CodeGen: Remove pipeline dependencies on StackProtector; NFC

This re-applies r336929 with a fix to accomodate for the Mips target
scheduling multiple SelectionDAG instances into the pass pipeline.

PrologEpilogInserter and StackColoring depend on the StackProtector analysis
being alive from the point it is run until PEI, which requires that they are all
scheduled in the same FunctionPassManager. Inserting a (machine) ModulePass
between StackProtector and PEI results in these passes being in separate
FunctionPassManagers and the StackProtector is not available for PEI.

PEI and StackColoring don't use much information from the StackProtector pass,
so transfering the required information to MachineFrameInfo is cleaner than
keeping the StackProtector pass around. This commit moves the SSP layout
information to MFI instead of keeping it in the pass.

This patch set (D37580, D37581, D37582, D37583, D37584, D37585, D37586, D37587)
is a first draft of the pagerando implementation described in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-June/113794.html.

Patch by Stephen Crane <sjc@immunant.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49256

llvm-svn: 336964

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp
index d27128b..fc62c8c 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
 #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitter.h"
 #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
 #include "llvm/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.h"
-#include "llvm/CodeGen/StackProtector.h"
 #include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetFrameLowering.h"
 #include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetInstrInfo.h"
 #include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetOpcodes.h"
@@ -143,7 +142,6 @@ INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(PEI, DEBUG_TYPE, "Prologue/Epilogue Insertion", false,
                       false)
 INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(MachineLoopInfo)
 INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(MachineDominatorTree)
-INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(StackProtector)
 INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitterPass)
 INITIALIZE_PASS_END(PEI, DEBUG_TYPE,
                     "Prologue/Epilogue Insertion & Frame Finalization", false,
@@ -160,7 +158,6 @@ void PEI::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
   AU.setPreservesCFG();
   AU.addPreserved<MachineLoopInfo>();
   AU.addPreserved<MachineDominatorTree>();
-  AU.addRequired<StackProtector>();
   AU.addRequired<MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitterPass>();
   MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);
 }
@@ -695,7 +692,6 @@ AssignProtectedObjSet(const StackObjSet &UnassignedObjs,
 /// abstract stack objects.
 void PEI::calculateFrameObjectOffsets(MachineFunction &MF) {
   const TargetFrameLowering &TFI = *MF.getSubtarget().getFrameLowering();
-  StackProtector *SP = &getAnalysis<StackProtector>();
 
   bool StackGrowsDown =
     TFI.getStackGrowthDirection() == TargetFrameLowering::StackGrowsDown;
@@ -844,16 +840,16 @@ void PEI::calculateFrameObjectOffsets(MachineFunction &MF) {
           EHRegNodeFrameIndex == (int)i)
         continue;
 
-      switch (SP->getSSPLayout(MFI.getObjectAllocation(i))) {
-      case StackProtector::SSPLK_None:
+      switch (MFI.getObjectSSPLayout(i)) {
+      case MachineFrameInfo::SSPLK_None:
         continue;
-      case StackProtector::SSPLK_SmallArray:
+      case MachineFrameInfo::SSPLK_SmallArray:
         SmallArrayObjs.insert(i);
         continue;
-      case StackProtector::SSPLK_AddrOf:
+      case MachineFrameInfo::SSPLK_AddrOf:
         AddrOfObjs.insert(i);
         continue;
-      case StackProtector::SSPLK_LargeArray:
+      case MachineFrameInfo::SSPLK_LargeArray:
         LargeArrayObjs.insert(i);
         continue;
       }