From 8eaf53202ea60191162d5f1069cd08ebd9f38f6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Marchi Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:36:20 -0500 Subject: Fix usage of inferior_ptid in two thread_alive implementations While inspecting some target code, I noticed that in these two implementations of thread_alive, inferior_ptid is referenced directly instead of using the ptid passed as parameters. I guess that it is wrong, although I can't really test it in both cases. gdb/ChangeLog: * bsd-uthread.c (bsd_uthread_thread_alive): Use ptid instead of inferior_ptid. * go32-nat.c (go32_thread_alive): Likewise. --- gdb/bsd-uthread.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'gdb/bsd-uthread.c') diff --git a/gdb/bsd-uthread.c b/gdb/bsd-uthread.c index 41c7d59..20eecd3 100644 --- a/gdb/bsd-uthread.c +++ b/gdb/bsd-uthread.c @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ bsd_uthread_thread_alive (struct target_ops *ops, ptid_t ptid) { enum bfd_endian byte_order = gdbarch_byte_order (target_gdbarch ()); struct target_ops *beneath = find_target_beneath (ops); - CORE_ADDR addr = ptid_get_tid (inferior_ptid); + CORE_ADDR addr = ptid_get_tid (ptid); if (addr != 0) { -- cgit v1.1