1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
|
# Copyright 2003-2004, 2007-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# This file is part of the gdb testsuite.
# This contains tests for GDB's use of RTTI information. This stems
# from a bug reported in PR gdb/488 and other places, which leads to
# statements like 'warning: can't find class named 'C::D', as given by
# C++ RTTI'. It arises from GDB not knowing about classes that are
# defined in namespaces.
# NOTE: carlton/2003-05-16: I suspect it could arise from nested class
# issues, too, and even once we fix that, there might be situations
# (involving templates, in particular) where this problem triggers
# because GDB and GCC have different ideas what a class is called.
if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue }
#
# test running programs
#
standard_testfile rtti1.cc rtti2.cc
if [get_compiler_info "c++"] {
return -1
}
if {[prepare_for_testing $testfile.exp $testfile \
[list $srcfile $srcfile2] {debug c++}]} {
return -1
}
if ![runto_main] then {
perror "couldn't run to breakpoint"
continue
}
# First, run to after we've constructed the object:
gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "main-constructs-done" "$srcfile"]
gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors in main"
gdb_test_multiple "print *e1" "print *e1" {
-re "warning: RTTI symbol not found for class 'n1::D1'.*$gdb_prompt $" {
# gdb HEAD 2003-12-05
kfail "gdb/488" "print *e1"
}
-re "warning: can't find class named `n1::D1', as given by C\\+\\+ RTTI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
# gdb 6.0
kfail "gdb/488" "print *e1"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n1::Base1> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "print *e1"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<Base1> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
# NOTE: carlton/2003-05-16: If code is compiled by GCC2, we
# don't print the warning (for no particular reason), but we
# still call the class via the wrong name; PR gdb/57 is our
# catch-all PR for nested type problems.
kfail "gdb/57" "print *e1"
}
}
# NOTE: carlton/2004-01-14: This test with an "<incomplete type>"
# message because, within rtt1.cc, GDB has no way of knowing that the
# class is called 'n2::D2' instead of just 'D2'. This is an artifical
# test case, though: if we were using these classes in a more
# substantial way, G++ would emit more debug info. As is, I don't
# think there's anything that GDB can do about this case until G++
# starts emitting DW_TAG_namespace info; this should arrive with GCC
# 3.4.
gdb_test_multiple "print *e2" "print *e2" {
-re "warning: RTTI symbol not found for class 'n2::D2'.*$gdb_prompt $" {
# gdb HEAD 2003-12-05
kfail "gdb/488" "print *e2"
}
-re "warning: can't find class named `n2::D2', as given by C\\+\\+ RTTI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
# gdb 6.0
kfail "gdb/488" "print *e2"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\]* = <incomplete type>\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
kfail "gdb/1511" "print *e2"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n2::Base2> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "print *e2"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<Base2> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
kfail "gdb/57" "print *e2"
}
}
# Now we test the hack that's been implemented to get around some
# instances of PR gdb/1511.
gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "func-constructs-done" "$srcfile"]
gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors in func"
gdb_test "print *obj" "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n2::Base2> = .*}"
gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "func3-constructs-done" "$srcfile"]
gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors in func3"
gdb_test "print *obj3" "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n2::C2> = .*}"
gdb_exit
return 0
|
