From aa2045e7fa41ea80a876421bca89443f7a2df92f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Marchi Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:01:13 -0400 Subject: gdb: rs6000_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum return -1 for unknown register number With the current implementation of rs6000_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum, if an unknown DWARF register number is passed, the same number is returned as the internal GDB number. This assumes that the internal GDB register numbers match the DWARF register numbers, which is not the case. Change it to return -1, as documented in gdbarch.sh for the dwarf2_reg_to_regnum method. This fixes a failure in gdb.dwarf2/bad-regnum.exp: (gdb) info addr foo1 -Symbol "foo1" is a variable in $. -(gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/bad-regnum.exp: info addr foo1 +Symbol "foo1" is a variable in $bad_register_number. +(gdb) PASS: gdb.dwarf2/bad-regnum.exp: info addr foo1 I ran the entire testsuite on powerpc64 (gcc203 on the compile farm) and didn't see any regression. gdb/ChangeLog: * rs6000-tdep.c (rs6000_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum): Return -1 for unknown register numbers. Change-Id: I585aa07a08f845a46c36bfdb6d3118ea94f8f54d --- gdb/rs6000-tdep.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'gdb/rs6000-tdep.c') diff --git a/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c b/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c index 264d4e0..4b8c3ed 100644 --- a/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c +++ b/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c @@ -3240,9 +3240,10 @@ rs6000_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int num) return tdep->ppc_vrsave_regnum; case 612: return tdep->ppc_spefscr_regnum; - default: - return num; } + + /* Unknown DWARF register number. */ + return -1; } /* Translate a .eh_frame register to DWARF register, or adjust a -- cgit v1.1