Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
|
|
This fixes a clang-tidy diagnostic when building libc++ with RTTI
disabled. This was originally part of #65518.
|
|
As part of the upcoming clang-formatting of libc++, this patch performs
the long desired removal of the _VSTD macro.
See https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
|
|
In preparation for running clang-format on the whole code base, we are
also removing mentions of the legacy _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY macro in
favor of the newer _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
We're still leaving the definition of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to avoid
creating needless breakage in case some older patches are checked-in
with mentions of the old macro. After we branch for LLVM 18, we can do
another pass to clean up remaining uses of the macro that might have
gotten introduced by mistake (if any) and remove the macro itself at the
same time. This is just a minor convenience to smooth out the transition
as much as possible.
See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
|
|
There is no reason to use `alignment_of<T>` instead of `alignof(T)` or
`_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF(T)`. It only makes the code more verbose and results in
slightly worse compile times.
|
|
POSIX allows certain macros to exist with generic names (i.e. refresh(), move(), and erase()) to exist in `curses.h` which conflict with functions found in std::filesystem, among others. This patch undefs the macros in question and adds them to LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS and LIBCPP_POP_MACROS.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147356
|
|
into _LIBCPP_EXPORTED_FROM_ABI
These macros are always defined identically, so we can simplify the code a bit by merging them.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, krytarowski, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152652
|
|
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, miyuki
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149599
|
|
We already have a clang-tidy check for making sure that `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` is on free functions. This patch extends this to class members. The places where we don't check for `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` are classes for which we have an instantiation in the library.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: jplehr, mikhail.ramalho, sstefan1, libcxx-commits, krytarowski, miyuki, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142332
|
|
We changed the `abort` calls when trying to throw exceptions in `-fno-exceptions` mode to `__verbose_abort` calls, which removes the dependency in most files.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: dim, emaste, mikhail.ramalho, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146076
|
|
directly
These calls were added in D141222.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits, smeenai, mikhail.ramalho
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146227
|
|
This results in proper error messages instead of just an abort.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: #libc_vendors, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141222
|
|
This patch also updates the moved code to the new style (i.e. formatted, replaced marcos and typedefs)
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: arichardson, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145095
|
|
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, #libc_abi
Spies: #libc_vendors, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145320
|
|
Other macros that disable parts of the library are named `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_WHATEVER`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143163
|
|
This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate `_LIBCPP_STD_VER >=` instead. To avoid churn in the git-blame this commit should be added to the `.git-blame-ignore-revs` once committed.
Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, arphaman, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143962
|
|
Other macros that disable parts of the library are named `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_WHATEVER`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143164
|
|
std::aligned_union)
There are no tests for the aliases because clang doesn't diagnose deprecated template aliases currently.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127678
|
|
Reviewed By: ldionne, huixie90, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134479
|
|
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137283
|
|
The new version is a lot simpler and has less option which were not
used. This uses the CSV files as generated by D133127 as input data.
The current Python script has more features but uses a simple "grep"
making the output less accurate:
- Conditionally included header are always included. This is an issue
since part of our includes are unneeded transitive includes. Based on
the language version they may be omitted. The script however always
includes them.
- Includes in comments are processed as-if they are includes. This is an
issue when comments explain how certain data is generated; of course
there are digraphs which the script omits.
This implementation uses Clang's --trace-includes to generate the includes
per header. This means the input of the generation script always has the
real list of includes.
Libc++ is moving from large monolithic Standard headers to more fine
grained headers. For example, algorithm includes every header in
`__algorithm`. Adding all these detail headers in the graph makes the
output unusable. Instead it only shows the Standard headers. The
transitive includes of the detail headers are parsed and "attributed" to
the Standard header including them. This gives an accurate include graph
without the unneeded clutter. Note that this graph is still big.
This changes fixes the cyclic dependency issue with the previous version
of the tool so the markers and its documentation is removed.
Since the input has no cycles the CI test is removed.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134188
|
|
Use `using` aliases to avoid instantiating lots of types
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, miyuki
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132785
|
|
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: vitalybuka, paulkirth, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132790
|
|
As discussed in D132284 they will be moved to the end.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133212
|
|
Breaks buildbots.
This reverts commit 30adaa730c4768b5eb06719c808b2884fcf53cf3.
|
|
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132790
|
|
it through readability-identifier-naming
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: aheejin, sstefan1, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129386
|
|
This defines a new policy for removal of transitive includes.
The goal of the policy it to make it relatively easy to remove
headers when needed, but avoid breaking developers using and
vendors shipping libc++.
The method used is to guard transitive includes based on the
C++ language version. For the upcoming C++23 we can remove
headers when we want, but for other language versions we try
to keep it to a minimum.
