aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb2384.exp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>2021-03-16 10:21:40 +0000
committerAndrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>2021-03-26 14:04:16 +0000
commit6e8922974295dc8bee77a554783f6308adfecab5 (patch)
treed70e15ba99931cc35394d32b292513e9facd0a15 /gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb2384.exp
parentac45a6ca5105ebd9f6b68368bcba24bbb9453e58 (diff)
downloadfsf-binutils-gdb-6e8922974295dc8bee77a554783f6308adfecab5.zip
fsf-binutils-gdb-6e8922974295dc8bee77a554783f6308adfecab5.tar.gz
fsf-binutils-gdb-6e8922974295dc8bee77a554783f6308adfecab5.tar.bz2
gdb/testsuite: remove duplicate test names from gdb.cp/gdb2384.exp
The test gdb.cp/gdb2384.exp contains some duplicate test names, and also some test names with a string inside parentheses at the end. In order to resolve the duplicates the obvious choice would be to add yet more strings inside parentheses at the end of names, however, this is discouraged in our test naming scheme. The string in parentheses originates from a comment in the test source code, which naturally leads to including this comment in the test name. In this commit I have changed the comment in the test source to remove the string in parentheses, I then rename the tests in the .exp script to match, making sure that all test names are unique. There should be no change in test coverage after this commit. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.cp/gdb2384.cc (main): Change comments used for breakpoints. * gdb.cp/gdb2384.exp: Change and extend test names to avoid duplicates, and also to avoid having a string inside parentheses at the end of test names.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb2384.exp')
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb2384.exp20
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb2384.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb2384.exp
index 69f9709..db03206 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb2384.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb2384.exp
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ if ![runto_main] then {
return -1
}
-gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "set breakpoint here"]
-gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "set breakpoint here"
+gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "First breakpoint"]
+gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "run to 'First breakpoint', first time"
gdb_test "print d1.meth ()" \
".*42.*"
@@ -58,25 +58,25 @@ gdb_test "print d1.meth ()" \
# Now try again. gdb's without the fix will hopefully segv here
runto_main
-gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "set breakpoint here"]
-gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "set breakpoint here"
+gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "First breakpoint"]
+gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "run to 'First breakpoint', second time"
gdb_test "print d1.meth ()" \
".*42.*" \
- "gdb2384"
+ "gdb2384 at 'First breakpoint'"
# second case
runto_main
-gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "set breakpoint here (second)"]
-gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "set breakpoint here (second)"
+gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "Second breakpoint"]
+gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "run to 'Second breakpoint', first time"
gdb_test "print d2.meth ()" \
".*24.*" \
"print d2.meth()"
runto_main
-gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "set breakpoint here (second)"]
-gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "set breakpoint here (second)"
+gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "Second breakpoint"]
+gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "run to 'Second breakpoint', second time"
gdb_test "print d2.meth ()" \
".*24.*" \
- "gdb2384 (second)"
+ "gdb2384 at 'Second breakpoint'"