| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
See https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2024-June/209726.html
for the details.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
(cherry picked from commit e222ed2ce5b5359bfc6d8fd125534ccb507d7fb0)
|
|
|
|
Test behaviour of watchpoints triggered by MOPS instructions. This test
is similar to gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp, but specifically for MOPS
instructions rather than whatever instructions are used in the libc's
implementation of memset/memcpy/memmove.
There's a separate watched variable for each set of instructions so that
the testcase can test whether GDB correctly identified the watchpoint
that triggered in each case.
Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Tested-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
(cherry picked from commit 55e3fcf5e523007bd97868214e00324db42c11f6)
|
|
There are two kinds of MOPS instructions: set instructions and copy
instructions. Within each group there are variants with minor
differences in how they read or write to memory — e.g., non-temporal
read and/or write, unprivileged read and/or write and permutations of
those — but they work in the same way in terms of the registers and
regions of memory that they modify.
The new gdb.reverse/aarch64-mops.exp testcase verifies that MOPS
instructions are recorded and correctly reversed. Not all variants of the
copy and set instructions are tested, since there are many and the record
and replay target processes them in the same way.
PR tdep/31666
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31666
Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Tested-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
(cherry picked from commit ebd06ca6b9bb2327e1269b52eb99b2f012faabf9)
|
|
The AArch64 MOPS (Memory Operation) instructions provide a standardised
instruction sequence to perform a memset, memcpy or memmove. A sequence is
always composed of three instructions: a prologue instruction, a main
instruction and an epilogue instruction. As an illustration, here are the
implementations of these memory operations in glibc 2.39:
(gdb) disassemble/r
Dump of assembler code for function __memset_mops:
=> 0x0000fffff7e8d780 <+0>: d503201f nop
0x0000fffff7e8d784 <+4>: aa0003e3 mov x3, x0
0x0000fffff7e8d788 <+8>: 19c10443 setp [x3]!, x2!, x1
0x0000fffff7e8d78c <+12>: 19c14443 setm [x3]!, x2!, x1
0x0000fffff7e8d790 <+16>: 19c18443 sete [x3]!, x2!, x1
0x0000fffff7e8d794 <+20>: d65f03c0 ret
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) disassemble/r
Dump of assembler code for function __memcpy_mops:
=> 0x0000fffff7e8c580 <+0>: d503201f nop
0x0000fffff7e8c584 <+4>: aa0003e3 mov x3, x0
0x0000fffff7e8c588 <+8>: 19010443 cpyfp [x3]!, [x1]!, x2!
0x0000fffff7e8c58c <+12>: 19410443 cpyfm [x3]!, [x1]!, x2!
0x0000fffff7e8c590 <+16>: 19810443 cpyfe [x3]!, [x1]!, x2!
0x0000fffff7e8c594 <+20>: d65f03c0 ret
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) disassemble/r
Dump of assembler code for function __memmove_mops:
=> 0x0000fffff7e8d180 <+0>: d503201f nop
0x0000fffff7e8d184 <+4>: aa0003e3 mov x3, x0
0x0000fffff7e8d188 <+8>: 1d010443 cpyp [x3]!, [x1]!, x2!
0x0000fffff7e8d18c <+12>: 1d410443 cpym [x3]!, [x1]!, x2!
0x0000fffff7e8d190 <+16>: 1d810443 cpye [x3]!, [x1]!, x2!
0x0000fffff7e8d194 <+20>: d65f03c0 ret
End of assembler dump.
The Arm Architecture Reference Manual says that "the prologue, main, and
epilogue instructions are expected to be run in succession and to appear
consecutively in memory". Therefore this patch disables displaced stepping
on them.
The testcase verifies that MOPS sequences are correctly single-stepped.
PR tdep/31666
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31666
Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Tested-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
(cherry picked from commit b995344c116e04bd6bfeaf53364cd791d0dae45d)
|
|
|
|
In commit:
commit 824083f34c222aa7419e2ea58e82d6f230d5f531
Date: Fri Apr 12 17:47:20 2024 +0100
gdb/doc: use silent-rules.mk in the Makefile
I rewrote the rules for building the man pages. While doing this I
accidentally switched from using MAN2POD5 to MAN2POD1 for generating
the file gdbinit.5.
Restore use of MAN2POD5 where appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit changes gdb/version.in to 15.0.91.DATE-git.
|
|
This commit changes gdb/version.in to 15.0.91.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While preparing the new release it was discovered that commit:
commit 824083f34c222aa7419e2ea58e82d6f230d5f531
Date: Fri Apr 12 17:47:20 2024 +0100
gdb/doc: use silent-rules.mk in the Makefile
was causing problems. Given a release tar file, an attempt to build
and install GDB would give an error like this:
[...]
TEXI2POD gdb.pod
cannot find GDBvn.texi at ../../../gdb-15.0.50.20240508/gdb/doc/../../etc/texi2pod.pl line 251, <GEN0> line 16.
make[5]: *** [Makefile:663: gdb.pod] Error 2
The problem here is how the man pages are built, and how they are
distributed within a release.
Within the development (git) tree, the man page files are not part of
the source tree, these files are built as needed. Within a release
tar file though, the man pages are included. The idea being that a
user can build and install GDB, including getting the man pages,
without having to install the tools needed to generate the man pages.
The man pages are generated in a two step process. First the .texi
file is processed with texi2pod to create a .pod file, then this .pod
file is processed to create the .1 or .5 man file.
Prior to the above commit these two steps were combined into a single
recipe, this meant that when a user performed a build/install from a
release tree all of the dependencies, as well as the final result,
were all present in the source tree, and so nothing needed to be
rebuilt.
However, the above commit split the two steps apart. Now we had a
separate rule for building the .pod files, and the .1/.5 man page
files depended on the relevant .pod file.
As the .pod files are not shipped in a GDB release, this meant that
one of the dependencies of the man page files was now missing. As a
result if a user tried to install from a release tree a rebuild of the
.pod files would be attempted, and if that succeeded then building the
man pages would follow that.
Unfortunately, building the .pod files would fail as the GDBvn.texi
file, though present in the source tree, was not present in the build
tree, which is where it is needed for the .pod file generation to
work.
To fix this, I propose merging the .pod creation and the .1/.5 man
page creation back into a single recipe. Having these two steps split
is probably the "cleaner" solution, but makes it harder for us to
achieve our goal of shipping the prebuilt man page files. I've added
a comment explaining what's going on (such a comment would have
prevented this mistake having been made in the first place).
One possibly weird thing here is that I have left both an
ECHO_TEXI2POD and a ECHO_TEXI2MAN in the rule $(MAN1S) and $(MAN5S)
recipes. This is 100% not going to break anything, these just print
two different progress messages while executing the recipes, but I'm
not sure if this is considered poor style or not. Maybe we're only
supposed to have a single ECHO_* per recipe?
Anyway, even if this is poor style, I figure it really is just a style
thing. We can tweak this later as needed. Otherwise, this commit
should fix the current issue blocking the next GDB release.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit changes gdb/version.in to 15.0.90.
|
|
This commit changes the title of the section to refer to the actual
release version number, now that all changes listed are confirmed
to be part of the upcoming GDB 15 release.
|
|
This is done by setting the "development" variable to "false"
in bfd/development.sh.
|
|
Now that the GDB 15 branch has been created,
this commit bumps the version number in gdb/version.in to
15.0.90.DATE-git
For the record, the GDB 15 branch was created
from commit 3a624d9f1c5ccd8cefdd5b7ef12b41513f9006cd.
|
|
|
|
This is the v2 patch I am checking in.
H.J.
|
|
|
|
Adjust the gas testsuite to suit commit de203ed568f6.
* testsuite/gas/loongarch/relax-cfi-fde-DW_CFA_advance_loc.d:
Expect data alignment of -8. Tidy.
|
|
PR gas/31752
These are effectively macro-like, without any separate macro definition.
They already support \@, so they would better also support \+. This
allows, where desired, to get away without maintaining an explicit count
variable in source code.
With this the recently introduced testcase doesn't need any xfails
anymore.
|
|
The present handling of inner double quotes can lead to very strange
diagnostics. Follow one of the two possible interpretations of the doc:
@dots{} referring to possibly multiple white space separated
@var{values}, each of which may be quoted. The original implementation,
prior to 465e5617233f ("PR gas/3856"), hints at the other possible
interpretation: When quoted there's only a single @var{values}, with
inner quotes taken as ordinary characters. That, however, seems overall
less useful to me.
While touching the documentation, mirror the (inverse) spelling
correction (@section line inconsistent with actual description) to .irp
as well.
|
|
As already suggested during review, rather than having an extra
conditional in build_modrm_byte() (a code path used for quite a few
more insns, including even certain GPR ones), adjust the attribute in
the installed template to properly describe things with operands
swapped.
|
|
These run after template matching. Therefore operands are already known
to match the template in use. With the loop bodies skipping anything not
a GPR in the actual operands, there's therefore no need to check the
template's operand type for permitting Reg or Accum.
At the same time bring the three functions in sync for the "byte" part
of the logic, as far as checking the template for other sizes (qword
specifically) goes. Plus drop a stale comment from check_qword_reg(),
when all three are now behaving the same in this regard.
|
|
Properly reject inappropriate suffixes (No_lSuf / No_qSuf mistakenly
omitted by cf665fee1d6c ["x86: re-work AVX512 embedded rounding / SAE"]),
to avoid emitting bad or arbitrarily guessed instructions. Interestingly
check_{long,qword}_suffix() don't help here, which perhaps is another
indication that the way they work right now isn't quite appropriate.
Sadly correcting just the templates breaks operand ambiguity detection,
since so far that worked from a single template permitting more than one
suffix. Here we have ambiguity though which can now be noticed only when
taking all (matching) templates together. Therefore we need to determine
further matching templates (see code comments for constraints), to then
accumulate permitted suffixes across all of them.
|
|
gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp
When running test-case gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp, I run
regularly into PR26286:
...
(gdb) continue^M
Continuing.^M
[LWP ... exited]^M
...
[LWP ... exited]^M
^M
Program terminated with signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.^M
The program no longer exists.^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 9: \
break at break_fn: 1
...
