diff options
| author | Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> | 2019-12-26 20:56:01 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> | 2020-01-06 21:16:28 +0000 |
| commit | 153d79c451fd852e97cdfecf2205781e3a13dd55 (patch) | |
| tree | fbc51135a3b0f8851b917905085247e88cc30d11 /ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pic-and-nonpic-2a.s | |
| parent | 66182876b46d40163e81504f7fa4f206268cb83c (diff) | |
| download | fsf-binutils-gdb-153d79c451fd852e97cdfecf2205781e3a13dd55.zip fsf-binutils-gdb-153d79c451fd852e97cdfecf2205781e3a13dd55.tar.gz fsf-binutils-gdb-153d79c451fd852e97cdfecf2205781e3a13dd55.tar.bz2 | |
gdb: Fix backtrace with disassemble-next-line on
In this commit:
commit ec8e2b6d3051f0b4b2a8eee9917898e95046c62f
Date: Fri Jun 14 23:43:00 2019 +0100
gdb: Don't allow annotations to influence what else GDB prints
A change was accidentally made that moved a call to do_gdb_disassembly
out of an if block guarded by 'if (source_print && sal.symtab)'. The
result was that if a user has 'set disassemble-next-line on' then the
backtrace would now include some disassembly of a few instructions in
each frame.
This change was not intentional, but was not spotted by any tests.
This commit restores the old behaviour and adds a test to ensure this
doesn't break again in the future.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* stack.c (print_frame_info): Move disassemble_next_line code
inside source_print block.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.base/backtrace.c: New file.
* gdb.base/backtrace.exp: New file.
Change-Id: I47c52a202fa74be138382646b695827940178689
Diffstat (limited to 'ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pic-and-nonpic-2a.s')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions