diff options
| author | Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> | 2021-08-12 06:44:40 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> | 2021-08-16 09:38:15 -0600 |
| commit | 892a1e530379eeea924e938c8a588fbf3845f4fa (patch) | |
| tree | fa438cc2b7d40aad90829e8fe1be138044b5bb50 | |
| parent | 1dd34eff4bb106e77b798e854f4b06cf1eb7d4b2 (diff) | |
| download | fsf-binutils-gdb-892a1e530379eeea924e938c8a588fbf3845f4fa.zip fsf-binutils-gdb-892a1e530379eeea924e938c8a588fbf3845f4fa.tar.gz fsf-binutils-gdb-892a1e530379eeea924e938c8a588fbf3845f4fa.tar.bz2 | |
Fix register regression in DWARF evaluator
On an internal test case, using an arm-elf target, commit ba5bc3e5a92
("Make DWARF evaluator return a single struct value") causes a
regression. (It doesn't happen for any of the other cross targets
that I test when importing upstream gdb.)
I don't know if there's an upstream gdb test case showing the same
problem... I can only really run native tests with dejagnu AFAIK.
The failure manifests like this:
Breakpoint 1, file_1.export_1 (param_1=<error reading variable: Unable to access DWARF register number 64>, str=...) at [...]/file_1.adb:5
Whereas when it works it looks like:
Breakpoint 1, file_1.export_1 (param_1=99.0, str=...) at [...]/file_1.adb:5
The difference is that the new code uses the passed-in gdbarch,
whereas the old code used the frame's gdbarch, when handling
DWARF_VALUE_REGISTER.
This patch restores the use of the frame's arch.
| -rw-r--r-- | gdb/dwarf2/expr.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/expr.c b/gdb/dwarf2/expr.c index 85088e9..0e62de2 100644 --- a/gdb/dwarf2/expr.c +++ b/gdb/dwarf2/expr.c @@ -927,9 +927,11 @@ dwarf_expr_context::fetch_result (struct type *type, struct type *subobj_type, { case DWARF_VALUE_REGISTER: { + gdbarch *f_arch = get_frame_arch (this->m_frame); int dwarf_regnum = longest_to_int (value_as_long (this->fetch (0))); - int gdb_regnum = dwarf_reg_to_regnum_or_error (arch, dwarf_regnum); + int gdb_regnum = dwarf_reg_to_regnum_or_error (f_arch, + dwarf_regnum); if (subobj_offset != 0) error (_("cannot use offset on synthetic pointer to register")); |