diff options
author | Arjun Shankar <arjun.is@lostca.se> | 2018-01-18 16:47:06 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Arjun Shankar <arjun@redhat.com> | 2018-01-18 17:55:45 +0100 |
commit | 8e448310d74b283c5cd02b9ed7fb997b47bf9b22 (patch) | |
tree | a5cb99be6773177cf14683cbf10ecbc34a7dc82c /io/chmod.c | |
parent | 80647883cf5847c8b6b0197e9703eb04222496b6 (diff) | |
download | glibc-8e448310d74b283c5cd02b9ed7fb997b47bf9b22.zip glibc-8e448310d74b283c5cd02b9ed7fb997b47bf9b22.tar.gz glibc-8e448310d74b283c5cd02b9ed7fb997b47bf9b22.tar.bz2 |
Fix integer overflows in internal memalign and malloc functions [BZ #22343]
When posix_memalign is called with an alignment less than MALLOC_ALIGNMENT
and a requested size close to SIZE_MAX, it falls back to malloc code
(because the alignment of a block returned by malloc is sufficient to
satisfy the call). In this case, an integer overflow in _int_malloc leads
to posix_memalign incorrectly returning successfully.
Upon fixing this and writing a somewhat thorough regression test, it was
discovered that when posix_memalign is called with an alignment larger than
MALLOC_ALIGNMENT (so it uses _int_memalign instead) and a requested size
close to SIZE_MAX, a different integer overflow in _int_memalign leads to
posix_memalign incorrectly returning successfully.
Both integer overflows affect other memory allocation functions that use
_int_malloc (one affected malloc in x86) or _int_memalign as well.
This commit fixes both integer overflows. In addition to this, it adds a
regression test to guard against false successful allocations by the
following memory allocation functions when called with too-large allocation
sizes and, where relevant, various valid alignments:
malloc, realloc, calloc, reallocarray, memalign, posix_memalign,
aligned_alloc, valloc, and pvalloc.
Diffstat (limited to 'io/chmod.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions