From f9a6a8f09dc2310d5f4a482a2e7ffc1be3984cd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Modra Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 14:21:52 +1030 Subject: PR27116, Spelling errors found by Debian style checker PR 27116 bfd/ * xcofflink.c: Correct spelling in comments. binutils/ * coffgrok.c (do_type): Correct spelling of auxiliary in errors. * doc/binutils.texi: Correct grammar. * readelf.c (process_version_sections): Correct spelling of auxiliary in warning. * testsuite/binutils-all/vax/objdump.exp: Comment grammar fix. config/ * override.m4: Correct comment grammar. gas/ * config/tc-i386.c: Correct comment spelling. * config/tc-riscv.c: Likewise. * config/tc-s390.c: Correct comment grammar. * doc/c-i386.texi: Correct spelling. * doc/c-s390.texi: Correct grammar. gold/ * tilegx.cc: Correct comment spelling. gprof/ * README: Correct grammar. * gprof.texi: Likewise. include/ * coff/internal.h: Correct comment spelling. * coff/sym.h: Likewise. * opcode/aarch64.h: Likewise. ld/ * configure.tgt: Correct comment grammar. * emultempl/m68hc1xelf.em: Likewise. * ld.texi: Correct grammar. --- gprof/gprof.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'gprof/gprof.texi') diff --git a/gprof/gprof.texi b/gprof/gprof.texi index a589a1a..b2b2048 100644 --- a/gprof/gprof.texi +++ b/gprof/gprof.texi @@ -1931,7 +1931,7 @@ load due to other users won't directly affect the output you get. @section Profiling Data File Format The old BSD-derived file format used for profile data does not contain a -magic cookie that allows to check whether a data file really is a +magic cookie that allows one to check whether a data file really is a @code{gprof} file. Furthermore, it does not provide a version number, thus rendering changes to the file format almost impossible. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} uses a new file format that provides these features. For backward -- cgit v1.1