From 136bb21fda016fcfc97dfeff692ee899951148de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:49:05 -0700 Subject: Sync toplevel files with GCC Sync with GCC 2015-07-24 Michael Darling PR other/66259 * config-ml.in: Reflects renaming of configure.in to configure.ac * configure: Likewise * configure.ac: Likewise --- config-ml.in | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'config-ml.in') diff --git a/config-ml.in b/config-ml.in index 927bad6..5e51994 100644 --- a/config-ml.in +++ b/config-ml.in @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ # user select which libraries s/he really wants. # # Subdirectories wishing to use multilib should put the following lines -# in the "post-target" section of configure.in. +# in the "post-target" section of configure.ac. # # if [ "${srcdir}" = "." ] ; then # if [ "${with_target_subdir}" != "." ] ; then @@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ if [ "${enable_multilib}" = yes ]; then # ${with_multisubdir} tells us we're in the right branch, but we could be # in a subdir of that. # ??? The previous version could void this test by separating the process into -# two files: one that only the library's toplevel configure.in ran (to -# configure the multilib subdirs), and another that all configure.in's ran to +# two files: one that only the library's toplevel configure.ac ran (to +# configure the multilib subdirs), and another that all configure.ac's ran to # update the Makefile. It seemed reasonable to collapse all multilib support # into one file, but it does leave us with having to perform this test. ml_toplevel_p=no -- cgit v1.1