From 2eade1dba4a8d6e1c6867e9127bcd88cf4e55976 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arthur Eubanks Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 15:18:04 -0700 Subject: [WPD] Use new llvm.public.type.test intrinsic for potentially publicly visible classes Turning on opaque pointers has uncovered an issue with WPD where we currently pattern match away `assume(type.test)` in WPD so that a later LTT doesn't resolve the type test to undef and introduce an `assume(false)`. The pattern matching can fail in cases where we transform two `assume(type.test)`s into `assume(phi(type.test.1, type.test.2))`. Currently we create `assume(type.test)` for all virtual calls that might be devirtualized. This is to support `-Wl,--lto-whole-program-visibility`. To prevent this, all virtual calls that may not be in the same LTO module instead use a new `llvm.public.type.test` intrinsic in place of the `llvm.type.test`. Then when we know if `-Wl,--lto-whole-program-visibility` is passed or not, we can either replace all `llvm.public.type.test` with `llvm.type.test`, or replace all `llvm.public.type.test` with `true`. This prevents WPD from trying to pattern match away `assume(type.test)` for public virtual calls when failing the pattern matching will result in miscompiles. Reviewed By: tejohnson Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128955 --- llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp') diff --git a/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp b/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp index 1d6c21b..1943b5d 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp @@ -7788,7 +7788,7 @@ static Expected getEnableSplitLTOUnitFlag(BitstreamCursor &Stream, case bitc::FS_FLAGS: { // [flags] uint64_t Flags = Record[0]; // Scan flags. - assert(Flags <= 0x7f && "Unexpected bits in flag"); + assert(Flags <= 0xff && "Unexpected bits in flag"); return Flags & 0x8; } -- cgit v1.1