From 057302ceb3b1c171afe9bfa24642af208a60b6e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Tromey Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:20:40 -0600 Subject: Remove exit_inferior_num_silent The sole caller of exit_inferior_num_silent was getting the inferior's number to then use the number to look up the inferior again. I think it's better to simply not have exit_inferior_num_silent; any potential callers that only have the inferior's number should probably be converted to pass the inferior itself around instead. Tested by the buildbot. gdb/ChangeLog 2018-07-03 Tom Tromey * infrun.c (follow_exec): Use exit_inferior_silent. * inferior.c (exit_inferior_num_silent): Remove. * inferior.h (exit_inferior_num_silent): Don't declare. --- gdb/infrun.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'gdb/infrun.c') diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c index 28a4391..2eb25c0 100644 --- a/gdb/infrun.c +++ b/gdb/infrun.c @@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ follow_exec (ptid_t ptid, char *exec_file_target) /* Do exit processing for the original inferior before adding the new inferior so we don't have two active inferiors with the same ptid, which can confuse find_inferior_ptid. */ - exit_inferior_num_silent (current_inferior ()->num); + exit_inferior_silent (current_inferior ()); inf = add_inferior_with_spaces (); inf->pid = pid; -- cgit v1.1