diff options
| author | Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> | 2023-01-05 11:23:45 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> | 2023-01-05 11:36:05 -0500 |
| commit | cabd67874a6ef7aaed41490d9eaddc4a4869a452 (patch) | |
| tree | 6725db9866b13f8a92a9e4136bf5b0be8ef910e2 /COPYING.LIB | |
| parent | 954a1f9183c68671c07f21baf78ac2053390af55 (diff) | |
| download | fsf-binutils-gdb-cabd67874a6ef7aaed41490d9eaddc4a4869a452.zip fsf-binutils-gdb-cabd67874a6ef7aaed41490d9eaddc4a4869a452.tar.gz fsf-binutils-gdb-cabd67874a6ef7aaed41490d9eaddc4a4869a452.tar.bz2 | |
gdb/testsuite: add back needed -re clause in gdb_breakpoint
Commit 4b9728be ("gdb: use gdb_test_multiple in gdb_breakpoint") caused,
amongst others:
(gdb) break 1^M
No line 1 in the current file.^M
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) n^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-main-no-line-number.exp: gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at 1
FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-main-no-line-number.exp: !$breakpoint_at_missing_lineno_set
This is because it removed one empty -re clause (matching just the
prompt) that is necessary after replying "n" to the pending breakpoint
question. Add this clause back.
Change-Id: Ibfaa059d58bbea660bc29f0547e2f75c323fcbc6
Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'COPYING.LIB')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions