// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -std=c99 %s // RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -std=c99 -fno-dollars-in-identifiers %s /* WG14 N717: Clang 17 * Extended identifiers */ // Used as a sink for UCNs. #define M(arg) // C99 6.4.3p1 specifies the grammar for UCNs. A \u must be followed by exactly // four hex digits, and \U must be followed by exactly eight. M(\u1) // expected-warning {{incomplete universal character name; treating as '\' followed by identifier}} M(\u12) // expected-warning {{incomplete universal character name; treating as '\' followed by identifier}} M(\u123) // expected-warning {{incomplete universal character name; treating as '\' followed by identifier}} M(\u1234) // Okay M(\u12345)// Okay, two tokens (UCN followed by 5) M(\U1) // expected-warning {{incomplete universal character name; treating as '\' followed by identifier}} M(\U12) // expected-warning {{incomplete universal character name; treating as '\' followed by identifier}} M(\U123) // expected-warning {{incomplete universal character name; treating as '\' followed by identifier}} M(\U1234) // expected-warning {{incomplete universal character name; treating as '\' followed by identifier}} \ expected-note {{did you mean to use '\u'?}} M(\U12345) // expected-warning {{incomplete universal character name; treating as '\' followed by identifier}} M(\U123456) // expected-warning {{incomplete universal character name; treating as '\' followed by identifier}} M(\U1234567) // expected-warning {{incomplete universal character name; treating as '\' followed by identifier}} M(\U12345678) // Okay M(\U123456789) // Okay-ish, two tokens (valid-per-spec-but-actually-invalid UCN followed by 9) // Now test the ones that should work. Note, these work in C17 and earlier but // are part of the basic character set in C23 and thus should be diagnosed in // that mode. They're valid in a character constant, but not valid in an // identifier, except for U+0024 which is allowed if -fdollars-in-identifiers // is enabled. // FIXME: These three should be handled the same way, and should be accepted // when dollar signs are allowed in identifiers, rather than rejected, see // GH87106. M(\u0024) // expected-error {{character '$' cannot be specified by a universal character name}} M(\U00000024) // expected-error {{character '$' cannot be specified by a universal character name}} M($) // These should always be rejected because they're not valid identifier // characters. // FIXME: the diagnostic could be improved to make it clear this is an issue // with forming an identifier rather than a UCN. M(\u0040) // expected-error {{character '@' cannot be specified by a universal character name}} M(\u0060) // expected-error {{character '`' cannot be specified by a universal character name}} M(\U00000040) // expected-error {{character '@' cannot be specified by a universal character name}} M(\U00000060) // expected-error {{character '`' cannot be specified by a universal character name}} // UCNs outside of identifiers are handled in Phase 5 of translation, so we // cannot use the macro expansion to test their behavior. // This is outside of the range of values specified by ISO 10646. const char *c1 = "\U00110000"; // expected-error {{invalid universal character}} // This does not fall outside of the range const char *c2 = "\U0010FFFF"; // These should always be accepted because they're a valid in a character // constant. int c3 = '\u0024'; int c4 = '\u0040'; int c5 = '\u0060'; int c6 = '\U00000024'; int c7 = '\U00000040'; int c8 = '\U00000060'; // Valid lone surrogates. M(\uD799) const char *c9 = "\U0000E000"; // Invalid lone surrogates, which are excluded explicitly by 6.4.3p2. M(\uD800) // expected-error {{invalid universal character}} const char *c10 = "\U0000DFFF"; // expected-error {{invalid universal character}}