| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New in this version:
- Better comment in target_kill
- Uncomment line in test to avoid hanging when exiting, when testing on
native-extended-gdbserver
PR 28275 shows that doing a sequence of:
- Run inferior in background (run &)
- kill that inferior
- Run again
We get into this assertion:
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:2590: internal-error: target_wait: Assertion `!proc_target->commit_resumed_state' failed.
#0 internal_error_loc (file=0x5606b344e740 "/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c", line=2590, fmt=0x5606b344d6a0 "%s: Assertion `%s' failed.") at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/errors.cc:54
#1 0x00005606b6296475 in target_wait (ptid=..., status=0x7fffb9390630, options=...) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:2590
#2 0x00005606b5767a98 in startup_inferior (proc_target=0x5606bfccb2a0 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>, pid=3884857, ntraps=1, last_waitstatus=0x0, last_ptid=0x0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/nat/fork-inferior.c:482
#3 0x00005606b4e6c9c5 in gdb_startup_inferior (pid=3884857, num_traps=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/fork-child.c:132
#4 0x00005606b50f14a5 in inf_ptrace_target::create_inferior (this=0x5606bfccb2a0 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>, exec_file=0x604000039f50 "/home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/test", allargs="", env=0x61500000a580, from_tty=1)
at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/inf-ptrace.c:105
#5 0x00005606b53b6d23 in linux_nat_target::create_inferior (this=0x5606bfccb2a0 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>, exec_file=0x604000039f50 "/home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/test", allargs="", env=0x61500000a580, from_tty=1)
at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/linux-nat.c:978
#6 0x00005606b512b79b in run_command_1 (args=0x0, from_tty=1, run_how=RUN_NORMAL) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/infcmd.c:468
#7 0x00005606b512c236 in run_command (args=0x0, from_tty=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/infcmd.c:526
When running the kill command, commit_resumed_state for the
process_stratum_target (linux-nat, here) is true. After the kill, when
there are no more threads, commit_resumed_state is still true, as
nothing touches this flag during the kill operation. During the
subsequent run command, run_command_1 does:
scoped_disable_commit_resumed disable_commit_resumed ("running");
We would think that this would clear the commit_resumed_state flag of
our native target, but that's not the case, because
scoped_disable_commit_resumed iterates on non-exited inferiors in order
to find active process targets. And after the kill, the inferior is
exited, and the native target was unpushed from it anyway. So
scoped_disable_commit_resumed doesn't touch the commit_resumed_state
flag of the native target, it stays true. When reaching target_wait, in
startup_inferior (to consume the initial expect stop events while the
inferior is starting up and working its way through the shell),
commit_resumed_state is true, breaking the contract saying that
commit_resumed_state is always false when calling the targets' wait
method.
(note: to be correct, I think that startup_inferior should toggle
commit_resumed between the target_wait and target_resume calls, but I'll
ignore that for now)
I can see multiple ways to fix this. In the end, we need
commit_resumed_state to be cleared by the time we get to that
target_wait. It could be done at the end of the kill command, or at the
beginning of the run command.
To keep things in a coherent state, I'd like to make it so that after
the kill command, when the target is left with no threads, its
commit_resumed_state flag is left to false. This way, we can keep
working with the assumption that a target with no threads (and therefore
no running threads) has commit_resumed_state == false.
Do this by adding a scoped_disable_commit_resumed in target_kill. It
clears the target's commit_resumed_state on entry, and leaves it false
if the target does not have any resumed thread on exit. That means,
even if the target has another inferior with stopped threads,
commit_resumed_state will be left to false, which makes sense.
Add a test that tries to cover various combinations of actions done
while an inferior is running (and therefore while commit_resumed_state
is true on the process target).
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28275
Change-Id: I8e6fe6dc1f475055921520e58cab68024039a1e9
Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
|
|
New in this version: add a dedicated test.
When I do this:
$ ./gdb -nx --data-directory=data-directory -q \
/bin/sleep \
-ex "maint set target-non-stop on" \
-ex "tar ext :1234" \
-ex "set remote exec-file /bin/sleep" \
-ex "run 1231 &" \
-ex add-inferior \
-ex "inferior 2"
Reading symbols from /bin/sleep...
(No debugging symbols found in /bin/sleep)
Remote debugging using :1234
Starting program: /bin/sleep 1231
Reading /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from remote target...
warning: File transfers from remote targets can be slow. Use "set sysroot" to access files locally instead.
Reading /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from remote target...
Reading /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/a6/7a1408f18db3576757eea210d07ba3fc560dff.debug from remote target...
[New inferior 2]
Added inferior 2 on connection 1 (extended-remote :1234)
[Switching to inferior 2 [<null>] (<noexec>)]
(gdb) Reading /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 from remote target...
attach 3659848
Attaching to process 3659848
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/thread.c:85: internal-error: inferior_thread: Assertion `current_thread_ != nullptr' failed.
Note the "attach" command just above. When doing it on the command-line
with a -ex switch, the bug doesn't trigger.
The internal error of GDB is actually caused by GDBserver crashing, and
the error recovery of GDB is not on point. This patch aims to fix just
the GDBserver crash, not the GDB problem.
GDBserver crashes with a segfault here:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00005555557fb3f4 in find_one_thread (ptid=...) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.cc:177
#1 0x00005555557fd5cf in thread_db_thread_handle (ptid=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffa0>, handle=0x7fffffffc400, handle_len=0x7fffffffc3f0)
at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.cc:461
#2 0x000055555578a0b6 in linux_process_target::thread_handle (this=0x5555558a64c0 <the_x86_target>, ptid=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffa0>, handle=0x7fffffffc400,
handle_len=0x7fffffffc3f0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:6905
#3 0x00005555556dfcc6 in handle_qxfer_threads_worker (thread=0x60b000000510, buffer=0x7fffffffc8a0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1645
#4 0x00005555556e00e6 in operator() (__closure=0x7fffffffc5e0, thread=0x60b000000510) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1696
#5 0x00005555556f54be in for_each_thread<handle_qxfer_threads_proper(buffer*)::<lambda(thread_info*)> >(struct {...}) (func=...) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/gdbthread.h:159
#6 0x00005555556e0242 in handle_qxfer_threads_proper (buffer=0x7fffffffc8a0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1694
#7 0x00005555556e04ba in handle_qxfer_threads (annex=0x629000000213 "", readbuf=0x621000019100 '\276' <repeats 200 times>..., writebuf=0x0, offset=0, len=4097)
at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1732
#8 0x00005555556e1989 in handle_qxfer (own_buf=0x629000000200 "qXfer:threads", packet_len=26, new_packet_len_p=0x7fffffffd630) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:2045
#9 0x00005555556e720a in handle_query (own_buf=0x629000000200 "qXfer:threads", packet_len=26, new_packet_len_p=0x7fffffffd630) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:2685
#10 0x00005555556f1a01 in process_serial_event () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4176
#11 0x00005555556f4457 in handle_serial_event (err=0, client_data=0x0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4514
#12 0x0000555555820f56 in handle_file_event (file_ptr=0x607000000250, ready_mask=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:573
#13 0x0000555555821895 in gdb_wait_for_event (block=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:694
#14 0x000055555581f533 in gdb_do_one_event (mstimeout=-1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:264
#15 0x00005555556ec9fb in start_event_loop () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3512
#16 0x00005555556f0769 in captured_main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe0d8) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3992
#17 0x00005555556f0e3f in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe0d8) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4078
The reason is a wrong current process when find_one_thread is called.
