[NFC] Correct C++ standard names (#81421)

5 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/DeprecatedHeadersCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/DeprecatedHeadersCheck.cpp
index 6d287eb..6a46791 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/DeprecatedHeadersCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/DeprecatedHeadersCheck.cpp
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ IncludeModernizePPCallbacks::IncludeModernizePPCallbacks(
             {"wctype.h", "cwctype"}})) {
     CStyledHeaderToCxx.insert(KeyValue);
   }
-  // Add C++ 11 headers.
+  // Add C++11 headers.
   if (LangOpts.CPlusPlus11) {
     for (const auto &KeyValue :
          std::vector<std::pair<llvm::StringRef, std::string>>(
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize/deprecated-headers.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize/deprecated-headers.rst
index 974a56a..298243f 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize/deprecated-headers.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize/deprecated-headers.rst
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ modernize-deprecated-headers
 ============================
 
 Some headers from C library were deprecated in C++ and are no longer welcome in
-C++ codebases. Some have no effect in C++. For more details refer to the C++ 14
+C++ codebases. Some have no effect in C++. For more details refer to the C++14
 Standard [depr.c.headers] section.
 
 This check replaces C standard library headers with their C++ alternatives and
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize/use-override.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize/use-override.rst
index 0440ab85..f8f3479 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize/use-override.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize/use-override.rst
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ removes ``virtual`` from those functions as it is not required.
 user that a function was virtual. C++ compilers did not use the presence of
 this to signify an overridden function.
 
-In C++ 11 ``override`` and ``final`` keywords were introduced to allow
+In C++11 ``override`` and ``final`` keywords were introduced to allow
 overridden functions to be marked appropriately. Their presence allows
 compilers to verify that an overridden function correctly overrides a base
 class implementation.
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/container-contains.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/container-contains.rst
index 07d1e35..b28daec 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/container-contains.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/container-contains.rst
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 readability-container-contains
 ==============================
 
-Finds usages of ``container.count()`` and ``container.find() == container.end()`` which should be replaced by a call to the ``container.contains()`` method introduced in C++ 20.
+Finds usages of ``container.count()`` and ``container.find() == container.end()`` which should be replaced by a call to the ``container.contains()`` method introduced in C++20.
 
 Whether an element is contained inside a container should be checked with ``contains`` instead of ``count``/``find`` because ``contains`` conveys the intent more clearly. Furthermore, for containers which permit multiple entries per key (``multimap``, ``multiset``, ...), ``contains`` is more efficient than ``count`` because ``count`` has to do unnecessary additional work.
 
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/use-anyofallof.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/use-anyofallof.rst
index f7bd9ff..6e58766 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/use-anyofallof.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/use-anyofallof.rst
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ readability-use-anyofallof
 ==========================
 
 Finds range-based for loops that can be replaced by a call to ``std::any_of`` or
-``std::all_of``. In C++ 20 mode, suggests ``std::ranges::any_of`` or
+``std::all_of``. In C++20 mode, suggests ``std::ranges::any_of`` or
 ``std::ranges::all_of``.
 
 Example: