From 5c4491d385d6143e64180d906126b6bced69e0d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kazu Hirata Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:06:40 +0000 Subject: * aix5ppc-core.c: Fix comment typos. * aout-arm.c: Likewise. * aout-ns32k.c: Likewise. * aoutx.h: Likewise. * archures.c: Likewise. * bfd-in.h: Likewise. * bfd.c: Likewise. * bfdio.c: Likewise. * coff-arm.c: Likewise. * coff-h8300.c: Likewise. * coff-i860.c: Likewise. * coff-m88k.c: Likewise. * coff-mcore.c: Likewise. * coff-ppc.c: Likewise. * coff-rs6000.c: Likewise. * coff-z8k.c: Likewise. * coff64-rs6000.c: Likewise. * coffcode.h: Likewise. * cofflink.c: Likewise. * cpu-alpha.c: Likewise. * cpu-arm.c: Likewise. * cpu-ns32k.c: Likewise. * dwarf2.c: Likewise. * bfd-in2.h: Regenerate. --- bfd/coff-i860.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'bfd/coff-i860.c') diff --git a/bfd/coff-i860.c b/bfd/coff-i860.c index 74b599c..db77a2c 100644 --- a/bfd/coff-i860.c +++ b/bfd/coff-i860.c @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ coff_i860_rtype_to_howto (bfd *abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, BFD_ASSERT (h != NULL); /* I think we *do* want to bypass this. If we don't, I have seen some data - parameters get the wrong relcation address. If I link two versions + parameters get the wrong relocation address. If I link two versions with and without this section bypassed and then do a binary comparison, the addresses which are different can be looked up in the map. The case in which this section has been bypassed has addresses which correspond -- cgit v1.1