From 4e64159c866446ed7f5783649f8f5699f84bb1a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: cor3ntin <corentinjabot@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 06:16:12 +0100
Subject: [Clang] Implement CWG2598: Union of non-literal types (#78195)

A union is considered a literal type unless it has no non-literal
member.

This resolves CWG2096 (which makes unions with literal members literal)
and CWG2598 (empty unions are literal types).

Fixes #77924
---
 clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'clang/www')

diff --git a/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html b/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html
index 397bf13..5e7c1a0 100755
--- a/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html
+++ b/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html
@@ -12384,7 +12384,7 @@ and <I>POD class</I></td>
     <td><a href="https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2096.html">2096</a></td>
     <td>CD4</td>
     <td>Constraints on literal unions</td>
-    <td class="unknown" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="unreleased" align="center">Duplicate of <a href="#2598">2598</a></td>
   </tr>
   <tr class="open" id="2097">
     <td><a href="https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2097.html">2097</a></td>
@@ -15396,7 +15396,7 @@ and <I>POD class</I></td>
     <td><a href="https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2598.html">2598</a></td>
     <td>C++23</td>
     <td>Unions should not require a non-static data member of literal type</td>
-    <td class="unknown" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="unreleased" align="center">Clang 18</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="2599">
     <td><a href="https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2599.html">2599</a></td>
-- 
cgit v1.1