In this code the transitive include of `<chrono>` is removed
since D128577 introduces a header cycle between `<format>`
and `<chrono>`. This cycle is indirectly required by the
Standard. Our cycle dependency tool basically is a grep based
tool, so it needs some hints to ignore cycles. With the input
of our transitive include tests we can create a better tool.
However that's out of the scope of this patch.
Note the flag `_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES` remains
unchanged. So users can still opt-out of transitives includes
entirely.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132284
|
|
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Spies: aheejin, libcxx-commits, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124714
|
|
readability-identifier-naming
Ensure that parameter names have the style `__lower_case`
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: aheejin, sstefan1, libcxx-commits, miyuki
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129051
|
|
This commit re-adds transitive includes that had been removed by
4cd04d1687f1, c36870c8e79c, a83f4b9cda57, 1458458b558d, 2e2f3158c604,
and 489637e66dd3. This should cover almost all the includes that had
been removed since LLVM 14 and that would contribute to breaking user
code when releasing LLVM 15.
It is possible to disable the inclusion of these headers by defining
_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES. The intent is that vendors will
enable that macro and start fixing downstream issues immediately. We
can then remove the macro (and the transitive includes) by default in
a future release. That way, we will break users only once by removing
transitive includes in bulk instead of doing it bit by bit a every
release, which is more disruptive for users.
Note 1: The set of headers to re-add was found by re-generating the
transitive include test on a checkout of release/14.x, which
provided the list of all transitive includes we used to provide.
Note 2: Several includes of <vector>, <optional>, <array> and <unordered_map>
have been added in this commit. These transitive inclusions were
added when we implemented boyer_moore_searcher in <functional>.
Note 3: This is a best effort patch to try and resolve downstream breakage
caused since branching LLVM 14. I wasn't able to perfectly mirror
transitive includes in LLVM 14 for a few headers, so I added a
release note explaining it. To summarize, adding boyer_moore_searcher
created a bunch of circular dependencies, so we have to break
backwards compatibility in a few cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128661
|
|
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127445
|
|
Those were spotted when a project unintentionally started exporting
these symbols from its ABI just by using the libc++ headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126496
|
|
This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any public
C++ header of the library. Note that C compatibility headers are
excluded because we don't implement all the C headers ourselves --
some of them are taken straight from the C library, like assert.h.
It also adds a generated test to check it. Furthermore, this new
generated test is designed in a way that will make it possible to
replace almost all the existing test-generation scripts with this
system in upcoming patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122506
|
|
warnings in the test suite
This should make CI consistent on all the compilers we support. Most of
this patch is working around various warnings emitted by GCC in our code
base, which are now being shown when we compile the tests.
After this patch, the whole test suite should be warning free on all
compilers we support and test, except for a few warnings on GCC that
we silence explicitly until we figure out the proper fix for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120684
|
|
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: EricWF, libcxx-commits, arphaman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120466
|
|
Now we'll notice if a header forgets to include this magic phrase.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118800
|
|
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
|
|
Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
|
|
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102781
|
|
Mostly, *don't* include <experimental/__config> from C++17 <any>,
because that doesn't make any sense. I think it was just a cut-and-paste
typo when this header moved from experimental/.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99089
|
|
Currently, vendor-specific availability markup is enabled by default.
This means that even when building against trunk libc++, the headers
will by default prevent you from using some features that were not
released in the dylib on your target platform. This is a source of
frustration since people building libc++ from sources are usually not
trying to use some vendor's released dylib.
For that reason, I've been thinking for a long time that availability
annotations should be off by default, which is the primary change that
this commit enables.
In addition, it reworks the implementation to make it easier for new
vendors to add availability annotations for their platform, and it
refreshes the documentation to reflect the current state of the codebase.
Finally, a CMake configuration option is added to control whether
availability annotations should be turned on for the flavor of libc++
being created. The intent is for vendors like Apple to turn it on, and
for the upstream libc++ to leave it off (the default).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90843
|
|
|
|
allocate/deallocate/construct/destroy objects in std::any
https://llvm.org/PR45099 notes (correctly) that we're inconsistent in memory
allocation in `std::any`. We allocate memory with `std::allocator<T>::allocate`,
construct with placement new, destroy by calling the destructor directly, and
deallocate by calling `delete`. Most of those are customizable by the user,
but in different ways.
The standard is silent on how these things are to be accomplished.
This patch makes it so we use `allocator_traits<allocator<T>>` for all
of these operations (allocate, construct, destruct, deallocate).
This is, at least, consistent.
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR45099.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81133
|
|
llvm-svn: 363835
|
|
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
and bad_any_cast
Reviewers: dexonsmith, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, arphaman, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53256
llvm-svn: 347219
|
|
feature test macros, though. Reviewed as: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51955
llvm-svn: 342073
|
|
rdar://problem/19988944
llvm-svn: 338933
|
|
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336866
|