indvars.iv, !dbg !88 store i32 %1, ptr %arrayidx4, align 4, !dbg !89 %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1 %exitcond.not = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, %n br i1 %exitcond.not, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body, !dbg !81 for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.body, %entry ret void } ; // c) Dependence::BackwardVectorizable ; // Loop gets vectorized since it contains a backward dependency ; // between A[i] and A[i-4], but the dependency distance (4) is ; // greater than the minimum possible VF (2 in this case) ; void test_backwardVectorizable(int n, int* A) { ; for(int i=4; i < n; ++i) { ; A[i] = A[i-4] + 1; ; } ; } ; CHECK-NOT: remark: source.c:{{0-9]+}}:{{[0-9]+}}: define dso_local void @test_backwardVectorizable(i64 %n, ptr nocapture %A) !dbg !93 { entry: %cmp8 = icmp sgt i64 %n, 4 br i1 %cmp8, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 4, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ] %0 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -4, !dbg !106 %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %0, !dbg !108 %1 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx, align 4, !dbg !108 %add = add nsw i32 %1, 1 %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %indvars.iv, !dbg !110 store i32 %add, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4, !dbg !111 %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1 %exitcond.not = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, %n br i1 %exitcond.not, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.body, %entry ret void } ; // d) Dependence::Backward ; // Loop does not get vectorized since it contains a backward ; // dependency between A[i] and A[i+3]. ; void test_backward_dep(int n, int *A) { ; for (int i = 1; i <= n - 3; i += 3) { ; A[i] = A[i-1]; ; A[i+1] = A[i+3]; ; } ; } ; CHECK: remark: source.c:48:14: loop not vectorized: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop ; CHECK-NEXT: Backward loop carried data dependence. Memory location is the same as accessed at source.c:47:5 define void @test_backward_dep(i64 %n, ptr nocapture %A) { entry: %cmp.not19 = icmp slt i64 %n, 4 br i1 %cmp.not19, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body.preheader for.body.preheader: ; preds = %entry %sub = add nsw i64 %n, -3 br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %for.body.preheader, %for.body %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 1, %for.body.preheader ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ] %0 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -1 %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %0 %1 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 %arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %indvars.iv, !dbg !157 store i32 %1, ptr %arrayidx3, align 8 %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 3 %arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %indvars.iv.next, !dbg !160 %2 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx5, align 8, !dbg !160 %3 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1 %arrayidx8 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %3 store i32 %2, ptr %arrayidx8, align 8 %cmp.not = icmp ugt i64 %indvars.iv.next, %n br i1 %cmp.not, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.body, %entry ret void } ; // e) Dependence::ForwardButPreventsForwarding ; // Loop does not get vectorized despite only having a forward ; // dependency between A[i] and A[i-3]. ; // This is because the store-to-load forwarding distance (here 3) ; // needs to be a multiple of vector factor otherwise the ; // store (A[5:6] in i=5) and load (A[4:5],A[6:7] in i=7,9) are unaligned. ; void test_forwardButPreventsForwarding_dep(int n, int* A, int* B) { ; for(int i=3; i < n; ++i) { ; A[i] = 10; ; B[i] = A[i-3]; ; } ; } ; CHECK: remark: source.c:61:12: loop not vectorized: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop ; CHECK-NEXT: Forward loop carried data dependence that prevents store-to-load forwarding. Memory location is the same as accessed at source.c:60:5 define void @test_forwardButPreventsForwarding_dep(i64 %n, ptr nocapture %A, ptr nocapture %B) !dbg !166 { entry: %cmp11 = icmp sgt i64 %n, 3 br i1 %cmp11, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 3, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %indvars.iv, !dbg !179 store i32 10, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 %0 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -3 %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %0, !dbg !183 %1 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4, !dbg !183 %arrayidx4 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %B, i64 %indvars.iv store i32 %1, ptr %arrayidx4, align 4 %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1 %exitcond.not = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, %n br i1 %exitcond.not, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.body, %entry ret void } ; // f) Dependence::BackwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding ; // Loop does not get vectorized despite having a backward ; // but vectorizable dependency between A[i] and A[i-15]. ; // ; // This is because the store-to-load forwarding distance (here 15) ; // needs to be a multiple of vector factor otherwise ; // store (A[16:17] in i=16) and load (A[15:16], A[17:18] in i=30,32) are unaligned. ; void test_backwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding(int n, int* A) { ; for(int i=15; i < n; ++i) { ; A[i] = A[i-2] + A[i-15]; ; } ; } ; CHECK: remark: source.c:74:5: loop not vectorized: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop ; CHECK: Backward loop carried data dependence that prevents store-to-load forwarding. Memory location is the same as accessed at source.c:74:21 define void @test_backwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding(i64 %n, ptr nocapture %A) !dbg !189 { entry: %cmp13 = icmp sgt i64 %n, 15 br i1 %cmp13, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 15, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ] %0 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -2 %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %0 %1 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 %2 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -15 %arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %2, !dbg !207 %3 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx3, align 4 %add = add nsw i32 %3, %1 %arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %indvars.iv, !dbg !209 store i32 %add, ptr %arrayidx5, align 4, !dbg !209 %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1 %exitcond.not = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, %n br i1 %exitcond.not, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.body, %entry ret void } ; // g) Dependence::Unknown ; // Different stride lengths ; void test_unknown_dep(int n, int* A) { ; for(int i=0; i < n; ++i) { ; A[(i+1)*4] = 10; ; A[i] = 100; ; } ; } ; CHECK: remark: source.c:83:7: loop not vectorized: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop ; CHECK: Unknown data dependence. Memory location is the same as accessed at source.c:82:7 define void @test_unknown_dep(i64 %n, ptr nocapture %A) !dbg !214 { entry: %cmp8 = icmp sgt i64 %n, 0 br i1 %cmp8, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ] %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1 %0 = shl nsw i64 %indvars.iv.next, 2 %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %0, !dbg !229 store i32 10, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %indvars.iv, !dbg !231 store i32 100, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4, !dbg !231 %exitcond.not = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, %n br i1 %exitcond.not, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.body, %entry ret void } ; YAML: --- !Analysis ; YAML-NEXT: Pass: loop-vectorize ; YAML-NEXT: Name: CantIdentifyArrayBounds ; YAML-NEXT: DebugLoc: { File: source.c, Line: 4, Column: 16 } ; YAML-NEXT: Function: test_unknown_bounds ; YAML-NEXT: Args: ; YAML-NEXT: - String: 'loop not vectorized: ' ; YAML-NEXT: - String: cannot identify array bounds ; YAML-NEXT: ... ; YAML-NEXT: --- !Missed ; YAML-NEXT: Pass: loop-vectorize ; YAML-NEXT: Name: MissedDetails ; YAML-NEXT: DebugLoc: { File: source.c, Line: 3, Column: 5 } ; YAML-NEXT: Function: test_unknown_bounds ; YAML-NEXT: Args: ; YAML-NEXT: - String: loop not vectorized ; YAML-NEXT: ... ; YAML: --- !Analysis ; YAML-NEXT: Pass: loop-vectorize ; YAML-NEXT: Name: UnsafeDep ; YAML-NEXT: DebugLoc: { File: source.c, Line: 48, Column: 14 } ; YAML-NEXT: Function: test_backward_dep ; YAML-NEXT: Args: ; YAML-NEXT: - String: 'loop not vectorized: ' ; YAML-NEXT: - String: 'unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop' ; YAML-NEXT: - String: "\nBackward loop carried data dependence." ; YAML-NEXT: - String: ' Memory location is the same as accessed at ' ; YAML-NEXT: - Location: 'source.c:47:5' ; YAML-NEXT: DebugLoc: { File: source.c, Line: 47, Column: 5 } ; YAML-NEXT: ... ; YAML-NEXT: --- !Missed ; YAML-NEXT: Pass: loop-vectorize ; YAML-NEXT: Name: MissedDetails ; YAML-NEXT: Function: test_backward_dep ; YAML-NEXT: Args: ; YAML-NEXT: - String: loop not vectorized ; YAML-NEXT: ... ; YAML-NEXT: --- !Analysis ; YAML-NEXT: Pass: loop-vectorize ; YAML-NEXT: Name: UnsafeDep ; YAML-NEXT: DebugLoc: { File: source.c, Line: 61, Column: 12 } ; YAML-NEXT: Function: test_forwardButPreventsForwarding_dep ; YAML-NEXT: Args: ; YAML-NEXT: - String: 'loop not vectorized: ' ; YAML-NEXT: - String: 'unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop' ; YAML-NEXT: - String: "\nForward loop carried data dependence that prevents store-to-load forwarding." ; YAML-NEXT: - String: ' Memory location is the same as accessed at ' ; YAML-NEXT: - Location: 'source.c:60:5' ; YAML-NEXT: DebugLoc: { File: source.c, Line: 60, Column: 5 } ; YAML-NEXT: ... ; YAML-NEXT: --- !Missed ; YAML-NEXT: Pass: loop-vectorize ; YAML-NEXT: Name: MissedDetails ; YAML-NEXT: Function: test_forwardButPreventsForwarding_dep ; YAML-NEXT: Args: ; YAML-NEXT: - String: loop not vectorized ; YAML-NEXT: ... ; YAML-NEXT: --- !Analysis ; YAML-NEXT: Pass: loop-vectorize ; YAML-NEXT: Name: UnsafeDep ; YAML-NEXT: DebugLoc: { File: source.c, Line: 74, Column: 5 } ; YAML-NEXT: Function: test_backwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding ; YAML-NEXT: Args: ; YAML-NEXT: - String: 'loop not vectorized: ' ; YAML-NEXT: - String: 'unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop' ; YAML-NEXT: - String: "\nBackward loop carried data dependence that prevents store-to-load forwarding." ; YAML-NEXT: - String: ' Memory location is the same as accessed at ' ; YAML-NEXT: - Location: 'source.c:74:21' ; YAML-NEXT: DebugLoc: { File: source.c, Line: 74, Column: 21 } ; YAML-NEXT: ... ; YAML-NEXT: --- !Missed ; YAML-NEXT: Pass: loop-vectorize ; YAML-NEXT: Name: MissedDetails ; YAML-NEXT: Function: test_backwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding ; YAML-NEXT: Args: ; YAML-NEXT: - String: loop not vectorized ; YAML-NEXT: ... ; YAML-NEXT: --- !Analysis ; YAML-NEXT: Pass: loop-vectorize ; YAML-NEXT: Name: UnsafeDep ; YAML-NEXT: DebugLoc: { File: source.c, Line: 83, Column: 7 } ; YAML-NEXT: Function: test_unknown_dep ; YAML-NEXT: Args: ; YAML-NEXT: - String: 'loop not vectorized: ' ; YAML-NEXT: - String: 'unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop' ; YAML-NEXT: - String: "\nUnknown data dependence." ; YAML-NEXT: - String: ' Memory location is the same as accessed at ' ; YAML-NEXT: - Location: 'source.c:82:7' ; YAML-NEXT: DebugLoc: { File: source.c, Line: 82, Column: 7 } ; YAML-NEXT: ... ; YAML-NEXT: --- !Missed ; YAML-NEXT: Pass: loop-vectorize ; YAML-NEXT: Name: MissedDetails ; YAML-NEXT: Function: test_unknown_dep ; YAML-NEXT: Args: ; YAML-NEXT: - String: loop not vectorized ; YAML-NEXT: ... !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0} !llvm.module.flags = !{!4} !0 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 54f0f826c5c7d0ff16c230b259cb6aad33e18d97)", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !2, splitDebugInlining: false, nameTableKind: None) !1 = !DIFile(filename: "source.c", directory: "") !2 = !{} !4 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3} !13 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "test_unknown_bounds", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 2, type: !45, scopeLine: 2, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !2) !23 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !13, file: !1, line: 3, column: 5) !27 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !23, file: !1, line: 3, column: 5) !28 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 5, scope: !23) !35 = !DILocation(line: 4, column: 16, scope: !27) !44 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "test_nodep", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 14, type: !45, scopeLine: 14, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !2) !45 = !DISubroutineType(types: !46) !46 = !