aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJim Kingdon <jkingdon@engr.sgi.com>1994-02-04 14:40:56 +0000
committerJim Kingdon <jkingdon@engr.sgi.com>1994-02-04 14:40:56 +0000
commit068b06f2df27982f9aa60e7241ac04708e7a03f8 (patch)
tree67f1c4e8cb63e2e1a9add3ba74856e82459759e5 /gdb/doc
parent4386eff2d12dc946403cc01998dfdcb1d19676c8 (diff)
downloadfsf-binutils-gdb-068b06f2df27982f9aa60e7241ac04708e7a03f8.zip
fsf-binutils-gdb-068b06f2df27982f9aa60e7241ac04708e7a03f8.tar.gz
fsf-binutils-gdb-068b06f2df27982f9aa60e7241ac04708e7a03f8.tar.bz2
* gdb.texinfo (Continuing and Stepping): When talking about "step"
versus functions without line numbers, also mention stepping into them as well as "step" when you are in them. Tell the user how to deal with the situation. Add comment about "debugging information".
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/doc')
-rw-r--r--gdb/doc/ChangeLog7
-rw-r--r--gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo9
2 files changed, 15 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/doc/ChangeLog b/gdb/doc/ChangeLog
index 9358b19..e03b737 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/doc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Fri Feb 4 06:31:31 1994 Jim Kingdon (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com)
+
+ * gdb.texinfo (Continuing and Stepping): When talking about "step"
+ versus functions without line numbers, also mention stepping into
+ them as well as "step" when you are in them. Tell the user how to
+ deal with the situation. Add comment about "debugging information".
+
Thu Feb 3 11:39:59 1994 Jim Kingdon (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com)
* stabs.texinfo (Enumerations): Document restriction on where
diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
index a1f9217..a902084 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
@@ -2846,10 +2846,17 @@ line, then stop it and return control to @value{GDBN}. This command is
abbreviated @code{s}.
@quotation
+@c "without debugging information" is imprecise; actually "without line
+@c numbers in the debugging information". (gcc -g1 has debugging info but
+@c not line numbers). But it seems complex to try to make that
+@c distinction here.
@emph{Warning:} If you use the @code{step} command while control is
within a function that was compiled without debugging information,
execution proceeds until control reaches a function that does have
-debugging information.
+debugging information. Likewise, it will not step into a function which
+is compiled without debugging information. To step through functions
+without debugging information, use the @code{stepi} command, described
+below.
@end quotation
@item step @var{count}