From 5166082f5f8ef80ec9840e1407e93d368da0b80f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pedro Alves Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 23:15:27 +0100 Subject: PR gdb/13860: make -interpreter-exec console "list" behave more like "list". I noticed that "list" behaves differently in CLI vs MI. Particularly: $ ./gdb -nx -q ./testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-cli Reading symbols from /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-cli...done. (gdb) start Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x40054d: file ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/basics.c, line 62. Starting program: /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-cli Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/basics.c:62 62 callee1 (2, "A string argument.", 3.5); (gdb) list 57 { 58 } 59 60 main () 61 { 62 callee1 (2, "A string argument.", 3.5); 63 callee1 (2, "A string argument.", 3.5); 64 65 do_nothing (); /* Hello, World! */ 66 (gdb) Note the list started at line 57. IOW, the program stopped at line 62, and GDB centered the list on that. compare with: $ ./gdb -nx -q ./testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-cli -i=mi =thread-group-added,id="i1" ~"Reading symbols from /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-cli..." ~"done.\n" (gdb) start &"start\n" ... ~"\nTemporary breakpoint " ~"1, main () at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/basics.c:62\n" ~"62\t callee1 (2, \"A string argument.\", 3.5);\n" *stopped,reason="breakpoint-hit",disp="del",bkptno="1",frame={addr="0x000000000040054d",func="main",args=[],file="../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/basics.c",fullname="/home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/basics.c",line="62"},thread-id="1",stopped-threads="all",core="0" =breakpoint-deleted,id="1" (gdb) -interpreter-exec console list ~"62\t callee1 (2, \"A string argument.\", 3.5);\n" ~"63\t callee1 (2, \"A string argument.\", 3.5);\n" ~"64\t\n" ~"65\t do_nothing (); /* Hello, World! */\n" ~"66\t\n" ~"67\t callme (1);\n" ~"68\t callme (2);\n" ~"69\t\n" ~"70\t return 0;\n" ~"71\t}\n" ^done (gdb) Here the list starts at line 62, where the program was stopped. This happens because print_stack_frame, called from both normal_stop and mi_on_normal_stop, is the function responsible for setting the current sal from the selected frame, overrides the PRINT_WHAT argument, and only after that does it decide whether to center the current sal line or not, based on the overridden value, and it will always decide false. (The print_stack_frame call in mi_on_normal_stop is a little different from the call in normal_stop, in that it is an unconditional SRC_AND_LOC call. A future patch will make those uniform.) A previous version of this patch made MI uniform with CLI here, by making print_stack_frame also center when MI is active. That changed the output of a "list" command in mi-cli.exp, to expect line 57 instead of 62, as per the example above. However, looking deeper, that list in question is the first "list" after the program stops, and right after the stop, before the "list", the test did "set listsize 1". Let's try the same thing with the CLI: (gdb) start 62 callee1 (2, "A string argument.", 3.5); (gdb) set listsize 1 (gdb) list 57 { Huh, that's unexpected. Why the 57? It's because print_stack_frame, called in reaction to the breakpoint stop, expecting the next "list" to show 10 lines (the listsize at the time) around line 62, sets the lines listed range to 57-67 (62 +/- 5). If the user changes the listsize before "list", why would we still show that range? Looks bogus to me. So the fix for this whole issue should be delay trying to center the listing to until actually listing, so that the correct listsize can be taken into account. This makes MI and CLI uniform too, as it deletes the center code from print_stack_frame. A series of tests are added to list.exp to cover this. mi-cli.exp was after all correct all along, but it now gains an additional test that lists lines with listsize 10, to ensure the centering is consistent with CLI's. One related Python test changed related output -- it's a test that prints the line number after stopping for a breakpoint, similar to the new list.exp tests. Previously we'd print the stop line minus 5 (due to the premature centering), now we print the stop line. I think that's a good change. Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20. gdb/ 2014-05-21 Pedro Alves * cli/cli-cmds.c (list_command): Handle the first "list" after the current source line having changed. * frame.h (set_current_sal_from_frame): Remove 'center' parameter. * infrun.c (normal_stop): Adjust call to set_current_sal_from_frame. * source.c (clear_lines_listed_range): New function. (set_current_source_symtab_and_line, identify_source_line): Clear the lines listed range. (line_info): Handle the first "info line" after the current source line having changed. * stack.c (print_stack_frame): Remove center handling. (set_current_sal_from_frame): Remove 'center' parameter. Don't center sal.line. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-05-21 Pedro Alves * gdb.base/list.exp (build_pattern, test_list): New procedures. Use them to test variations of "list" after reaching a breakpoint. * gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp (line_main_callme_2): New global. Test "list" with listsize 10 after reaching a breakpoint. * gdb.python/python.exp (decode_line current location line number): Adjust expected line number. --- gdb/frame.h | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'gdb/frame.h') diff --git a/gdb/frame.h b/gdb/frame.h index b88bd28..ad03a0b 100644 --- a/gdb/frame.h +++ b/gdb/frame.h @@ -395,10 +395,9 @@ extern void find_frame_sal (struct frame_info *frame, struct symtab_and_line *sal); /* Set the current source and line to the location given by frame - FRAME, if possible. When CENTER is true, adjust so the relevant - line is in the center of the next 'list'. */ + FRAME, if possible. */ -void set_current_sal_from_frame (struct frame_info *, int); +void set_current_sal_from_frame (struct frame_info *); /* Return the frame base (what ever that is) (DEPRECATED). -- cgit v1.1