diff options
author | Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> | 2019-07-23 10:38:33 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> | 2019-07-23 10:38:33 +0200 |
commit | 5ba29434765feed692b6342a8b0f853050be2402 (patch) | |
tree | 265d704277a8fca3f51e43b371ca6f56b5cda04d /missing | |
parent | 89356123a17c27548c7e71f4f000b1f74e551c31 (diff) | |
download | gdb-5ba29434765feed692b6342a8b0f853050be2402.zip gdb-5ba29434765feed692b6342a8b0f853050be2402.tar.gz gdb-5ba29434765feed692b6342a8b0f853050be2402.tar.bz2 |
[gdb/testsuite] Fix command result testing in mi-complete.exp
When running gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp in conjunction with:
...
$ stress -c $(($(cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -c "^processor") + 1))
...
we get less than 50% full passes:
...
$ for n in $(seq 1 100); do \
make V=1 -O check \
'RUNTESTFLAGS=gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp --target_board=unix'; \
done 2>&1 \
| grep "expected passes" | sort | uniq -c
45 # of expected passes 7
9 # of expected passes 8
46 # of expected passes 9
...
A diff between a passing and failing gdb.log shows this difference:
...
-&"set max-completions 1\n"
2-complete br
+&"set max-completions 1\n"
...
The problem is that the test-case issues the "set max-completion <n>" command,
and without waiting for the output issues a next command, and tries to parse
the results of both commands, expecting a specific interleaving of the various
output streams.
Fix the FAIL by waiting for the result of the "set max-completion <n>" command
before issuing another command.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-07-23 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR testsuite/24711
* gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp: Wait for "set max-completions" result before
issuing next command.
Diffstat (limited to 'missing')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions