diff options
| author | Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com> | 2003-06-01 22:30:30 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com> | 2003-06-01 22:30:30 +0000 |
| commit | 1fd4ae226388e78eba387080d1bb8b13fa08fb93 (patch) | |
| tree | 245020fe37235327fbb24fe8eb734970153ccec1 /gdb/infcall.c | |
| parent | 44d8858367e916cf2e56c5d4e1f857ac9ca3d87f (diff) | |
| download | fsf-binutils-gdb-1fd4ae226388e78eba387080d1bb8b13fa08fb93.zip fsf-binutils-gdb-1fd4ae226388e78eba387080d1bb8b13fa08fb93.tar.gz fsf-binutils-gdb-1fd4ae226388e78eba387080d1bb8b13fa08fb93.tar.bz2 | |
Oops, really commit. Part of:
* infcall.c (call_function_by_hand): Update comment on
DEPRECATED_DUMMY_WRITE_SP.
* mips-tdep.c (mips_gdbarch_init): Do not set
deprecated_dummy_write_sp.
(mips_eabi_push_dummy_call): Set the SP register.
(mips_o64_push_dummy_call): Set the SP register.
(mips_o32_push_dummy_call): Set the SP register.
(mips_n32n64_push_dummy_call): Set the SP register.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/infcall.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | gdb/infcall.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/infcall.c b/gdb/infcall.c index 82c18ae..546e33c 100644 --- a/gdb/infcall.c +++ b/gdb/infcall.c @@ -809,15 +809,16 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name); if (struct_return && DEPRECATED_STORE_STRUCT_RETURN_P ()) DEPRECATED_STORE_STRUCT_RETURN (struct_addr, sp); - /* Write the stack pointer. This is here because the statements above - might fool with it. On SPARC, this write also stores the register - window into the right place in the new stack frame, which otherwise - wouldn't happen. (See store_inferior_registers in sparc-nat.c.) */ - /* NOTE: cagney/2003-03-23: Disable this code when there is a - push_dummy_call() method. Since that method will have already - stored the stack pointer (as part of creating the fake call - frame), and none of the code following that code adjusts the - stack-pointer value, the below call is entirely redundant. */ + /* Write the stack pointer. This is here because the statements + above might fool with it. On SPARC, this write also stores the + register window into the right place in the new stack frame, + which otherwise wouldn't happen (see store_inferior_registers in + sparc-nat.c). */ + /* NOTE: cagney/2003-03-23: Since the architecture method + push_dummy_call() should have already stored the stack pointer + (as part of creating the fake call frame), and none of the code + following that call adjusts the stack-pointer value, the below + call is entirely redundant. */ if (DEPRECATED_DUMMY_WRITE_SP_P ()) DEPRECATED_DUMMY_WRITE_SP (sp); |