diff options
| author | Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> | 2019-12-17 14:23:55 +1030 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> | 2019-12-17 16:36:54 +1030 |
| commit | 5b660084e26050d2e7f1fda06daec1e83311c188 (patch) | |
| tree | 3cc8a64338afe4cb610c60c75a71e0e85e8d784c /COPYING | |
| parent | 62e6599087efba193e0156d89ee65fb74fc99cb2 (diff) | |
| download | fsf-binutils-gdb-5b660084e26050d2e7f1fda06daec1e83311c188.zip fsf-binutils-gdb-5b660084e26050d2e7f1fda06daec1e83311c188.tar.gz fsf-binutils-gdb-5b660084e26050d2e7f1fda06daec1e83311c188.tar.bz2 | |
Remove tic80 support
This is one way of fixing ubsan bug reports, just delete the code.
The assembler support was removed back in 2005 along with other
non-BFD assemblers, but somehow the remainder of the port stayed in.
bfd/
* coff-tic80.c: Delete file.
* cpu-tic80.c: Delete file.
* archures.c: Remove tic80 support.
* coffcode.h: Likewise.
* coffswap.h: Likewise.
* targets.c: Likewise.
* config.bfd: Likewise.
* configure.ac: Likewise.
* Makefile.am: Likewise.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* bfd-in2.h: Regenerate.
* configure: Regenerate.
* po/SRC-POTFILES.in: Regenerate.
binutils/
* testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp: Remove tic80 support.
* testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp: Likewise.
gas/
* doc/as.texi: Remove mention of tic80.
include/
* coff/tic80.h: Delete file.
* opcode/tic80.h: Delete file.
ld/
* emulparams/tic80coff.sh: Delete file.
* scripttempl/tic80coff.sc: Delete file.
* configure.tgt: Remove tic80 support.
* Makefile.am: Likewise.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* po/BLD-POTFILES.in: Regenerate.
opcodes/
* tic80-dis.c: Delete file.
* tic80-opc.c: Delete file.
* disassemble.c: Remove tic80 support.
* disassemble.h: Likewise.
* Makefile.am: Likewise.
* configure.ac: Likewise.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* configure: Regenerate.
* po/POTFILES.in: Regenerate.
Diffstat (limited to 'COPYING')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions