##### cppreference.com

##### Search

Create account

##### Namespaces

- Page
- Discussion

##### Variants

##### Views

- View
- Edit
- History

##### Actions

# explicit (full) template specialization

From cppreference.com
< cpp‎ | language

Allows customizing the template code for a given set of template arguments.

### [edit] Syntax

`template` `<>` declaration |  |

Any of the following can be fully specialized:

1. function template
2. class template
3. (since C++14)variable template
4. member function of a class template
5. static data member of a class template
6. member class of a class template
7. member enumeration of a class template
8. member class template of a class or class template
9. member function template of a class or class template

For example,

Run this code

    #include <iostream>
    template<typename T>   // primary template
    struct is_void : std::false_type
    {
    };
    template<>  // explicit specialization for T = void
    struct is_void<void> : std::true_type
    {
    };
    int main()
    {
        // for any type T other than void, the
        // class is derived from false_type
        std::cout << is_void<char>::value << '\n';
        // but when T is void, the class is derived
        // from true_type
        std::cout << is_void<void>::value << '\n';
    }

### [edit] In detail

Explicit specialization may be declared in any scope where its primary template may be defined (which may be different from the scope where the primary template is defined; such as with out-of-class specialization of a member template). Explicit specialization has to appear after the non-specialized template declaration.

    namespace N {
        template<class T> class X { /*...*/ }; // primary template
        template<> class X<int> { /*...*/ }; // specialization in same namespace

        template<class T> class Y { /*...*/ }; // primary template
        template<> class Y<double>; // forward declare specialization for double
    }
    template<>
    class N::Y<double> { /*...*/ }; // OK: specialization in same namespace

Specialization must be declared before the first use that would cause implicit instantiation, in every translation unit where such use occurs:

    class String {};
    template<class T> class Array { /*...*/ };
    template<class T> void sort(Array<T>& v) { /*...*/ } // primary template

    void f(Array<String>& v) {
        sort(v); // implicitly instantiates sort(Array<String>&),
    }            // using the primary template for sort()

    template<>  // ERROR: explicit specialization of sort(Array<String>)
    void sort<String>(Array<String>& v); // after implicit instantiation

A template specialization that was declared but not defined can be used just like any other incomplete type (e.g. pointers and references to it may be used)

    template<class T> class X; // primary template
    template<> class X<int>; // specialization (declared, not defined)
    X<int>* p; // OK: pointer to incomplete type
    X<int> x; // error: object of incomplete type

### [edit] Explicit specializations of function templates

When specializing a function template, its template arguments can be omitted if template argument deduction can provide them from the function arguments:

    template<class T> class Array { /*...*/ };
    template<class T> void sort(Array<T>& v); // primary template
    template<> void sort(Array<int>&); // specialization for T = int
    // no need to write
    // template<> void sort<int>(Array<int>&);

A function with the same name and the same argument list as a specialization is not a specialization (see template overloading in function_template)

An explicit specialization of a function template is inline only if it is declared with the inline specifier (or defined as deleted), it doesn't matter if the primary template is inline.

Default function arguments cannot be specified in explicit specializations of function templates, member function templates, and member functions of class templates when the class is implicitly instantiated.

An explicit specialization cannot be a friend declaration.

If the primary template has a exception specification that isn't `noexcept(false)`, the explicit specializations must have a compatible exception specification.

### [edit] Members of specializations

When defining a member of an explicitly specialized class template outside the body of the class, the syntax template <> is not used, except if it's a member of an explicitly specialized member class template, which is specialized as a class template, because otherwise, the syntax would require such definition to begin with template<parameters> required by the nested template

    template< typename T>
    struct A {
        struct B {};  // member class
        template<class U> struct C { }; // member class template
    };

    template<> // specialization
    struct A<int> {
        void f(int); // member function of a specialization
    };
    // template<> not used for a member of a specialization
    void A<int>::f(int) { /* ... */ }

    template<> // specialization of a member class
    struct A<char>::B {
        void f();
    };
    // template<> not used for a member of a specialized member class either
    void A<char>::B::f() { /* ... */ }

    template<> // specialization of a member class template
    template<class U> struct A<char>::C {
        void f();
    };

    // template<> is used when defining a member of an explicitly
    // specialized member class template specialized as a class template
    template<>
    template<class U> void A<char>::C<U>::f() { /* ... */ }

An explicit specialization of a static data member of a template is a definition if the declaration includes an initializer; otherwise, it is a declaration. These definitions must use braces for default initialization:

    template<> X Q<int>::x; // declaration of a static member
    template<> X Q<int>::x (); // error: function declaration
    template<> X Q<int>::x {}; // definition of a default-initialized static member

A member or a member template of a class template may be explicitly specialized for a given implicit instantiation of the class template, even if the member or member template is defined in the class template definition.

    template<typename T>
    struct A {
        void f(T); // member, declared in the primary template
        void h(T) {} // member, defined in the primary template
        template<class X1> void g1(T, X1); // member template
        template<class X2> void g2(T, X2); // member template
    };

    // specialization of a member
    template<> void A<int>::f(int);
    // member specialization OK even if defined in-class
    template<> void A<int>::h(int) {}

    // out of class member template definition
    template<class T>
    template<class X1> void A<T>::g1(T, X1) { }

    // member template specialization
    template<>
    template<class X1> void A<int>::g1(int, X1);

    // member template specialization
    template<>
    template<> void A<int>::g2<char>(int, char); // for X2 = char
    // same, using template argument deduction (X1 = char)
    template<>
    template<> void A<int>::g1(int, char);

Member or a member template may be nested within many enclosing class templates. In an explicit specialization for such a member, there's a template<> for every enclosing class template that is explicitly specialized.

    template<class T1> class A {
        template<class T2> class B {
            void mf();
        };
    };
    template<> template<> class A<int>::B<double>;
    template<> template<> void A<char>::B<char>::mf();

In such a nested declaration, some of the levels may remain unspecialized (except that it can't specialize a class member template if its enclosing class is unspecialized). For each of those levels, the declaration needs template<arguments>, because such specializations are themselves templates:

    template <class T1> class A {
        template<class T2> class B {
            template<class T3> void mf1(T3); // member template
            void mf2(); // non-template member
         };
    };

    // specialization
    template<> // for the specialized A
    template<class X> // for the unspecialized B
    class A<int>::B {
        template <class T> void mf1(T);
    };

    // specialization
    template<> // for the specialized A
    template<> // for the specialized B
    template<class T> // for the unspecialized mf1
    void A<int>::B<double>::mf1(T t) { }

    // ERROR: B<double> is specialized and is a member template, so its enclosing A
    // must be specialized also
    template<class Y>
    template<> void A<Y>::B<double>::mf2() { }

### [edit] Defect reports

The following behavior-changing defect reports were applied retroactively to previously published C++ standards.

DR | Applied to | Behavior as published | Correct behavior
--- | --- | --- | ---
CWG 727 | C++14 | full specializations not allowed in class scope, even though partial are | full specialization allowed in any scope

### [edit] See also

- templates
- class template
- function template
- partial specialization

Retrieved from "http://en.cppreference.com/mwiki/index.php?title=cpp/language/template_specialization&oldid=91980"
Hidden category:

- Pages with unreviewed CWG DR marker