* mn10300-tdep.c (mn10300_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum): New function.

(mn10300_gdbarch_init): Register it as the architecture's
dwarf2_reg_to_regnum method.

1 files changed, 30 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gdb/mn10300-tdep.c b/gdb/mn10300-tdep.c
index ae7d2f5..d0d710a 100644
--- a/gdb/mn10300-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/mn10300-tdep.c
@@ -893,6 +893,35 @@ mn10300_register_raw_size (int reg)
   return 4;
 }
 
+/* If DWARF2 is a register number appearing in Dwarf2 debug info, then
+   mn10300_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum (DWARF2) is the corresponding GDB
+   register number.  Why don't Dwarf2 and GDB use the same numbering?
+   Who knows?  But since people have object files lying around with
+   the existing Dwarf2 numbering, and other people have written stubs
+   to work with the existing GDB, neither of them can change.  So we
+   just have to cope.  */
+static int
+mn10300_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum (int dwarf2)
+{
+  /* This table is supposed to be shaped like the REGISTER_NAMES
+     initializer in gcc/config/mn10300/mn10300.h.  Registers which
+     appear in GCC's numbering, but have no counterpart in GDB's
+     world, are marked with a -1.  */
+  static int dwarf2_to_gdb[] = {
+    0,  1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7, -1, 8,
+    15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
+  };
+  int gdb;
+
+  if (dwarf2 < 0
+      || dwarf2 >= (sizeof (dwarf2_to_gdb) / sizeof (dwarf2_to_gdb[0]))
+      || dwarf2_to_gdb[dwarf2] == -1)
+    internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
+                    "bogus register number in debug info: %d", dwarf2);
+
+  return dwarf2_to_gdb[dwarf2];
+}
+
 static void
 mn10300_print_register (const char *name, int regnum, int reg_width)
 {
@@ -1041,6 +1070,7 @@ mn10300_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info,
   set_gdbarch_max_register_virtual_size (gdbarch, 4);
   set_gdbarch_register_virtual_size (gdbarch, mn10300_register_virtual_size);
   set_gdbarch_register_virtual_type (gdbarch, mn10300_register_virtual_type);
+  set_gdbarch_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum (gdbarch, mn10300_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum);
   set_gdbarch_do_registers_info (gdbarch, mn10300_do_registers_info);
   set_gdbarch_fp_regnum (gdbarch, 31);