gdb

	* windows-tdep.c (windows_xfer_shared_library):
	* windows-nat.c (get_module_name, windows_make_so):
	* v850-tdep.c (v850_handle_pushm):
	* utils.c (null_cleanup, gdb_realpath):
	* ui-out.c (get_next_header):
	* tracepoint.c (clear_traceframe_info):
	* symtab.c (lookup_symtab):
	* serial.h (struct serial_ops):
	* mipsread.c (read_alphacoff_dynamic_symtab):
	* infcmd.c (print_return_value):
	* ia64-linux-tdep.c (ia64_linux_sigcontext_register_address):
	* f-exp.y (parse_number):
	* exceptions.c (catch_exceptions):
	* dummy-frame.c (dummy_frame_this_id):
	* defs.h (struct cleanup):
	* breakpoint.c (disable_breakpoints_in_unloaded_shlib):
	* arm-tdep.c (arm_push_dummy_call):
	* amd64-tdep.h (amd64_collect_xsave):
	* amd64-tdep.c (amd64_collect_xsave):
	* alpha-tdep.c (alpha_heuristic_frame_unwind_cache):
	* README (typing): Remove duplicate words.
	* cli/cli-decode.c (lookup_cmd_composition): Add comma.
	* infrun.c (siginfo_value_read): Fix typo.
	* solib-frv.c (frv_fdpic_find_global_pointer): Likewise.
	* top.c (source_line_number): Add comma.
gdb/doc
	* gdbint.texinfo (Register Information Functions): Remove
	duplicate "the".
	* gdb.texinfo (Emacs): Remove duplicate "to".
	(GDB/MI Variable Objects): Remove duplicate "the".
	(General Query Packets): Likewise.
gdb/testsuite
	* gdb.mi/mi-nsmoribund.exp:
	* gdb.hp/gdb.objdbg/objdbg01.exp:
	* gdb.base/structs.exp (test_struct_returns):
	* gdb.base/call-sc.exp (test_scalar_returns):
	* gdb.base/bigcore.exp: Remove duplicate words.
gdb/gdbserver
	* win32-low.c (handle_load_dll): Remove duplicate "the".

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp
index c576596..2e433f8 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ proc test_struct_returns { n } {
 
     # The relevant code looks like "L{n} = fun{n}()".  The test forces
     # "fun{n}" to "return" with an explicit value.  Since that code
-    # snippet will store the the returned value in "L{n}" the return
+    # snippet will store the returned value in "L{n}" the return
     # is tested by examining "L{n}".  This assumes that the
     # compiler implemented this as fun{n}(&L{n}) and hence that when
     # the value isn't stored "L{n}" remains unchanged.  Also check for