The current process is the 2nd one, which was just attached. It does
not yet have thread_db data (proc->priv->thread_db is nullptr). As we
iterate on all threads of all process to fulfull the qxfer:threads:read
request, we get to a thread of process 1 for which we haven't read
thread_db information yet (lwp_info::thread_known is false), so we get
into find_one_thread. find_one_thread uses
`current_process ()->priv->thread_db`, assuming the current process
matches the ptid passed as a parameter, which is wrong. A segfault
happens when trying to dereference that thread_db pointer.
Fix this by making find_one_thread not assume what the current process /
current thread is. If it needs to call into libthread_db, which we know
will try to read memory from the current process, then temporarily set
the current process.
In the case where the thread is already know and we return early, we
don't need to switch process.
Add a test to reproduce this specific situation.
Change-Id: I09b00883e8b73b7e5f89d0f47cb4e9c0f3d6caaa
Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
|
|
This commit addresses one of the issues identified in PR gdb/28275.
Bug gdb/28275 identifies a number of situations in which this assert:
Assertion `!proc_target->commit_resumed_state' failed.
could be triggered. There's actually a number of similar places where
this assert is found in GDB, the two of interest in gdb/28275 are in
target_wait and target_stop.
In one of the comments:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28275#c1
steps to trigger the assertion within target_stop were identified when
using a modified version of the gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp test
script.
In the gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp test, we attach to a
multi-threaded inferior, and continue the inferior in asynchronous
(background) mode. Each thread is continuously hitting a conditional
breakpoint where the condition is always false. While the inferior is
running we detach. The goal is that we detach while GDB is performing a
step-over for the conditional breakpoint in at least one thread.
While detaching, if a step-over is in progress, then GDB has to
complete the step over before we can detach. This involves calling
target_stop and target_wait (see prepare_for_detach).
As far as gdb/28275 is concerned, the interesting part here, is the
the process_stratum_target::commit_resumed_state variable must be
false when target_stop and target_wait are called.
This is currently ensured because, in detach_command (infrun.c), we
create an instance of scoped_disable_commit_resumed, this ensures that
when target_detach is called, ::commit_resumed_state will be false.
The modification to the test that I propose here, and which exposed
the bug, is that, instead of using "detach" to detach from the
inferior, we instead use "quit". Quitting GDB after attaching to an
inferior will cause GDB to first detach, and then exit.
When we quit GDB we end up calling target_detach via a different code
path, the stack looks like:
#0 target_detach
#1 kill_or_detach
#2 quit_force
#3 quit_command
Along this path there is no scoped_disable_commit_resumed created.
::commit_resumed_state can be true when we reach prepare_for_detach,
which calls target_wait and target_stop, so the assertion will trigger.
In this commit, I propose fixing this by adding the creation of a
scoped_disable_commit_resumed into target_detach. This will ensure
that ::commit_resumed_state is false when calling prepare_for_detach
from within target_detach.
I did consider placing the scoped_disable_commit_resumed in
prepare_for_detach, however, placing it in target_detach ensures that
the target's commit_resumed_state flag is left to false if the detached
inferior was the last one for that target. It's the same rationale as
for patch "gdb: disable commit resumed in target_kill" that comes later
in this series, but for detach instead of kill.
detach_command still includes a scoped_disable_commit_resumed too, but I
think it is still relevant to cover the resumption at the end of the
function.
Co-Authored-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28275
Change-Id: Ie128f7aba6ef0e018859275eca372e6ea738e96f
|
|
Factor out some bits of gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp to procs in
preparation to adding some new variations of the test. Rename the
existing "test" proc and make it use proc_with_prefix.
Co-Authored-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Change-Id: Ib4412545c81c8556029e0f7bfa9dd48d7a9f3189
|
|
Before doing further changes to this file, change to use the :: notation
instead of declaring global variables with the `global` keyword.
Change-Id: I72301fd8f4693fea61aac054ba17245a1f4442fb
Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
|
|
This commit adds new gdb_attach to centralize the failure checking of
"attach" command. Return 0 if attach failed, otherwise return 1.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Change-Id: I553cf386cef60c67d38e331904b4aa01e132104a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
