diff options
author | Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com> | 2018-08-30 08:44:32 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com> | 2018-08-30 08:44:32 +0200 |
commit | 3bad2358d67d371497079bba4f8eca9c0096f4e2 (patch) | |
tree | 5444ba60c308776f6442e1a5fc5eff2682c8c5c9 /stdlib | |
parent | 09c12efcafd1e08c290e63e2095c772ce35117be (diff) | |
download | glibc-3bad2358d67d371497079bba4f8eca9c0096f4e2.zip glibc-3bad2358d67d371497079bba4f8eca9c0096f4e2.tar.gz glibc-3bad2358d67d371497079bba4f8eca9c0096f4e2.tar.bz2 |
Test stdlib/test-bz22786 exits now with unsupported if malloc fails.
The test tries to allocate more than 2^31 bytes which will always fail on s390
as it has maximum 2^31bit of memory.
Before commit 6c3a8a9d868a8deddf0d6dcc785b6d120de90523, this test returned
unsupported if malloc fails. This patch re enables this behaviour.
Furthermore support_delete_temp_files() failed to remove the temp directory
in this case as it is not empty due to the created symlink.
Thus the creation of the symlink is moved behind malloc.
Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
ChangeLog:
* stdlib/test-bz22786.c (do_test): Return EXIT_UNSUPPORTED
if malloc fails.
Diffstat (limited to 'stdlib')
-rw-r--r-- | stdlib/test-bz22786.c | 15 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/stdlib/test-bz22786.c b/stdlib/test-bz22786.c index d1aa691..777bf91 100644 --- a/stdlib/test-bz22786.c +++ b/stdlib/test-bz22786.c @@ -39,16 +39,25 @@ do_test (void) const char *lnk = xasprintf ("%s/symlink", dir); const size_t path_len = (size_t) INT_MAX + strlen (lnk) + 1; - TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (symlink (".", lnk) == 0); - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; #if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) /* GCC 7 warns about too-large allocations; here we need such allocation to succeed for the test to work. */ DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than="); #endif - char *path = xmalloc (path_len); + char *path = malloc (path_len); DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; + if (path == NULL) + { + printf ("malloc (%zu): %m\n", path_len); + /* On 31-bit s390 the malloc will always fail as we do not have + so much memory, and we want to mark the test unsupported. + Likewise on systems with little physical memory the test will + fail and should be unsupported. */ + return EXIT_UNSUPPORTED; + } + + TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (symlink (".", lnk) == 0); /* Construct very long path = "/tmp/bz22786.XXXX/symlink/aaaa....." */ char *p = mempcpy (path, lnk, strlen (lnk)); |