Add a kfail for this, such that we have:
...
(gdb) KFAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 9: \
break at break_fn: 1 (PRMS: threads/26286)
...
Reviewed-By: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
Tested on x86_64-linux.
|
|
|
|
In a remote testing setup, I saw this error:
~~~
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/foll-fork.exp: check_fork_catchpoints: runto: run to main
ERROR: tcl error sourcing gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/foll-fork.exp.
ERROR: expected boolean value but got ""
while executing
"if { ![check_fork_catchpoints] } {
untested "follow-fork not supported"
return
}"
(file "gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/foll-fork.exp" line 434)
invoked from within
"source gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/foll-fork.exp"
("uplevel" body line 1)
invoked from within
"uplevel #0 source gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/foll-fork.exp"
invoked from within
"catch "uplevel #0 source $test_file_name""
Remote debugging from host 172.0.1.3, port 37766
Killing process(es): 1171
Quit
~~~
The actual reason for this were some connection problems. Though the
function check_fork_catchpoints shouldn't return an empty string, especially
as it promises to always return 0 or 1. Fix that.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
The code that was factored out from gdb.base/relativedebug.exp assumed that
libc has debug info and only determined that it doesn't if it saw a specific
message from GDB to that effect. In the process of factoring it into a
require predicate, I made it stricter by trying to make a specific
determination of whether or not debug info is available.
Pedro noticed that "It'll disable the testcase on systems that link with
their libc statically (even if has debug info), or systems that name their
libc something else." Which is something I hadn't considered.
This patch returns libc_has_debug_info to the original behaviour.
Also, remove a verbose message that is redundant with the $message
variable.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31700
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
|
|
* testsuite/libctf-regression/open-error-free.c (main): Correct
format length modifier.
|
|
Unfortunately the background DWARF reading series introduced a number
of races, as repored by thread sanitizer. This patch changes gdb to
disable this feature for the time being -- in particular for the gdb
15 release.
I've filed a bug and linked all the known races to it. Once those are
fixed we can re-enable this feature by default.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31751
|
|
A build with --enable-maintainer-mode is currently failing with:
make[4]: *** No rule to make target '<SRC>/gas/config/te-ia64aix.h',
needed by '<SRC>/gas/po/gas.pot'. Stop.
make[4]: Leaving directory '<$OBJ>/gas/po'
make[3]: *** [Makefile:1695: all-recursive] Error 1
...
As config/te-ia64aix.h is now removed, remove the corresponding fragment
from the makefile.
gas/
* Makefile.am: Remove config/te-ia64aix.h.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* po/POTFILES.in: Regenerate.
|
|
This patch fixes a mistake in the encoding of the system register
pmsdsfr_el1.
Reference:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2022-09/AArch64-Registers/PMSDSFR-EL1--Sampling-Data-Source-Filter-Register?lang=en
|
|
This patch is to enable ZU for IMUL (opcodes 0x69 and 0x6B) and SETcc.
Since the spec only recommends one form of setzu, I won't be adding
set<cc>reg32/reg64 support in this patch.
gas/ChangeLog:
* config/tc-i386.c (build_apx_evex_prefix): Handle ZU.
* testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64.exp: Added new tests for ZU.
* testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64.exp: Added new tests for ZU.
* testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-apx-zu-intel.d: New test.
* testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-apx-zu-inval.l: Ditto.
* testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-apx-zu-inval.s: Ditto.
* testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-apx-zu.d: Ditto.
* testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-apx-zu.s: Ditto.
opcodes/ChangeLog:
* i386-dis-evex-prefix.h: Handle PREFIX_EVEX_MAP4_40 ~
PREFIX_EVEX_MAP4_4F.
* i386-dis-evex.h: Ditto.
* i386-dis.c (struct dis386): Add new micro 'ZU'.
(putop): Handle %ZU.
* i386-gen.c: Added ZU.
* i386-opc.h: Ditto.
* i386-opc.tbl: Added new templates to support ZU.
|
|
Resulting code will do better without the extra conditional branch.
Remove "i.rex" to eliminate extra conditional branch.
gas/ChangeLog:
* config/tc-i386.c (establish_rex): Remove i.rex.
|
|
ChangeLog
2024-05-20 Vladimir Mezentsev <vladimir.mezentsev@oracle.com>
* src/collctrl.cc: Use StringBuilder to create messages.
Remove unused variables and arrays.
* src/collctrl.h: Remove unused variables.
|
|
ChangeLog
2024-05-20 Vladimir Mezentsev <vladimir.mezentsev@oracle.com>
PR gprofng/31123
* common/hwctable.c: Remove hardware counter tables for Sparc machines.
|
|
ChangeLog
2024-05-20 Vladimir Mezentsev <vladimir.mezentsev@oracle.com>
* libcollector/collector.c: Use static initialization instead of memset.
* libcollector/dispatcher.c: Likewise.
* libcollector/hwprofile.c: Likewise.
* libcollector/jprofile.c: Likewise.
* libcollector/profile.c: Likewise.
* libcollector/synctrace.c: Likewise.
|
