From 99500e8c08a4d941acb8a7eb00523296fb2acf7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mariya Podchishchaeva <mariya.podchishchaeva@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 11:36:50 +0300
Subject: [Clang][C++23] Implement P2448R2: Relaxing some constexpr
 restrictions (#77753)

Per
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2448r2.html
function/constructor/destructor can be marked `constexpr` even though it
never produces a constant expression.
Non-literal types as return types and parameter types of functions
marked `constexpr` are also allowed.
Since this is not a DR, the diagnostic messages are still preserved for
C++ standards older than C++23.
---
 clang/www/cxx_status.html | 9 +--------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

(limited to 'clang/www')

diff --git a/clang/www/cxx_status.html b/clang/www/cxx_status.html
index 421b342..5ed27cd 100755
--- a/clang/www/cxx_status.html
+++ b/clang/www/cxx_status.html
@@ -356,14 +356,7 @@ C++23, informally referred to as C++26.</p>
     <tr>
       <td>Relaxing some constexpr restrictions</td>
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/P2448R2">P2448R2</a></td>
-      <td class="partial" align="center">
-        <details><summary>Clang 17 (Partial)</summary>
-	  We do not support outside of defaulted special memeber functions the change that constexpr functions no
-          longer have to be constexpr compatible but rather support a less restricted requirements for constexpr
-          functions. Which include allowing non-literal types as return values and parameters, allow calling of
-          non-constexpr functions and constructors.
-        </details></td>
-      </td>
+      <td class="unreleased" align="center">Clang 19</td>
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td>Using unknown pointers and references in constant expressions</td>
-- 
cgit v1.1