From ba1d21c7d8613c90e424fa3e77d52184d531c302 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aaron Ballman Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:13:24 -0400 Subject: [C2y] Claim conformance to WG14 N3254 (#97581) The test coverage for this has to lean on LLVM's test coverage for the actual TBAA behavior, but this demonstrates that Clang emits reasonable LLVM IR to support this construct. It would be surprising should LLVM break this pattern given how ubiquitous the pattern is in the wild. The paper can be found at: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3254.pdf --- clang/www/c_status.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'clang/www') diff --git a/clang/www/c_status.html b/clang/www/c_status.html index 3fb1efc..2030e1e 100644 --- a/clang/www/c_status.html +++ b/clang/www/c_status.html @@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@ conforms by not defining the __STDC_IEC_559_COMPLEX__ macro. Accessing byte arrays N3254 - Unknown + Yes Slay some earthly demons I -- cgit v1.1