{null, !18, !16, !16} !16 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_pointer_type, baseType: !17, size: 64) !17 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed) !18 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 64, encoding: DW_ATE_signed) !52 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !44, file: !1, line: 15, column: 3) !56 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !52, file: !1, line: 15, column: 3) !60 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !56, file: !1, line: 15, column: 31) !61 = !DILocation(line: 16, column: 12, scope: !60) !63 = !DILocation(line: 16, column: 21, scope: !60) !70 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "test_forward", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 24, type: !45, scopeLine: 24, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !2) !77 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !70, file: !1, line: 25, column: 3) !80 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !77, file: !1, line: 25, column: 3) !81 = !DILocation(line: 25, column: 3, scope: !77) !83 = !DILocation(line: 26, column: 5, scope: !84) !84 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !80, file: !1, line: 25, column: 28) !87 = !DILocation(line: 27, column: 12, scope: !84) !88 = !DILocation(line: 27, column: 5, scope: !84) !89 = !DILocation(line: 27, column: 10, scope: !84) !93 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "test_backwardVectorizable", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 36, type: !95, scopeLine: 36, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !2) !95 = !DISubroutineType(types: !96) !96 = !{null, !18, !16} !99 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !93, file: !1, line: 37, column: 3) !103 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !99, file: !1, line: 37, column: 3) !106 = !DILocation(line: 38, column: 15, scope: !107) !107 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !103, file: !1, line: 37, column: 28) !108 = !DILocation(line: 38, column: 12, scope: !107) !110 = !DILocation(line: 38, column: 5, scope: !107) !111 = !DILocation(line: 38, column: 10, scope: !107) !136 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "test_backward_dep", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 45, type: !95, scopeLine: 45, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !2) !145 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !136, file: !1, line: 46, column: 3) !149 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !145, file: !1, line: 46, column: 3) !153 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !149, file: !1, line: 46, column: 39) !157 = !DILocation(line: 47, column: 5, scope: !153) !160 = !DILocation(line: 48, column: 14, scope: !153) !166 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "test_forwardButPreventsForwarding_dep", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 58, type: !45, scopeLine: 58, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !2) !172 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !166, file: !1, line: 59, column: 3) !176 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !172, file: !1, line: 59, column: 3) !179 = !DILocation(line: 60, column: 5, scope: !180) !180 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !176, file: !1, line: 59, column: 28) !183 = !DILocation(line: 61, column: 12, scope: !180) !189 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "test_backwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 72, type: !95, scopeLine: 72, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !2) !196 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !189, file: !1, line: 73, column: 3) !200 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !196, file: !1, line: 73, column: 3) !204 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !200, file: !1, line: 73, column: 29) !207 = !DILocation(line: 74, column: 21, scope: !204) !209 = !DILocation(line: 74, column: 5, scope: !204) !214 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "test_unknown_dep", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 80, type: !95, scopeLine: 80, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !2) !219 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !214, file: !1, line: 81, column: 3) !223 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !219, file: !1, line: 81, column: 3) !227 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !223, file: !1, line: 81, column: 28) !229 = !DILocation(line: 82, column: 7, scope: !227) !231 = !DILocation(line: 83, column: 7, scope: !227)